Translate

Friday, 3 September 2021

On being deplatformed from the Amy Newman channel (at the behest of her Christian guests?)


James W — 3 September 2021 at 5:56 AM

So we've been discussing it among ourselves, the subscribers, patrons, mods. While you have always been polite to us, it's our viewers and those who support the show financially who make it all possible. 

The sordid articles and photos circulating the internet are just too big of an elephant in the room, Godwin's Law fully applies and virtual every stream will get pulled in that direction. Nobody is really listening to your ideas, they just wait for you to stop talking so they can berate you for being a terrible person. That's just not the kind of show we want or content we want to put out.

The fact you are open about who you are and all that information is available, it's an albatross around the show. We just can't risk alienating a descent amount of our supporters to continue to platform you. You've made your case to them, they heard what you said and they'd rather not hear anymore. At this time we just won't be able to have you on the platform.

6:00  The morally and intellectually corrupt, will deny or ignore Truth, Logic and Morality. 

8:00  Jen's definition of morality

10:00  The logos of reason

11:00  No bribes or threats from me.

Ed Dutton on Citizen Reporter

12:00  Corruption is denying or ignoring truth. 

Mark Collett and Millennial Woes

13:00  The West is contained in a sandwich of corruption from top and bottom.

14:00  I win all the arguments.

16:00  Antisemitic arguments are easily defeated by me.  

20:00  I will not submit to Godwin's law.

22:00  Antisemitism

23:00  Christian guests of the Amy Newman channel

27:00  John Calvin
Will Stewart and Pat Lowinger are her Christian guests who cannot explain how and why Christianity is not idolatry and blasphemy.

I propose theocracy on the Amy Newman channel.

Discussing Leviticus on the Amy Newman channel

Explaining the Torah on the Amy Newman channel

38:00  Failure of Christianity that allowed feminism to triumph.

Learning the lesson properly by adopting Secular Koranism

39:00  Not enough to merely repeal feminist legislation. 

40:00  Invoking a higher authority/supreme authority/hypothetical supreme authority

43:00  Properly acknowledging the mistake

44:00  "Regresssive traditionalist"

45:00  No one can define traditionalism.

47:00  Patriarchy, antifeminist backlash, gender justice

48:00  No justice, no peace.

49:00  Idolatry and a permanent solution

50:00  The Koran affirms the existence of tribes and nations.

51:00  Different states would interpret Secular Koranism in their own individual way if this were allowed. 

54:00  I am indeed building a new orthodoxy.  

ROB
I think many say the same about you. 10yrs? Claire 10yrs. Do you have children. A husband. what fruit do you have for your work. And just because I don't believe in your SQ doesn't mean you can't keep trying. Isn't it your job to convince us?

CK 
I can only convince people who submit to TLM.

A piece of fruit is salvageable if only a part of it is rotten.

If nearly most of it is rotten, you have to throw the whole thing away.

You just want to waste my time coming up with your nonsense arguments that you don't even understand yourself.

The fact is that there are six sharia theocracies in the world and they have no problem with finding their Koran.

You are clutching at straws wanting the Koran to be not fit for purpose when it obviously is.
Why would you want it not to work anyway?

Because you are an Islamophobe, which is so obvious. It would be understandable if what you have is obviously better, but it is not. It is in fact rotten to the core, but still you want the only thing that could be the cure to your disease to fail.

That is why I know you are not quite right in your mind. Just because you manage to say something in response to my points does not mean it was a sound argument or even logical.

Lunatics wandering in mental asylums mumble to themselves and they don't make sense either.
The fact that you want the Koran to be unfit for purpose of being the basis of the new moral system of the West when you know Christianity has failed is ipso facto evidence of your irrationality.

You are basically saying you would rather go to hell Christian than get to heaven Muslim.

ROB
I see a lot of projection here. The quran is unnaceotable because it places women as second class human who will mostly end up in hell. Jesus is all about equal oppertunity. I do not have any irrational fear of Islam. Just like i don't have a irrational fear of a hungry Lion. It is a perfectly rational fear. I choose to avoid the animal or if there is no choice put it down. I pray you don't end up lost and mad in a institution mumbling about how you could of saved the west if only they had listned.

CK
What is the nature of my alleged projection?

The Koran would be unacceptable to any Islamophobe who refuses to give up his Islamophobia.

Why do you think so many white working class women converted to Islam first? Because they wanted to be married mothers.

On what basis do you claim Muslim women will end up in hell?

Do you think Muslim women think they will end up in hell?

What makes you think Muslim women are more likely to end up in hell than Christian women if God exists?

How is Jesus about equal opportunity?

Equating Islam with a hungry lion about to consume you is clearly irrational.

Supposing that you can deal with Islam as you would deal with a hungry lion is to make one of the greatest category errors I have ever come across. This means you would exterminate Muslims which is more evidence of your irrational hatred and fear with violent intentions.

I don't expect my arguments which are based on undisputed fact and sound logic constrained by the Seven Noahide laws to be accepted by Westerners who have spent their entire lives rejecting Truth, Logic and Morality fueled by the antisemitism that makes them reject the Noahide laws and by the Islamophobia which makes them reject Islam when you know you have nothing better. The entire narrative of the New Testament was intended to incite antisemitism. You should stop pretending that you believe in the Abrahamic God though, for your own sake. If you did believe in the Abrahamic God, you must assume that you will be punished for your idolatry and blasphemy for worshiping an executed revolutionary crucified for blasphemy.

1:09:00  Trump Derangement Syndrome

1:10:00  What is sacred to Rob

1:11:00  Marriage is the most expensive of form of sex. Patriarchy was obviously a burden to men. 

1:12:00  Making marriage a good bargain for men again

1:13:00  Will Elon Musk be campaigning to abolish no fault divorce?

1:15:00  Infantilised men

1:17:00  Secular Koranism

1:20:00  Beta males behaving like immoral and irrational women too risk-averse to act

No comments:

Theology with Rake and Carol

https://t.co/I3mCTZKHM2 — Rake’s revenge (@Eagle_force_555) November 27, 2024 Gen X 1:00  English and European tradition 2:00  CLAIRE KHAW j...