 |
In theory, a constitutional amendment could be passed to make the Commandments of Allah the supreme law of the USA abolishing all political parties other than the National Party of America to be run on the same lines as the Communist Party of China.
The great thing about that system is that if Xi Jinping were to fall under a bus, a new leader would be promptly presented by the Politburo Standing Committee of the CCP. I imagine they would be chosen under the Papal Conclave rules with each member forbidden to vote for himself and obliged to choose the best person other than himself.
I would advise the incorporation of the farewell speech of George Washington into the US constitution because virtually all the advice given by the venerable American sage has in fact been ignored.
As for Britain doing the same, the British monarchy makes it a very messy exercise since British monarchs are only allowed one religion: Anglicanism.
The Church of England could be disestablished reducing Anglicans to the status of Coptic Christians in Egypt.
Charles III has been known to speak warmly about Islam and he could accelerate the transition of Britain from a constitutional monarchy to an Islamic Republic if he were to cause a constitutional crisis by converting to Islam, but this would mean the throne passing to William weakening the sense of continuity through giving the impression that British monarchs came and went like patients in a doctor's waiting room.
The tidiest way for Britain to transition from being a nominally Christian kingdom to becoming an Islamic Republic would be to first become a republic like America.
The scenario is that the Archbishop of Canterbury would be asked to defend the Trinity. When he fails to do so, the parcel, so to speak, would be passed to the Head of the Church of England, which is the British monarch. When the British monarch also fails to defend it, abdication would seem a natural response.
William would doubtless fail in this exercise in his turn, fatally weakening the monarchy and making the establishment of an Islamic Republic under a one-party state a natural response to the political and social problems that have beset this country.
You may be surprised to learn that this is not the first time the idea has come up in British history.
Establishing an Islamic Republic as soon as possible in the West would have to begin with the American Republic whose foundations I would argue are Islamic, in particular the First Amendment based on https://quran.com/2/256
This is because we already know neither Jews under the Torah nor the subjects of absolute Christian monarchs enjoyed any religious freedom at all.
The principle of cuius regio, euius religio must have been a universal practice to all kingdoms, but was enforced with more rigour and cruelty than ever before in the newly Christian kingdoms of the barbarian kings of Europe, doubtless encouraged by the Catholic Church.
When the Americans talk about cruel and unusual punishments, they must have been referring to the practice of heretic burning in the Old World.
I imagine the only reason why any absolute monarch would agree to being a constitutional monarch is because the alternative would have been regicide. After the regicides of Charles I, Louis XVI and Nicholas II, European monarchs must have known they had no choice but to accept their role as the figureheads and puppets of the legislature that is Parliament.
While the American social conservatives of all races and religions campaign in support of a constitutional amendment to make the Commandments of Allah the supreme law of the United States of America, British republicans could be inviting the Archbishop of Canterbury to explain how and why Christianity is not idolatry and blasphemy and how why Jesus is God in writing. This response would be challenged by myself as well as Orthodox rabbis and Islamic scholars.
Since we already know that the Trinity is morally and intellectually indefensible, it is an open goal.
When it is seen that the Archbishop of Canterbury is not up to the job of defending the morally and intellectually indefensible Trinity under sustained questioning by Orthodox rabbis, Islamic scholars and myself, he will predictably resign as Archbishop of Canterbury leaving it to Charles III to defend it.
When Charles in turn fails to do so, it is possible he will just convert to Islam as a show of penitence for 14 centuries of idolatry and blasphemy. It is said that 597 was the year Christianity came to England with St Augustine.
The moment Charles becomes Muslim, he will be forced to abdicate, since only Anglicans can inherit the throne.
When William V in his turn fails to explain how the Trinity is not idolatry and blasphemy and how Jesus is God, the throne will pass to his children
Prince George of Wales (b. 2013)
Princess Charlotte of Wales (b. 2015)
Prince Louis of Wales (b. 2018)
who cannot be expected to defend it whereupon the parcel will be passed to his brother Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex (b. 1984)
then to his brother's children
Archie Mountbatten-Windsor (b. 2019)
Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor (b. 2021)
If and when they get to his uncle, the disgraced Prince Andrew, Duke of York, the monarchists will finally give up, if they have not done so before.
Under this scenario, the line to the royal succession will seem like an undignified queue at a public convenience and in this way end, making way for more rational and better government under an Islamic Republic.
The former British dominions of Australia, Canada and New Zealand will seize their chance to declare independence losing America its use of Australia as its naval and military bases making it impossible for it to maintain its global marine empire.
In this way would the American Empire be ended peacefully and, hopefully, WW3 averted.
China will continue to peacefully trade with its trading partners in the Far East and perhaps even incline towards Islam since they are already a republic, having given up their monarchy last century, in this way being more advanced in their political development than the West.
Russia and India would soon follow making international relations globally more harmoniously Islamic than previously.
This would be the best case scenario of the Great Islamic Reset.
No comments:
Post a Comment