Translate

Saturday 29 September 2018

Is an executed revolutionary the co-equal of the eternal and supreme Abrahamic God?

executed revolutionary < God

God > executed revolutionary

Before the Doctrine of the Trinity Act 1813, it was blasphemy to say this.

In 1600 at the behest of John Calvin, Michael Servetus was burned at the stake for denying the Trinity.

Jews and Muslims regarded the doctrine of the Trinity as idolatrous and the Inquisition was conducted to keep them in line.

If God exists He must wish to punish Christians for what is undeniably idolatry. Some might suppose that the wheels of this particular engine have been set in motion.

Jews believe that Satan is God's Prosecuting Counsel. This rather suggests His modus operandi is to lay down the law and then give us the rope we need to hang ourselves after giving us freewill and the capacity to reason. He even helpfully sends the occasional prophet or prophetess to show us the way even if the result sometimes ends in the persecution and execution of these prophets, after which God sent the Romans to punish the Jews by depriving them of their homeland for 2000 years.

The Jews now have their homeland, but it is not a theocracy, but rather a liberal democracy and a colonial outpost of a corrupt and declining empire up to its ears in usurious debt spreading its abomination of gay marriage around the world and turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah, doubtless attracting the same punishment.

If the West is now Post Christian, it must be because most people cannot bring themselves to believe in such an absurdity after being given the legal option not to do so.

This meant however meant that the baby of Biblical morality has been thrown out with the bathwater of the Trinity.

We must remember that Christianity was not enough to save Rome and bear in mind that the world's most powerful church, the Catholic Church, is unlikely to ever regain its moral authority after it is swept away by a tsunami of sex scandals.

Islam has never relied on a parasitic priesthood to maintain morality. The closest thing to a priesthood in an Islamic State would be the judiciary interpreting sharia. Any advanced civilisation would already have a judiciary.

An Islamic theocracy would be lean and efficient guaranteeing a small state with the taxpayer protected by a constitutional right not to pay more than a flat rate income tax of 20% (8:38-41) while discouraging the existence of two parasitic classes:

1) a corruptible priesthood and

2) immoral women who are unmarried mothers and bad parents producing the next generation of criminals senior men in politics no longer dare criticise for fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence, when an accusation is as good as a conviction, ignoring or forgetting the rule in Deuteronomy 19:15 because Westerners both Jew and gentile who are about to acquire an Islamic heritage have lost their Judeo-Christian heritage.

Theocracy is to Islam what the Trinity is to Christianity.

The Koran guarantees freedom of belief with 2:256 and it is believed that Thomas Jefferson who owned a copy based the First Amendment on this verse.

Were Britain to become an Islamic State, the Church of England would be disestablished and the monarch could become its head, rather than the Archbishop of Canterbury. It would be interesting to see if Charles takes up this role, or converts to Islam. If he becomes the head of the Anglican Church and then converts to Islam, then it would mean the extinction of the Church of England. The French Revolutionaries used the assignat to acquire church property for their own purposes.

1 comment:

TH said...

Islam poses no danger to Christianity. In fact the oldest denominations of Christians exist in Muslim world. Islam has been part of Western world since 711. Until 11th century large swathes of Northern Europe were not Christian. It is impossible for Muslims to become a majority in Europe, or in any Western country.