The Western world is convulsed by toxic gender relations that its religious leaders are too afraid to discuss because they fear being accused of something or other.
Don't let feminists divide your society by destroying your civilisation through destroying marriages and families. The matriarchy is a danger to itself. After it has destroyed the patriarchy (which it has equated with domestic violence), it will proceed to destroy itself through the chaos and criminality of degeneracy.
As the hero Arjuna tells the God Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita:
‘In overwhelming chaos, Krishna
Women of the family are corrupted,
And when women are corrupted,
Disorder is born in society’
Men of other races, religions and nations will know that men who submit to the censorship of feminism will be unable to defend a principle, let alone their country. Men who submit to feminists are men who submit to immoral and irresponsible women who bribe men with extramarital sex to keep them quiescent in their matriarchy, desperate for sexual access to women if they are unattached, or afraid of losing sexual access if they are attached.
Men and women who want to become and remain married parents to properly rear the next generation must say no to feminism now.
4 comments:
This is wholly inaccurate. Feminism does not correlate with “destroying marriages and families”, it is about acknowledging the value to be found in creating equality between genders.
It in no way is responsible for “chaos and criminality of degeneracy”, and it is incredibly insulting and particularly disillusioned to suggest that feminism has anything to do with “immoral and irresponsible” behaviour, “bribery”, or “desperation for sexual access to women”.
What it allows is for people to gain much more value from each other in relationships.
It allows women access to opportunities for personal development and career progression that have only ever been accessible to men.
And the overwhelming response to this has been positive - it is well established now that having a mix of female leaders has helped businesses and organisations to grow and develop faster and more sustainably than those who refuse senior positions for women.
Creating opportunities and providing access to education for women specifically is also strongly correlated with the reduction of poverty across the world, and is a significant factor in determining a child’s success in life.
I recommend you truly research what feminism stands for and what there is to gain from it. These traditional, conservative beliefs that you and many others hold are unfounded and are the result of fear of change.
Patriarchal leaders in societies teach their people to be fearful of this change only because it would mean a reduction in their own power, which is a selfish stance to take at the expense of thousands or millions of others.
Everything about feminism undermines marriage, does it not?
Why are you claiming I have not researched feminism? The West is now a matriarchy and operates on the principles of intersectional feminism, which is an inversion of the social hierarchy of patriarchy. While patriarchy would prioritise the preferences of married parents who want to properly parent their legitimate offspring, matriarchy prioritises the preferences of unmarried parents who casually conceived and parented their illegitimate offspring leading to ever lowering educational standards and ever rising levels of crime.
What I am claiming is that you have misunderstood the aims of feminism completely. You seem to have interpreted them in a very disillusioned way, and pretty much everything you have stated in this post is simply not true.
For a start, feminism is still relevant because there is still an inequality between genders even in the West. The West is not a matriarchy at all, it is still predominantly governed by male leaders and although we are taking steps to change this, and we have certainly made strong progress here, there is still a long way to go before equality truly exists.
And in any case, “matriarchy” is not the goal of feminism. The very idea of “male-led” or “female-led” society is backwards and old-fashioned. The goal is to have an equal mix of all genders.
And I am disappointed that you would use extremely derogatory terms such as “illegitimate” to describe children born outside of marriage. Children are children, and their being born at all should not be judged. Luckily, I live in a society where children born to single parents are now given opportunities to flourish as much as those from married parents. It is proof that conservative ideas about marriage are unfounded.
And to even suggest that children born outside of marriage has an influence on “educational standards and levels of crime” is crass and deeply flawed. This is a perception held by people who have no knowledge of it at all, and it is in fact almost the opposite case.
As I mentioned in my previous post, creating support and equal opportunities for women has helped reduced poverty levels to their lowest ever, which in turn has created much higher levels of educated people and educational standards.
Crime is simply not correlated with these elements, so is not even worth discussing here.
Can you prove that convicted criminals are not mostly brought up by their unmarried mothers?
The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents. The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents. The West is a matriarchy all right. A matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried parents who casually conceived and parented their illegitimate offspring over-represented in the crime statistics. You need to do more than simply say "correlation is not causation" and then disengage. Anyone who continues to regard extramarital sex as their human right is a feminist even if they are men's rights activists complaining about feminism. Feminism bribes men with extramarital sex to distract them from marriage and married parenting making them less likely to marry because men are primarily motivated by sex. This makes women more likely to become unmarried mothers and for society to condone widespread illegitimacy. Married parents are now the minority in British society, therefore Britain is now a matriarchy, because the majority of parents in Britain are unmarried parents. There is a pair of unmarried parents in Downing Street.
Post a Comment