WHY MY IDEA OF A ONE PARTY THEOCRACY GOVERNED BY THE PRINCIPLES OF SECULAR KORANISM IS MORE MORALLY AND POLITICALLY SUSTAINABLE THAN THE POGROM SOME WHITE NATIONALISTS ARE YEARNING FOR
The first thing I did was to make sure the message is sent, received and understood.
The second thing I did was to explain why the patriarchy must be restored for the continued existence of any civilisation.
Third, I demonstrated that there is no alternative but a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism. (Those who reject Secular Koranism have only two options: vote UKIP at the next election or wait for law and order to collapse in the next 10 years so they can conduct their yearned for pogrom,)
Fourth, I demonstrated that those who would reject my proposed one party theocracy are unmarriageable morally compromised men whose views should be dismissed because they are morally compromised and unmarriageable with no intention or prospect of becoming the fathers of legitimate children or parenting them properly and who want standards of sexual morality to remain conveniently low so they need not take a wife nor hire a prostitute in order to be sexually active.
Fifth, I demonstrated that those who would support the restoration of the patriarchy are those who want to become the married fathers of legitimate children and parent them properly, and only those who are prepared to fight this particular culture war deserve to win.
Sixth, I have made clear that restoring the patriarchy means privileging married parents and discriminating against unmarried parents to the extent of treating them as sex offenders as prescribed by 24:2 of the Koran. quran.com/24/2
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PEOPLE WHO OPPOSE THE RESTORATION OF THE PATRIARCHY
Men who reject my proposal for the return of marriage and family values who have no other solution other than wait for pogrom cannot be trusted by the generality of the people.
Men who are not prepared to acknowledge that sacrifices must be made for future generations because they are unmarriageable atheists more concerned for standards of sexual morality to remain conveniently low for unmarried men to be sexually active without paying upfront tend not to be people of great moral probity prepared to admit the truth.
People may hate my solution, but I at least do present a solution that should appeal to those who want the law to support marriage and family values.
Those who are just sullenly waiting for law and order to break down before taking their revenge on the people whose presence they resent tend not to be people who can be trusted to govern the nation.
The peasants may revolt, but eventually, some middle class professional - usually a lawyer - will take over, or, if not, a military figure.
The main thing to note about religion is that any established religion automatically has a higher status than man-made ideologies such as nationalism.
However much you hate Islam, it has a far higher status than nationalism in the minds of intellectuals and the educated who will be the ones in government once the revolution has taken place.
Religions have a better track record than political ideologies such as Nazism, Fascism, Communism, Liberalism, Conservatism etc simply because religions have been around for centuries while political ideologies are here today and gone tomorrow, easily and quickly swept away by the tides of human history.
Jews have been around for as long as the Chinese and all ancient and advanced civilisations practise marriage. After 2000 years of being without their homeland, Jews managed to get it back again. Christianity and Islam are derived from Judaism, but Christianity and liberal democracy are now failing. This is not even a matter of making difficult choices, but reading the writing on the wall and knowing that there is no alternative.
The antithesis of a sexually-liberated liberal democracy must be a one-party theocracy led by a constitutional dictator trusted by the governed to govern in the national interest according to the terms of a constitution based on the laws made by an eternal and supreme God.
All the Abrahamic faiths refer to the supreme, eternal and morally perfect Abrahamic God as their final authority, but all who call themselves white nationalists can only refer to dead men who died unnatural deaths as the most successful practitioners of nationalism. Why would any rational and moral person want that?
If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.
If Islam is Judaism Lite, then Secular Koranism is Koran Lite.
The difference between their sharia and Secular Koranism, which is basically sharia as interpreted by me, is that Secular Koranism is a legal system, not a belief system. It is a legal system that absolutely guarantees freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256 and would restore the patriarchy.
Once patriarchy is restored, your society will return to the moral order that existed before the feminists took over, when women and minorities knew their place and did not spend most of their time enraging, mocking and provoking the white heterosexual male who only wants the government to acknowledge his difficulties and ameliorate them as a married father in the undertaking of properly parenting the next generation.
If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution.
If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle. Otherwise, the next generation would simply forget about the lessons this generation learned and undo all the good previous generations did. The point of putting God as the head of all things is that it is necessary to acknowledge His existence either as an entity in fact existing or as a concept, in order to obey His laws.
https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/09/the-white-nationalist-manifesto/
The first thing I did was to make sure the message is sent, received and understood.
The second thing I did was to explain why the patriarchy must be restored for the continued existence of any civilisation.
Third, I demonstrated that there is no alternative but a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism. (Those who reject Secular Koranism have only two options: vote UKIP at the next election or wait for law and order to collapse in the next 10 years so they can conduct their yearned for pogrom,)
Fourth, I demonstrated that those who would reject my proposed one party theocracy are unmarriageable morally compromised men whose views should be dismissed because they are morally compromised and unmarriageable with no intention or prospect of becoming the fathers of legitimate children or parenting them properly and who want standards of sexual morality to remain conveniently low so they need not take a wife nor hire a prostitute in order to be sexually active.
Fifth, I demonstrated that those who would support the restoration of the patriarchy are those who want to become the married fathers of legitimate children and parent them properly, and only those who are prepared to fight this particular culture war deserve to win.
Sixth, I have made clear that restoring the patriarchy means privileging married parents and discriminating against unmarried parents to the extent of treating them as sex offenders as prescribed by 24:2 of the Koran. quran.com/24/2
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PEOPLE WHO OPPOSE THE RESTORATION OF THE PATRIARCHY
Men who reject my proposal for the return of marriage and family values who have no other solution other than wait for pogrom cannot be trusted by the generality of the people.
Men who are not prepared to acknowledge that sacrifices must be made for future generations because they are unmarriageable atheists more concerned for standards of sexual morality to remain conveniently low for unmarried men to be sexually active without paying upfront tend not to be people of great moral probity prepared to admit the truth.
People may hate my solution, but I at least do present a solution that should appeal to those who want the law to support marriage and family values.
Those who are just sullenly waiting for law and order to break down before taking their revenge on the people whose presence they resent tend not to be people who can be trusted to govern the nation.
The peasants may revolt, but eventually, some middle class professional - usually a lawyer - will take over, or, if not, a military figure.
The main thing to note about religion is that any established religion automatically has a higher status than man-made ideologies such as nationalism.
However much you hate Islam, it has a far higher status than nationalism in the minds of intellectuals and the educated who will be the ones in government once the revolution has taken place.
Religions have a better track record than political ideologies such as Nazism, Fascism, Communism, Liberalism, Conservatism etc simply because religions have been around for centuries while political ideologies are here today and gone tomorrow, easily and quickly swept away by the tides of human history.
Jews have been around for as long as the Chinese and all ancient and advanced civilisations practise marriage. After 2000 years of being without their homeland, Jews managed to get it back again. Christianity and Islam are derived from Judaism, but Christianity and liberal democracy are now failing. This is not even a matter of making difficult choices, but reading the writing on the wall and knowing that there is no alternative.
The antithesis of a sexually-liberated liberal democracy must be a one-party theocracy led by a constitutional dictator trusted by the governed to govern in the national interest according to the terms of a constitution based on the laws made by an eternal and supreme God.
All the Abrahamic faiths refer to the supreme, eternal and morally perfect Abrahamic God as their final authority, but all who call themselves white nationalists can only refer to dead men who died unnatural deaths as the most successful practitioners of nationalism. Why would any rational and moral person want that?
If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.
If Islam is Judaism Lite, then Secular Koranism is Koran Lite.
The difference between their sharia and Secular Koranism, which is basically sharia as interpreted by me, is that Secular Koranism is a legal system, not a belief system. It is a legal system that absolutely guarantees freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256 and would restore the patriarchy.
Once patriarchy is restored, your society will return to the moral order that existed before the feminists took over, when women and minorities knew their place and did not spend most of their time enraging, mocking and provoking the white heterosexual male who only wants the government to acknowledge his difficulties and ameliorate them as a married father in the undertaking of properly parenting the next generation.
If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution.
If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle. Otherwise, the next generation would simply forget about the lessons this generation learned and undo all the good previous generations did. The point of putting God as the head of all things is that it is necessary to acknowledge His existence either as an entity in fact existing or as a concept, in order to obey His laws.
https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/09/the-white-nationalist-manifesto/
No comments:
Post a Comment