·
Well, good news and bad news dear Claire.
I have a very senior journalist friend from one of the UK's major broadsheets interested in an interview with you regarding your secular koranic stuff.
While she is fully aware I think it's all a total croc of disingenuous sh*t, she is rightly, as any open-minded journalist without their own knowledge on the subject, reserving any conclusion until after the fact.
However, there are a few things she wants clarifying before agreeing to an interview and revealing herself to you. She has said she is not prepared to waste time researching if she can't clarify even the basics. Although she will be "happy" to research if she can't get answers and feels it does indeed need investigating! So you have in effect created your own dilemma here!
These are:
1. When was your secular koranism founded, by whom and who are the principal officers
2. Where is your base (she has seen that you have no website which she says she finds very strange)
3. As a claimed "legal system" have you lodged paperwork or claims anywhere, and can she have a copy of your "constitution and claims" - that is, the documentation you would use as a basis for your koranism.
4. Most importantly, secular koranism, as a claimed "legal" system, and she having worked for the same newspaper for 23 years, she would like you to prove your claim that the media is run by the CIA.
5. She would also like proof of your claim that the Koran is Zionist (she is not Jewish by the way), given that the world as a whole understands that:
"Zionism is a nationalist movement, dating back to the mid to late 1800's that espouses the establishment of, and support for, a homeland for the Jewish people centred in the area roughly corresponding to what is known in Jewish tradition as the Land of Israel" which is about as far from the Muslim holy book as you can get.
She also has concerns (as I pointed out and showed her) that you continually use Jewish references in some 60% of your reposts that could be interpreted as negative and pointedly antisemitic. She is very worried that this is your intention. She also wants to know why you publicise "radicalisedrabbi" (which she agrees gives credence to my claim of your subliminal antisemitism) whereas, if it's about secular koranism, it should be, as I suggested, "radicalisedimam".
She is very curious as to your continual Jewish references for something that's meant to be Islamic-related and secular.
I will add that she finds points 4 and 5 above in particular of concern to her.
If you can supply this, you are on your way to an interview.
Do bear in mind that if you can't, she may take a different path (one that incudes the famous "XXX declined to comment" which of course is the most negative PR you could wish for, and we all know that liars, thieves and criminals all say "no comment" when all know they are guilty).
I can only advise that it is not best practice to get the back up of an award-winning and very highly-respected investigative journalist. She has also taken note of my observance that 90% of the time you reply to people by asking a question, and has stated that if she does agree to an interview, if you start asking questions in response to her original questions (as I showed her from your timeline), she will terminate the interview without hesitation.
Although I'm not a regular user of Facebook Messenger, you can send me a Word (or other) document with your response therein which I will pass on.
Claire Khaw
'1. When was your secular koranism founded, by whom and who are the principal officers'
Secular Koranism is not an organisation but an IDEA. I first blogged about it in November 2009 on my blog of Voice of Reason whose link Facebook rejects.
'2. Where is your base (she has seen that you have no website which she says she finds very strange)'
I have LinkTree which Facebook also rejects but you can find it if you search "Secular Koranism".
'3. As a claimed "legal system" have you lodged paperwork or claims anywhere, and can she have a copy of your "constitution and claims" - that is, the documentation you would use as a basis for your koranism.'
To understand Secular Koranism properly, you would have to read the Koran identifying the verses that are Commandments of Allah capable of being made into legislation.
"4. Most importantly, secular koranism, as a claimed "legal" system, and she having worked for the same newspaper for 23 years, she would like you to prove your claim that the media is run by the CIA."
Of course I cannot prove it!
"5. She would also like proof of your claim that the Koran is Zionist (she is not Jewish by the way), given that the world as a whole understands that"
quran.com/17/104 acknowledges a Jewish homeland, does it not?
'She also has concerns (as I pointed out and showed her) that you continually use Jewish references in some 60% of your reposts that could be interpreted as negative and pointedly antisemitic. She is very worried that this is your intention. She also wants to know why you publicise "radicalisedrabbi" (which she agrees gives credence to my claim of your subliminal antisemitism) whereas, if it's about secular koranism, it should be, as I suggested, "radicalisedimam". '
I am saying rabbis should be more radical in discouraging idolatry by explaining the nature and purpose of the Noahide laws forbidding idolatry and blasphemy.
I say they should be ranking the four gentile religions according to their conformity with the Noahide laws to make their point, but they refuse, presumably because they are still terrified of offending their Christian overlords.
"She is very curious as to your continual Jewish references for something that's meant to be Islamic-related and secular."
I am saying that the Torah and Koran support each other and demonstrate
a) lower status Christian scripture which is only the word of mortal and fallible men testifying that they met Jesus compared to the Word of God in the Torah and Koran
b) the idolatry of Christianity
I am saying Jews and Muslims should be supporting each other in pointing out the idolatry of Christianity but are still too afraid of their Christian overlords to do so.
Secular Koranism is intended to unite social conservatives of all races and religions in the West as well as all the nations of the world while protecting the freedom of belief of individuals - a human right granted by the Koran to all of humanity.
I call my proposed moral and legal political system Secular Koranism because I respect the secular nature of Western governments and want to make the point that Secular Koranism intends to respect and protect freedom of belief and is a supporter of the First Amendment based on quran.com/2/256
"I can only advise that it is not best practice to get the back up of an award-winning and very highly-respected investigative journalist. She has also taken note of my observance that 90% of the time you reply to people by asking a question, and has stated that if she does agree to an interview, if you start asking questions in response to her original questions (as I showed her from your timeline), she will terminate the interview without hesitation."
I pride myself in my questions that are more informative than most people's answers.
My thesis is threefold: theological, philosophical and political.
No comments:
Post a Comment