Daniel Bell explains the superiority of Neo-Confucianism over Western individualism in coping with Covid-19

2:00 Respect for hierarchy and the gentleman politician
3:00 Meritocracy
4:00 Respect and trust for competent government in Nordic countries
5:00 Countries with a culture of social responsibility, social harmony and the rule of law are better at dealing with emergencies in vast empires.
6:00 Diversity v Uniformity, Obedience v Innovation
7:00 Politicised mask wearing

8:00  What should be merely a matter of common sense becomes a party political issue in the liberal democracies of the West.

Mask wearing in Toronto and Vancouver compared to Montreal where there are more deaths than in Wuhan.

12:00 Chineseness

13:00 When Chineseness was a cultural idea

14:00 Racial superiority is really military supremacy. Military supremacy does not last since all empires fall.

15:00 Exceptionalism and uniqueness

16:00 Confucian values are universal.

17:00 Social harmony, meritocracy, justifiable hierarchy

18:00 "You should become more like me!"

Identifying and dividing the enemy in the pandemic

You are either in favour of lockdown or you are not.

If you want it to end now, were you ever in favour of it?

Who are the people in favour of lockdown?

1. the elderly
2. the risk-averse female
3. the welfare-dependent
4. the economically unproductive
5. the atheist
6. the feminist far removed from common sense
7. the liberal
8. the never-Trumper
9. the unprincipled
10. the parasitic

Who are the people who never wanted lockdown?

1. the robust
2. the economically active and productive taxpayer
3. Trump supporters
4. Brexiteers
5. the religious
6. the principled
7. the young
8. the morally courageous
9. the enterprising male
10. the social conservative in touch with common sense

The men who pander to immoral and parasitical women should be ignored as feminised, infantilised, irresponsible and of weak character. Only masculine principled men who are married fathers eg Lord Sumption are only fit to have their views heard since they are men who are invested in properly parenting their legitimate offspring. This is how it should be put to people who wish to organise themselves against lockdown totalitarianism. There is no danger of the human race dying out because of the pandemic. It tends to be the parasites, atheists, nihilists and the welfare-dependent who demand to be protected from the virus at all costs. Nihilists tend not to be married parents nor do they care about what happens to their society after they are dead. 

The matriarchy wants to topple the statues of the patriarchy and the Western political establishment is now at war with itself

The mania for statue-toppling could end in the destruction of the Statue of Liberty on both sides of the Atlantic. If so, it does suggest that the French Revolution from which liberalism originated was not a very good idea after all. In 1972, Chinese premier Zhou Enlai was asked about the impact of the French Revolution. “Too early to say,” he replied. I trust the time is now ripe to pronounce on this matter. Ellen Futter, whom I believe to be Jewish and not a Trump supporter, has had a very interesting career.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_V._Futter

Has Trump been good for Jews?
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/roosevelt-statue-to-be-removed-for-white-supremacy-overtones/ar-BB15O2nm?ocid=sf

Zionist Jews would think he has made an effort for them by recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Is Ellen Futter an observant Jew or a Liberal Democrat Jew?

Are observant Jews more likely to protect Trump's presidency than liberal Jews who are currently doing their utmost to subvert his presidency and destroy his chances of winning the 2020 Presidential election?

Are Jews who act contrary to the principles of Judaism guilty of Chillul Hashem?

How many Liberal Jews are there to every observant Jew?

How many Liberal Gentiles are there to every Conservative Gentile?

How useful are the ideologies of Liberalism and Conservatism if neither of them have ever had an official handbook while with Jews and Muslims their official handbook is their scripture?

Rabbis would have to agree that Islam is the most Noahide-observant of all world religions. My contention is that Christianity has failed which is evidenced by the statue-toppling of the Western establishment being at war with each other.

The matriarchy is represented by "leftist" female and senior voters too physically and intellectually enfeebled to fight over their statues, the resurgent patriarchy is represented by dispossessed men who see their interests being represented by an alpha male leader capable of winning a second term.The possibility of Trump winning a second term has triggered the liberal elite into a frenzy of police de-funding and statue-toppling mass hysteria.

The liberal elite are weaponising the pandemic which turbo-charged the statue- toppling in the hope of preventing Trump from winning the election. The Western plutocracy is at war with itself and I am reminded of the last time they had a fight with each other over the Corn Laws. The nouveau riche who owned factories and wanted free trade won and the landed gentry lost. Who will win this time?

The matriarchy now has its official representative in Downing Street

Deep down, it is an expression of male/female differences caused by the fact that we live in a matriarchy ie a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers. There are now two bastards at Downing Street.

Single mothers whose father/husband is the welfare state are happy to stay forever in lockdown because that was their lifestyle pre-lockdown anyway. Their preferences are prioritised even over the preferences of big business like Virgin Airlines, P&O etc. In a matriarchy, all men are lower in status than the unmarried mother, and this includes POTUS. Too bad British men are singularly unable to discuss this amongst themselves. The last man who did so was the Jew Keith Joseph, and he paid dearly for this lèse-majesté. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron While Jews and Muslims worship the Abrahamic God, Post-Christian Westerners who hate them only worship unmarried mothers recruited from irresponsible and immoral women to whom they desire sexual access. They now have their representative in Downing Street.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/05/03/boris-johnson-must-end-absurd-dystopian-tyrannical-lockdown2/

Steve Baker:
" On March 23, as we debated the Coronavirus Act, Boris Johnson told the nation in a statement, “From this evening I must give the British people a very simple instruction - you must stay at home.”

On March 24, the Government texted the nation, “new rules in force now: you must stay at home.” Immediately, the police in various places began enforcing them.

A barbecue was turned over by police in the West Midlands. Officers in Crewe stopped cars to ascertain whether they were making essential journeys. British Transport Police stopped and questioned people on trains in and around London, asking their reasons for travel.

But there was no new law in force until 1pm on March 26.

That’s when the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Regulations were signed into law by Matt Hancock under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984. While most of us complied by voluntary consent, where the police enforced the rules in the meantime, they were enforcing a proclamation. Whatever the necessities, that the rule of law should have been overthrown in this period is extraordinary and deeply troubling.

Only today do those rules enforcing the most draconian restrictions in British history come before the Commons for retrospective endorsement with just two hours debate and no division. We have lived under house arrest for weeks by ministerial decree – a statutory instrument that parliament had no foresight of and no opportunity to scrutinise or approve before it changed life in this country as we know it. The situation is appalling.

As I conceded on March 23, there were good reasons for ministers to take rapid action. The public would expect nothing less. The first responsibility of any government is to protect the lives of its people and faced with the uncertainty of this awful virus, the instruction for us all to stay at home to save lives was the right call.

But this suspension of freedom comes with a cost too. Millions of people in our country have been plunged into idleness at public expense and unemployment, facing financial and psychological hardship on a scale never seen before. Thousands of people have missed life-prolonging health appointments. Vulnerable people are isolated and domestic violence has soared. Soon will come the full economic impact on all our lives.

These extraordinary measures require not only legal authority but democratic consent. There is a real possibility that they have had neither.

A judicial review is being brought against the lockdown laws, claiming they are ultra vires – that is, that ministers have no legal authority to impose them in the way they did – and that they incur a disproportionate interference with fundamental rights and freedoms. There is serious legal scholarship supporting that view. I fear the present rules may be unlawful.

Meanwhile, the CPS is reviewing every single charge, conviction and sentence brought under emergency powers after civil liberties group Big Brother Watch detailed a string of wrongful convictions in a damning review. The zealous criminalisation of people for activity that, until a few weeks ago was entirely ordinary, has concerned many, including me. I am horrified by the expansion of the surveillance state, with thermal imaging cameras, drones, ANPR and location tracking being deployed at the drop of a hat to police the nation into imprisonment at home.

This is why the role of parliament is so vital. We must oversee the extraordinary measures that are being taken. Only we can supply legal and democratic legitimacy to the difficult decisions that need to be made in this crisis.

As I read the regulations we will surely endorse on Monday, curtailing our freedoms in ways unimaginable, I see rules which are unclear, subjective and potentially legally unsound. For example, the law in England does not restrict how frequently or for how long we exercise, nor whether we drive to do it. Yet ministers have dilated on whether an hour or 30 minutes is allowable. And we have risked offences of sitting too long on a park bench, purchasing luxury food and sweating inadequately while cycling. People have been accused of not exercising when practicing yoga and walking. Families have been driven off their own outdoor property, against the law.

This is absurd, dystopian and tyrannical. The sooner it is ended, the better.

If parliament is to be able to scrutinise the lockdown restrictions on Monday, we must see the Government’s detailed exit strategy. Parliamentarians, and the public, need more than vague assurances to see the light at the end of the tunnel. When our lives are at stake, we cannot operate on trust alone.

The world just changed but British values have not. It is imperative we hold ministers’ and the Prime Minister’s feet to the fire to uphold Parliamentary democracy, the rule of law and the freedoms which rest upon them. "

The mental and physical health of Quarantine Britain

3:00  UK's Plan B if 'Team Johnson' Is Incapacitated? Answer Is Unclear
https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/04/05/world/europe/05reuters-health-coronavirus-britain-johnson-illness.html

4:00  Elected dictators
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dictator

5:00  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominic_Raab

6:00  Dominic Raab should have told the ITV journalist to stick his stupid question up his arse. Then he might have become leader, but he doesn't have the balls really. 

8:00  Idiot journalists goes on to ask Raab how many times he works out in a week. That was when Raab should have smashed punched that fucker in the face and told him to leave his property.  

10:00  Raab is a snorefest about feminism when he could have been inspirational and appealing. If you are a feminist suffering from insomnia, listen to Raab complaining about feminism. 

11:00  Raab prevaricates about the abolition of the Equalities Office when previously said he would abolish it.  

14:00  In principle, that bore Raab is in favour of grammar schoolszzzzzzzzzzzzzz

15:00  Raab is "a little bit worried" about transgenderism.

23:00  Favourite song: Break On Through To The Other Side by The Doors

23:30  Favourite meal: Wuhanese Bat Stew

24:00  Biggest regret: not punching journalists with stupid questions in the face sooner

Raab is clearly a danger to society because he will make us all fall asleep at the wheel after stirring up tsunamis of apathy up and down the country. 

It's got to be Gove, don't you see?

I know he has done and said stuff but he really does come across as milquetoast the way he talks.

7:00  Michael Gove

7:30  Succession

8:00  The British constitution is the official handbook for the Rules of Britain, but it neither has an index nor chapter headings because it is unwritten with the whole purpose of being obscure, hard to find and subject to the rule of parliamentary sovereignty, which is really the principle of being unprincipled.

11:00  Keir Starmer
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/search?q=Keir+Starmer

12:00  A state of emergency should have been declared once the EU referendum delivered Brexit

13:00  Matriarchy

13:30  Email to me soliciting my services for the mental well-being of the world
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/04/claire-khaws-voice-of-reason-identified.html

18:00  The health of the British Prime Minister discussed
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000h0f0

19:00  Dr Abdul Wahid on Prime Ministerial health



24:00  Michael Gove

28:00  Dominic Raab

30:00  "Well-developed protocols on national security" my arse

33:00  A one-party state

34:00  Dominic Raab

35:00  It's got to be Gove if Boris goes, IMHO.
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/search?q=Michael+Gove

I restate my support for herd immunity

28:00  I join.
The only problem is the disposal of corpses.
20:00  NEETs and bedblockers
30:00  Sacrifices will have to be made.
31:00  Independent businesses
33:00  The end of civilisation as we know it
33:30  The end of American exceptionalism
34:00  Effeminate, cowardly, unmanly
35:00  The orphans of Western civilisation
36:00  Periodic clearout
37:00  Europeans went on to achieve great things after the bubonic plague.
38:00  Dying with dignity
38:30  The West is a geographical as well as a political expression.
41:00  Boomer remover
42:00  Prioritising the national interest
43:00  Is there a duty to strive officiously to keep alive?
https://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2013/07/striving-officiously-to-keep-alive-.html
46:00  Senescent Italy
47:00  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/14/italians-80-will-left-die-country-overwhelmed-coronavirus/
48:00  Islamic consultation
https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/161015269761
49:00  India, Mexico, Brazil and Sweden
51:00  Covid-19 deaths in Sweden
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1102203/cumulative-coronavirus-cases-in-sweden/
51:30  Spanish flu
https://www.historytoday.com/archive/history-matters/spanish-flu-pandemic
52:00  It's not what happens to you, but how you deal with it.
52:30  The divine punishment narrative
53:00  The Abrahamic God
53:30  The Ancient Greeks
54:00  The slaves of God
55:00  Prometheus
56:00  Alexander Fleming
56:30  Israel means wrestling with God.
57:00  Biblical and rabbinic responses to suffering
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/biblical-and-rabbinic-responses-to-suffering/

Throughout the literature of Jewish piety, the idea is found of accepting suffering in love and faith in God. The Mekhilta [a midrash on the book of Exodus] to the verse: “Ye shall not make with Me gods of silver and gods of gold” (Exodus 20: 23) comments: “Do not behave towards Me as heathens behave to their gods. When happiness come to them, they sing praises to their gods, but when retribution comes upon them they curse their gods. If I bring happiness upon you give thanks, and when I bring sufferings give thanks also.”

58:00  People on the whole are not interested in learning. 

Kevin Michael Grace talks about the matriarchy I have been talking about for years

52:00  "The price of matriarchy is eternal panic."

1:08:00  "We're living in a matriarchy and ain't it grand."

If God is punishing different nations with Covid-19, what would they be punished for?

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases

If we are being punished by God, here are my suggestions as to the reason why:

Italy for the blasphemy and idolatry of the Catholic Church.
Span for the Inquisition.

China for its disregard of halal dietary restrictions and its atheism.

Iran for dividing the religion of Islam into sects and rejoicing in its own doctrines as the Koran has warned against. http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e2129

France for the French Revolution and being responsible for liberalism and neo-liberalism.

The United States for promoting global gay marriage.

The UK for its global empire of usury and the idolatrous and blasphemous religion of Christianity that requires Christians to worship an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

How would you prioritise medical care if you were in charge?

https://ask.fm/oneparty4all

Italians over 80 'will be left to die' as country overwhelmed by coronavirus
Hardest-hit region drafts new proposals saying who will live and who will die
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/14/italians-80-will-left-die-country-overwhelmed-coronavirus/

LEFT TO DIE

1. Anyone five years over retirement age
2. Anyone who has more than three criminal convictions
3. Expectant unmarried women
4. Drug addicts/sociopaths/psychopaths who are NEETs

GIVEN MEDICAL TREATMENT

1. Those with dependents
2. Those in employment, particularly those working in the essential services

7:00  Claire Khaw, Spokesperson for Western voters
8:00  Bowing and curtseying
11:00  Designing uniforms for different groups of people
18:00  I have a little list of six categories.,
24:00  Sociopath and psychopaths
25:00  Sociopaths and psychopaths in positions of power
29:00  Having principles
31:00  Valid arguments
32:00  A sound argument
34:00  Sociopaths and habitual liars
35:00  Deniers of Secular Koranism
37:00  Luke Ford's sociopathy
39:00  Definition of religion
42:00  Caring for others helps us get better.
45:00  Sociopaths and psychopaths are atheists.
48:00  A Hypothetical Supreme Being
50:00  Atheism and short term thinking
51:00 The National Interest and TLM
52:00  Unprincipled hedonists
53:00  Cotto-Gottfried
55:00  Facebook discussion on who gets medical treatment
https://www.facebook.com/claire.khaw.906/posts/227258595337669?notif_id=1584265671806966&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic