@pperrin "Libertarianseque" former @UKIP member wants to ban word Muslim/close down mosques/abolish religious freedom. Perhaps a pogrom too?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
MT @HMantour: Wife of France jihad killer: “We are normal Muslims. << Yes that is what is becoming ever more clear...
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem @HMantour Its a lose/lose - either its what 'normal muslims' do, or 'normal muslims' are 100% unpredictable...
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
RT @DGoodinson: Tunisia to shut down 80 ‘propagandist’ mosques post deadly attack https://t.co/i7ReUZT78L via @sharethis << Why not before?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
So what is the downside of banning Islam and closing Mosques? UK liberty restricted? And keeping them open? UK liberty ended. Is that right?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
Prayer Mats - fine. Sharia - no. Supporting sharia should probably be on a par with promoting paedophilia - not allowed.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
Now Muslims know where their hobby can lead it would seem wise for them to find another way to occupy their time - unless they already knew.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@ntfem going to mosques - that kind of thing.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin You are proposing to close down mosques.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem Yes and we should paint clouds green. This is twitter - not the house of commons.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@Radio_Spunky_UK @LBC We tried that one. Can't separate ISIS from 'civilians' - so 'slay them all, god knows his own'?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@Radio_Spunky_UK @LBC We tried that one. Can't separate ISIS from 'civilians' - so 'slay them all, god knows his own'?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
Islam is a religion of peace. But mosque inhabiting, Koran preaching, beard bearing, head covering, shaira supporters are evil terrorists.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk If islam is irrelevant, fine - I want these murdering terrorists and their breeding grounds taken out...
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk Chemotherapy kills good cells and bad - but if that's the price of killing a life threatening cancer its a choice we make.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem I thought your English language (and twitter) skills were better than that. Over analysing similes is amateurish trolling.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin https://t.co/S9yWTAekXp suggests you intend to treat Muslims as cancer cells and use chemotherapy on them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
@pperrin Wot else were u saying shd b done to Muslims other than giving them chemotherapy, closing down mosques and banning the word Muslim?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk The biggest contribution to peace a 'real' muslim could make is to renounce the name 'muslim' so the evil stand alone.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk 'advocate'? Is accepting the risk of collateral damage 'advocating'?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
We now know @pperrin wants to close down mosques and ban the word "Muslim" amongst other things. @bilalmahmooduk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
We now know @pperrin is proposing to end religious freedom. That would be the end of Western civilisation as we know it. @bilalmahmooduk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem oh I *TOTALLY* reject *RELIGIOUS FREEDOM* there is only freedom - all qualifiers to it are evil.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@ntfem 'freedom'.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin I have no idea what you are trying to say.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem There is only 'freedom' - talk of religion having more as 'religious freedom', that is mentally deficient and morally repugnant.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin What is the only freedom you can think of?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem Simpler question - what are 'religious freedoms' that shouldn't be available to the non-religious too?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin I really have no idea what you are asking me.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem state a freedom that you consider a 'religious freedom'. Freedom to do.... what?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin Religious freedom just means freedom of belief and freedom of worship. You were proposing to abolish it, weren't you?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
@pperrin Religious freedom = freedom of worship = freedom of belief. You were proposing to abolish this. I merely ask you to confirm this.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem Freedom to worship? Depends how you worship - i.e. human sacrifices aren't allowed.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin Human sacrifice is forbidden by Islam.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem So you aren't interested in 'religious freedom' you are interested in 'islamic freedom'?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin Religious freedom means freedom of belief and worship for all.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
@pperrin Are you proposing to abolish freedom of worship and belief?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem There is no freedom of worship, your worship must fit in with the freedom you already share with everyone else. Kneel=fine, kill=no.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin I don't think you know what religious freedom or freedom of worship means.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
@pperrin I have already explained what religious freedom means, or didn't you get it?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
@ntfem No - what is someone permitted to do in the name of religion that they can't do otherwise? Nothing, its just 'freedom'.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@ntfem Err... well... go back a few tweets, I did ask you what you meant by it!!
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin I have already explained what religious freedom means, or didn't you get it?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
@pperrin Religious freedom is quite a simple concept. I think you are just pretending not to understand it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
@pperrin Would you describe yourself as a libertarian?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem I don't - I say 'libertarian-esque' so tweet tolls don't waste my time with such hair splitting questions.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem you wont' bait me by putting words in my mouth... yawn
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@ntfem You can't control what someone believes. You can't even know what someone else really believes!
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
@pperrin You just said you wanted to close down mosques and ban the word "Muslim".
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk let the evil muslims/islamists stand alone - let the good ones renounce the name.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk To have 'collateral damage' you must have some 'legitimate targets' - who are your 'legitimate targets'?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk Individual renouncing is no use to anyone - choose a new name, make it plain.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk Why? It is only a word - you won't change a word to end this terror?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk I don't care where they came from, only where they are going - why do you stand in the way? A voluntary human shield?
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk You change your name to show you don't stand with them - its only a name, a word.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk You need repetition? Change the words, drop 'muslim' and 'islam' leave those to the terrorists so they are clear to see.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk They are just words - and english words at that - of no importance to a true follower of Mohammed surely.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk If you insist on acting as a shield for them, you will have to take whatever consequences that brings.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk Seems you will say anything, except agree to do anything that makes the terrorists easier to identify.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk If you block our shot on the terrorists, you protect the terrorists, which means you are a terrorist...
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk No - just change a word. Trivial, if you really wanted to.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk I have truth - if you refuse to see that, then it is because you deny truth.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk Change the words, they are tainted. Choose new ones, or be branded by the taint of the old ones.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk you can help defeat the islamic terrorists, but refuse to do so. One can only question your true motives.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk What you are doing is providing cover for terrorists. You could simply get out of the way, but you insist on not doing so.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk 'bigotry' for asking you to let us get a clear shot at the terrorists? I think you should stop digging...
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk liberty brings peace, terrorism attack liberty, you protect terrorists.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk I want *nothing* from you. But if you choose to be the terrorists human shield don't be surprised by the consequences.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
Ok, I'll call that Paul 1, Islamic Apologist Nil.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
.@bilalmahmooduk I just suggest you change a word to help save the country and protect the innocent. You care for neither.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 27, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment