1) Is X the case? 2) Can X be done? 3) Should X be done? This is how debates should be organised

4:00  Israeli War Bonds

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/opposition-stage-protest-in-dail-over-sale-of-israeli-war-bonds/a1998744634.html

7:00  Ukraine v Russia

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-russia-war-live-peace-talks-pows-drone-strikes-latest-b2762412.html

9:00  Viktor Orban

12:00  Will migrant men be joining the Armed Forces and the police force?

14:00  White people lack a leader.

15:00  "Effort post"

16:00  Did ordinary Britons want either WW1 or WW2?

18:00  The official narrative is the national narrative.

19:00  WW3

21:00  Abdication and regicide

The end of Western civilisation as we know it would be the end of liberal democracy.

28:00  Noahide laws indicate sharia.

30:00  A hierarchy of debaters

Jews and Antisemites

Muslims and Islamophobes

Feminists and Slut-shamers

Democrats and Theocrats

32:00  Organising debates on three catogories ie 

1)  Is X the case?

2)  Can X be done?

3)  Should X be done?

34:00  Echo chambers/comfort zones v boxing ring

35:00  Andrew Wilson and Nick Fuentes