— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) April 23, 2025
1:00 ZIA and I agree about the Muslim space we were just in.
2:00 Men should not be obliged to pay for their illegitimate offspring.
3:00 The father has custody of his legitimate offspring after divorce if they are 7 or over.
5:00 Prostitution
https://secularkoranism.blogspot.com/2025/03/secular-koranism-pamphlet-on.html
6:00 No loan agreement
8:00 The marriage license
https://secularkoranism.blogspot.com/2025/03/secular-koranism-pamphlet-on-marriage.html
9:00 Sichuan Province
10:00 Average age of Japan
11:00 Christianity
Dugin is still an Orthodox Christian.
14:00 Hypocrites go to hell, according to the Koran.
16:00 Rules are made to broken.
Christians are the worst hypocrites.
18:00 The Jefferson Koran
https://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2021/10/thomas-jeffersons-quran-at-the-world-expo-in-dubai/
19:00 Secular Koranism
21:00 Invitation
22:00 Parents will frighten their children with Allah.
25:00 https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2023/02/a-three-stage-legislative-programme-to.html
26:00 Rules of interpretation
27:00 Prayer
28:00 Usury - increase, compound
30:00 Jews
The primary rules of statutory interpretation include the literal rule, the golden rule, the mischief rule, and the purposive approach. These rules guide courts in determining the meaning of legal provisions, especially when the language is unclear or ambiguous.
Here's a more detailed look at each rule:
Literal Rule:
This rule requires courts to interpret words in a statute according to their plain and ordinary meaning. The court must give the words their natural and grammatical meaning, without considering any other factors.
Golden Rule:
The golden rule allows courts to modify the literal meaning of a word to avoid absurd or unreasonable results. It recognizes that sometimes a literal interpretation can lead to outcomes that were not intended by Parliament.
Mischief Rule:
This rule, also known as the purposive approach, focuses on the purpose and intent of the legislation. Courts consider the "mischief" the statute was designed to remedy and interpret it accordingly.
Purposive Approach:
The purposive approach is similar to the mischief rule, but it emphasizes a broader interpretation of the statute's purpose. Courts consider the overall objective of the legislation and interpret it in a way that best achieves that purpose.
Other important rules and concepts:
Ejusdem Generis (of the same kind):
When a list of specific items is followed by general words, the general words are limited to items of the same kind as those specifically mentioned.
Context:
Courts often consider the broader context of the legislation, including other provisions and the legislative history, when interpreting a statute.
Presumption:
Courts often assume that Parliament intended to act with common sense and not to create absurd results.
In essence, these rules and principles guide courts in understanding and applying the law, ensuring that statutes are interpreted in a way that is consistent with their intended purpose and avoids illogical or unintended consequences.
34:00 Service
36:00 Awful/awesome
37:00 DR URBAN GENIUS
No comments:
Post a Comment