Translate

Monday, 22 August 2022

The ambiguous pronouns of Jen Scharf explained by Doooovid from 2:38:00 to 5:44:00


2:38:00  Use of English words
2:40:00  Anti-intellectual
2:42:00  Anti-intellectual and dishonest
2:43:00  Etymology of awareness and consciousness
2:45:00  Consciousness and science of philology
2:46:00  Due diligence
2:52:00  Lack of scholarship
3:04:00  Writing 101 and elementary English
3:05:00  Very hard to write, says Jen. Harder to read, says Doooovid. 
3:05:00  Impossible to read
3:06:00  Jen admits to lacking in self-awareness.
3:07:00  Paragraphing explained to Jen.
3:08:00  Reading Jen's prose is like reading a dictionary. 
3:09:00  Jen says "ununderstandable".
3:12:00  Abstract concepts
3:18:00  Jen has not made a coherent argument.
3:20:00  Jen is not aware of the standard essay form but managed to graduate with honours from the University of Ottawa. 
Jen says writing is very hard for her. That is because she does not like to read. Her favourite book is Transpotting by Irving Welsh. 
3:33:00  "That which is excluded" lacks an antecedent.
3:34:00  It is not proper English.
3:35:00  Jen doesn't know basic grammar and doesn't know what an antecedent is. 
3:36:00  Jen should just have said "The sustainer is excluded" but it was too short for her and she wanted to sound clever.  
3:39:00  What is that?
3:42:00  Unintelligible
3:43:00  Pronouns
3:43:00  Elementary school writing
3:46:00  Jen is not sure what a pronoun is.  
3:47:00  Basic grammar
3:48:00  Doooovid tells Jen not to use pronouns. 
3:49:00  The sustainer
3:50:00  Jen violates a sacred grammatic rule.
Jen is just copying phrases from someone else in a teaching video.
3:52:00  That pronoun! 
3:53:00  Unsignified pronoun
That is not anything! 
3:54:00  Jen is copying from Buddhism which she previously scorned.
3:55:00  Grammatically incorrect
3:56:00  Unsignified pronouns
3:57:00  Basic English grammar
3:59:00  Stop using pronouns! 
4:00:00  What is excluded?
4:01:00  Jen avoids Dooovid's question "What is a pronoun?"
4:02:00  Jen does not realise "that" is a pronoun. 
4:03:00 Jen makes no sense. 
4:04:00  Jen is unintelligible because of her unsignified pronouns.
Is Jen trying to write poetry?
4:09:00  Unintelligible
4:10:00  Elementary school pronouns
4:11:00  Dangling pronoun
4:14:00  Way off in the weeds
4:15:00  Purposefully confusing
4:16:00  The sustainer is excluded. 
That was all Jen meant but she wanted to sound clever and confusing. 
4:17:00  Unreferenced pronoun
4:18:00  Jen not using standard grammar or standard format.
4:19:00  What's Jen's thesis or argument?
"From quantum state exclusion you can build a panpsychic model."
4:20:00  Introduction roadmap
4:22:00  Jen must not use pronouns.
4:23:00  Pronouns are a shorthand for referring to nouns.  
4:32:00  It
4:33:00  Jen gets really upset and accuses Dooovid of cultural bias.
4:35:00  Decomposition
4:37:00  Jen appeals for support in the chat.
4:38:00  It is literally incomprehensible. 
4:39:00  A few of Jen's statements are nonsensical.  
4:42:00  Jen asks if ambiguous pronouns are a bad thing! 
4:43:00  Jen admits to being an obscurantist while claiming she is being clear! 
4:46:00  Why is Jen arguing?
4:48:00  Ambiguous pronouns
4:50:00  That is a pronoun.
4:54:00  Jen is not easy to understand. 
4:55:00  Poor writing
4:56:00  Jen descends into self-pity.
4:58:00  Jen suffers from a comon problem. 
5:00:00  Spellcheck won't help Jen with her ambiguous pronouns. 
5:09:00  Writing coach and identity coach for Jen
5:13:00  Jen wants people to accept her authority. 
5:14:00  Jen writes badly because she does not have a narrative voice. She does not have a narrative voice because everything she does is without utility to anyone else other than to feed her narcissism.  
5:27:00  Creating a narrative voice
5:35:00  Poor writing, poor structure, poor format
What is the point of what Jen is saying?
5:36:00  To give her the attention she craves even when she has nothing useful to say
5:37:00  The requirement to write in good English
5:38:00  Jen's poor writing
5:39:00  Jen cannot even tell her ghost writer what the hell she is on about.
5:40:00  Jen acknowledges that her writing will not add to anyone's knowledge! 
5:41:00  Lack of fundamentals in writing
5:42:00  Poor writing

More examples of her incoherent thoughts of dubious utility badly expressed in ungrammatical English can be found at https://churchofentropy.wordpress.com/

No comments:

Can theocracy regulate technocracy?

Space https://t.co/DtnwWGGSC5 — Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) November 26, 2024 1:00  KNIGHT joins. 2:00  Salafists 3:00  Hadi...