Ian Millard - 'The Zionist Assault on freedom of Expression in England'

The brilliant screenplay to HITLER - THE MOVIE ignored in our PC world

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Young-Hitler-Claus-Hant/dp/0704371820

I noticed today that Naim Attallah with whom I had lunch this time two years ago was complaining that the critics had completely ignored Claus Hant's "non-fiction novel" entitled YOUNG HITLER

Naim Attallah at Le Boudin Blanc where we had lunch in January 2011
http://www.boudinblanc.co.uk/

Naim tweeted:

https://twitter.com/nattallah/status/290910057649033216"For those who follow my blog read my article tomorrow about " Young Hitler" a book Quartet published in 2010. It was ignored then ."

https://twitter.com/nattallah/status/290911532840263680"Why was "Young Hitler "ignored? Although on the face of it the reason is obscure, the reality is different . It is thought provoking......"

https://twitter.com/nattallah/status/291451642807742464Diana Mosley http://wp.me/pGlMo-ET 

It is terribly sad that the liberal establishment and media are conspiring to ignore this book which is both entertaining and profound.   My review is at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/book-on-which-hitler-movie-will-be.html

Here is what I suggest Quartet Books do for maximum publicity:

Announce that forthcoming issues of The Literary Review and The Oldie will contain reviews of Young Hitler by

1. the current Lord Chief Rabbi
2. the former Lord Chief Rabbi
3. the Neturei Karta Rabbi
4. the current Archbishop of Canterbury
5. the former Archbishop of Canterbury
6. Abdal Hakim Murad
7. Anjem Choudary
8. David Irving who will I hope one day become Lord Irving of Nazism in the same way Kenneth Clark  became Lord Clark of Civilisation
9. the PM or anyone he nominates
10. the Deputy PM or anyone he nominates
11. the Leader of the Opposition or anyone he nominates
12. the leader of UKIP
13. the leader of the BNP

who would all be sent review copies.

It would not surprise me at all if many of the above would shrink from this undertaking, but out of this lot I really think Naim can at least squeeze at least a review or three out of this list.  

It does not all have to be published in one issue, though it would be nice to have an Adolf Hitler Special  issue of both the Literary Review and the Oldie, which would no doubt increase their respective circulations dramatically, if the publicity is managed properly, by me, perhaps.  

It is possible that the editrix of the Literary Review Nancy Sladek might baulk at this idea, but I would like to think that Richard Ingrams of the Oldie would still be game for a laugh.  In my experience, it is not the elderly but the young who have a fit of the vapours whenever they see a swastika.  The old should always retain the capacity to shock the young, and the idea of the Oldie doing a Nazi Special is too delicious for words.

My review of Mein Kampf at Amazon

http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/817224164X/ref=cm_cr_pr_btm_link_1?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=0


I found Mein Kampf informative and entertaining though it must be pointed out that Hitler conflates Jews with liberals and liberalism.

Jews, by dint of following their religion, practising their traditions and respecting the institutions of marriage and family, will find themselves effortlessly superior to the gentiles who do not.

While I do not agree with him about his racial theories, all that he says about government, democracy, the stupidity of the general public, liberals and the cowardice and hypocrisy of the middle classes remains disturbingly true.

His racial theories are clearly nonsensical since, if there were a race that was inherently superior to all other races then that race would stay top dog for all time.

That "every dog will have his day" is clearly closer to reality.

It is of course perfectly possible to argue that the Jews secretly or not so secretly consider themselves to be a superior race. They were after all the people who created God.

It could even be said that Jews are the teacher's pet in a world of dunces and bullies.

My theory is that the problem of antisemitism, endemic in Christian Europe, is actually a problem of Christianity, which is as a faith inferior to both Judaism and Islam. Christianity is inferior to Judaism and Islam because you have to ignore so much of it to make it work. I believe Hitler even thought that himself, but knew it would not be politic to point this out to the Germans of his time.

It occurs to me that if Hitler had really been serious about the Germans acquiring racial superiority, then he should have converted the Germans to Judaism, instead of just planning to get rid of the competition by shipping them to Madagascar minus their property.

Racial superiority is rather like claiming to be a lady or gentleman. The more you insist that you are a lady or a gentleman, the less likely you are to be either.

A truly superior person would never dream of claiming to be superior.


Get the John Murphy translation.

WHY THE NATIONALISTS SHOULDS GROW SOME BALLS AND OPEN THEIR MEETINGS UP TO CONTROVERSIAL AND OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS by David Jones

AN OPEN LETTER TO IN DEFENCE OF CLAIRE KHAW'S RIGHT TO ATTEND NATIONALIST UNITY MEETING

By David Jones (Over the Farm Gate, Pennine Independent Nationalist)

Honoured Guest Blogger David Jones

Nationalism is in a crisis, we are not facing violent threats, state bans or unimaginable horrors, we are facing the worst thing a nationalist could ever face—obscurity!

I have been following the case of my friend and ally Claire Khaw being excluded from a “Nationalist Unity” meeting in London. Now it is highly likely she is being excluded on colour grounds, the keynote speaker Richard Edmonds is a member of the National Front and the National Front certainly wouldn’t allow Claire to attend one of their meetings.

However at such “unity” meetings she has been allowed to attend in the past but hysterical reaction to

a) her controversial and outspoken attacks on welfare-fuelled feminism,
b) her blogging about nationalist speakers and what they said at nationalist meetings and
c) her being unafraid to associate with swastikas etc

To begin with the first I suggest you read her earlier post “why feminism is a nationalist issue”, (http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/feminism-is-nationalist-issue.html) and also in a more recent context her article about the “Rochdale Grooming Gang” case (http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/notice-how-neurotic-british-journalists.html and http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/simple-solution-to-problem-of-sex.html).

The second relates to the veil of secrecy that nationalists see fit to impose over everything that they do. The situation with her being excluded from the last IONA meeting in London being a prime example, for that read her blog post “Harmless old dears harassed by far left” (http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/harmless-old-dears-harassed-by-far-left.html) , surely nationalists WANT controversial publicity, surely they do not want to be driven into obscurity. If they don’t care about being driven into obscurity then they are not playing to win - and by definition do not have the nation's interest at heart.

Thirdly, read Claire’s blog post about her exclusion from this upcoming meeting where Mr Edmonds is due to speak. (http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/reasons-given-to-exclude-me-from.html)

Regarding her photos taken at my address it is highly strange that many White Nationalist want to make use of Third Reich Symbolism, the BPP uses the drab-looking Celtic Cross in a “Nazi style setting. I would rather get straight to the point... I use a Swastika. The swastika is a common symbol of rebellion on the Outlaw world of motorcycles.

David Jones with a BPP Celtic Cross behind him

Hells Angel Auckland Swastika

Hell's Angels President Sonny Barger told the Los Angeles Times in the 1960s. "If a Hells Angels guy is wearing Nazi paraphernalia, it's basically their equivalent of sticking up a finger to some middle class family they see in a Volvo.”

I am however a serious nationalist who is prepared to go out and gather serious support, despite my being unafraid (like Claire Khaw) to be photographed with a swastika. You, Mr Edmonds once questioned me in disbelief at a recent Bacup National Front Meeting, expressing alarm that I as a serious candidate could wear the jacket pictured below.

David Jones with gun and flag

Richard Edmonds in tie and suit

Just compare my election campaign with yours, though yours was more high profile the NF got less than 0.6% of the vote whereas mine got 8.5% of the vote, despite the fact that I’m more likely to be seen in a Swastika–emblazoned motorcycle jacket that a suit. Believe me the public don’t care. 

Nationalist Unity

Richard, if you’re reading this, learn a few lessons and realize that nobody cares how strongly or loudly you condemn Mr. Breivik, the press will still treat us like pariahs regardless. We are not the good guys in this cause and in the public minds, we are villains and we can’t change that. I urge you to support Ms. Claire Khaw attendance the meeting, and accept the fact that we as nationalists must be prepared to adopt a daring and aggressive, middle finger strategy, and stop treating nationalist as a spectator sport with old fashioned house rules.

We are not engaged in a debate between gentlemen here but a fight for the survival of Britain.



NB:  As a result of our Nationalist Unity photos, probably, Amazon are now selling Nazi flags.

http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/05/16/the-debate-should-amazon-be-selling-nazi-flags/

£6.44 each if anyone's interested.  http://www.amazon.co.uk/German-Regular-Nazi-Party-1920-1945/dp/B004NDDF0C/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top