Translate

Thursday 20 June 2019

Deals I could broker between Jews, dissenters and the political classes of the West



I begin by explaining why Secular Koranism should be adopted as a legal system in a one party theocracy.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_texts

56:00  Rabbi Sacks
58:00  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_B._Soloveitchik
1:05:00  Roger Scruton
1:06:00  Ambiguity is a feminine stratagem and the resort of cowards.


1:17:00  JEN JOINS.
1:22:00  I explain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectification_of_names to Jen and say using words wrongly is like using the wrong value in algebra.
1:25:00  Jen's axioms
1:26:00  Nihilism
1:27:00  Free will
1:28:00  Politicians are heuristics of humanity, says Jen.
1:29:00  What is politics?
1:30:00  All political participants are implicitly asserting their free will.
1:33:00  The precipitation of causality
1:36:00  The perennialist
1:42:00  The defects of Jen's character
1:44:00  Jen supports determinism because she knows it bothers me.
1:46:00  The ugly truth
1:47:00  The Koran supports free will on the one hand, yet acknowledges that there are people whose minds and hearts sealed.
1:48:00  The concept of God definitely exists.
1:49:00  The attributes of God
1:49:00  The most powerful god is the Abrahamic God.
1:52:00  It would be rational to worship the most powerful God if we want to worship a deity.
1:53:00  Christianity is idolatrous.
1:54:00  Christian scripture isn't even divinely sourced while the Torah and the Koran are believed to be the Word of God.
1:55:00  A Secular Koranist Islamic State would protect the interests of the indigenous by restoring the patriarchy while treating minorities fairly.
1:56:00  quran.com/2/256 should be enshrined in Secular Koranism.
1:57:00  All attempts to solve problems are exercises of free will.
2:03:00  My definition of free will
2:06:00  Wll2PWR
2:07:00  My view on Western philosophy
2:08:00  The rules of debate
2:12:00  The person who wins is the one whose argument is at least understood or remembered.
2:14:00  Jen is unable to answer what ad homs I have used against her.
2:17:00  Is Jen practising malign encouragement? "THE TRUTH OF MY PROPOSITIONS HINGES ON THE EXISTENCE OF THE *CONCEPT* OF THE ABRAHAMIC GOD."
2:22:00  Jen's axioms
2:29:00  The purpose of morality
2:34:00  The dual purpose of religion
2:35:00  Liberalism
2:36:00  Being fair enough
2:37:00  Marriage and parenting
2:40:00  Legal brothels
2:47:00  The sacrifice of marriage
2:49:00  There are only five world religions.  5 - 4 = 1
2:50:00  The rule of law

No comments: