http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/farage-fans-ukip-lovers-watch-5272855
The Mirror:
.jpeg)
Why was I pulled in the end? What did I say that made the Channel 5 production team think me not suitable for inclusion? It was not that they didn't take the trouble since they spent 6 hours in total filming me over two separate days.
Perhaps I wasn't angry and nutty enough for inclusion?
(They asked for and received my permission to use the flag and gun photos, which I knew they could use whether or not I gave permission.)
Or perhaps it was because I explained the reasons for my antifeminism and that breached a taboo?
My latest post against feminism can be read at
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-british-matriarchy-was-established.html
If you read the credits from the 45th minute at http://www.channel5.com/shows/farage-fans-ukip-lovers/episodes/farage-fans-ukip-lovers you will find this listing of the Production Team:
9 women, 12 men.
If the Executive Producer who is female does not want me in her show, then I stay out of her show. I get it loud and clear, and so should you, dear reader.
If the Executive Producer who is female hates UKIP and wants to make them look like a bunch of losers and tools then it is her prerogative, geddit?
TV - staffed and controlled by women - will always make political parties they hate and fear look stupid.
You will never get round this.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Schopenhauer on Women
The Bhagavad Gita:
Now, wouldn't you like to know what I actually said when they were filming me that made the feminazis decide to omit me? Well, thanks to the fact that they are in charge of everything now, exerting both soft power as well as hard power YOU WILL NEVER FIND OUT.
Probably, the only way left for you to fight this system is terrorism, or my insisting that next time I am filmed NO WOMEN AT ALL ARE INVOLVED in the editing process and NO WOMAN HAS THE FINAL WORD on what gets included or excluded. But then that would mean that I will never be on TV, right? Right. They have got our mouths stitched up after having us gagged and there are no real men left now prepared to even protest at this as I have explained at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-british-matriarchy-was-established.html
You would be a complete mug to expect the feminazis and their mangina running dogs to treat you fairly or exercise their journalistic duty of balance and impartiality. They will use every dirty trick in the book to stop you. Besides, the modern degenerate feminazi-bred and schooled man or woman has great difficulty understanding abstract concepts like principle, impartiality and fairness, so don't expect any changes any time soon.
We already know that British men are so pussywhipped that if you asked them for their views on feminism they will say they love feminism and love it so much that they would stay on their knees and suck its cock for as long as it wants.
Many thwarted social conservatives and nationalists talk in terms of the "Jew-controlled media", but I don't think it is the Jews at all, do you?
It is the moral corruption of feminazis who refuses to allow feminism to be challenged who will do anything in their collective power to prevent this. They already know they have no arguments and no answers to the questions I have raised: the only thing left for them to do is to smear and then ignore me.
The Mirror:
UKIP's more colourful supporters, Claire Khaw, who is a self-confessed internet troll. She's a former member of the BNP and still supports UKIP despite them not letting her join because of her former party.
Why was I pulled in the end? What did I say that made the Channel 5 production team think me not suitable for inclusion? It was not that they didn't take the trouble since they spent 6 hours in total filming me over two separate days.
Perhaps I wasn't angry and nutty enough for inclusion?
(They asked for and received my permission to use the flag and gun photos, which I knew they could use whether or not I gave permission.)
Or perhaps it was because I explained the reasons for my antifeminism and that breached a taboo?
My latest post against feminism can be read at
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-british-matriarchy-was-established.html
If you read the credits from the 45th minute at http://www.channel5.com/shows/farage-fans-ukip-lovers/episodes/farage-fans-ukip-lovers you will find this listing of the Production Team:
- Caitlin Moran (Female) - Narrator (Some of you may know her as the Arch-Feminist who wrote http://www.amazon.co.uk/How-To-Woman-Caitlin-Moran/dp/0091940745 injecting the right degree of sneering contempt in her voiceover. Do listen to it again. She blocked me on Twitter a long time ago when she found herself unable to deal with the points I raised on feminism.)
- Stephen Collins (Male) - Director of Legal Content
- Claire Freeman (Female) - Post Production Manager http://careerssearch.bbc.co.uk/jobs/job/post-production-manager-continuing/7053
- Ben Dodds (Male) - Edit Assistant http://getinmedia.com/careers/assistant-editor
- Stephanie Wrate (Female) - Head of Production http://careerssearch.bbc.co.uk/jobs/job/head-of-production/4500
- Daniel Lilly (Male) - Production Executive http://messageboard.donedealpro.com/boards/showthread.php?t=48639
- Erin Boylan (Female) - Production Co-ordinator http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Production_coordinator
- Mimi Barber (Female) - Production Assistant http://www.media-match.com/usa/jobtypes/production-assistant-jobs-402756.php
- Natalie Howell (Female) - Production Assistant
- Lex Nichol (Male) - Additional Editing
- Stuart Powell (Male) - Casting Researcher http://www.productionbase.co.uk/film-tv-jobs/casting-researcher-11.14.0083893
- Daisy Parr Watson (Female) - Casting Assistant http://careerssearch.bbc.co.uk/jobs/job/Casting-Assistant/9232
- Sara Booth (Female) - Assistant Producer http://careerssearch.bbc.co.uk/jobs/job/Assistant-Producer/8351
- Adrian Gatton (Male) - Producer
- Matthew Chapman (Male) - Producer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_producer
- Mark Olden (Male) - Producer
- Edmund Davis (Male) - Producer Director http://www.startintv.com/jobs/producerdirector-bbc.php
- Kosta Papanicolas (Male) - Producer Director
- Chris Toft (Male) - Offline Editor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offline_editing
- Jacqui Wilson (Female) - Executive Producer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_producer - the highest ranking individual who is responsible for the development and daily management of the show If this woman wants me out of her show then I will be on the cutting room floor. Maybe her best friend is Arch-Feminist Caitlin Moran?
- Bob Jefford (Male) - Series Editor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Story_editor
9 women, 12 men.
If the Executive Producer who is female does not want me in her show, then I stay out of her show. I get it loud and clear, and so should you, dear reader.
If the Executive Producer who is female hates UKIP and wants to make them look like a bunch of losers and tools then it is her prerogative, geddit?
TV - staffed and controlled by women - will always make political parties they hate and fear look stupid.
You will never get round this.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Schopenhauer on Women
“The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning.
Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them.
But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all.”
"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."
@ntfem sounds like they only want to show us as nutters, instead of normal people. oh well.
— RobinHoodUKIP (@RobbingHoodUK) March 2, 2015
@ntfem @kel_emvor @exlabourite maybe they are saving you for election week.
— mkpdavies (@mkpdavies) March 5, 2015
@mkpdavies @kel_emvor @exlabourite Reason is name of the narrator @caitlinmoran for why I was omitted. @channel5_tv @TVCastingsDaisy #UKIP
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@mkpdavies @kel_emvor @exlabourite What was *fatal* to my inclusion was my views on feminism, right @caitlinmoran and @TVCastingsDaisy?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@mkpdavies @kel_emvor @exlabourite Do have a look at the credits from the 45th minute of http://t.co/uMEo28Y8gC and see how many are women.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@mkpdavies @kel_emvor @exlabourite What a shame the impartiality of @channel5_tv is also fatally compromised by feminists. @Channel5Press
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@ntfem It was a disgraceful program portraying the supporters as nut jobs, even devil worshippers it was tacky propaganda
— Gene (@GeneGenieGene) March 5, 2015
@GeneGenieGene Feminazis are in a position of influence in mainstream media as you can see from the Channel 5 credits of the Production Team
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@GeneGenieGene Feminazis see UKIP as a threat to feminism and will do anything and everything in their power to suppress social conservatism
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@GeneGenieGene Did Channel 5 really think their choice of using the filthy sneering voice Caitlin Moran would be unnoticed by me?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@GeneGenieGene UKIP men must *never* forget how much feminazis hate and fear the laws they think UKIP might introduce.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
.@ntfem But as all that was know beforehand, why spend two days filming you? Footage for later? Fishing for links?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) March 5, 2015
@pperrin I guess I didn't sound mad/angry/stupid enough and rather spoiled things for them. The probably didn't want to launch my TV career.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
.@ntfem Maybe you and Joshua Bonehill should get together to host a chat show? (!).
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) March 5, 2015
@pperrin I will just wait until mainstream media invite me, but they won't will they. because the feminazis have all the men stitched up.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@pperrin If the men don't play ball it is the easiest thing to accuse them of rape, a historic sexual offence or being a child sex abuser.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
Now, wouldn't you like to know what I actually said when they were filming me that made the feminazis decide to omit me? Well, thanks to the fact that they are in charge of everything now, exerting both soft power as well as hard power YOU WILL NEVER FIND OUT.
Probably, the only way left for you to fight this system is terrorism, or my insisting that next time I am filmed NO WOMEN AT ALL ARE INVOLVED in the editing process and NO WOMAN HAS THE FINAL WORD on what gets included or excluded. But then that would mean that I will never be on TV, right? Right. They have got our mouths stitched up after having us gagged and there are no real men left now prepared to even protest at this as I have explained at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-british-matriarchy-was-established.html
You would be a complete mug to expect the feminazis and their mangina running dogs to treat you fairly or exercise their journalistic duty of balance and impartiality. They will use every dirty trick in the book to stop you. Besides, the modern degenerate feminazi-bred and schooled man or woman has great difficulty understanding abstract concepts like principle, impartiality and fairness, so don't expect any changes any time soon.
We already know that British men are so pussywhipped that if you asked them for their views on feminism they will say they love feminism and love it so much that they would stay on their knees and suck its cock for as long as it wants.
Many thwarted social conservatives and nationalists talk in terms of the "Jew-controlled media", but I don't think it is the Jews at all, do you?
It is the moral corruption of feminazis who refuses to allow feminism to be challenged who will do anything in their collective power to prevent this. They already know they have no arguments and no answers to the questions I have raised: the only thing left for them to do is to smear and then ignore me.
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh Channel 5 Executive Producer was Jacqui Wilson who is female. The narrator was @caitlinmoran the Arch-Feminist.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh I was omitted because I wasn't an angry ranting pleb or a weirdo who thinks God sent Nigel Farage to save Britain
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh Including me the UKIP documentary would have given too good an impression of the party that was why I was shelved
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh I am sure it was precisely the intention of Jacqui Wilson not to give an antifeminist the oxygen of publicity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh I think Jaqui Wilson should be made to disclose her anti-UKIP political affiliations.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh This time the feminazis have gone too far and are now hoist by their own petard.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh I think someone at @Channel5Press should ask Jacqui Wilson why she chose @caitlinmoran to be narrator.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@Jacobs1754 @EnglandsAce @JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh @caitlinmoran It is useful to highlight how much feminazis hate UKIP, especially now.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh Jacqui Wilson deliberately ensured that anything sensible anyone said would be obscured by bondage and weirdos.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh I think @Ofcom shd investigate political affiliations of Jaqui Wilson. A UKIP supporter she ain't. @Channel5Press
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@JohnClarke1960 @satbsingh If Jacqui Wilson chose Caitlin Moran as narrator it is a foregone conclusion the documentary would be anti-UKIP.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
9 comments:
You'd have been a credit to UKIP which is why they shelved you Claire Khaw. Channel 5 was only interested in nutters.
Because you're not a blind bondage-loving fisherman.
FAIL! Obviously not nuts enough, Claire?
It’s like they went out of their way to find the most weird and eccentric characters they could possibly find. And I only saw the first 20 minutes. The only normal people were the fishermen (though I wouldn’t be surprised if we found out later that they were both into cross-dressing or something). Shame you didn’t appear, Claire. I was selling your appearance to my Dad, which got him really enthusiastic about watching.
If I had been weirder and angrier they would have put me on.
Makes Sense. We have all read Morans drivel. She should have stuck to music reviews (although she was crap at that too). The femiNazi stamp out free speech again. Shock. Horror. Probe.
I'll tell you what is going on. They are looking for UKIP supporters with extreme views so they portray the party as extreme. That will destroy the party, and remove the threat to the EU. I would not participate in any documentary unless I had some control over the final cut, and the right to have my part removed. That won't happen. They know aspiring politicians like to be famous and will use that weakness to draw you in and stitch you up.
Yup, both C4 and the BBC screed anti-UKIP mockumentaries, so the media is out to destroy UKIP by all means necessary
I am not sure why the likes of Caitlin Moran were making a programme about UKIP anyway. Her prose style is completely unintelligible – it is impossible to finish one of her articles - yet she seems enormously popular.
No doubt in the end she and others did not wish to give a platform to reasonably expressed antifeminism.
Post a Comment