"Stupid, fatuous, irrelevant and not crucial" from the 41st minute:
Hate is the corollary of love and a natural emotion for humans to feel when they feel threatened. I am merely observing that something more than hate is required for successful politics. It is also necessary to propose practical solutions that are not unrealistic or at least be prepared to discuss them. Nationalists dare not discuss solutions or examine the problems honestly because they are afraid of falling out with each other and therefore only concentrate on merely agreeing with each other on whom they hate. Millennial Woes recently said that questions such as how is the ethonostate going to be established and the nature of its government and policies are "silly" and "fatuous". Just because you don't know the answer to the question does not mean the question is silly or fatuous. I have the answer but of course he doesn't want to discuss it with me.
Millennial Woes doesn't want to discuss the solution to feminism - the cause of Western malaise - the way an alcoholic doesn't want to give up drink. I think they have all given up anyway because there is obviously a policy of only to complaining without discussing or proposing solutions.
Nationalists are constantly complaining about Jews and Muslims - people of faith - while having none themselves. Isn't it obvious that the reason why they are in fear of Jews exploiting and Muslims invading them because they have no religion and cannot cooperate with each other to accomplish even the simplest things?
It is of course religion that imposes common values and a hierarchy and sets rules for social behaviour in order to preserve the male solidarity that is so necessary for the co-operation necessary for any society to deal effectively with its internal and external enemies.
There is a reason why MPs like pandering to Muslims: because they still do things as a group. You get a mosque elder to support your party and he will get his congregation to support your party. Trying to get the white working class vote is like herding cats.
The white proletariat are divided in the following categories:
Jews and Muslims have more male solidarity and inter-generational co-operation than nationalists because they know they are supposed to respect their elders and they at least go to the same place of worship. Nationalists only ever meet in pubs because they have no community centre and this increases their tendency to steal each other's women, fight each other drunkenly and then stab each other in the back later for a variety of reasons. Community centres come from having a place of worship, after all, and places of worship have higher standards of behaviour than your local pub.
Nationalists don't want to discuss whether Christianity is kaput because they don't want to find themselves admitting that Christianity is kaput.
They don't want to admit that Christianity is kaput because it would mean discussing whether it needs to be replaced.
They don't want to discuss whether Christianity needs to be replaced because they don't want to find themselves having to admit that it needs to be replaced.
They don't want to discuss what might replace Christianity because they know there is only one religion that could replace Christianity anyway.
They are basically cowards and hypocrites unfit to lead any political movement because they cannot even admit the truth to themselves.
Where do you think nationalists are now in the Five Stages of Grief?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kübler-Ross_model
I don't think they are even past the first stage.
I ask nationalists to imagine a time in the future when all non-whites have been expelled including Jews and Muslims. On what basis would such an ethnostate be run?
The silence is deafening.
I think I am shunned precisely because I ask this question.
Individual nationalists know they must not propose any solutions because doing so would simply mean falling out with other nationalists who won't agree with them.
Would they have to live in a patriarchy?
Does this mean shaming sluts who undermine patriarchy?
Who is a slut?
Are the women they are having sex with sluts? (Any woman to whom you are not married with whom you are having sex is indeed a slut.)
Would they have to give up premarital sex? (Virtually all British men regard fornication as their inalienable human right.)
Would they have to give up gay sex? (Many nationalists are gays eg Douglas Murray feeling threatened by Muslims.)
Would they have to stay married to their white wives just to properly parent their legitimate their racially pure white offspring?
Would they have to abolish no fault divorce?
Would they have to abolish the welfare state?
Better not go there!
The long and short of it is that there can be no nationalism without patriarchy because only a patriarchy can produce enough good strong men prepared to effectively defend the national interest.
There can be no patriarchy without slut-shaming and the shaming of morally-compromised slut-fuckers as quran.com/24/2 prescribes.
The truth is that no nationalist is prepared to consider making these sacrifices, let alone actually make them.
This is because virtually all nationalists are atheists who regard this life as their only life and this makes them unwilling to make any sacrifices for the greater good of their race or nation.
This makes them ideologically and morally inferior to Muslims and Jews whose religion imposes on them the religious duty to remain a member of the group and to make sacrifices for it, which is the real purpose of religion.
The reason why no nationalist is prepared to discuss any of the above with me is because they have already made up their minds not to make any sacrifices for the group other than to complain weakly weekly on YouTube without demanding of their slack and supine audience any more than clicks for LIKE and SUBSCRIBE, and that is why they are never going to get anywhere.
Millennial Woes considers questions such as "How are you going to establish your ethnostate and what economic and political system will it have?" as "stupid". https://t.co/QUz7X9VfqY— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 9, 2018
White Nationalists find it hard to decide whom they hate more: Jews or Muslims. While they hate Jews, Jews are familiar and they have become accustomed to their ways. While they hate Muslims, they find Muslims also hate Jews and support their Holocaust Denial. How will it end?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 10, 2018
Hate is the corollary of love and a natural emotion for humans to feel when they feel threatened. I am merely observing that something more than hate is required for successful politics. It is also necessary to propose practical solutions that are not unrealistic or at least be prepared to discuss them. Nationalists dare not discuss solutions or examine the problems honestly because they are afraid of falling out with each other and therefore only concentrate on merely agreeing with each other on whom they hate. Millennial Woes recently said that questions such as how is the ethonostate going to be established and the nature of its government and policies are "silly" and "fatuous". Just because you don't know the answer to the question does not mean the question is silly or fatuous. I have the answer but of course he doesn't want to discuss it with me.
Millennial Woes doesn't want to discuss the solution to feminism - the cause of Western malaise - the way an alcoholic doesn't want to give up drink. I think they have all given up anyway because there is obviously a policy of only to complaining without discussing or proposing solutions.
Nationalists are constantly complaining about Jews and Muslims - people of faith - while having none themselves. Isn't it obvious that the reason why they are in fear of Jews exploiting and Muslims invading them because they have no religion and cannot cooperate with each other to accomplish even the simplest things?
It is of course religion that imposes common values and a hierarchy and sets rules for social behaviour in order to preserve the male solidarity that is so necessary for the co-operation necessary for any society to deal effectively with its internal and external enemies.
There is a reason why MPs like pandering to Muslims: because they still do things as a group. You get a mosque elder to support your party and he will get his congregation to support your party. Trying to get the white working class vote is like herding cats.
The white proletariat are divided in the following categories:
- the aristocracy of labour who are unionised and protected at the cost of the free speech of individual union members
- the independent contractor who is able to say what he wants more or less, eg white van men, taxi drivers, but who are regularly vilified because they support UKIP
- welfare-claimants who are part of the rent a mob from time to time mobilised to intimidate nationalists
- unskilled manual labour who are NEETs who were singly parented by their unmarried mothers without the education or the work ethic or the group support necessary to better themselves or the organisational skills to be effective who are leaderless because the men of their political establishment have completely abandoned them in their mania to pander to the capricious and unreasonable demands of the female voter
Jews and Muslims have more male solidarity and inter-generational co-operation than nationalists because they know they are supposed to respect their elders and they at least go to the same place of worship. Nationalists only ever meet in pubs because they have no community centre and this increases their tendency to steal each other's women, fight each other drunkenly and then stab each other in the back later for a variety of reasons. Community centres come from having a place of worship, after all, and places of worship have higher standards of behaviour than your local pub.
Nationalists don't want to discuss whether Christianity is kaput because they don't want to find themselves admitting that Christianity is kaput.
They don't want to admit that Christianity is kaput because it would mean discussing whether it needs to be replaced.
They don't want to discuss whether Christianity needs to be replaced because they don't want to find themselves having to admit that it needs to be replaced.
They don't want to discuss what might replace Christianity because they know there is only one religion that could replace Christianity anyway.
They are basically cowards and hypocrites unfit to lead any political movement because they cannot even admit the truth to themselves.
Where do you think nationalists are now in the Five Stages of Grief?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kübler-Ross_model
I don't think they are even past the first stage.
I ask nationalists to imagine a time in the future when all non-whites have been expelled including Jews and Muslims. On what basis would such an ethnostate be run?
The silence is deafening.
I think I am shunned precisely because I ask this question.
Individual nationalists know they must not propose any solutions because doing so would simply mean falling out with other nationalists who won't agree with them.
Would they have to live in a patriarchy?
Does this mean shaming sluts who undermine patriarchy?
Who is a slut?
Are the women they are having sex with sluts? (Any woman to whom you are not married with whom you are having sex is indeed a slut.)
Would they have to give up premarital sex? (Virtually all British men regard fornication as their inalienable human right.)
Would they have to give up gay sex? (Many nationalists are gays eg Douglas Murray feeling threatened by Muslims.)
Would they have to stay married to their white wives just to properly parent their legitimate their racially pure white offspring?
Would they have to abolish no fault divorce?
Would they have to abolish the welfare state?
Better not go there!
The long and short of it is that there can be no nationalism without patriarchy because only a patriarchy can produce enough good strong men prepared to effectively defend the national interest.
There can be no patriarchy without slut-shaming and the shaming of morally-compromised slut-fuckers as quran.com/24/2 prescribes.
The truth is that no nationalist is prepared to consider making these sacrifices, let alone actually make them.
This is because virtually all nationalists are atheists who regard this life as their only life and this makes them unwilling to make any sacrifices for the greater good of their race or nation.
This makes them ideologically and morally inferior to Muslims and Jews whose religion imposes on them the religious duty to remain a member of the group and to make sacrifices for it, which is the real purpose of religion.
The reason why no nationalist is prepared to discuss any of the above with me is because they have already made up their minds not to make any sacrifices for the group other than to complain weakly weekly on YouTube without demanding of their slack and supine audience any more than clicks for LIKE and SUBSCRIBE, and that is why they are never going to get anywhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment