THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
When your feminist matriarchy has normalised fornication, there is no urgency for men to marry women of their own race.
When you have no fault divorce, it is not safe for men to marry.
When you refuse to marry the women of your own race because you can get sex before marriage, men and women stay single and women with thwarted maternal instincts treat foreign men and foreign children as their babies, or they become man-hating cat ladies who vote for pro-immigration parties to spite their men for not marrying them. Or they are unmarried mothers left to rely on the welfare state which needs to be funded by the taxes immigrant workers pay the state.
When did you last hear any anti-immigration party talk about restoring the patriarchy or protecting the institution of marriage?
In fact, they point black refuse to talk about it because they are all morally compromised: Anne Marie Waters of For Britain is a lesbian spinster and Mark Collett of the Patriotic Alternative is an unmarried father.
"It is not Christianity that is the religion of nationalists, no, it is Islamophobia. An irrational fear based on koranic misreadings and misconceptions false fed to them by social media and other infidel sources linked to Zionist groups and Wahhabis. Whenever a white Westerner reverts, he is labeled an ethnomasochist or a traitor to his own kind even though he has adopted a natural belief system of values that submits to the absolute, the intelligent design of this universe and a straightforward morality. Every time you hear something from nationalists about Islam, it is always the same: "terrorist", "ISIS" or "pedophile". You would never hear that regarding a Christian nor a Jewish convert. Pure naive silence as usual. For the last ten years since the BNP fell, nationalists fail to find a solution to the national interest but have mainly resorted to infantile islamophobic mania. Nationalism in Britain will fail again and again."
How I am described these days by the less respectful members of the nationalist community: "she's a famous loon from England. Used to hang out with the BNP." https://t.co/SJQJIjYniG
Sorry about it ending rather abruptly when I was talking about white genocide, but I am sure you get the gist of it. I don't know why that keeps happening.
The bit you missed was me complaining that he says he is too busy to discuss Heidegger and authenticity with me.
Asian-Aryanism is just socially conservative Asians getting on with white nationalists better than white men get on with white women. From the 51st minute
To my surprise I find this evening that I never saw this documentary, although many of the scenes are familiar to me as clips on YouTube, especially the one of Bob Bailey - an impressive streetfighter - in a scuffle with some Asian youths.
The word elegiac comes to mind though of course the music was added later after the results were known.
"Always cry out in pain as you strike your enemy" was the tactic clearly being employed by Labour not short of funds or the minds of bright young researchers working for them or large numbers of the immigrant community organised to frighten other voters into not voting BNP.
My memory is a little hazy now, but I remember trying to tell them to be nicer to the immigrants and not frighten them too much with anti-immigrant rhetoric, but as usual, I was ignored. They couldn't have done what Trump did to win the Presidential election by being nice to legal immigrants, because they didn't have it in them to be like that, for class reasons, probably. Anyway, when Margaret Hodge told the immigrant community that the BNP would if elected throw their babies out of helicopters she was instantly believed. (This is actually a very old Labour tactic. In the 1980s I met a Sikh woman - the sister of my BBC journalist ex-friend - who seemed to believe that voting Tory would mean being "sent home on the first banana boat", because this was what the local Labour Party had been repeatedly telling her. Years later, this ex-friend informed me that her mother had moved to Ascot to get away from her West London neighbourhood that now had too many Asians.)
How sullen, abusive and violent the immigrant community were to my mates in BNP activists was quite telling. It is how nasty people might treat abandoned children because they know they can get away with it, because they already know no one cares about them.
"Why did British people die in the Second World War?" one BNP-supporting householder asked.
"They died to let everyone come in and take over."
While it is clearly racist and false to suggest that a black
man's teeth would glow in the dark while a white man's wouldn't, which
Act of Parliament forbade the telling of racist jokes? Is a freeborn Englishman still entitled to assume that what is not forbidden is allowed, or must he check with a woman every time he decides to say or do anything? So when exactly did the rules change?
Gazza
was being prosecuted under s 5 of the Public Order Act 1986. The
purpose of that Act 1986 is to preserve public order. Telling a racist
joke in Wolverhampton Civic Hall in no way threatened public order.
Therefore the prosecution of Gazza by the CPS headed by feminazi
Directrix of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders was obviously
politically motivated.
It is politically motivated because it was not in the public interest to worsen race relations. How is it in the public interest to make the white man feel that the black man has the whip hand over him in his own country, as Enoch Powell warned would happen if immigration was not controlled?
Can you imagine the PC CPS seriously considering a white man's complaint about a black man telling a joke about white men and humiliating him in public? Of course not. The femimazi DPP would send him away with a flea in his ear.
What does this politically-motivated prosecution reveal about the position of the white man in his own land? That he is lower in status than the black man and certainly lower in status than his women, who despise him.
Feminazis are after all white middle class women who fear and loathe white working class men angry enough to vote BNP or at least UKIP.
Feminazis pose a far greater threat to
white working men than Muslims, but white plebs are too Islamophobic to
see this or to see that only Islam will be strong enough to eradicate
feminism. After feminism is eradicated, men will finally be able to
wrest back control of a government that now prioritises the preferences
of immoral parasitical women at their expense.
If we
don't watch out, feminazis in charge of Government Departments will soon
be declaring that using the word "feminazi" is misogyny, and misogyny
is THOUGHTCRIME punishable by fines, loss of liberty, manual amputation,
castration and perhaps even the death penalty.
The
American working man has Donald Trump to represent him, but British male
MPs are too stupid, skint and scared to challenge the matriarchy.
Philip Davies MP is only one man anyway, and very from being a billionaire. He also voted for Andrea Leadsom rather than Michael Gove to be Tory leader which suggests that his judgement is not infallible. It is to be doubted he will do
much for men all by himself while other male Tory MPs cower and quake at the thought of Theresa May frowning at them.
“Some people say we preach hatred. Of course we preach hatred,” cried Choudary emphatically.
We should hate evil and love good.
How can we tell the difference between good and evil?
It is really very simple.
What is encouraged by the Koran is good.
What is forbidden by the Koran is evil.
What more do you need to know?
To hear Anjem Choudary admit that he preaches hatred, go to 2:11
Muslims are assured of victory even if hopelessly outnumbered.
008.065
YUSUFALI: O Prophet! rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding.
PICKTHAL: O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you twenty steadfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred (steadfast) they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are a folk without intelligence.
SHAKIR: O Prophet! urge the believers to war; if there are twenty patient ones of you they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a hundred of you they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they are a people who do not understand.
008.066
YUSUFALI: For the present, Allah hath lightened your (task), for He knoweth that there is a weak spot in you: But (even so), if there are a hundred of you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred, and if a thousand, they will vanquish two thousand, with the leave of Allah: for Allah is with those who patiently persevere.
PICKTHAL: Now hath Allah lightened your burden, for He knoweth that there is weakness in you. So if there be of you a steadfast hundred they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a thousand (steadfast) they shall overcome two thousand by permission of Allah. Allah is with the steadfast.
SHAKIR: For the present Allah has made light your burden, and He knows that there is weakness in you; so if there are a hundred patient ones of you they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a thousand they shall overcome two thousand by Allah's permission, and Allah is with the patient.
The NF was formed in 1967.
The BNP was formed in 1982.
Choudary came to the notice of the public in 2003.
Nationalism is nowhere, but Islam is in our consciousness.
From what I have observed of Muslims, Muslim men are more masculine, energetic, educated, intelligent, purposeful and better-organised than the Islamophobes who hate and fear them, evidenced in the utter collapse of the parties dedicated to Islamophobia, anti-semitism and hatred of other races. They are also younger and more technologically savvy than the senescent and technophobic Islamophobes.
Muslim men also tend to marry and have legitimate offspring and stay together for their children, while Islamophobes tend to be gay like Douglas Murray or tend to have bastards with their women who are mostly sluts. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html In other words, Islamophobes are irrational degenerates and irrational degenerate effeminates cannot win any war against those who are not degenerate who are neither effeminate nor irrational.
The writing is on the wall, but that just means that the Islamophobes are just going to pretend that they can't read.
Atheist Islamophobes like to pretend they are more rational than Muslims, but anyone can see that it ain't so. You may hate what ISIS are saying and doing, but you would be clear about what they want and do. Has the UK government explained to your satisfaction what UK foreign policy is all about? Why won't they? MPs cannot explain its rationale even to themselves.
The British political establishment talks about extremism without being able to define it, other than to set British values in stone with their ridiculous definition of "democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs".
Imagine a Victorian Briton reading this arrant nonsense. Will he recognise these PC Libtard values as British values? Would he be appalled that this piece of arrant nonsense that states what British values are has been set in stone for all eternity?
Individual liberty to be a slut - how good is that for the long term national interest when all the degenerate bastards are born?
Traditionally married couples are to respect gaily "married" couples? Why should those who expend their time, energy and resources and make sacrifices to bring up the next generation be treated as equal to those who have purely recreational sex all their lives and don't care what happens to their country after they are dead?
The liberal political establishment will not be answering these questions nor will the liberal media be asking them. Both are hopelessly corrupt and unfit for their designated purpose.
The British government does not see as its role the duty to promote the long term national interest and the British media, instead of asking questions, look the other way.
Therefore the only alternative to this nonsense remains Islam, I have reluctantly concluded.
There is no mystery to this. Muslims are more likely to make sacrifices for Muslims than degenerate selfish atheist libtards for other degenerate selfish atheist libtards.
E O Wilson:
"Selfishness beats altruism in groups. Altruistic groups beat selfish groups, and everything else is commentary."
"Human nature is hung in the balance: our behaviour driven by selfishness and our desire to co-operate to ensure the survival of the group."
"The tension between individual and group selection is the tension between sin and virtue."
God if He exists is Darwinian. He means to demonstrate to us that those who follow His laws most closely will triumph over those who flout His laws. For this reason it is not looking good for the West, even if ISIS do occasionally misinterpret the Koran.
Even after his suspension for antisemitism Sen received 6058 votes rather more than what the previous UKIP candidate got in 2010, who only got 1775.
Robert Blay also did rather well after threatening to shoot Tory MP Ranil Jayawardena if he became PM, and doubled UKIP's vote in North East Hampshire.
Interestingly, Sen also got more votes than Paul Nuttall and Steven Woolfe.
Rabina Khan - eloquently praising Lutfur Rahman who endorsed her candidacy while declaring that she is very much her own woman.
Nicholas McQueen the UKIP Tower Hamlets Mayoral Candidate
A former member of the BNP, no less, says:
Here is the choice.
Elaine BAGSHAW (Liberal Democrats) John BIGGS (Labour) Andy ERLAM (Red Flag–Anti-Corruption) John FOSTER (Green) Peter GOLDS (Conservative) Vanessa Helen HUDSON (Animal Welfare) Hafiz Abdul KADIR (independent) Rabina KHAN (independent) Nicholas MCQUEEN (UKIP) Md Motiur RAHMAN NANU (independent)
I suppose I should say Nicholas MCQUEEN (UKIP). However, this time I think I would like to vote for someone who might actually win.
I remember Peter GOLDS (Conservative) screaming at police officers near a polling station in an local election once that I was passing out 'seditious literature' (i.e BNP leaflets) and that I ought to be stopped. The police responded by asking me to move about 3 feet. I think it would be difficult to give such a man my vote.
John BIGGS (Labour) is a boring Labour machine politician, forever burnishing his 'anti-fascist' credentials whenever necessary. And there is no point in voting for any of the others except - Rabina Khan.
Why?
(1) I have already had two leaflets from Khan's team, whereas the others have delivered none to me whatsoever. The Rahman/Khan team do seem to be the most serious about winning.
(2) I don't think on reflection that Rahman received a fair trial, for a number of reasons, one of which is that criminal matters should not be tried in a civil court.
(3) Even if Rahman is as corrupt as they say, his management of the Muslim vote is in many ways no worse than the manipulation of the Muslim vote practiced in the past by Labour. Labour are, of course, annoyed that they can no longer rely on this automatic caucus.
The tribal and divided state of race relations in Tower Hamlets is largely the creation of the Labour Party, not of Lutfur Rahman. It was Labour that alienated the white vote, especially in the 1990s when they wanted to defeat the BNP as well as the Liberals.
So I shall vote for Rabina Khan on the basis that her victory will weaken the Labour Party - a thoroughly anti-British party which supports unlimited immigration and is thus far more dangerous than Rahman's Tower Hamlets First group could ever be.
The best way to stick it to Labour is to vote for Khan.
A political system that is not dysfunctional would allow its participants to vote positively for what they do want, not voting to to stick it to the party they hate most.
Unfortunately, we are all reduced to this. If we cannot decide whom we like most then we will decide on whom we hate most.
It is only the smaller parties that can be used to tell all the big parties who created all the problems in the first place that they got it wrong.
If I lived in TH it would be a toss up between the UKIP candidate and Rabina Khan - an attractive, eloquent, passionate and apparently sincere woman who is clearly very competent - against a middle aged man who is not attractive, not eloquent, not charismatic and who does not inspire confidence.
This does highlight the kind of power an attractive woman has over "mere" men. If the candidate Lutfur Rahman endorsed candidate had been middle-aged, Muslim and male, voters would be more likely to vote for the candidate who best represented their political principles, rather than be distracted by the candidate they would rather be having sex with ....
This is probably the real reason why it is said most women should not be allowed the vote (they would vote for the most handsome male candidate or a female candidate) and why most women should not be allowed to stand for election (because beta males would much rather vote for a woman they find attractive than another beta male).
At first I thought this rule unnecessarily strict and then revised my opinion. All it takes is a beautiful and silent woman wearing a rosette to influence the choice of most voters in a polling station.
Out of rational self-interest you would choose the most able candidate to be your mayor. Khan would put TH on the political map while it is impossible to imagine McQueen as mayor.
If Western foreign policy causes Muslim terrorism then who is more responsible for terrorism?
Are non-terrorist Muslims more or less responsible for terrorism than Western voters are responsible for Western foreign policy?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 7, 2015
Why don't we ask UK voters for their voting record?
Did they ever vote for a party on the basis of its foreign policy? (Expect a very blank look.)
Do they even know that all political parties that were ever in government without exception operated a Zionist foreign policy which Muslims might just find objectionable?
Was an apology ever given for mistakenly invading Iraq?
Has Blair yet said sorry for ordering the invasion of Iraq?
Did you know that the only party in the UK that had a non-Zionist foreign policy was the BNP infamous for its Islamophobia?
Did you know that the only way Muslims could peacefully object to UK foreign policy was through publicly declaring that they would vote BNP (who hate them)?
Are you surprised that Muslims have not done so in numbers significant enough to make the LibLabCon change their foreign policy?
The proposed Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill will severely limit freedom of expression for "non-violent extremists". Oppose it.
— BritishNationalParty (@bnp) January 29, 2015
The only thing left to do is work out is how much higher the percentage of female MPs who will vote for more shit totalitarian legislation are compared to male MPs.
We know who to blame most for the loss of our liberties, don't we?
@ntfem I'm not quite sure what relevance this piece of nonsense has, but considering your UKIP spt I'm not surprised by yo need to share it.
— Christopher Jordan (@ChristopherJor5) January 22, 2015
@ntfem Okay. Here's the deal. Any attack on democracy is nonsensical. Now go away and bother someone else with your nonsense.
— Christopher Jordan (@ChristopherJor5) January 22, 2015
@ntfem Okay. I'm going to block you now.
— Christopher Jordan (@ChristopherJor5) January 22, 2015
@ChristopherJor5 If you don't know the answer, just say you don't. No need to get aggressive.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 22, 2015
@ChristopherJor5 Thank you for your tweets which so illuminatingly revealed the arrogance, ignorance and incoherence of the average UK voter
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 22, 2015
This is somehow even more shocking to me than British Muslims objecting to UK foreign policy burning the flag, because they clearly mean to show hatred and contempt towards it.
I once attended a BNP meeting in the run-up to the 2010 election. At this meeting I remember Bob Bailey and Richard Barnbrook, who later went on to became BNP London Assembly member. Typically, there was a Union Jack on a table and then, to my horror, I found empty beer glasses being placed directly on the tablecloth after the evening got going. Like a fussy housewife I found myself removing them and putting them somewhere else. I still haven't gotten over the incident. This photograph reminded me of that evening again.
@DuncanBannatyne cant believe Lord Freud hasnt resigned yet but think its inevitable he will have to. Disgraceful comment he made.
— Dean Laybourne (@deanolaybo) October 16, 2014
@DuncanBannatyne I never advocated a policy of compulsory extermination, merely an option 2b extend to parents of unwanted disabled babies.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 16, 2014
@ntfem Bollocks you just told me to google you to see who you were, now you say google is wrong Hypocrite
— Duncan Bannatyne (@DuncanBannatyne) October 16, 2014
@DuncanBannatyne What people say about me is not necessarily true or what I would say about myself. People do misunderstand me a lot.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 16, 2014
@ntfem Firstly nobody called you a coward for telling the truth so you should stop twisting things round to suit your biased judgement
— Duncan Bannatyne (@DuncanBannatyne) October 16, 2014
@ntfem "ndl it is very rude of you to say you are waiting for me to specify something thus suggesting I have not done so in a timely manner
— Duncan Bannatyne (@DuncanBannatyne) October 16, 2014
@DuncanBannatyne The Old Testament punishment of stoning unmarried mothers is too harsh,while the Koranic punishment of 100 lashes wd work.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 16, 2014
@DuncanBannatyne I have since been expelled by the Conservative Party. The best is yet to come when I become a chat show hostess ...
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 16, 2014
I am going to RT a tweet from the repulsive Claire Khaw then I am going to block her
— Duncan Bannatyne (@DuncanBannatyne) October 16, 2014
@DuncanBannatyne The Old Testament punishment of stoning unmarried mothers is too harsh,while the Koranic punishment of 100 lashes wd work.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 16, 2014
