2:00 Foreign policy
3:00 America is a nation of Christian cults.
5:00 Amish, Mennonites, Quakers, Shakers and Jehovah's Witnesses
7:00 The First Amendment
E Michael Jones's Holocaust Narrative
8:00 Legality of Holocaust Denial
Did Westerners fight a World War only to discover that they are not allowed to talk about it afterwards??
11:00 Israelis cannot deny their own Holocaust.
12:00 Judicial notice of the Holocaust
15:00 Affidavits can give false testimony.
16:00 What evidence would satisfy the IHR?
17:00 E Michael Jones: "Truth is the opinion of the powerful."
19:00 Taking judicial notice of the Holocaust means legal actions will fail if they question or deny the Holocaust eg IHR against Mermelstein.
22:00 Avigdor Miller
23:00 Rabbi Mizrachi
27:00 Laws forbidding Holocaust Denial incite even more antisemitism. The powers that be want to incite antisemitism in order to continue their policy of divide and rule.
28:00 Westerners must be allowed to discuss US foreign policy before another World War breaks out, particularly Americans who still have their First Amendment rights.
29:00 Jews need the cooperation and support of gentile empires if they want to live in Israel.
Christianity has not protected Europeans from each other if you consider the European Wars of Religion, the Napoleonic Wars, the Wars of National Unification, WW1 and WW2 as well as the decline and fall of Rome, nor will it protect Americans from each other. Therefore America should adopt sharia before another World War or another American Civil War breaks out.
30:00 Christian Nationalism is a mortal threat to the First Amendment.
32:00 Americans don't notice when their First Amendment rights are being infringed, or pretend not to.
The First Amendment rights of American husbands and fathers are being infringed right, left and centre and they are so terrified they dare not even complain!
AI Overview:
Threats of divorce over voting for Donald Trump are a reported, recurring phenomenon in the United States, particularly noted during the 2016, 2020, and 2024 election cycles. The decision is often driven by a partner feeling that the vote represents a betrayal of personal values, safety, or the rights of women and children.Here is an overview of this trend, based on reported cases and social media:The "Last Straw": In many documented cases, the threat of divorce is not about a single policy disagreement but represents the climax of existing marital tension, with one partner viewing the vote as a violation of fundamental moral beliefs."You Are Who You Vote For": Some partners argue that voting for Trump is a deal-breaker because they identify the vote with negative characteristics they believe he possesses.Betrayal and Fear: Many women in these situations report feeling that their husbands are voting against their own best interests, bodily autonomy, or the future of their children.Documented Incidents:In 2016, a woman threatened to divorce her husband and move to Canada if he voted for Trump.A 73-year-old woman separated from her husband of 22 years after he planned to vote for Trump, describing it as a "betrayal".In 2024, reports surfaced of women filing for divorce after discovering their husbands voted for Trump, citing a lack of remorse and feeling like they were married to a "stranger".Political Divorce Trend: Divorce lawyers have observed a rise in inquiries and filings following major elections, particularly when polarization is high.Contextual FactorsWhile some couples separate, others attempt to navigate these differences by:Setting boundaries, such as making politics "off-limits" in conversation.Focusing on non-political shared values and activities.Seeking counseling to address the underlying relationship issues that the political argument has brought to the surface.The intense polarization has caused some to reassess their relationships, with some concluding that such a fundamental disagreement is irreconcilable.
https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2026/01/whats-for-dinner.html is further evidence of an American husband and father terrified of discussing politics in case his wife divorces him.
This is why Chad and Olson who can only talk about themselves as gasbagging bores and windbags have such a visceral hatred of me. Olson is now trying to accuse me of Holocaust Denial. Chris is their therapist and Chris talking politics with me enrages them because it is cutting into their therapy time with Chris.
34:00 George Orwell's 1984 was better than Catholic totalitarianism.
35:00 Henry II
36:00 Venial and mortal sins
39:00 Zionism
40:00 It is important for Westerners to discuss Western foreign policy and Western imperialism.
42:00 Republican revolutions
44:00 The Sanctity of the Holocaust Narrative
45:00 Affirmative Action infringes the First Amendment.
46:00 Christian Nationalism and its bait of antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism
49:00 The historical narrative keeps changing.
50:00 WW2 was the founding of the global hegemon that is the American Empire.
No comments:
Post a Comment