Why feminised Western Man is no longer capable of defending a principle

1. He lacks a moral education.
2. A moral education is being aware that one is a member of a group who subscribes to a moral system ie religion.
3. He does not even know what a principle is, let alone what it is for, nor is he capable of having a discussion on the subject. 
4. He is an atheist.
5. He is also a nihilist who subscribes to no moral principle and does not even pretend he will not break the law or break a promise if he can get away with it.
6. No moral philosopher in the West is capable of having an honest and honourable discussion about this because philosophers are a dime a dozen and no one will defend the right of any moral philosopher to say anything even if it is true, rational and moral, as long as it can be smeared as "offensive" or "hateful". 
7. Western Man is subconsciously aware that any discussion on the subjects I raise will lead to a discussion about whether Christianity is kaput and whether democracy is dementia.
8. Ordinary men do not feel powerful enough to have this discussion without risking losing their employment, income and status. 
9. Supposedly powerful men in the political establishment do not feel able to have this discussion without risk of losing status and being denounced for saying something "hateful" or "extremist". 
10. Men will do anything for sex, and I do mean anything. They will commit acts of violence and murder but they will also keep quiet and become women in order to maintain their access to sex. Men becoming women is part of beating feminists at their own game to acquire the feminine privilege they think women have.
11. Feminine privilege is basically having more offers of sex than one is prepared to accept including a woman's prerogative to change her mind. 
12. Masculinity is a state of mind prepared to defend patriarchal moral values.
13. Patriarchal moral values is about husbanding resources rationally, fairly, honourably and sustainably.