The pathetic reasons given by a Muslim for rejecting Secular Koranism

How about this for a proposal, Claire.

Let us take the rest of the week - all the way until Saturday night - and see if you can keep from mentioning me or tagging me in a single post.

Let us see if you can go a full week without doing so.

— nobody (@Hvsmrspct) September 18, 2023

I will keep asking you questions you refuse to answer to expose your hypocrisy.

1. How is globohomo better than Secular Koranism?
2. How is Secular Koranism worse than globohomo?
3. How is the methodology of Secular Koranism inferior to the interpretation of Islamic scholars?

— Secular Koranist (@Book_of_Rules) September 18, 2023

Great.

Remember, each question needs two tweets - so that is a total of six -

Here we go:

1.) 1. How is globohomo better than Secular Koranism?
As I see it, within the thought system you call “globohomo” - there remains an ability to stand up for one’s rights.

1/6

— nobody (@Hvsmrspct) September 19, 2023

2/6

Under SK, you view all “rights” as actually being nothing more than state sanctioned privileges that can be revoked.
Leaving any opposition subject to state sanctioned oppression.

— nobody (@Hvsmrspct) September 19, 2023

3/6

2. How is Secular Koranism worse than globohomo?
As if the last answer didn’t suffice,

SK would be an actual political system by which its tyranny would be forced upon the people.
Globohomo is a movement, an idea -

— nobody (@Hvsmrspct) September 19, 2023

4/6

perhaps we can even say a philosophy - that can be accepted or rejected by any given society.

As such, mankind can take a stand against globohomo w/out the need for bloodshed.
To break free from a 1 party theocracy based the draconian laws you propose would demand bloodshed

— nobody (@Hvsmrspct) September 19, 2023

5/6

3. How is the methodology of Secular Koranism inferior to the interpretation of Islamic scholars?
The interpretation of the Qur’an by Islamic scholars has an entire science behind it. The methodology is codified & seeks preserve the True & clear message of its entirety.

— nobody (@Hvsmrspct) September 19, 2023

6/6

The methodology of SK is inferior as it only seeks to interpret select verses &, rather than interpret them according to any scientific methodology taking into account the entirety of the text, the only aim is to impose laws according to a preconceived political philosophy.

— nobody (@Hvsmrspct) September 19, 2023

You refuse to challenge representative democracy because you want to be seen as a still a democrat and reject the advice of George Washington even as you know general elections have meant the salami slicing away of sense sacrificed to silliness. You are comfortable with that?

— Secular Koranist (@Book_of_Rules) September 19, 2023

Your answer to question 2 appears to be “A one party state Is by definition a tyranny, while globohomo is the representative democracy we love so well whose elections are stolen.”

— Secular Koranist (@Book_of_Rules) September 19, 2023

My attempt to paraphrase your answer to the first question produces “Representative democracy is superior to a one party theocracy.”

— Secular Koranist (@Book_of_Rules) September 19, 2023

What makes you think ending globohomo can be done without bloodshed? At the most you are only making a prediction for which you have no basis.

— Secular Koranist (@Book_of_Rules) September 19, 2023

Can you give an example of the interpretation of Secular Koranism being inferior to the Maliki interpretation?

— Secular Koranist (@Book_of_Rules) September 19, 2023