All is lost. The Marriage Foundation is destroying marriage https://t.co/cedAT1wQLW— Belinda Brown (@bbhippopotamus) 1 January 2018
Er, do you quite mean to say "The Marriage Foundation is destroying marriage", Belinda?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
Yes I do.— Belinda Brown (@bbhippopotamus) 1 January 2018
https://t.co/a2B8bwIN5P "We believe that couples should be encouraged to make careful decisions about their future together before they *cohabit*." Is this the problem, Belinda?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
No. By creating a range of options - civil partnership, legal statuses to cohabitation, legalizing pre-nups; marriage is even less likely to happen. I think this article puts the case well: https://t.co/Y6mgpRavFN— Belinda Brown (@bbhippopotamus) 1 January 2018
Not only is the government so cucked and corrupt male MPs cannot collectively assert the principle that marriage is for the purpose of having legitimate children, neither can Sir Paul Coleridge of the @MarriageF. It is the latter that is even more shameful and cucked. @rabbisacks— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
If you cannot even agree that the purpose of marriage is to have legitimate children, then you have no business getting married.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
Clearly, our government is so cucked and corrupt that no senior male MP even if married with legitimate children can even discuss the real eugenic purpose of marriage.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
Not only is the government so cucked and corrupt male MPs cannot collectively assert the principle that marriage is for the purpose of having legitimate children, neither can Sir Paul Coleridge of the @MarriageF. It is the latter that is even more shameful and cucked. @rabbisacks— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
It really does appear that feminism has filleted the spine out of the gentile Western male so completely that he is now unable to even defend the twin foundation of all civilisations: the institutions of marriage and the family.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
The essence of a patriarchy is that the married parent is privileged over the unmarried in that only couples married to each other should have the privilege of having recreational sex with each other. This subject can no longer be discussed without causing distress and alarm.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
Since most of the West is nominally Christian and only Christian in the sense that a human skeleton is human, it can be seen that the gentile non-Muslim has no moral or religious principles that he cares to defend, however fundamental they are to the health of his society.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
If a defence is made of any fundamental principle against the squatting giantess of the matriarchy above his head, the gentile non-Muslim man will only do so in a token fashion, weakly n ineffectually, making defeat inevitable. Coleridge will soon be apologising for daring to try— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 January 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment