The Prophetess of Secular Koranism v The Prophetess of Periodic Tablism and the Prophet of Propertarianism

.@churchofuntropy: "i do fear the fact that the current elite would support your plan [for a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism]."

Best news I have heard all year! https://t.co/wCbuumzZQk

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 20, 2019 

High Priestess of Church of Entropy Jennifer Scharf does fear that the current elite would support my plan for a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism!

But that is good, isn't it? The left, right, centre all support a one-party state led by a competent and confident alpha male leader in a restored patriarchy. 

Once we all get our one-party state, Secular Koranism will be perceived to be the obvious choice as surely as night follows day because it allows men to protect their interests while being fair enough to women and minorities. It is also easy to administer giving politicians better results and an easier working life.

Just a few things:
- stop with the flagrant slander / misrepresenting my ideas, makes you look moronic
- I know you want me locked up because you can't win in a debate
- Stop tagging me in these ridiculous obsessive tweet storms https://t.co/pNDVamXaOR

— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) January 21, 2019

I am giving you countless opportunities to explain yourself in case I have misunderstood you. False prophets and charlatans will be presenting themselves to confused frightened White People who are none too bright these days. I, the Grandmother of the alt-right will protect them!

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

I have not slandered you nor have I misrepresented your ideas. There is no need to lock you up since you are clearly far away from the confused frightened White People you are currently toying with from afar to keep yourself amused. Cease and desist in this cruel sport!

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

6:45:00  Brundlefly joins, all guns blazing, accusing Jennifer Schart, High Priestess of Church of Entropy of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. 

When I said "Secular Tablism" above, I meant, of course, Periodic Tablism, the ideology of the High Priestess of the Church of Entropy who refuses to disclose in which country she currently resides or who her followers are though we know she is married. Nor can she prove that she has solved the Universal Field Theory as she claims, being a mere physics graduate who went on to become a physics teacher. The only thing that I can make out from my discussion with her about how she would change the rules is that she would make it illegal to deny reincarnation.

.@Brundlefly14 : "Do you respect Claire Khaw?" @ChurchofUntropy: "She's OK as a debater but I don't respect her ideas [a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism]."  https://t.co/IYar1uwsAd

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

While reading the Koran would give you a better idea of the society you;d get ie a patriarchy of married fathers defending the national interest and the interests of their legitimate offspring, legitimate grandchildren and descendants, all @churchofuntropy does is say "Trust me."

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

She claims to have proved reincarnation and has lived past lives, but refuses to discuss this. She has also admitted that she is only claiming to be a theocratic prophetess because she is "bored".

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

She refuses to disclose in which country she is based because she fears being doxed and refuses to answer substantive questions. To ask her for proof of her claims is to blaspheme, and invite the accusation of not believing in reincarnation, the equivalent of Holocaust Denial.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Is it possible to imagine @churchofuntropy being "looked after" in a secure home and allowed internet access as occupational therapy and a way of coping with the boredom (of which she complained numerous times during her conversation with @Brundlefly14) of being incarcerated?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

"You're the one who is denying reincarnation" is the accusation to sikence any discussion in the theocracy @churchofuntropy proposes. They would be future equivalent of being racist, sexist, fascist, Nazi and antisemitic when being accused of this means you have become a pariah.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

The difference between me and @churchofuntropy could not be starker. The moral authority of Secular Koranism is derived from the best of Western legal tradition as well as the most conceptually advanced scripture of the Abrahamic faiths: the Koran, which would restore patriarchy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

If you asked me how the rules would change under Secular Koranism, I would refer you to the Koran which I have said I would follow as correctly as I can and explain how my interpretation would differ from the Schools of Sharia now operating throughout the Muslim world.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

.@churchofuntropy is always claiming that Islam has failed and is aggressive imperialism, but my answer is that Secular Koranism has never been tried because it was only conceived of in 2009 by me. https://t.co/qbzGGAtEgx

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Many mock me for the alleged failure of Secular Koranism because it lacks famous name supporters, but it has never been tried. The only way it will be seen to have failed is after it has been adopted and seen to subsequently fail. It should be implemented globally simultaneously.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

When will Secular Koranism be implemented globally and simultaneously, as I recommend? When the unsustainable Western banking system crashes, of course. Out of its ashes will rise the phoenix of Secular Koranism which would ban usury and rebase all Western currencies.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

I take the AA attitude to the intransigent closed-mindedness of the Western political establishment, currently at sixes and sevens trying to sabotage Brexit and pull down Trump's wall before it is built. They won't change their behaviour till they hit rock bottom. Not long now!

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Because the idea of Secular Koranism is so easy to understand and easy to remember, it can easily be adopted when the time for its implementation becomes undeniable, even if I am no longer around to guide Western governments with my prophetic advice and recommendations.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Obviously, it would be so much better for everyone if Western leaders in charge - if there are any - see reason before everything crashes and burns to shorten the period of chaos and to lessen the horror and suffering of the end of Western civilisation as we know it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

What must Western leaders do? Acknowledge the failure of their religion (Christianity) and political system (liberal democracy) ie accept that no other honest, logical and moral replacement exists other than Secular Koranism in a one-party theocracy to adequately replace the two.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

As for the alt-right, its intellectual impoverishment is pitiful to observe. Solutions I am aware of are: White Sharia (far more restrictive of women's rights than Secular Koranism), Pogrom and/or Ethnostate in Maine, Propertarianism and the Periodic Tablism of @churchofuntropy

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Correct me if I am wrong, but Propertarianism is a mere skeleton of an undeveloped idea by Curt Doolittle who seems to be sayingthe National Interest is the Common Property of the Western Citizen. Any politician convicted of alienating the National Interest will be punished.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

This is of course far too vague because most of Curt Doolittle's terms are not defined, let alone understood. If ever implemented, a specially chosen judiciary would be appointed to interpret these new ideas and they will of course get confused or abuse their power.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

When I interviewed Curt Doolittle at https://t.co/kvgNXxpi7X he was perfectly happy, but when he discovered that it was I who conceived of Secular Koranism, he turned against me simply because he actually *hates* all the Abrahamic faiths and thinks his wisdom exceeds all of them.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Since Doolittle himself admits he is autistic presumably to excuse himself for any defects of behaviour and character, I know I do not betray any confidence in pointing this out. Autists cannot be good leaders because they lack the necessary personal and communication skills.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

What of my character and personality? Men have thanked me in their comments under my YouTube videos at https://t.co/EqRr3rNh68 and told me they could listen to my calming voice talking about radical solutions all day. Men, please note, both Jew and Gentile.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

As Prophetess of Secular Koranism come to save Western civilisation from a tsunami of sluts and feminazis, my task is to get senior rabbis of the world to declare idolatrous Christianity to be less in conformity with the Noahide laws than Islam, with its strict monotheism.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

There must be at least one rabbi in every Western nation prepared to publicly declare idolatrous Christianity to be less in conformity with the Noahide laws than Islam. An open letter sent to their national leader to this effect would serve as individual acts of Kiddush Hashem.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Once it is globally established by rabbis of World Jewry that the Abrahamic God will punish any Sodom and Gomorrah Western nations that has been practising 2000 years of idolatrous Christianity, the case for Secular Koranism in these nations would become obvious and irresistible.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

If they hurry up and do it in my lifetime, I will be at hand to advise them. If they wait till after their economies have collapsed and their states failed after I am dead and gone, the situation will become harder to correct. Rabbinical authority would expedite matters.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Surely it is not that hard for the rabbis of World Jewry to agree and then declare that Islam is more in conformity with the Noahide laws than idolatrous Christianity? https://t.co/1eHQ1hhVDw @JewishVLibrary

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Surely it is not that hard for moral and political philosophers of the world to agree on the following:

1) If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.

2) If Islam is 'Judaism Lite', then Secular Koranism must be 'Islam Lite'.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

The point I am trying to make is that compared to @churchofuntropy I do have a plan and an answer for everything. I am the Prophetess for White & Other Peoples of the World With A Plan for Global Secular Koranism.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

What of my personality and character as Prophetess of Secular Koranism? I've been described as charming, kind, truthful, rational and principled.  In fact, I am so personable @channel5docs made a documentary about @UKIP supporters, but left me out because I came across too well.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

NUJ rules apparently prevents journalists from reporting any story that allows civic nationalists to come across well, even if it is true. https://t.co/wzNNsGJIWm That is why there is a news blackout and reporting ban imposed on newsworthy me by liberal media worldwide.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

https://t.co/8iwW8Gj1Tz mentions the Channel 5 documentary even @DailyMirror was expecting me to appear in, but I ended up on the cutting room floor. Why? Because I would have made too good an impression on the voting public.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

So, while @churchofuntropy is an attractive woman thirsty bachelors of the alt-right would love to keep looking at without paying much attention to what she says, she offers no idea of substance. If she were a picnic, she is only the rather attractive but empty picnic hamper.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

.@churchofuntropy will not be around in politics to be called the Grandmother of the alt-right, as I was described recently, by Tom Anderson at https://t.co/J6KqBO2mw8 who thinks I sound about 80. Since I am no spring chicken, no more time should be lost in tackling our problems.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 21, 2019

Curt Doolittle's sayings and doings on Propertarianism

Curt Doolittle:

How do men argue differently from women? Men argue strategically and women argue tactically. Men argue empirically and women argue emotionally. Men worry about the long term, women only care about the short term. The feminine method of argument has a structure and grammar.  Male argument is about science and law, female argument is about morality.

Western males have invented truth, apparently. This is very ethno-centric and obviously untrue suggesting that non-Western males cannot tell the different between falsehood and truth. Doolittle says men will speak the truth though the heavens fall, but women will do the opposite. Women will make an excuse for anything and have no sense of reciprocity. But this is not true, is it? You can also tell that a male politician is lying by the fact that his lips are moving.

We compromise with our women because we have to reproduce. We could do what the Muslims do to their women. We just have to put violence on the table and say 'Well, the end result is that this is no longer good for us. Conservatives have these values and they are better than your values empirically. Our values are eugenic, productive and evolutionary. Yours are dysgenic and unproductive and also damaging to the planet for that matter, so I don't see why we should co-operate any more. So the idea that we should keep the government of the United States or any of our governments intact rather than break them up so the people who want to go right go right and the people who want to go left go left and libertarians go wherever they choose is a great idea, but the idea that we are going to tolerate this any more, it's just off the table, so we'll just take it off the table. The eugenic people can go one way and the dysgenic people can go another. And we're able to do that. We no longer have to compromise, so we can separate. 

ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM sounds an oxymoron. Why not say meritocracy?

Naval powers get excessively libertarian and commit suicide, military powers tend to get excessively Conservative and fail to compete technologically.

Thalossocracies are by definition scattered empires and harder to keep together. Compare Britain to Russia and China.