Translate

Friday, 22 February 2019

Why white men are leaderless

White men are leaderless because the West is a matriarchy. In a matriarchy, all men are lower than the unmarried mother and any male leader would only be appointed by the matriarchy. Such appointed leaders would never dare to criticise unmarried mothers and we know who is in power by those we dare not criticise.

Worse than that, white men are not even talking about restoring the patriarchy. In a patriarchy, beta males would choose their alpha male leader who would look after their interests in exchange for their loyalty and support.

White men dare not talk about restoring the patriarchy because they are afraid of their immoral women and their running dogs. They are terrified of losing status through losing sexual access to their immoral women, and dare not admit it.

Being atheists, white men have no principles they dare defend against the matriarchy because atheism and childlessness makes them short-termist cowards who cannot think beyond their next sexual encounter. The alt-right, being a marginalised movement of marginalised and unmarriageable men, will not have the moral or intellectual authority to persuade anyone other than others who feel the same sense of hatred, anger and outrage that their government does not care about them. In the meantime, they refuse to discuss practical solutions.

Racism, Antisemitism, Islamophobia and Pogromism are now the quasi-religions of the alt-right. A religion would contain rules and solutions, but the alt-right have no solutions other than Pogrom, Paganism and Propertarianism. The alt-right who congregate to discuss their racism, antisemitism, Islamophobia and their anticipation of conducting their yearned for pogrom - which are but expressions of their feeling weelings - only do so to bond with each other while sharing horror stories of immigrant crime.

Why won't anyone already in the political establishment help these marginalised men? Apart from cowardice, they don't see these marginalised men as useful allies or in any way socially useful. Let us imagine that all the non-white immigrant workers have been expelled, as Greg Johnson predicts, after white men agree and then co-operate to remove them. Can you imagine these elderly embittered men or the young NEETs doing the jobs the immigrants used to do? Of course not. They have nothing to offer anyone in the political establishment to fight for you. Even if these men offered their loyalty and support - which so far they have not thought of doing - they cannot be trusted to deliver.

Preston Wigginton, the White Nationalist Texan who runs a business, actually admits that it is hard to get anyone white and indigenous to do the work his business requires them to do. There is no work ethic amongst whites now.

In fact, it has been pointed out by the historian David Starkey that whites have become black.

Only a revolution would overthrow the matriarchy and restore the patriarchy. Is the alt-right even admitting that Christianity and democracy have failed? Are they discussing what Christianity and democracy should be replaced with? Have they acknowledged that however perfect a political system is in theory, it cannot come into being if politicians are incompetent and corrupt? If establishment politicians are incompetent and corrupt, all the more so anti-establishment figures like Curt Doolittle, Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer.

What are the big ideas of the alt-right? Pogrom, Paganism and Propertarianism!

They don't even have the honesty to discuss the failure of Christianity, much less face the truth that the only legal system capable of protecting them from Liberal Jews and the indifference and contempt of the liberal elite for a working class that is no longer fit for purpose is Secular Koranism.

In fact, the liberal elite no longer want to even have the bother of making the working classes work, because they want them to be replaced by robots. Yuval Harari, the Israeli academic, gay and gaily married, has said as much in his books, in particular Homo Deus. It is a work of surpassing arrogance if you know what Homo Deus means.

The Abrahamic God is the most powerful God conceivable, Judaism is for Jews only, Christianity is kaput, and Islam is the only possible religion for you if you are a gentile wishing to remain a gentile who wishes to worship the Abrahamic God without being guilty of the idolatry of Christianity.

If you believe in the Abrahamic God and wish to obey His laws, you would know that He has forbidden idolatry in the Ten Commandments and through His Chosen People who are religiously obliged by the Noahide laws to forbid idolatry.

If you accept that God has forbidden idolatry, then you must expect Him to punish it, especially if you have been guilty of it for 2000 years. If you deny that Christianity is idolatry, you would have to prove that worshiping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the Abrahamic God is not in fact idolatry.

How is the US going to change its laws even if every member of the alt-right converted to Christianity? It is only Islam that accepts the logic that your laws should be in harmony with the principles of your chosen moral system, whatever they are. Any lawyer and social scientist should understand that laws are the algorithms of human behaviour.

No comments:

The supremacy of ethical monotheism over a sub-Noahide moral system

https://t.co/TqNh0UNU53 — Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno)  November 14, 2024 Vivek Ramaswamy, Cory Booker, Noahide laws, Tulsi Gabbard  $...