I have always said it was a distinction without a difference.
The only reason we should consider is which is more effective, but they are the same.
The enemies of feminism and liberal democracy are perceived to be Islam. The former represents the matriarchy and the latter the patriarchy.
Does it matter to your victims if you kill them for political or religious reasons?
Does it matter that your victims take revenge on you for political or religious reasons, by murdering you and your children?
If it does, what is the difference between being murdered for political reasons and being murdered for religious reasons, in practice and in theory?
If God is an instrument of government, isn't He more effective for this purpose than effeminate liberalism and immoral feminism, ignorant and indifferent to economic and foreign policy, interested only in choosing which bribe to accept at General Elections, eager to believe that it is both possible to have higher government spending and lower taxes and that uncontrolled immigration is good for the economy and should long continue?
The Iranians in their one party theocracy at least had a choice in the kind of foreign policy their country pursues and whether they wanted the hardline Raisi or the moderate Rouhani to pursue it. The Iranians had a more meaningful choice in their elections than the West. In the West, no voter ever votes on foreign policy. If you even ask your MP about this, you are treated as an oddball, or even an extremist who may possibly be a terrorist, probably.
Let us face facts: we are a declining and degenerate matriarchy and we distrust and despise our leaders. There is no evil we would not suspect them of committing. The most surprising thing about the Manchester attack was not that it happened, but the people who cynically observed that Theresa May would benefit from it and win the General Election by more of a margin because of it.
The Ancient Chinese concept of Yin and Yang is now in play. In its Newtonian way it states that for every action there will be a reaction. We and the terrorists who want to kill us and our children are now reacting against the stinking matriarchy we now find ourselves in, wondering which way to head for the shortest way out of the swamp.
The so-called enemies of the West have rational and principled men leading their countries while the West has only incompetent female leaders and a US President the deep state wants to topple and whose wife slaps away his hand when he reaches out for it in public.
The most notable thing about the Muslim terrorists is that they are adhering to their religious principles by terrorising us until they get what they want from us. Do we have any religious or political principle for invading and destroying Muslim countries in the way the US military industrial complex deep state wants us to keep doing? The nearest thing we have is that of the neocon goal of full spectrum global dominance that it does not appear Western voters are even aware of. Presumably, this goal is hidden away from the infantilised and feminised voters of NATO member states who don't like thinking of themselves as ruthless imperialists with blood-soaked hands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-spectrum_dominance
Iran elections: Pro-Rouhani reformists in Tehran power sweep
Yin and Yang and Newton's Third Law
Humanitarian Imperialism: Using Human Rights to Sell War
Ideology A gives up its principles in order to fight Ideology B. Which ideology has won?
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10389/europe-migration-policies
The only reason we should consider is which is more effective, but they are the same.
The enemies of feminism and liberal democracy are perceived to be Islam. The former represents the matriarchy and the latter the patriarchy.
Does it matter to your victims if you kill them for political or religious reasons?
Does it matter that your victims take revenge on you for political or religious reasons, by murdering you and your children?
If it does, what is the difference between being murdered for political reasons and being murdered for religious reasons, in practice and in theory?
If God is an instrument of government, isn't He more effective for this purpose than effeminate liberalism and immoral feminism, ignorant and indifferent to economic and foreign policy, interested only in choosing which bribe to accept at General Elections, eager to believe that it is both possible to have higher government spending and lower taxes and that uncontrolled immigration is good for the economy and should long continue?
The Iranians in their one party theocracy at least had a choice in the kind of foreign policy their country pursues and whether they wanted the hardline Raisi or the moderate Rouhani to pursue it. The Iranians had a more meaningful choice in their elections than the West. In the West, no voter ever votes on foreign policy. If you even ask your MP about this, you are treated as an oddball, or even an extremist who may possibly be a terrorist, probably.
Let us face facts: we are a declining and degenerate matriarchy and we distrust and despise our leaders. There is no evil we would not suspect them of committing. The most surprising thing about the Manchester attack was not that it happened, but the people who cynically observed that Theresa May would benefit from it and win the General Election by more of a margin because of it.
The Ancient Chinese concept of Yin and Yang is now in play. In its Newtonian way it states that for every action there will be a reaction. We and the terrorists who want to kill us and our children are now reacting against the stinking matriarchy we now find ourselves in, wondering which way to head for the shortest way out of the swamp.
The so-called enemies of the West have rational and principled men leading their countries while the West has only incompetent female leaders and a US President the deep state wants to topple and whose wife slaps away his hand when he reaches out for it in public.
The most notable thing about the Muslim terrorists is that they are adhering to their religious principles by terrorising us until they get what they want from us. Do we have any religious or political principle for invading and destroying Muslim countries in the way the US military industrial complex deep state wants us to keep doing? The nearest thing we have is that of the neocon goal of full spectrum global dominance that it does not appear Western voters are even aware of. Presumably, this goal is hidden away from the infantilised and feminised voters of NATO member states who don't like thinking of themselves as ruthless imperialists with blood-soaked hands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-spectrum_dominance
Iran elections: Pro-Rouhani reformists in Tehran power sweep
Yin and Yang and Newton's Third Law
Humanitarian Imperialism: Using Human Rights to Sell War
Ideology A gives up its principles in order to fight Ideology B. Which ideology has won?
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10389/europe-migration-policies
When the G7 heads of state arrive in Taormina, Sicily, for the G7 meeting on May 26, they will find themselves in an embellished, picture-postcard version of European reality. Italy, the host of the G7 meeting, has announced that it will close all harbors on the island to ships that arrive with migrants ( mainly from Libya) for the duration of the two-day meeting. The reason for the closure of the Italian island to migrants is to protect the G7 meeting from potential terrorist attacks. According to Italian reports, "the Department of Public Safety believes that the boats with illegal immigrants could be hiding an Islamist threat".
G7 meetings are, of course, always subject to a host of high-level security measures. However, shielding heads of state from seeing the consequences of the policies that they themselves have forced on the entire European continent represents a staggering new level of hypocrisy. Literally altering reality in order to present a whitewashed picture of the influx of migrants into Europe, which happens largely through Italy, is a Potemkin measure, regardless of terror risks. Heads of state, such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whom Italy seeks to protect from a terrorist risk, seem not to care particularly about the very real terrorist risks that European citizens are forced to live with daily thanks to the migrant policies of these heads of state.
A meme I found on Facebook
 |
| Another meme I found on Facebook |
As an analyst, I blame the political elite. As a father & grandfather I pray for the kids & their families. #manchesterexplosion— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 22, 2017
#ISIS claim responsibility for #ManchesterMassacre #BBC still saying they have no idea who did it. Pathetic #FakeNews wankers!— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 23, 2017
After #Islamist terror strikes #Manchester #TheresaMay announces end to aid for Islamists in #Syria Not! "As ye sow, so shall ye reap".— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 23, 2017
Finally! Independent admits it: #Manchester Massacre was on 4th anniversary of murder of #LeeRigby #NeverForget— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 23, 2017
Gay GF of first named victim of Jihadi #ManchesterBombing had this to say. Sad that Western snowflakes have to learn the hard way https://t.co/lEHH0DzN1S— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 23, 2017
#StandUpToTrump I've never been more proud to be a Brit! America we are with you, the world is with you! We stand up to the Muslim ban ☪️ pic.twitter.com/adFiW7jFd5— Sophie ⚢ (@Sophie_Jauregui) January 30, 2017
I'm no Islamophile, but don't demand "Muslims should condemn ISIS" while voting for leaders who sell arms to #ISIS sponsor #SaudiArabia— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 23, 2017
CBS names Manchester bomber as Salman Abedi, 'known to police'. Unconfirmed, perhaps because police don't want to admit another total fuckup— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 23, 2017
#DonaldTrump will show his solidarity with #Manchester by selling $160Billion of weapons to #SaudiArabia , the source of ALL #Wahhabi terror— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 23, 2017
Hope they don't mark #Manchester with candles. It's a war zone not a feckin giant birthday cake. Reality demands action, not luvvie slogans— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 23, 2017
— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) May 23, 2017
— #VoteLabour (@volkan_gunduz) May 26, 2017
9 comments:
Whenever there is a "terror attack" as far as I am concerned it's a false flag until proven otherwise. Just a note of caution... Don't believe a word the mainstream media tells you about Manchester over the next 24 hours. Wait until you get independent confirmation from citizen investigators. Within 2 days they can usually find out if it was real or staged.
It's no coincidence that another "terrorist attack" has occurred in the UK weeks away from the general election. It's not hard to put 2+2 together on this incident. It's all by design.
22-05-13 Lee Rigby
22-03-16 Brussels attack
22-07-16 Munich attack
22-03-17 London attack
22-05-17 Manchester attack
22-07-17 ????
Do you see a pattern here?
22 is the number of Major Arcana (Secrets) in the Tarot. Hmmmm
As you know our psychopathic elite are obsessed with numerology. They plan certain world events on particular days for a reason.
In numerology, 22 is considered a power number
22 is 11 doubled. 11 is a very significant number in elite numerology too, as you've seen with 9/11.
In both cases you are dead, so it makes no difference.
Here, I'm going to break the latest "terror" attack down for you (and every single preceding one).
(1) It's all fake, all staged. Why would someone be able to bring a bomb in? Everyone is body checked. I tell you why: because they allowed them in, they planned it!
(2) Who knows whether that little "boom" was actually much hurting anyone. Perhaps it was. Perhaps it wasn't. Who cares. The point is to make YOU afraid and to make YOU fed up.
(3) However, YOU can't do ANYTHING, and the point is to make you FEEL that you can't do anything. Your vote doesn't count. You can vote BREXIT until the cows come home, you will NEVER be free of the tyranny any more.
(4) The real terrorists are your governments and those who control them. And boy do you need to go a long way to stop allowing them to control you through government! A terrorist is one who performs violent acts to instill fear, and this is EXACTLY what your government and the fake news mainstream media are doing on you.
(5) They want you to beg them to protect you. You must pay for it, dearly. You must pay with your liberty and your money and your life time and your very soul! THAT is what they want. They want no less. Look at Theresa May and her Internet censorship and surveillance proposal. They want to control you 100%.
(6) BUT that doesn't mean that Islamic violence is not real. ISIS is real. The ideology is real. The hate is real. The lone wolf jihadism is real. However, NONE OF IT would affect you if it wasn't for YOUR GOVERNMENTS and those who control them to sell your countries out by making those wars, and that mass immigration multi-culti thing. AND MAKING YOU PAY FOR IT!
ARE YOU STILL PAYING FOR IT?
Look, if you are still paying for it, then it is YOUR OWN FAULT. Quit complaining and start getting out. You are a slave to them, nothing but a slave. And worse even, not only do they want you to work and give them half of your life time by way of taxes to receive their fake "protection" and their funny-money. They also love to taunt you and to hurt you and to make you afraid! They want local violence to occur. They want your wife and daughter to be unsafe in the streets. They want you to be beaten up and robbed by these cultural enrichment process. They want real attacks to happen. They want blood to flow. They want innocents to die. You should then go and petition the government, hold demonstrations, fight with ANTIFA, and vote, so that you exhaust yourself in the mouse wheel, thinking that you're making a difference. But they are telling you SCREW YOU! You want BREXIT? You're not gonna get BREXIT. They have rigged the system. Instead of BREXIT you're gonna get more Tyranny. And you're gonna get more of this government enabled terrorism. Then more Tyranny!
WAKE UP AND GET OUT! QUIT PAYING FOR IT! THAT MEANS: START BOYCOTTING THE ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA INDUSTRY TODAY!
* Cancel your cable and satellite subscription TODAY
* Quit clicking on links of the NYT, WaPo, HuffPo, Guardian, Independent, etc.
* Quit listening to syndicated radio and the stupid music they make you swallow.
* DO NOT EVER go to ANY of their stupid shows
* DO NOT EVER watch a Hollywood flick again
* QUIT PAYING INTO THE SYSTEM THAT ENSLAVES YOU.
Post a Comment