Translate

Wednesday, 10 October 2018

Should we submit to mob rule? You already know the right answer


42:00 Methods of dealing with troublesome minorities

1) Assimilation
2) Partition
3) Expulsion
4) Extermination

I have a better solution: the smack of firm government and changing the rules (currently unfair, irrational and unsettling) to what will be perceived as fairer eg restoring the rule of law in a way that dispenses justice, stopping immigration, dealing firmly with violent antifa intimidation, narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only and shrinking the state to prevent a burgeoning parasitic class from overwhelming its host.

Why is the government afraid of enforcing existing laws?

Because it is not really in charge.

SOLUTION: then the men should just take charge and deal with the feminazis. It is the feminazis and their running dogs who are running the show after all.

8:65:

If there are among you twenty [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome a thousand of those who have disbelieved because they are a people who do not understand.

8:66:

Now, Allah has lightened [the hardship] for you, and He knows that among you is weakness. So if there are from you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you a thousand, they will overcome two thousand by permission of Allah. And Allah is with the steadfast.

6 comments:

MF said...

Claire, I really fail to understand why you pursue this pointless feud against Mike Buchanan.
Like you, Mike is an anti-feminist and a supporter of traditional marriage.
You would achieve your aims more quickly if you put some energy into supporting Mike, rather than slagging him off.

Claire Khaw said...

I have tried being nice to him, but he is such a petty pathetic angry little man.

MF said...

It is not a question of being 'nice', it is a question of working together to defeat feminism.
In normal interaction, you are a robust and thick-skinned woman. But, in the matter of Mike Buchanan, you seem somewhat sensitive, if I may say so.

To make progress in the real world, we need to leave our egos at the door. Ego does not help where we must cooperate in order to achieve actual progress. I suggest putting the problem first - the damage done by feminism - and then working together to overcome it.

Leaving the ego at the door is important. It is not helping.

Claire Khaw said...

He won't even discuss abolishing no fault divorce. I am perfectly happy to engage with him at any time.

Instead of campaigning to abolish no fault divorce and make marriage a good bargain for men again, he prefers to identify with antisemites and Islamophobes. It is important that I make my disapproval of his position loudly and repeatedly.

JS said...

Good grief. More Beta males.

Claire Khaw said...

Men who support Elizabeth Hobson and Mike Buchanan are by definition beta male victims of feminism.The trouble is that they are led by an obviously beta male and unmarried mother with absolutely no interest in restoring the patriarchy.

The Founding Fathers: what did they really say by Mat Clark

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Founding-Fathers-Evidence-Christian-Principles/dp/1979939470 Christian principles are not "freedom for everyon...