Translate

Showing posts with label Adam Walker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adam Walker. Show all posts

Tuesday, 18 August 2020

Men who refuse to marry women of their own race are punished with immigrants



When your feminist matriarchy has normalised fornication, there is no urgency for men to marry women of their own race.

When you have no fault divorce, it is not safe for men to marry.

When you refuse to marry the women of your own race because you can get sex before marriage, men and women stay single and women with thwarted maternal instincts treat foreign men and foreign children as their babies, or they become man-hating cat ladies who vote for pro-immigration parties to spite their men for not marrying them. Or they are unmarried mothers left to rely on the welfare state which needs to be funded by the taxes immigrant workers pay the state.

When did you last hear any anti-immigration party talk about restoring the patriarchy or protecting the institution of marriage?

In fact, they point black refuse to talk about it because they are all morally compromised: Anne Marie Waters of For Britain is a lesbian spinster and Mark Collett of the Patriotic Alternative is an unmarried father.

In addition to the punishment of immigrants, white men who refuse to marry women of their own race are also punished by their women converting to Islam so they can marry Muslim men in order to have legitimate children and husbands.
https://standpointmag.co.uk/features-may-10-why-do-western-women-convert-julie-bindel-islam-female-conversion/
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 7 April 2016

Nick Griffin and the problem with the BNP












at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 3 October 2014

How Adam Walker became BNP Chairman





at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Wednesday, 1 October 2014

By expelling Nick Griffin, the BNP have committed regicide

27 September 13:47
Adam Walker must be getting pretty desperate to hang on to his temporary job as Acting Chairman.

He has now taken our constitution and is changing parts that don’t suit him; he is changing the rules regarding leadership elections so that we won’t get a leadership election and he will continue using the title he has already awarded himself, Chairman.

A job as Chairman of the British National Party is a demanding one, even when you are merely an acting one, so what makes someone in Adam’s position continue to ignore calls for transparency, a leadership election and an EGM.

The Nick Griffin report makes some serious issues regarding wills left to the party and the members have a right to debate this issue, the longer Adam holds off from calling an election and an EGM the more suspicious the situation regarding these wills looks to the membership.

This is doing the party no good at all; the party could be saved right now by holing an election for a new Chairman, or are the allegations regarding wills true?


27 September 11:36
It is disgraceful that Adam Walker has chosen to change our constitution without reference to the party members, and without proper authority.
In a part of the constitution, section 6, which the duly elected Chairman was authorised to change, the crooks that are hijacking our party have amended it with this little gem.
6.4 The power to appoint a President and a Deputy Chairman. In the event 
that the Chairman resign his position before an election is held the Deputy
of the next Chairman shall become Acting Chairman until the date scheduled
election. The Acting Chairman shall have the same powers under this
Constitution as would the Chairman and will be referred to (for convenience) as
“the Chairman”.
This has been added in an attempt to give legitimacy to Adam Walkers claim to be party Chairman, it also denies the members their leadership election contrary to section 8.6 which clearly demands for a leadership election in the event of a Chairman stepping down.
I would still dispute that the last NEC meeting was legitimate as the NEC members have still not received a copy of the minutes of that meeting; they are probably still falsifying some right now, section 8.5 of the constitution clearly deals with this.
8.5 The National Executive shall, each year, by simple majority vote, appoint from its own ranks a National Secretary who shall prepare agendas and arrange meetings and ENSURE that minutes are taken.
(What is the point in minutes if they can’t even be seen by those that attended the meeting?)
We have built this party up to become an immediately recognised name in British politics, are we now going to allow a bunch of greedy criminals to tear it apart?
Demand that we hold an EGM.
Demand that any changes to our constitution since the last NEC are repealed.
Demand an immediate leadership election.
We can no longer stand by whilst they destroy our party.

27 September 12:37
right so this is the amended version
6.4 The power to appoint a President and a Deputy Chairman. In the event that the Chairman resign his position before an election is held the Deputy Chairman shall become Acting Chairman until the date of the next scheduled election. The Acting Chairman shall have the same powers under this Constitution as would the Chairman and will be referred to (for convenience) as “the Chairman”.
Page 33 of 96  
6.4.1 A power to determine, and where necessary change, all organisational structures within our Party and to determine all rules and procedures whereby such structures are governed.
6.4.2 A power to determine all routine executive, administrative, policy and tactical decisions made by our Party.
28 September 11:02
The last NEC meeting was held on the nineteenth of July 2014, at this meeting Chairman Nick Griffin was forced out of office by some members of the EC, the removal of an elected Chairman, elected by the whole of the membership, should not be decided by a few EC members.
After Nick Griffin was deposed as Chairman, a report on corruption within the Bnp which should have been investigated as a matter of urgency was sent to the Acting Chairman and EC members, they decided to put on hold even debating the report until late November when its scheduled to be heard, behind closed doors and by unelected by NEC members.
Those debating it are to be the same NEC that replaced our elected Chairman; NEC members are also claiming the report to be all lies long before even debating the issue.
In the document which was leaked online and written by Nick Griffin, he asks why the minutes of that EC meeting had not been sent out weeks later, he requests that those minutes be released immediately; Other EC members have also complained that they have still not received the minutes even now.
In light of the fact that three months down the line the minutes have still not been provided, I think that EC meeting should be declared null and void and a new one called immediately with Nick Griffin resuming his role as Chairman; if at that meeting threats are made towards him then he should call a leadership election and let the membership decide.
The BNP Constitution provides for the keeping of minutes at meetings as can be seen below and any produced now for that meeting will be suspect, after all how are attendees meant to recall exact words spoken three months earlier.
8.5 The National Executive shall, each year, by simple majority vote, appoint from its own ranks a National Secretary who shall prepare agendas and arrange meetings and ENSURE that minutes are taken.
(What is the point in minutes if they can’t even be seen quickly and disputed if necessary by those that attended the meeting?)

********************************************

Letter from Nick Griffin to Adam Walker - 28/9/14, 11:32 PM 
It is now over two months since I told you about the huge potential threat to the security and indeed survival of the BNP.

This is the result of Clive Jefferson's refusal to respond either to me, or to the Trustee in my bankruptcy, over the party legal debts (some genuine, some in my opinion inflated and contestable) that led to me being declared bankrupt.

There is no way of getting away from the fact that I was bankrupted over BNP legal bills. As a result, on the wording of the Constitution and basic bankruptcy law, the trustee now 'owns´ my right to an indemnity from party central funds for such bills.

The various self-proclaimed 'creditors', include the Belfast printer who was jailed for reacting to being at loggerheads with Clive Jefferson by sending a carload of thugs to try to drive my daughter and son-in-law off the road.

With the Trustee's own fees (hundreds of pounds per hour) and genuine and bogus creditors all taken together, the reality is that Clive Jefferson's boast that "the BNP is debt-free has largely been achieved by dumping those debts on me personally - and they total around £300,000!

This presumably is one reason for the absurd and thoroughly Stalinist decision to airbrush my court battles out of the accounts of the BNP's fight to expose Muslim grooming gangs.

Be that as it may, the BNP is not 'debt-free' at all. Because the Trustee in Bankruptcy now owns not just everything he can seize from me - he also owns the constitutionally prescribed right of any BNP Chairman to an indemnity for debts incurred or imposed on behalf of the party.

Far from being 'debt-free', the BNP is very soon going to be smashed with a demand for over £250,000. Once the additional costs of the Trustee, legal bills and Official Receiver (see below) are included, the total could easily spiral to nearer £500,000.

You will recall that I explained to you that the problem was still not insoluble, and that the party should approach the matter in two ways:

The first was that you should order the Treasurer, Clive Jefferson, to find and give to the Trustee the waiver document that I signed several years ago.

This would provide the Party with good legal grounds to resist his claim (as you know, I tried repeatedly to get Clive to do this during the last two months of my leadership, and met only evasion). Since this has not been done it would appear that no such legal defence exists.

The second line of belated defence, therefore, is that the Trustee has a duty on behalf of genuine creditors to examine carefully all claims and to knock out unsubstantiated ones. In order to do so, however, he needs the co-operation of the National Treasurer, who in turn needs to work with me to go through each claim, invoice etc and provide evidence that some are bogus or inflated.

This could reduce the amount that is going to have to be paid if the BNP is to survive to something manageable. And such co-operation would facilitate an agreement with the Trustee for staged payments to be made over a period, which the party would be able to make and still survive. The golden eggs wouldn't have to be too large to persude him not to wring the BNP's neck!

Both you and Clive Jefferson, sadly, continue to stick your heads in the sand and over many months have not acknowledged my communications or even returned my phone calls, let alone done anything about it.

All you have done is to insert a couple of revisions into the new version of the Constitution that you had ready to publish on the same day that you took over as Acting Leader, 19th July.

Written by Pat Harrington, the main line of ´defence´ on which you appear set to try to rely is that you have given yourself the purported power to declare that any chunk of "central funds" aren´t "central funds" at all.

Leaving aside the questions of probity such a declaration would raise, I can tell you that this clause is childish nonsense. The best that can be said for it is that the Trustee may be more amused than annoyed at such a pathetic attempt to block his enormous legal powers.

I cannot believe that Pat Harrington actually thinks for one minute that this new clause will help in any way. Whatever else has so often been said about him, Pat has a very good legal brain - that is a key reason why I valued him as an advisor, albeit one who had to be kept in check. So what he´s playing at with this nonsense I do not know, but can tell you that it is a waste of paper.

Let us suppose that there is a bank account containing a large sum of money from a recent bequest to the BNP. It doesn´t matter where the account is or what it is called, or how Mr Jefferson used his power as Executor to vary the will and squirrel away somewhere else money left to the BNP or to him on behalf of the BNP. You as Acting Leader still 'own' that money on behalf of the party.

So if you give it away by declaring that it now isn´t within reach of the Trustee, he will use the same law that prevents a wealthy husband going bankrupt from giving the house to his wife. The Trustee will simply overturn the ´gift´ and take the lot.

To do so, of course, he needs control of the Party´s accounts and operation. So even if the money is not there, or even if it has been squirreled away in a hole in the ground, he will move in and use his powers to collect as much information as possible to find out what has come in, what there now is and where, and what happened to funds which have come in and gone out again.

I have spoken now with two businessmen with practical, professional experience of the application of UK bankruptcy laws. Given that the Trustee was appointed in the early spring, both have expressed surprise that he has not ALREADY applied for a Court Order to impose an Official Receiver on the BNP.

I am also sending a copy of the latest letter to me from the Trustee. You will note that at the end of page 2 he confirms his intention to claim against the party - and that Clive Jefferson has refused to answer his communications.

Thanks to the BNP debts dumped on me, I have had the misfortune of having to deal with him and his firm for months now and I can assure you that it is no idle threat. He is a very professional and thorough operator in a seriously big firm.

The fact that the Trustee has been slow in advancing his claim against the party up until now may be due to the unusual circumstances of his having to deal with the totally new problem of seizing the personal assets and salary and redundancy payment of an MEP.

By the end of this year I will, as you know, be personally out of pocket to the tune of some £50,000 as a result of the Trustee seizing my severance pay, out-of-pocket expenses reclaims from the European Parliament and money in my and Jackie´s joint account.

You and Clive Jefferson have clearly decided that it´s a good idea to leave me and my family hanging out to dry, but do not be misled into thinking that the Trustee´s legal problems dealing with EP rules have done anything more than delay the time when he comes after the BNP for the rest.

Let me put this in very simple words and in six basic bullet-point facts for you:

* One day before the end of the year, quite possibly within weeks, you will find that neither you nor Clive Jefferson nor Frank Hogarth control the BNP, its bank accounts, offices, computers, vehicles and assets right down to the last pencil.

* Overnight, the whole party, including assets held in its various subsidiaries and fronts, will be seized by a Court-appointed Official Receiver. What you have in effect now seized from the members by refusing to face a leadership election will in turn be seized from you.

* Everything will be frozen while he and his staff take over the office and do a first sweep through the computers and records.

* He will then decide whether the operation should be kept running as a "going concern" from which he can extract money for the Bankruptcy Trustee. All this work will of course be added to the legal bill at a rate of four figures every hour.

* If he finds a pot of legacy gold, he will take far, far more than the genuine debts could have been settled for had you only listened to common sense and followed my advice.

* If he doesn´t find enough to pay off the Trustee, he will wind the party up. You and all other paid staff will all receive 'with immediate' effect redundancy notices. If you or any of the Treasury staff obstruct him or lie to him, you will probably end up in prison. Once the Receiver begins his in-depth forensic examination of the party records, he will soon find anything you have tried to hide. Any assets bought privately with 'redirected' BNP money will face sequestration.

Thanks to your actions and inactions, the BNP is about to be thrown into a death spiral.

With income and activity already slashed to the bone as members´anger over your various misjudgements and petty tyranny rises, the news that the party´s entire admin staff have been replaced in their posts by a team from the Official Receiver will instantly cut income to zero.
Once income is Zero, the Receiver will simply declare the whole thing unviable and wind it up.
Well done, Adam, it will have taken you about four months to become the first ´leader´in British political history to have ´his´party destroyed by a winding up order.
The trouble, of course, it that it is not ýour´party. It is a great collective creation, the property of all those individuals who have sacrificed so much - time, money, comfort, security, physical well-being and countless relationships - to build it.

The tragedy is that all that sacrifice is now set to be in vain, because the way you have mishandled it will have turned a big problem that could have been dealt with, into an utter and almost certainly fatal disaster.

This issue is so deadly dangerous and urgent that I am not going to give you the chance to deflect attention from it by addressing, as I could in detail, the way in which you and Pat Harrington have forged a constitutional amendment to deny the members their right to a leadership election.

You have altered a section of the Constitution that you have the power to change, in order to block the obligation to hold an immediate leadership election which exists in S.8.1 which you do NOT have the power to change.

This is nearly as untenable legally as Pat Harrington's similarly too-clever-by-half efforts to make things difficult for the Trustee. Since his axe will fall on your regime long before any challenge could be brought to your attempt to deny the members their rights, I am advising those who would otherwise launch and win such a challenge not to waste their time and money.

It will be far better employed in building the replacement that will have to be created once you and yours have destroyed the BNP.

Kipling is as apt as ever:

"If you can bear to see the words you've spoken,
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools
And see the things you gave your life to broken,
And stoop and build them up with worn out tools...."

If needs be, I and many others like me will do just that.

There is still just possibly time to avert catastrophe, but it would require you to act as a true leader, instead of like a petulant schoolboy caught with his hand in a sweet jar.

You must engage with the Trustee and strive to buy time for money to come in with which to do a deal with him.

You should take action to rebuild the goodwill you have thrown away, starting by removing Pat Harrington as de facto leader, and Clive Jefferson as de facto owner, of the BNP.

Then call the overdue Leadership Election. If the members see that you accept that it is their party, they will move Heaven and Earth to save it.

If they see that you regard it as your personal property, and that you continue to refuse to listen to reason, they will leave you to sink without trace.

You may feel no duty to our members, but I do. Starting with the duty to tell them the truth about the gravity of the situation.

So I will not sit around and wait for the reply that, on previous form, you probably won't send. Nor will I take any notice of your repeated threats of 'disciplinary' action.

I am giving you till tomorrow evening to call me and agree a serious plan to work together to sort out the shambles you have created.

If you fail to do so, I will send this letter to every local official in the party. Because it's their party - and the members have the right to know!

Yours sincerely

Nick Griffin
President, British National Party


https://m.bnp.org.uk/news/national/nick-griffin-expelled-bnp-membership

*** BREAKING NEWS ***
NICK GRIFFIN EXPELLED FROM BNP MEMBERSHIP
Nick Griffin, the former Chairman of the British National Party (BNP) has been expelled from membership.

A Conduct Committee established by new Party Chairman, Adam Walker took the step in a letter to Mr Griffin today.

The Conduct Committee stated:

We believe that since being given the title of honourary President, you have put all your efforts into trying to cause disunity by deliberately fabricating a state of crisis. The aim of this was to again embroil the BNP in factionalism designed to destabilise our Party.

This has included:

• Preparing a ‘report’ which tells lies about key Party personnel and finances and approving the leak of these damaging and defamatory allegations onto the internet.
• Harassing members of BNP staff and in at least one case making physical threats
• Bringing the Party into disrepute through public statements
• Publishing, causing to be published or being reckless as to the publication of untrue allegations against the Party in the form of e-mails giving a false account of your bankruptcy situation
• Disobeying legitimate, constitutional instructions given to you by our Chairman, Adam Walker aimed at preventing damage to the reputation and unity of the Party.

Mr Jefferson of the conduct committee stated:

"This has been a difficult decision to make and not one taken lightly. Although we all appreciate that Nick has achieved a lot for our Party in the past, we must also remember that the Party is bigger than any individual.

"Nick did not adjust well to being given the honourary title of President and it soon became obvious that he was unable to work as an equal member of the team and alarmingly his behaviour became more erratic and disruptive."

Mr Griffin had been Chairman of the BNP for fifteen years until leaving his position following an Executive Council meeting in July.

Mr Griffin had previously lost his seat as a Member of the European Parliament and has been declared personally bankrupt due to a series of legal bills he ran up over several years as a result of both pursuing and defending a series of long-running cases.








http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/CharlesI_execution.htm

At nearly 2.00 o’clock in the afternoon, Charles was led to the scaffold which was covered in black cloth. He had asked to wear thick underclothes under his shirt as he was very concerned that if he shivered in the cold, the crowd might think that he was scared. Charles gave a last speech to the crowd but very few could hear him. He said:

"I have delivered to my conscience; I pray God you do take those courses that are best for the good of the kingdom and your own salvation."

It is said that when he was beheaded a large groan went up throughout the crowd. One observer in the crowd described it as "such a groan by the thousands then present, as I never heard before and I desire I may never hear again."

Even in death, Charles found no dignity. Spectators were allowed to go up to the scaffold and, after paying, dip handkerchiefs in his blood as it was felt that the blood of a king when wiped onto a wound, illness etc. would cure that illness.

Who will front the BNP now?

Is Adam Walker up to the job?

Nick Griffin is at least a public schoolboy with a law degree from Cambridge - a prerequisite for getting anywhere in British politics these days, all the more so for a party like the BNP known for its plebeian membership.

Adam Walker may be go down well with the grassroots ranting about Muslim grooming, but the secret of politics is not just preaching to the converted. Poor old Nick, he should have known that in politics to stand still is to drown, but he was content just appealing to the grassroots and no more, because he thought he had nationalism sewn up and could tread water till his retirement before handing over the leadership to his daughter as if the BNP were a family firm and he senior partner. But even the plebs know when they see that things are not progressing as they should be, when they look at how well their Continental counterparts are doing.

https://news.vice.com/article/the-far-right-wins-again-as-france-elects-its-youngest-senator-ever

Clearly, Nick Griffin did not manage to ensure the loyalty of his praetorian guard.

http://www.history.com/news/history-lists/8-things-you-may-not-know-about-the-praetorian-guard

The test of Adam Walker's mettle is when he is chased by the media to comment on the expulsion of Nick Griffin. That will be when the members see what he is made of, and I don't think they will be impressed somehow.












NICK GRIFFIN: THE SUNKEN SHIP ABANDONS THE RAT
The best analysis so far, in my opinion.
at 30 comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

More trouble at the mill for the BNP

Dear oh dear. What does this all mean for Adam Walker and the National Executive?


I wonder how likely this is.

https://www.bnp.org.uk/sites/default/files/constitutionbnp14-2.pdf

SECTION 8 OUR PARTY’S NATIONAL EXECUTIVE
8.1 The National Executive shall be comprised of:

i) the duly elected National Chairman

ii) the Administration Committee, comprising of the National Treasurer, Head
of Administration, National Nominating Officer, National Organiser and up to
two other individuals as required from time to time. These posts will be
appointed by the National Chairman. The Presiding Officer of the National
Executive shall have the right to attend and vote at any meetings of the
Administration Committee;

iii) one Regional Organiser, elected by the Regional Council, from each of the
eleven European Parliamentary regions;

iv) one Regional Chairman, elected by the Regional Council, from each of the
eleven European Parliamentary regions;

v) one Councillors' Representative, elected at an annual meeting of councillors
and elected public representatives, to be held at the Annual Conference each
year;

vi) one Deputy Treasurer, responsible for the handling and overseeing of
Regional Funds, whether centrally controlled or devolved accounting units,
appointed by simple majority vote of the National Executive.

at 7 comments:
Labels: , ,

Wednesday, 10 September 2014

Trouble at the mill for the BNP


What can all this mean?

What is to be done?

There was I convinced that Nick Griffin had only appeared to stand aside but was pulling the strings from behind the scenes.

However, even the best laid plans of mice and men often go awry ...

It seems irresponsible to stand aside if there is not a worthy successor to take over, and it was pretty clear to me that Adam Walker was not up to the job for all sorts of reasons.

If it were me stepping down, I would see to it that a coronation ceremony of a worthy successor take place before doing so.

A selection of comments by nationalists:

Mark Collett:

After reading Griffin’s frankly hilarious 36 page document on ‘why the BNP is in a dire state’, I have to make the following observations. Every single operation he criticises was fully endorsed by him – they were failures when he was leader, so how can he claim the blame now lies with others? But most crucially, every single person he is attacking was hand-picked by him and were the greatest thing since sliced bread! If all the operations and individuals he attacks are actually that bad, then by his own words he is a total failure and utterly useless as a leader as he set them up and put them in place. The man is delusional!


Arthur Kemp:

Two further comments to Mark's succinct summary: (1) All the things Griffin is now complaining about (being left with credit card debt, pathetic website, being shut out by a "clique", outsider "non-nationalist" staff managers, etc. etc. are all things that he did to other people ALL the time. Karma is a bitch.

And then I won't even mention the clearly criminal attempt he made to frame Richard Barnbrook into bankruptcy with fraudulent invoices for the Barking election expenses--which was a clear an insight as one could hop to find into both his and Clive Jefferson's utterly deviant criminal minds.

The other issue to bear in mind here is why would Griffin have committed all this to writing, and then emailed it to the executive council. It was impossible that it would not be leaked. And he knew that. So why do it?

My guess is that Griffin has done this on purpose. Having smashed the party through his incompetence, greed, amateurish political buffoonery and criminality, he now wants to stomp on the pieces to administer the coup de grace, as he did with the NF in the 1980s. Then, he can start a new party and emerge as a new "leader" and start the con all over again. That's my guess for this move.

John Mccaffrey:

Arthur could well be right in regard to Griffin wanting to give the coup de grace to the BNP. Maybe he thinks he can get control of the BNP back through rebellion . Allegedly there is several million pounds coming in from wills. This is what the fight is all about. As Griffin said, Jefferson has complete control of all money. In fact from what Griffin said Jefferson could legally walk away with the lot. It is going to be interesting. 

Arthur Kemp:

Frank Hogarth is the auditor from the party's auditing firm, Silver and Co., and has been for many years. 

Derek Adams on 18 September 2014:

On the 11th September I received a telephone call from Chris Barnett warning me not to post anything regarding the leaked Nick Griffin report, this was due to me joining Mick Braun’s group on facebook and posting comments requesting an EGM.

In an attempt to do things properly and to save the party from any damage the leaked report could cause, I, along with other members sent in a request to the Temporary Acting Chairman on the 16th Sep 2014, it was also forwarded to BNP Admin, since that time there has not been any replies, not even an acknowledgment of receipt.

This is not leadership, this is cowardice; the membership of this party have a right to be involved in the debate regarding Nicks report, it reveals some very serious issues indeed, some of which had already been noted by members.

The next NEC meeting is not until the end of November and in any case with several NEC members’ openly saying that Nick’s report is all lies then it is hardly likely to get a fair hearing.

They have already decided that it’s all lies.

Clive Jefferson told me that he can prove that Nick’s report is lies in which case it would be a good idea to call an EGM, show the membership this proof and end this ridiculous situation before it causes fatal damage to our party.

There is no reason whatsoever to deny the membership their EGM, the report is now public, that can’t be altered, membership are asking questions regarding the allegations contained within the report, that can only spread and most people will have no faith in any verdict if this is heard by the NEC behind closed doors.

Show true leadership Mr. Temporary Acting Chairman, call an EGM now.

The report by Nick Griffin raises issue regarding the running, or indeed running down of the BNP website by possible traitor Chris Barnett, this becomes apparent today when there is no mention of the Scottish referendum, no appeal to keep the Union together no call to keep Scotland in Britain; even though we are called the British National Party.

Is this a mistake or a deliberate rebuttal to our Scots members?

Maybe the Temporary Acting Chairman and other leadership had not noticed the omission, didn't know there was a referendum or maybe they have cut off all communication with the outside world just in case anyone uses a three letter word at them. EGM.

The running down of the site is quite obviously true so therefore the claims by certain NEC members that the report is all lies cannot be taken seriously; as they have made this claim, months before its due to be debated behind closed doors, they cannot be trusted by the membership to debate this issue; we need an EGM.

Now we can see that part of this report is indeed true then maybe all of it may well be true, this really does need debating by the membership. 


The ‘dodgy dossier’ dealt with
at 3 comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, 23 August 2014

Will the BNP will have a leadership contest in 2015?

What makes you think Adam Walker is not up to the job of being BNP leader on his own?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118279039361

Has it occurred to you that Adam Walker might have been appointed by Nick Griffin on his own merits?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118278455425

Are you saying that Nick Griffin thinks stepping aside in favour of Adam Walker would avert the danger of leadership election in 2015 because he thought time would start running from the date of Walker assuming leadership and that the next leadership election would be 4 years from that date?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118277661313

Did you know that the BNP constitution is silent and ambiguous on when a leadership contest is to take place in the case of Adam Walker's incumbency? "7.1 The National Chairman of the Party shall be elected for a fixed term of four years; with the election cycle beginning in 2011."
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118280562817

Are you really claiming that Nick Griffin is so afraid of Jeffrey Marshall that he only pretended to step down in favour of Adam Walker so as to make it less likely that Jeffrey Marshall would throw his hat in the ring for the 2015 BNP leadership contest?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118276300161

How likely do you think other nationalists would be to encourage Jeffrey Marshall to throw his hat in the ring for the 2015 BNP leadership contest?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118275974529

What is the difference between what you think of as nationalism and Conservatism?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118294033281

Is there no difference between Conservatism and Nationalism them?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118294165889

Why do you continue to waste your time on the BNP - a party that was never meant for the likes of you?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118293486209

Wouldn't it be funny if Michael Crick asked if he could interview Adam Walker about the future of nationalism under his leadership?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118293216385

Are you saying that Nick Griffin forbade Adam Walker from tweeting because he is a stupid pleb who cannot be trusted to keep himself out of trouble whenever he opens his mouth?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118293096833

How can you be sure that Nick Griffin forbade Adam Walker from tweeting?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118292995969

Why do you think Nick Griffin forbade Adam Walker from tweeting?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118292947585

What would Jeffrey Marshall's bid for the BNP leadership contest in 2015, if he threw his hat in the ring, be based on?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118237774977

Now that you have laid out so much of your plans online, how do you think Jeffrey Marshall will feel about perceived to be merely your proxy for the 2015 BNP leadership contest?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118275270785

You seem to be saying Jeffrey Marshall has no other choice but to throw his hat into the ring for the 2015 BNP leadership election, aren't you?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118275751809

Which BNP policies are you in agreement with?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118275126145

Have you read Section 7 of the BNP constitution about the election of party leader?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118274794369

Is the publicity you think you will get for Jeffrey Marshall the kind of publicity that would help him in the 2015 BNP leadership contest?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118274296961

What makes you think Jeffrey Marshall is more likely to win the 2015 BNP leadership contest if you run his campaign?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118274206337

Has it occurred to you that Jeffrey Marshall may not want you to run his campaign in the 2015 BNP leadership contest?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118274091393

How are you going to persuade Jeffrey Marshall to throw his hat in the ring for the 2015 BNP leadership contest now that you seem to think he is reluctant to do so?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118273468033

What else are you going to say to Jeffrey Marshall to persuade him to stand if he says he is just not up to it and doesn't fancy throwing his hat in the ring for the 2015 BNP leadership contest because of all the opprobrium it would attract from BNP members who would resent him for rocking the boat?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118273864321

What would you do if Jeffrey Marshall explicitly declares that he is not having you as his campaign manager for the 2015 BNP leadership election?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/118243274369
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Saturday, 5 October 2013

BNP Lunar House Demo

SMS from BNP member at the Lunar House demo:

"BNP demo at Lunar House is pure shambles. UAF yelling at us for the past hour. Pretty soon we are all going to start hitting each other because there is nothing else to do. Plenty of police here but not that many [sic]. No sign of Nick Griffin or Adam Walker. Steve Squire and Carlos Cortiglia shouting through megaphones."   1304

"Dauntless member of public wanders over an wants information or expresses support. Some people honking as they go past. Steve Squire has brought some excellent long banners."   1319

"Mistake here is to waste time yelling back at UAF. They are all about 20 n 2n [sic]"  1339

"Want to start chant of RIGHTS FOR WHITES. That would stop the left in their tracks. People taking our leaflets including some polite blacks. Lefties with good cameras staring at us grimly for ages, waiting for violence, perhaps."  1353

"Reds singing what we shall we do with the drunker sailor.  What for?"  1355

" 'What shall we do with the BNP - earlie in the morning?'  'We are Croydon, you are scum.'  'Do you see Nazis?'  'Build a bonfire, build a bonfire.'  Their chanting gets better organised and they get as close as they can."  1404

"Their average age about 20 except for some old mad lefties."  1411

"Carlos now yelling bad temperedly in Spanish.  Honestly!"  1414

"Needless to say yelling at the Reds for hours on end is a tactical mistake.  Everyone is fed up with it.  Only Carlos can be bothered to answer.  Police photographing us now, which seems sinister."  1421

"It would be so interesting to see what would happen if the police weren't here.  They remain impassive between us.  Reds, who earlier had a hammer and sickle flag: MORE IMMIGRATION, NO BORDERS, NO NATION!!!  On our side; ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!  Carlos mocks their la la las but he probably misses the subtleties."  1435

"Reds quiet suddenly, to listen to Carlos denouncing socialism?  No, they don't listen.  We should only speak to each other and to the public, not them.  Chanting resumed."  1440

"Embarrassing to have teenagers yelling at us about Auschwitz.  We yell back about Stalin.  Carlos produces a Polish nationalist who tells them his father was killed by the Russians at Katyn.  Bit of communication there for a while.  We are finishing at 3 thank goodness."  1451

"Some of them seen insane.  Screaming their heads off after 2 hours."  1459




at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Saturday, 3 December 2011

Why can't the BNP get things right about race?


http://campaigns.bnp.org.uk/s/1/bbqi/YFnVsvb/swvv

It seems that the BNP have finally got its arse into gear about Emma West.

Instead of seeing to it that Emma West gets the best possible legal representation money can buy and receives damages for false imprisonment, Adam Walker has started a campaign of "Let us report non-whites saying horrible things about whites and try to get them arrested and thrown into jail too".

I despise all totalitarian hate speech thoughtcrime legislation and would never dream of using it against another.  When you resort to such tactics, you become just as low as they are.

It is the easiest thing to start a race war by taking the following steps.


  1. Post a video online of a white person saying rude things about foreigners.
  2. Post a video online of non-white saying rude things about whites.
  3. Post a video online of a white person being physically aggressive to a non-white.
  4. Post a video online of a non-white being physically aggressive to a white.
  5. Post a video online of whites being physically aggressive to non-whites.
  6. Post a video online of non-whites being physically aggressive to whites. 

You get the idea.

Whoever authorised the arrest and prosecution of Emma West in the Crown Prosecution Service should be named and shamed for doing what could start a race war.

I already know that some members of the BNP secretly and not so secretly hope for a race war, which makes Adam's Operation Fightback tactics understandable.  Because of the incompetence of their strategies and the contempt in which they are held by the general public, their grievances will remain ignored and they will remain marginalised because of the way the government gerrymanders the vote.  They also know that really, their party is no good and their leader is no good and they are being exploited.   A race war is the only way they can get their own back on the immigrants they hate and fear and the government they know despises them.

Whoever in the CPS who took the decision to persecute Emma West should have his head on the block for giving the BNP their opening opportunity to start a race war.  This, ultimately, would be Keir Starmer, who is the Director of Public Prosecutions, a card-carrying lefty not afraid of flaunting this, so mad with arrogance has he now become that he may have thought it was a good idea to put the frighteners on Emma West and her ilk to show what happens to people who complain loudly about immigration in public places ....

After Hubris comes Nemesis.   
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

​@WoodStoneAndSteel asks about the lolcows of the world

2:00   Incorrect diagnosis Chaste women 3:00  Political economy Abolishing no fault force 5:00  Socialising 6:00  Disposable relationships 7...