Christians are basically people who are supposed to know from the Ten Commandments that idolatry is forbidden but have been practising it for 2000 years. When they took their religion seriously, they would burn anyone at the stake for pointing this out. https://t.co/e8SCoKpDwn— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Knowing something is forbidden by the Ten Commandments yet practising it when you pray to an executed revolutionary you believe to be the co-equal of God for 2000 years is the best and biggest example of what Orwell described as doublethink. https://t.co/sUUEbITBAl— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
The idolatry of Hinduism is nothing compared to the hypocrisy of Christian idolatry, who were idolaters who would punish you for pointing out their idolatry. Because of the Crusades and Inquisition, Jews and Muslims to this day fear to point out Christian idolatry.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Having been practising idolatry for 2000 years, Christians imagined that God must have decided to retrospectively allow it. But God moves in mysterious ways and patiently waits to see if Christian idolaters will correct themselves in the light of their failing civilisation.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
God if He exists has created a logical universe, that is, a universe that can be explained through the use of truth and logic as well as problems solved through the use of truth and logic. What stops us from using logic to solve problems is the presence of sin. pic.twitter.com/vS9yZ2KkA1— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Even if you were an atheist, you would have to acknowledge, if you were being logical, that the laws of a deity supposed to be omnipotent and morally perfect would be better than anything lesser deities could come up with. Jews are conclusive evidence of divine protection.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Even if you were an atheist, you would have to acknowledge, if you were being logical, that the laws of a deity supposed to be omnipotent and morally perfect would be better than anything lesser deities could come up with. Jews are conclusive evidence of divine protection.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Since the narrative for Jews is that they have been given divine protection because they are God's Chosen People, it must be supposed that they were chosen to do some particular thing, which is to impose minimum standards of morality on gentile nations through the Noahide laws.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
It can only be supposed that gentiles who reject the Noahide laws are Judeophobes, since they are truly universal motherhood and apple pie. https://t.co/qv3LvcNH62 No gentile who rejects the Noahide laws has been able to successfully disguise his or her burning antisemitism.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
The battle for the West is really between Jews and Muslims with only one possible outcome. Christians have long ago dropped out of the picture since the West descended into deepening dementia. When it awakens, it will be as Muslim because Islam is easier than Judaism.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Why am I having such difficulty making these simple points? You would have thought many political activist would be eager to discuss the possible causes of Western and racial malaise, but these alt-right men seem incapable of even uttering the three words: RESTORE THE PATRIARCHY.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Addled by their atheism, alt-right men are incapable of responding to any call to arms. How would these men fight their eagerly awaited RAHOWA when they cannot bring themselves to discuss restoring the patriarchy, already knowing themselves to be hopelessly unmarriageable?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
In a matriarchy, all men are lower than the unmarried mother, including POTUS. All that need be done is that men actually discuss the accuracy of my diagnosis with each other and leave off complaining about Jews, Muslims and non-whites, but they cannot even do this.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Alt-right men know that calling for the restoration of the patriarchy would not infringe any hate speech laws the way expressing hatred for Jews, Muslims and non-whites would. The truth is that they do not wish to restore the patriarchy because they are in fact unmarriageable.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers who want to parent their legitimate offspring properly. Matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers indifferent to the parenting of their illegitimate offspring.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Marriage is eugenic because it compels women to choose their male sex partner who must also be their husband on his ability to be a good husband and father, and men to choose their female sex partner who must be their wife on her ability to be a good wife and mother.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Marriage is eugenic because it compels women to choose their male sex partner who must also be their husband on his ability to be a good husband and father, and men to choose their female sex partner who must be their wife on her ability to be a good wife and mother.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Bastardy is dysgenic because the production of a bastard is conclusive evidence that its parents were not married at the time of conception, meaning that the copulating pair - who should be treated as sex offenders - were heedless of the rules of marriage and eugenics.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
We should not be too surprised, however. The leading lights of the alt-right are men not known for being good husbands and fathers: an adulterer and sodomite whose followers are unmarriageable bachelors or husbands and fathers too terrified to reveal their identity.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
The alt-right are therefore men rational marriageable women would avoid as husbands. Being unmarriageable, they are low status. Being low status, they can be ignored by senior men in the political establishment because they have no use at all for low status unmarriageable men.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
The rational thing for low status men to do would be to demand status, or a rules that would give them a reasonable chance of raising their status. They do not ask for the rules to be changed, presumably because they don't expect to benefit from them even if they are changed.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
These men are addled by their atheism, probably abusive and neglected childhoods brought up their unmarried mother, suffer from risk aversion and degeneracy. Many of them are past their prime suffering from autism, OCD, narcissism, sex addiction and other mental health issues.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
The difference between unmarriageable atheists from broken homes suffering from addiction and marriageable men from whole families who believe in God with traditions to speak of are painfully obvious. If most of your countrymen are the former, your religion must have failed.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
The failure of Christianity has no plausible deniability at all. The laughable attempt to save their souls by running from Protestantism to Catholicism and from Catholicism to Orthodox Christianity illustrates the inevitability of Islam. https://t.co/oJKIa254gA— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
There is an English saying, coined probably during the time when the English were pirates, that it is better to jump before one is pushed. Are there any particular advantages to jumping off the plank when made to walk it, before one is pushed off? Let us consider them.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Whether one jumps off the plank or is pushed off it, it is death. The most obvious benefit of jumping first is dignity and a shortening of the death process. We retain more of our dignity and we show that we took a rational decision rather than be crushed by a predictable event.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
The most dignified to exist as a human is to be known for exercising reason rather than be the slave of the emotions of hate and fear. Western Man, having lost his dignity and reason, now only wishes to enjoy as many sexual encounters as he can have before he pops his clogs.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Degenerate Western Man knows that if were to talk about restoring the patriarchy he would have to talk about slut-shaming and talking about this would mean the withdrawal of sexual access to immoral women. He has in fact resigned himself to being lower than immoral women— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
There are 2 categories of Western Man unwilling to discuss slut-shaming or say they wish to restore the patriarchy:— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
1) Those who fear withdrawal of sexual access to immoral women
2) Those who dare not offend men in Category 1 above
Western Man is cowardice upon cowardice.
As I have demonstrated, a matriarchy is society that prioritises the preferences of shameless unmarried mothers indifferent to the parenting of the next generation whose men shamelessly submit to them. Of course such men are not going to ever get their country back.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Since these men know they will not have descendants to speak of because they neither expect nor care to have offspring, they can only amuse themselves by complaining about their symptoms to each other but never seek a cure, because they do not expect to benefit from it. #nihilism— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
But why wouldn't an alt-right YouTuber have me on his channel for the sake of entertaining his subscribers? Because he does want to frighten them? Because he does not trust himself to discuss them? If that is indeed the case, then Western Man clearly does not deserve to be saved.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
" ... does not want to frighten them."
Why is idolatry to be avoided, if one is an atheist? Because if God did not exist, He is still an idea and the most powerful idea conceivable It is in fact impossible to conceive of anything more powerful than the Abrahamic God who is omniscient and perfectly moral.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
Even if we denied the existence of God, we cannot deny the existence of what are said to be His laws in scripture. Therefore it would be prideful and irrational to refuse to read the Koran to consider the wisdom and justice of these laws when we are living in a failing state.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
The alt-right could be a debating forum where full and frank exchanges could take place, but its most prominent members seem more preoccupied in generating conflict for its own sake or giving what they know their subscribers want: stock antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
What is so bad about idolatry? If you practice it, you go from an advanced civilisation that seeks knowledge and is known for its legal system to a detestable ape that is a slave to its appetites and irrational emotions, as Western men now are, and wish to remain.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment