THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Why do Christians not follow the morality of the Bible? Because the Church itself does not follow Biblical principles and is only interes...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month... -
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
6 comments:
Whilst your critique of the West is applause worthy your idea that Islam is the answer is an insult to the intellect; the mutah, misyar, and talaq means that the claim that "a Muslim is more likely to take his marriage vows seriously than "white trash" or CHAV males who will not even consider getting married" is nonsense - though I accept most of your readers probably won't know that.
You could make your argument just as well without reference to Islam. I accept it is easier for white trash chavs to understand - or fear - your arguments if you make reference to Islam.
What you are implying is replacement, not (r)evolution - which is no different from what the libtard feminazis of the mainstream parties are offering.
I think if your ideas are to make headway in Britain - and they deserve to - they need to be recast in a different mould.
"Whilst your critique of the West is applause worthy your idea that Islam is the answer is an insult to the intellect; the mutah, misyar, and talaq means that the claim that "a Muslim is more likely to take his marriage vows seriously than "white trash" or CHAV males who will not even consider getting married" is nonsense - though I accept most of your readers probably won't know that."
I am not sure how this is "nonsense" if converting to Islam to nab a husband is what white working class women in fact do!
I am saying that some law punishing extramarital sex will be necessary to discourage people from having extramarital sex.
http://quran.com/24/2 is the verse I have in mind.
Since we are at war with Islamists and their ideology is the scariest of all the ideologies we can think of, we should use the most powerful ideology we can find.
If you were being terrorised by the most powerful weapon in the world and wanted a remedy to this, then you either find a weapon more powerful than that or snatch that weapon out of the hands of the people terrorising you.
If you have a better idea than that, please let me know.
I can't think of an ideology more powerful than Islam, and I can't think of a solution better than snatching the Koran out of the hands of Islamists and interpreting it better ourselves.
Again, I look forward to hearing from you with your alternative solution.
"What you are implying is replacement, not (r)evolution - which is no different from what the libtard feminazis of the mainstream parties are offering."
I am really not sure what you mean by this.
Having reflected on this, I personally would subscribe to a return to traditional Christianity and a return to monarchy. (It could incorporate a democratic debating chamber, but the monarch would have last say.) The West will never accept Islam en masse and nor should it, it s alien. It s good to see through that you ve been more critical of the Jews recently who are the source of all this destruction.
All the Abrahamic faiths promote the same patriarchal moral values. If you ever read the Bible and the Koran you will find that the Koran is clearer and shorter and has less harsh punishments. Christianity is kaput, because the Church is now fatally infested with a corrupt clergy now pushing the PC Liberal and feminazi agenda.
Secular Koranism is the antidote to Islamism and feminism. It is not a religion but a legal system.
"I am not sure how this is "nonsense" if converting to Islam to nab a husband is what white working class women in fact do!"
-That does not mean "a Muslim is more likely to take his marriage vows seriously than "white trash" or CHAV males".
"I am saying that some law punishing extramarital sex will be necessary to discourage people from having extramarital sex. "
- Which can be done without Islam.
"and their ideology is the scariest of all the ideologies... the most powerful ideology"
-Just because the West tells you it is scary does not make it the most powerful ideology.
"I can't think of an ideology more powerful than Islam"
- Empty your head then of what the Western media has put into it.
"What you are implying is replacement, not (r)evolution - which is no different from what the libtard feminazis of the mainstream parties are offering."
I am really not sure what you mean by this.
- Muslim immigrants are a replacement for, not an improvement of, the native population.
*
You have identified the problem, but introducing Islam does actually add any extra value to your solution. If you say that the answer is "Secular Koranism" because "It is not a religion but a legal system" then you could just simply say the answer is "a legal system".
I think people are less likely to be resistant to "a legal system" as the solution than anything that has the word Islam, Koran, or perhaps even secular, in it.
I know that Islam is not popular, but if anyone started looking at it more closely, they will ask what it is based on, and the cat will be out of the bag!
The trouble is that most people will never get round to reading it for themselves because they are too full of hate or too lazy to read it.
Lawyers who have read the Koran will be the people most likely to understand the nature of Secular Koranism but they are as rare as gold dust!
Post a Comment