THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
A Christian theocracy would be totalitarian. The Old and New Testament does not mention freedom of belief and it is not a concept known in Mosaic and Roman times. We all know Muhammad was born after the fall of Rome. Christianity is known for its forced conversions, Inquisition and heretic burning.
The Koran guarantees freedom of belief with Quran.com/2/256 and this is what the First Amendment is based on. Therefore sharia is closer to the American constitution than a Christian theocracy.
Not even Christians claim the New Testament was written by Christ, let alone God.
3:00 How should we choose the religion of our country?
4:00 We cannot tell which religion is true.
5:00 Choosing a religion is a moral and political choice.
6:00 The religion with the most powerful God
7:00 An imperial religion
8:00 How is going to church going to help your political activism?
9:00 The burned and bloody history of Christianity
11:00 Christians executed heretics who denied that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe. They were also antisemitic and haters of the Semitic religions ie Judaism and Islam. They hated the two other branches of the Abrahamic faiths because Jews and Muslims refused to believe in their idolatrous and blasphemous nonsense cooked up by a bunch of bishops called to Nicaea by an emperor that wasn't even Christian.
12:00 The way Jews and Christians define themselves
13:00 If a Jew's wife's conversion was not complete before her first child was born but was complete by the time her second was born, the first child would have to undergo a conversion while subsequent offspring would not.
15:00 Rule-based Judaism is a stronger religion than Christianity whose narrative is absurd, idolatrous and blasphemous.
16:00 God revealed the Torah for Jews and the Koran for gentiles. Not even Christians claim that the New Testament was written by Christ, let alone God. Not only are Christians idolatrous and blasphemous, their scripture is undeniably inferior in conception to the Torah and the Koran.
17:00 The Torah and the Koran are the directly revealed Word of God (ie direct evidence of God's existence if you accept the premise that God revealed the Torah and the Koran to mankind), but the New Testament is mere hearsay (ie what Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - mortal fallible men - claim to have witnessed).
24:00 Why do atheists complain about being threatened with hell?
25:00 If your religion were working properly, your government would be governing properly. If your government were governing properly, you would not be complaining about terrorism being committed by victims of your foreign policy.
27:00 Paul Gottfried:
"I never deny that Muslims are vile or that I would be delighted to be rid of them."
28:00 Your enemy may not be lying all the time.
29:00 What is the Western culture and what is the Western way of life?
30:00 Plebeian Islamophobes
31:00 Muslims represent the immigrant group xenophobes most hate and fear.
When I was in Israel, I met no one who sounded as passionately anti-Islamic as you are; the only people who share the depth of your antipathy are the Catholic converts at Chronicles and the Serb nationalist Trifkovich.
Clearly, they would rather talk to each other in their Islamophobic way than talk to me. Edward Welsch is a Catholic convert. Christians are terrified and avoid me like the plague because they know I would be gunning for their Trinity which they know, deep down, is morally and intellectually indefensible. Not even a Sistine Chapel stuffed with Cardinals longing to be Pope would be able to defend the Trinity against charges of blasphemy and idolatry.
It’s a pleasure to see you debating PG—my two favorite paleo intellectuals.May I suggest that the problem is that the two of you are operating under different definitions of “Islam”? Professor Gottfried appears to be using the conventional American usage, in which a “Muslim” is anyone who says he’s a Muslim. You appear to be discussing the actual tenets of orthodox Islam. I forget who said that in America there are Protestant Protestants, Protestant Catholics, and Protestant Jews. Likewise, I suspect the good professor’s “moderate Muslims” are Protestant Muslims. Or to be more exact, Unitarian Muslims. That is, they consider themselves Muslim, but their general outlook on life is not much different from that of the average “Stuff White People Like” intellectual fashion victim. A Protestant Islam is the great fantasy of our multiculturalist (ie, Unitarian) masters. In the Unitarian worldview, the only reason that all Muslims do not instantly convert to Unitarianism (while remaining, of course, Muslims) is the “hate” they encounter from those, such as you and Professor Gottfried, who have not yet submitted to multiculturalism. The resemblance between this strategy and Ann Coulter’s plan for solving the Muslim Problem (“invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity”) is rather striking, I find. This is why the actual tenets of Islam don’t matter to progressives (ie, Unitarians). It’s because, in the glorious future in which everyone is a Unitarian, there will be no Islam. There will only be “Muslims,” who pray to the One God who is named Allah, and perhaps preserve some of their colorful native rituals.
1:00:00 Unmarriageable Western men who are atheists would not want to restore the patriarchy because they are not prepared to make the sacrifices required of men ie raising the price of sex to establish and maintain the patriarchy.
1:03:00 Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his assassin were both Christian. Christians started two World Wars. Christians nuked two Japanese cities of civilian non-combatants. Christians fought the American Civil War. Christians fought the English Civil War. Christians fought the Wars of the Reformation and the European Wars of Religion as well as the Wars of European Unification. Christians started the French Revolution and the Revolutions of 1848. No other religion had a continent-wide war of religion. Sounds like Christians are the most militarily aggressive religion of all and this was why they were so good at war and acquired a global empire. But they hate and fear Muslims for a few acts of terrorism after they were traumatised from being the victims of Western foreign policy. These Christians can dish it out, but they can't take it when the slipper is on the other foot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archduke_Franz_Ferdinand_of_Austria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion
Paul Gottfried is just as opposed to Islam as you are, but he’s more afraid of the untold damage the neocons have done to this great nation and will continue to do if allowed to exploit the Islamic threat with the same non-solutions that the Republican party is championing namely their invade the world and invite the world policies. It’s quite simply Gottfried understands that the existential threat to the West isn’t Islam, it’s the West.
Jews and Muslims have the protective wrapper of religion which atheists lack. All societies have a religion or they become extinct. When the Romans stopped believing in the gods, they converted to Christianity. The Vikings were pagans who settled in France and became Christian. Where are they now? They have assimilated themselves out of existence. Monotheism is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more. Jews who were monotheists before Muslims are still with us today and the theocracy of Iran still defies America, which Britain cannot, being its poodle. If Iran had not had their Islamic Revolution, they would be practising liberal democracy and still a Western vassal state.
Jews and Muslims actually agree that Christianity is illegitimate, idolatrous and blasphemous but have been too afraid to say so because of so many centuries of being the victims of Christian wars, persecution and imperialism.
Jews and Muslims owe a duty to humanity to point out to Westerners that Christianity is kaput. Just as it would be our duty to point out that food and drink is poisoned to any person about to consume it, it is the duty of Jews and Muslims as good citizens of the world to point out that Christianity is kaput, so that Westerners do not further delude themselves that they have anything resembling a functioning religion capable of even maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality ie ensuring that most parents in your society are married parents.
If this error is not corrected soon, BLM will soon be the religion of the West. When the global American empire collapses, it will suck everything around into its vortex as it sinks.
Nature abhors a vacuum, and Christianity is now a moral vacuum. Its replacement should be clear and obvious because there is only one rational and moral choice.
The mania for statue-toppling could end in the destruction of the Statue of Liberty on both sides of the Atlantic. If so, it does suggest that the French Revolution from which liberalism originated was not a very good idea after all. In 1972, Chinese premier Zhou Enlai was asked about the impact of the French Revolution. “Too early to say,” he replied. I trust the time is now ripe to pronounce on this matter. Ellen Futter, whom I believe to be Jewish and not a Trump supporter, has had a very interesting career.
Zionist Jews would think he has made an effort for them by recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Is Ellen Futter an observant Jew or a Liberal Democrat Jew?
Are observant Jews more likely to protect Trump's presidency than liberal Jews who are currently doing their utmost to subvert his presidency and destroy his chances of winning the 2020 Presidential election?
Are Jews who act contrary to the principles of Judaism guilty of Chillul Hashem?
How many Liberal Jews are there to every observant Jew?
How many Liberal Gentiles are there to every Conservative Gentile?
How useful are the ideologies of Liberalism and Conservatism if neither of them have ever had an official handbook while with Jews and Muslims their official handbook is their scripture?
Rabbis would have to agree that Islam is the most Noahide-observant of all world religions. My contention is that Christianity has failed which is evidenced by the statue-toppling of the Western establishment being at war with each other.
The matriarchy is represented by "leftist" female and senior voters too physically and intellectually enfeebled to fight over their statues, the resurgent patriarchy is represented by dispossessed men who see their interests being represented by an alpha male leader capable of winning a second term.The possibility of Trump winning a second term has triggered the liberal elite into a frenzy of police de-funding and statue-toppling mass hysteria.
The liberal elite are weaponising the pandemic which turbo-charged the statue- toppling in the hope of preventing Trump from winning the election. The Western plutocracy is at war with itself and I am reminded of the last time they had a fight with each other over the Corn Laws. The nouveau riche who owned factories and wanted free trade won and the landed gentry lost. Who will win this time?
Islam means logos if logos means the peace you get from submitting to the inevitable ie Truth, Logic and Morality. You can ignore truth until it becomes unignorable. You can refuse to use logic until you fall into error and disaster. You can refuse to follow your moral principles until your body politic is lying on the ground decapitated by the Elephant in the Room: Feminism.
You can only comfort yourselves by pretending that you never cared about the statues anyway and hope your shops are not looted if you kneel to the God of Anti-racism, since the government will no longer uphold the law or protect your rights even if you are Big Business. How can the headless corpse of democracy and Christianity protect anything?
Perhaps the Jews will save us since they are the people who are supposed to martyr themselves if they are forced to kneel before idols, and idolatry is worshiping anything that isn't the Abrahamic God.
The Abrahamic God never forbade slavery in either the Torah or the Koran. It is enough that He forbade usury which leads to irresponsible borrowing and lending by individuals and governments. It is indebtedness that leads us into behaviour such as gambling and reckless imperial wars which ultimately leads to our own enslavement when we lose at gambling and at war.
I say Jews are the world's most ancient and powerful tribe. I also say they are the aristocracy of humanity, but that doesn't mean I think aristocrats are more moral than commoners, only that they are supposed to adhere to higher standards and will be punished more severely if they fail. I also say that Jewish privilege should not be available for unobservant Jews and for this reason have been struck off the Register of Jews that I propose. Registrars of this Register shall be rabbis. The Registry is for the purpose of protecting Jews and gentiles against each other. If Jews are suffering an identity crisis, then so will the rest of us.
I am saying if Jews were following their own principles, they would have to support Secular Koranism because according to their own beliefs, they are God's Chosen People, chosen to promote the Noahide laws amongst gentiles. Secular Koranism is more Noahide than Christianity because it is based on the Koran, and Jews already acknowledge that Islam is is the most Noahide of all the world religions.
7:00 The concept of God definitely exists. If we see the point of obeying His laws, we will incline towards belief because belief in God who made laws for us would make us more likely to obey them from generation to generation thereby prolonging the existence of our civilisation.
The Enlightenment was only a natural reaction against the Wars of the Reformation and the European Wars of Religion and was ended with the French Revolution. There would have been no need for the Wars of the Reformation if Europe had already been Muslim.
In any case, how enlightened were Europeans if they went from Catholicism to Protestantism to the French Revolution without stopping to consider Islam?
This is probably one of the speeches Naik made that got him into trouble with those who control Western media.
Richard Spencer:
"We might need to adopt some of the virtues of Islam if not all of it in order to survive. It is a kind of natural reaction against the ultimate consequence of Western ways of thinking which is if it feels good do it to satisfy your empty soul with material goods and that something like Islam is ultimately necessary."
0:48 Richard Spencer: "Islam has its advantages too."
When Spencer talks about ethnocentrism, he really means group solidarity and for that to happen it male solidarity is required and this requires what the Victorians called moral restraint. In other words, the shaming of sluts and slut-fuckers with quran.com/24/2
1:00 Spencer: "Is Islam the last hope of the West?"
Having a religion that promotes patriarchal moral values creates group solidarity because it creates shared values greater and wider than that of physical attributes eg race, youth, beauty. Group solidarity can ultimately only be achieved by male solidarity and men competing against each other for the sexual favours of capricious and immoral women not their wife while failing to parent their legitimate offspring properly will only cause anomie and atomisation and the decline and fall of their civilisation.
By group solidarity, we really mean male solidarity against sluts who bribe men with fornication to take their mind off what is actually happening to their civilisation. Bribing men with even more varieties of recreational sex is a way of taking their minds off the indignity of this low status.
In a matriarchy all men are lower in status than the unmarried mother and this includes POTUS who has not so far criticised the root of the problem: widespread bastardy.
If you wonder why no male politician will stand up for a principle any more, the reason was first what happened to Enoch Powell and then Keith Joseph. The principle in question was that of governing in the national interest, in case you were wondering.
13:00 Keith Woods talks about the Bosniaks and Serbs. Of course the principles of Islam cannot survive in a liberal democracy because such a democracy is a matriarchy and as such would be force-feeding its citizens sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting. For Islam to work in your society, it would have to be a theocracy ie a society that governs in accordance with the laws of God. Otherwise, you would be like someone complaining that the engine in his car won't start because the engine has already been taken out.
14:00 Richard Spencer asks "How does Islam increase ethnocentrism? How does Christianity not do it to such a degree or maybe the opposite?"
By ethnocentrism Spencer really means group solidarity. Group solidarity can only be achieved by shared values ie a moral system effective at ensuring that people do the right thing to keep the group in existence and apart from others.
All religions are moral systems. The golden thread that runs through all five world religions is that they support patriarchal moral values ie marriage and family values which go to creating a stable society where life is reasonably predictable, moral laws enforced and criminal behaviour punished. Group solidarity means male solidarity and male solidarity is only possible if sluts and slut-fuckers are shamed. quran.com/24/2 LGBT forms of recreational sex to cheat the system would also be forbidden. quran.com/4/15quran.com/4/16
Christianity is now indistinguishable from Liberalism. In the 21st century, Liberalism means nothing more than sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting and the degeneracy caused by the failure to see to it that most parents are married parents.
Tolerance of unmarried parents and a culture of fornication is clearly linked to lack of racial homogeneity and lack of male solidarity.
Basically, societies that don't tolerate unmarried parents have children who do a whole lot better at school than societies that have normalised bastardy. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-50563833
14:00 Dutton seems unaware European royal families perpetuated themselves by cousin marriage.
16:00 FMG is not mentioned at all in the Koran and this disgusting practice originates from Africa.
18:00 Ridiculously, Dutton talks about the "permanent erection" of Islam. I do hope people will actually read the Koran for themselves instead of believing in the sensationalist nonsense of the IQ-obsessed Dutton which is one of the badges of right-wingery these days which include racism, antisemitism and Islamophobia. Sadly, the alt-right don't actually know how low IQ they are, which is probably why they think Dutton is so very clever, because they don't know any better.
25:00 Keith Woods has heard very strange things about Muslims in Qatar that I have not heard of. Wahhabism described by Dutton but I urge everyone to take this with a large pinch of salt.
30:00 Spencer: "Religion determines who we are."
No religion, no group identity. It also tells us not to be a society of sluts, slut-fuckers and bastards.
"In terms of religion being separate from politics, I find this ridiculous. Religion is part of politics. It is part of how a population understands itself or an empire governs. We need to be willing to think in these terms of how religion affects the way we think politically."
The distinction between religion and politics is a distinction without a difference. Islam accepts the logic of your laws reflecting your chosen moral system. The real "religion" of the early 21st century West is the practice of sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting.
Islam also accepts the logic that a moral rule is more likely to be obeyed if it is the law and that any law is more likely to be obeyed for longer by more people if it is perceived to come from a Supreme Being that is omnipotent, omniscient, created the universe we are a part of, knows our hearts and minds and occasionally answers prayers who is also perfectly moral and cares about us individually.
Even if God were only a creation of Man, He was created for a purpose, that of assisting Man in his government, politics, law and spirituality. It would be a waste not to use this infinite and free resource to correct our previous mistakes, which only happened as a consequence of not obeying His laws.
"Islam is here. It is a hugely popular religion. Islam can inspire men to take up arms, to fight, to dominate, to engage in political activities. Therefore we need to seriously think about it in evolutionary terms. We are the descendants of religious doctrines."
Jews are the descendants of the religious doctrines of the Judaism based on the Torah.
Muslims are the descendants of the religious doctrines of Islam based on the Koran.
Do Christians even exist any more? If Christians are defined as those who believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God - considered by both Jews and Muslims to be blasphemous and idolatrous - are there any believing Christians? If you believe in this absurdity, you are too credulous. If you only pretend to believe in it, you are corrupt and are either a member of a corrupt priesthood, or wish to enter it to benefit from the status and income being a member of this parasitic class would give you.
It has been said that Christianity and Hypocrisy walk hand in hand. This is because while on the one hand Christians know that the Ten Commandments forbid idolatry and blasphemy, they practise it themselves while condemning it in others. Not only to do they practise idolatry and blasphemy, their idolatry is Supreme Idolatry and their blasphemy is the Ultimate Blasphemy.
What could be more offensive to God and blasphemous than to have Mary called His mother and her illegitimate son confused for Him? Yet, because Christians who have been practising this idolatry and blasphemy for 2000 years think they can continue to get away with flouting what He has specifically and expressly forbidden since Mosaic times. This must be because they are really atheists who don't believe in any of this nonsense at all. They are only pretending to do so because they think it makes them better than us, but now that they know they are only despised for their hypocrisy, they are in denial of the extent and depth of their depraved blasphemy. If they really did believe in God, they would fear His wrath. After all, the beginning of wisdom is the fear of God. It seems that two millennia of believing in this blasphemous absurdity (or pretending to) has utterly rotted their minds and morals.
If you point out the idolatry and blasphemy of Christian worship with the accompanying obscenity of pretending to eat the flesh and drink the blood of God Himself that Christians call the Eucharist, they will look at you with apparent incomprehension. If you finally get them to take your point, they will shrug their shoulders indifferently because they are obviously more invested in their idolatry than the correct worship of God, heedless of the divine prohibition against idolatry and blasphemy in the Ten Commandments, and say "So what?"
32:00 The important thing to note is that religious people who follow their religious principles don't have bastards. Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic. Religious people have a moral system that maintains minimum standards of sexual morality ie ensuring that most parents in your society are not parents of bastards while sexuallly liberated atheists who are also nihilists don't think a degenerate next generation is a problem because once they are dead, the actions and character of their badly parented bastard offspring - if they have any at all - is not their problem any more.
33:00 The people with the right to have sex and legitimate children in a patriarchy would be marriageable men and women while it is a free for all in our degenerate matriarchy.
35:00 Atheists are nihilists who decline to make themselves marriageable or make any sacrifices to bring up the next generation. They will tend to be Green Party supporters who are more or less told it is OK to mutilate your sex organs (thereby sterilising yourself and destroying any chance of becoming a good parent of legitimate offspring) in order to masquerade as a member of the opposite sex) before they are adult. The parent most likely to support such a course of action would be the unmarried mother who will not have to contend with the objections of her illegitimate offspring's father in a society where fathers have been denuded of their rights.
36:00 Dutton: "For society to remain healthy, 90% of it must not breed."
40:00 Dutton talks about the Christian duty to "understand God's revelation". The best way to understand the nature and purpose of God is to acknowledge the wisdom of His laws. Dutton should be informed that the New Testament says nothing about science, but the Koran does. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292970930_SCIENTIFIC_FACTS_IN_QURAN
47:00 As well as his bizarre stories of Muslims in Qatar believing God has arms and legs, Keith Woods says "Judaism does not have a concept of an afterlife". Obviously, he has not heard of the olam haba. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/olam-ha-ba
Even more bizarrely, Keith Woods seems to think that Jews came after the Greeks because he says Jews got the idea of the soul from the Greeks. What else will he say next? That the earth is flat?
51:00 Western identity is a fundamental problem.
53:00 The Reformation was basically European monarchs asserting their independence from the Pope.
1:00:00 Richard Spencer invites us to consider if Islam could win and whether it has any virtues.
1:03:00 Feminism and White Sharia
1:05:00 Spencer would like a dialogue with Muslims. He could dip his toe in the waters by talking to me first.
Richard Spencer:
We might need to adopt some of the virtues of Islam if not all of it in order to survive. It is a kind of natural reaction against the ultimate consequence of Western ways of thinking which is if it feels good do it to satisfy your empty soul with material goods and that something like Islam is ultimately necessary.
https://www.facebook.com/claire.khaw.906/posts/213565300040332?comment_id=213999576663571¬if_id=1582807342698499¬if_t=feedback_reaction_generic for a discussion about this. The mulishness of Morally Compromised Slut-Fuckers should be an eye opener. Men who want to be married fathers and who want to parent their legitimate offspring properly should of course ignore the naysayers who refuse to express remorse and who refuse to repent by supporting Secular Koranism, preferring to blame Jews and Muslims for the consequences of condoning fornication and unmarried parenthood - the primary cause of degeneracy and the decline and fall of Western civilisation.
Remember, Mark Collett is not a married father and Millennial Woes probably has no prospect of becoming a married father either because he is so incorrigibly neurotic with his weak character, flabby morals and inability to discuss the purpose of religion with me even after admitting that it was an urgent and important topic in 2019 at https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/03/will-millennial-woes-have-deleted-my.html
The strongest principles we have are religious principles.
Western Man is politically inert because he is Post-Christian. The Post Christian no longer believes in having principles, preferring to be bribed or threatened in the way beasts of burden are motivated by carrot or stick.
Western Man, formerly Christian Man, is unprincipled because the most important principle of Christianity is a patent absurdity, for a Christian is defined as one who worships an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.
It has been said that Christianity and Hypocrisy march hand in hand. What could be more hypocritical than claiming to believe in the Abrahamic God while practising the idolatry of worshipping an executed revolutionary as His co-equal?
What could be more blasphemous than to claim to worship God who has forbidden idolatry than to be guilty of the Supreme Blasphemy and Ultimate Idolatry of claiming that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of Hashem/Allah?
Once it became legal to deny the Trinity in 1813, the lifeblood of the lies that made up Christianity drained away. 200 years later, Christian faith is now so drained away that it was discovered that the Archbishop of Canterbury himself forgot that he was supposed to believe in that absurdity. He was heard to be declaring that while he sometimes doubted the existence of God, he was sure Christ definitely existed.
When Christians took their faith seriously, they would burn other Christians at the stake for heresy, which was defined as denying the Trinity. Michael Servetus was burned at the stake for this in 1553, but most Christians are not aware of the bloody and totalitarian history of Christianity.
His execution was at the behest of John Calvin who promoted usury which has now ended in negative interest rates to punish savers.
When you point out the idolatry of Christianity to Christians, they would look at you with blank incomprehension or claim they don't care that they are idolatrous, unmindful of the fact that the Abrahamic God that they claim to believe in expressly and specifically forbade idolatry from the time of Moses. Later, God also sent a warner against idolatry in the form of Muhammad, but because no violence was done to them, they thought they had escaped the consequences of their lies. But have they? God if He exists would be infinitely patient and has all of eternity to wait for the lying idolatrous hypocritical blaspheming Christian to suffer the consequences of the sin of idolatry, which is its own punishment.
The chief harm of idolatry is that it leads ineluctably to self-worship and the self-destruction of Narcissus.
The idolater would be so focused on his idolatry that he will ignore Truth, Logic and Morality itself while claiming to support it, so hypocritical is he.
If France had been an Islamic State, the conditions that provoked the French Revolution would not have existed. Now that Western Man knows Christianity is kaput, now is the opportunity to trade up to Islam. Secular Koranism is here to make the transition easier. All that is required of Jews is they confirm that Islam is more Noahide than Christianity which it is their religious duty to do.
If Judaism is Monotheism Mark I and Christianity is Mark II, then Islam is Monotheism Mark III, the latest and most advanced model of Monotheism, complete with driver's manual and MoT. Why settle for anything less?
0:01 I didn't manage to get the sound of the Aaron "party" stream after all. Apologies. This Neo-Nazi/alt-right house party in Jerusalem has been deleted.
2:00 Aaron Amihud won't let me on his streams because he hates and fears Secular Koranism. If you asked him for a reason, he would pretend it is for reasons of restoring the patriarchy, but that is just nonsense, and restoring the patriarchy does not mean not allowing Claire Khaw - who wants to restore the patriarchy - on your streams. My position is that only Secular Koranism would restore the patriarchy in Western nations and Aaron in his cowardice cannot accept that nor can he argue against it. Christianity is kaput and is in any case idolatrous, so as a Jew Aaron cannot tell Western nations to be more Christian. He knows he is conflicted, and he knows I know he is conflicted and that is the real reason why he bans me from his streams. In fact, I tried to ask him about his views on Chabad's Jew-administered Noahidism, but he ended a stream rather than answer my question, because he feared my forensic questioning. We presented five streams together at his suggestion and you can hear them all at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLiyerKd2Lcq7G082L7Ua182pWqkHNSyp It seems he gave up trying to demonstrate that Secular Koranism was not viable or moral and wants to deprive me of the oxygen of publicity by excluding me from the conversation, just like liberal media.
4:00 The irony of Jewish Aaron allowing White Nationalists and larping Nazis to take over his stream
6:00 My exchanges with Chabad rabbis on the Noahide laws
8:00 The medium of the written word is more subject to analysis than the spoken word.
10:00 Our religion defines our politics.
11:00 Religion is a standard of behaviour.
12:00 Unprincipled people make society unstable and life unpredictable.
13:00 A political system with a high turnover means the velocity of buck-passing is high and government unaccountable.
14:00 We prefer to deal with people we know and trust.
15:00 We want our leader to be the same person for as long as possible if we already trust him.
16:00 The obvious solution of a one party theocracy
17:00 All political parties should promote the national interest, and nationalism is government in the national interest.
18:00 Wisdom is long-term thinking with a goal in mind, and with the discipline of postponing pleasure, to the extent of waiting until the afterlife to enjoy guilty pleasures.
19:00 Time and energy is wasted in political rallies, making false promises and telling lies in liberal democracies.
20:00 Just govern the country properly already!
21:00 Democracy and Christianity is really stupid so it was always bound to crash and burn anyway. Antisemites attribute the indifference, incompetence and corruption of their governments to Jewish subversion and refuse to believe that their kaput religion that they themselves don't even believe in and the democracy that they now reject for a White Nationalist Dictator were anything less than perfect, until the Jews came along. They are like a householder whose roof is leaking going around beating up other members of the household after falsely accusing them of causing the roof to leak and evicting them rather than calling the roofer. Things will only get worse for the White Man if he does not adopt Secular Koranism pronto.
22:00 The bloody history of schismatic Christianity and the European Wars of Religion
23:00 People of the same race and religion can be horrid to each other eg European Wars of Religion, War of the Roses, the Highland Clearances, the American Civil War, WW1, WW2,
24:00 The in-fighting of echo chambers and the splintering of echo chambers into mini-echo chambers
25:00 Patriarchy is more likely to endure in a theocracy that promotes patriarchal moral values.
26:00 Even murderers can see the point of laws against homicide.
27:00 The New Testament is not a good enough document to base your theocracy on, but the Koran is. The Torah is far too harsh even for Jews, which is why over the centuries they have interpreted away most of it with the Talmud.
28:00 The defective scripture of Buddhism and Hindus explains why they have never achieved empire. The Chinese government is wise enough not to identify China with Buddhism because it is useless for statecraft. For statecraft, the Chinese government has always used political philosophers operating on legalism. Legalism would have a field day with Secular Koranism and I look forward to the day when I hear the Chinese government proclaiming that it is operating "Secular Koranisim with Chinese characteristics". It is envisaged that there will be many varieties of Secular Koranism eg American, French, Italian, German, Polish, Hungarian, Austrian, Russian, Irish etc and last but not least, one with British characteristics, whatever that will mean by then.
29:00 There is a natural and logical hierarchy of everything.
30:00 The impracticable ideas of the French Revolution
31:00 Egalitarianism is the greatest injustice of treating unequal things equally, but the caste system is too rigid. Secular Koranism will bring about a socially mobile meritocracy that is intended to benefit the traditionally despised lower middle classes.
32:00 A meritocracy logically and necessarily has class mobility and Secular Koranism would bring this about by giving society a formal hierarchy while allowing for class mobility. In practice, Secular Koranism would favour the lower middle classes that have been traditionally despised by those above and below them. Islamic inheritance rules and freedom of disposition
33:00 The eugenic nature of marriage and how it is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy
34:00 I have been asking white people to take me to their leader for years but nobody can tell me who it is really because the velocity of the buck-passing is increasing ie the buck was being passed around faster and faster until it is now just a blur. Harry Truman was saying as long ago as the 1950s that the buck stops at the White House, but that didn't happen, did it? Perhaps it is time for America to have a more Chinese political system. This would stop them from being always angry and envious of the Chinese and I think this is what the Chinese are hoping the Americans will do, eventually. Presumably, this is why the Chinese are producing their helpful and tuneful propaganda videos with catchy songs sung in American accents about how China is run so much better with its much cleverer politicians because it just has a much more rational political system run by people who are not completely intellectually crippled through indoctrination by feminism and Political Correctness.
35:00 The long term national interest, national identity and how history is being taught
36:00 Female masochism
37:00 BBC Radio 4 dumbed down by feminism.
38:00 Perhaps 2020 will be the year my genius is nationally and perhaps internationally acknowledged. This is not just for my own aggrandisement and I am thinking of my dear parents. Currently, they think I am just a crank, so it would be so nice if they could feel proud of me after all they have done for me, having paid for my expensive education.
39:00 Phatic expressions of antisemitism are an emotional release for emasculated and helpless men like OV and his associates who know their matriarchy only wants them to become women and will provide them with the means to mutilate their sex organs and sterilise themselves, further morally crippling the men and making it impossible for them to even aspire to become a society of married fathers that is a patriarchy. Make no mistake: a matriarchy is in fact satanic, and, dare I say it, Amalekite. I am not saying they should be exterminated by Jews, of course. In any case, Jews are only a very small minority of humanity and lack the personnel to do so even if they wanted to.
"As of 2010, there were about 14 million Jews around the world, representing 0.2% of the global population."
The problem is that there is an Amalekite in each of us in the form of the Yetzer Hara, the evil inclination. It was Muhammad who said that the Greater Jihad is the struggle with oneself.
If Jews have a duty to the gentile, the it must be to denounce Christianity as being kaput, idolatrous and blasphemous to monotheism and to raise the status of Islam by being declared it Noahide-compliant.
My communications with a Chabad Rabbi Michael Schulman https://asknoah.org/wp-content/uploads/rebuttal-of-claims-that-secular-koranism-is-noahide-compliant.pdf have revealed that Chabadniks are not about to endorse Secular Koranism as Noahide-compliant because they are themselves pushing a Jew-administered Noahidism on ex-Christians who are presumably Islamophobic and dim-witted. Indeed, they do not regard Muslims or Islam or the Koran as being Noahide -compliant. The reason they give is that the Koran does not punish idolatry or blasphemy as harshly as Jews ie with the death penalty.
Why would any gentile subject himself to a religion run by rabbis who would execute gentiles for idolatry if they could rather than trust other gentiles to run their society properly without infringing the First Amendment as Secular Koranism is guaranteed to do? One has to wonder at the as yet unplumbed depths of human stupidity.
40:00 Why I like discussing religion with rabbis
41:00 Why is child prostitution not being run by white men but by non-white and foreign gangs?
44:00 Condoning underage sex plays into the hands of child prostitution gangs
45:00 If child prostitution gangs were run by white men, Islamophobic white men would be shrugging their shoulders.
46:00 White sex predators work alone because they lack male solidarity having never met their unmarried fathers and were "educated" in their co-ed schools by female teachers. Non-white men tend to come from married parents which means they are more likely to have the male solidarity and male co-operation necessary to share information and resources with each other to run an enterprise, criminal or otherwise.
48:00 No British philosopher will even discuss the definition of masculinity, certainly not the late of Roger Scruton who pointedly refused to discuss feminism with me. Indeed, I recently heard a rumour that he was known to be bisexual. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2013/03/roger-scruton-conservative-philosopher.html While my own morals have not been perfect, I have no difficulty at all discussing what the law should be as regards sexual morality and propose to treat unmarried parents as sex offenders attracting the punishment of quran.com/24/2.
50:00 I define a Christian as someone who has been confirmed. There are not that many of them.
Today is also the Vietnamese New Year. Calendars are very political, I was telling my dear mother when I spoke to her today to wish her a happy Chinese New Year of the Rat.
The Japanese have a maddening calendar whose hours changed according to the time of year which they used for 28 years between 1844 to 1872 before Westernising and celebrating their new year on 1 January like normal people. This reminded me of how the French Revolutionaries drove themselves mad after changing their calendar and measurements. The British are still subject to the metric system. What do people think of my proposal of returning to the imperial system as an assertion of national sovereignty and having our money in pounds, shilling and pence again after rebasing our currency after our Secular Koranist Islamic Revolution? It would make children learn their time tables again, wouldn't it?
For some reason, I am not so keen on adopting the Islamic calendar and am toying with the idea of the Jewish one. (That would mean that this year is in fact 5780 rather than merely 2020.) If we all started celebrating Jewish festivals with Jews, there would be less antisemitism, I am sure. Easter and Christmas are just silly because even Christians don't believe Christ was born on 25 December or that Christ rose from the dead on Easter Bank Holiday Sunday.
Instead of Christians suffering from cultural appropriation, I propose that Jews should now be the new victims of cultural appropriation - for the excellent cause of preventing antisemitism - while we live in a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.
Think of all the money to be made from Hanukkah candle holders, temporary huts we can get from Homebase/B&Q as well as palm leaves and etrog from Sainsbury's and Tesco!
Of course, the rest of us don't have to keep kosher or halal, but it would help us get along a bit better if we celebrated the same festivals. Islam only gives us a month of fasting on Ramadan and that's it, so there is nothing really to culturally appropriate from Muslims.
I have always thought that Jewish festivals are so much more fun than Christian ones, especially the thing they do with football rattles on Purim!
According to Naik, Islam's position on nationalism is this:
While Muslims should be loyal to their respective nations, it should not be the unquestioning loyalty of "My Country Right or Wrong".
In any case, were the two imperial Word Wars waged by Britain against Germany in Britain's national interest?
If Britain had been Muslim, it would have practised the limited polygamy allowed by the Koran ie up to four wives to replenish the labour force lost by the waging of two ruinous World Wars to stop Germany from rising up as a rival European power. It would also have prevented so many women who longed to be wives and mothers from dying childless, and it would have avoided the need to import the foreign labour that is now the cause of increasing racial tension.
Since the most hated and feared immigrant group are Muslims, it may be that God if He exists is subtly telling us something.
The two World Wars declared against Germany were not in any way in conformity with the Koranic rules of warfare. The Koran only allows defensive wars and imperial wars for the promotion of Islam, while giving the conquered the option to enjoy freedom of belief even if they lost the war: the jizya was a conditional tribute which could be avoided by converting to Islam.
After WW2, power shifted from the Old World to the New World after the British and French lost their colonies. Suez was the first example of America asserting its power. Then there was the Korean War and the Vietnam War waged for no apparent reason or national benefit other than for the purpose of kicking sand in the faces of Communists, like a beach bully.
It seems America is not up to running its suddenly acquired thalassocracy. Thalassocracies tend to rise and fall suddenly. Athens was a thalassocracy and so was Carthage. The Romans destroyed Carthage, Britain destroyed itself and America is also about to destroy itself. When all you have is a hammer, every problem is a nail.
When you are a global empire, every war is a party and you are the party girl liable to get knocked up and have her reputation destroyed.
In many ways America resembles a weak-minded adolescent of 19 of bad character often found in bad company, who has inherited a fortune and is seemingly bent on frittering it away on wine, women and song.
Old land acquires acquired the hard way think in centuries and conserve carefully what their ancestors lived and died to acquire, or try to avoid falling into the Thucydides Trap lurking before every empire.
Every war is after all a gamble, and the Koran forbids games of chance.
Also, old empires teach and learn their history differently to the vainglorious Americans and British who do not seem to know the lessons of history or even acknowledge their status: America is indeed a global empire and was the beneficiary of the folly of Britain who formerly had a global empire whose foolish politicians operating a rotten political system caused it to fall into its Thucydides Trap not once, but twice.
Mother, I praise thee!
Rich with thy hurrying streams,
bright with orchard gleams,
Cool with thy winds of delight,
Dark fields waving Mother of might,
Mother free.
Glory of moonlight dreams,
Over thy branches and lordly streams,
Clad in thy blossoming trees,
Mother, giver of ease
Laughing low and sweet!
Mother I kiss thy feet,
Speaker sweet and low!
Mother, to thee I praise thee. [Verse 1]
Who hath said thou art weak in thy lands
When the swords flash out in seventy million hands
And seventy million voices roar
Thy dreadful name from shore to shore?
With many strengths who art mighty and stored,
To thee I call Mother and Lord!
Thou who savest, arise and save!
To her I cry who ever her foeman drove
Back from plain and Sea
And shook herself free. [Verse 2]
Thou art wisdom, thou art law,
Thou art heart, our soul, our breath
Thou art love divine, the awe
In our hearts that conquers death.
Thine the strength that nerves the arm,
Thine the beauty, thine the charm.
Every image made divine
In our temples is but thine. [Verse 3]
Thou art Durga, Lady and Queen,
With her hands that strike and her swords of sheen,
Thou art Lakshmi lotus-throned,
And the Muse a hundred-toned,
Pure and perfect without peer,
Mother lend thine ear,
Rich with thy hurrying streams,
Bright with thy orchard gleems,
Dark of hue O candid-fair [Verse 4]
In thy soul, with bejeweled hair
And thy glorious smile divine,
Loveliest of all earthly lands,
Showering wealth from well-stored hands!
Mother, mother mine!
Mother sweet, I praise thee,
Mother great and free! [Verse 5]
"If we could survive without a wife, citizens of Rome, all of us would do without that nuisance.” So proclaimed the Roman general, statesman, and censor Quintus Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus, in 131 B.C. Still, he went on to plead, falling birthrates required that Roman men fulfill their duty to reproduce, no matter how irritating Roman women might have become. "Since nature has so decreed that we cannot manage comfortably with them, nor live in any way without them, we must plan for our lasting preservation rather than for our temporary pleasure."
The Romans had no fault divorce. In fact, one spouse could divorce the other without even having to inform the other of it.
Obviously, the solution was to abolish no fault divorce, but they were probably too hooked on being able to enjoy extramarital sex to bother with reforming the law as regards marriage.
It had to be left to Islam to make marriage a contract and divorce a breach of that marriage contract.
The fall of Rome has many reasons attributed to it. Constantine thought he could save Rome by converting to Christianity. I like to think he would have converted to Islam if he had had that option, but when Rome fell, Muhammad was not yet born.
The law under liberalism is an ass, but why doesn't Christianity protect Western nations from gay marriage? Because it is kaput. Can any society survive without practising marriage and family values? The fact is that a matriarchy is a society whose members mostly do not practise marriage. All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution. If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle. The kind of theocracy to choose would be one based in divinely revealed scripture eg the Torah or the Koran, because everything else is changeable or would fall out of fashion. Both Jews and Muslims are agreed that Christians are idolatrous because they worship an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.
Since the West became great as a Christian nation practising patriarchal moral values, it is time to consider its replacement, because no society can survive without a religion to bind its members together. Religion comes from the Latin "religare", which means "to bind". Religion is therefore the means that will obtain your society social cohesion and the building blocks of a stable society are families in which both husband and wife live together rearing their children in a loving relationship. The golden thread that runs through all the five world religions is respect for the practice of marriage and family values. Christianity no longer maintains the minimum standard of sexual morality that makes couples marry before they have children. The link between criminality and illegitimacy has been well-established over the ages.
If you believed in the Abrahamic God, you would find it easy to accept that Christians would be cursed by God for practising the idolatry He has specifically and explicitly forbidden in His Ten Commandments for 2000 years without showing any signs of remorse.
Even if you did not believe in God, you should be able to see how idolatry leads to self-worship because idolatry implicitly rejects the rule of God's laws found in the Torah or the Koran. Self-worship would lead ineluctably to self-destruction, which was what happened to Narcissus. It is not for nothing that a mental disorder was named after him. How long could any civilisation survive if both the governed (who will soon become ungovernable) and their government suffered from Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
The point is that practising idolatry means that we eventually fall into self-worship and therefore what happened to Narcissus will also happen to us and our civilisation if we reject Truth, Logic and Morality in favour of our own emotional, irrational and immoral nihilistic preferences.
