Cautious temperament: scepticism of sluts.
Men should choose their women anyway. If she is love-bombing you, she is choosing you.
Oh, but hey, shouldn't you be the one doing the love-bombing?
Passive effeminate men who are too cucked to shame sluts or chase a woman get love-bombed by women with an agenda.
Aw, she was only looking for a father figure and this was you! It has been said that women really want to marry a man like their father, if they were fortunate enough to have loved their father. If you were female, you would want to be with a male partner taller, wealthier, wiser and higher status than you. If you had married her and fathered children with her and divorce were still stigmatised, she would have to lie in the bed that she made after she became bored and irritated by you. As things are, our Tinder culture makes us think there is something better round the corner and that there is nothing wrong in dropping our current long term relationship in search of a better one.
To be frank, I am surprised that as a nationalist and Catholic you have not yet discussed the mortal sin of fornication and its degenerative effect on your society. Perhaps you do not know that fornication is a mortal sin?
You are still not getting it that the rules of behaviour should be that men should court women and not the other way around. If she is throwing herself at you, she is probably a slut and a crazy lady asking to be fucked by some loser whose loserdom she does not quite realise at the time. So what will happen is that she will either get tired of you when she sees your clay feet, or you will tire of her.
What this has to do with stoicism I don't know, because stoicism is all about putting up with shit cheerfully because you have no choice.
If you know you have made a mistake, recognise it and don't repeat it. What's there to be stoical about?
If you live in a society where women always make the first move because men are so feminised they dare not risk rejection, then you are already marinating in the sewage of degeneracy. Rather than be stoical about it, why not speak against it?
I have already made this point in your previous three videos on the subject, but you don't seem to get it. Maybe it is because you want to make videos on the same subject over and over again like you never heard what I said because that is what your viewers prefer - a sad sack mooning about lost love. Oh, but you could make a video in response to what I have said if you're just into making videos for the sake of making YouTube videos, so why won't you? Well, you could make a video about why not! Haha!
You are still not getting it that the rules of behaviour should be that men should court women and not the other way around. If she is throwing herself at you, she is probably a slut and a crazy lady asking to be fucked by some loser whose loserdom she does not quite realise at the time. So what will happen is that she will either get tired of you when she sees your clay feet, or you will tire of her.
What this has to do with stoicism I don't know, because stoicism is all about putting up with shit cheerfully because you have no choice.
If you know you have made a mistake, recognise it and don't repeat it. What's there to be stoical about?
If you live in a society where women always make the first move because men are so feminised they dare not risk rejection, then you are already marinating in the sewage of degeneracy. Rather than be stoical about it, why not speak against it?
I have already made this point in your previous three videos on the subject, but you don't seem to get it. Maybe it is because you want to make videos on the same subject over and over again like you never heard what I said because that is what your viewers prefer - a sad sack mooning about lost love. Oh, but you could make a video in response to what I have said if you're just into making videos for the sake of making YouTube videos, so why won't you? Well, you could make a video about why not! Haha!
No comments:
Post a Comment