Claire Khaw disappointed with Jews who are supposed to be clever not answering any of her philosophical questions

A typically excellent serious piece by @Baddiel which ends with a brilliant joke http://t.co/Dmi6RNN8aZ
— Daniel Finkelstein (@Dannythefink) December 3, 2014

@Dannythefink Jew @Baddiel *delights* in totalitarian laws against free speech. Will he call the cops on me now for saying this? @cpsuk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@Dannythefink @Baddiel @cpsuk Are you being racist if you through words said you incite hatred against your OWN race? http://t.co/tYmd9fwOD0
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink u thot I was being "incoherent"? Wot don't u get about free speech? I thot u guys r supposed to be clever
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@El_Andrew_Uno @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink I am sorry u find truth n reason u can't argue against "detestable". The truth will save u
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Get help.
— Andrew D (@El_Andrew_Uno) December 3, 2014

@El_Andrew_Uno @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink I was really hoping for a more reasoned response and am disappointed u were not up to it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink You do realise every response is proving you are more & more crazed? Keep it coming!
— Andrew D (@El_Andrew_Uno) December 3, 2014

@ntfem Nope. You just crack on pal.
— Andrew D (@El_Andrew_Uno) December 3, 2014

@El_Andrew_Uno Your refusal is a sign of your intellectual bankruptcy for which I thank you for displaying.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Why don't you answer this question: do racial characteristics exist, or not?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink If racial characteristics exist, why are we not allowed to refer to them if we have free speech?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Do Jews have something against free speech?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink If Jews are against free speech, why is that?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Why is saying someone is good and careful with money a bad racist thing?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Because that stereotype was used as an excuse to murder millions of them?? You thick cunt.
— Jonjon Spencer (@JonjonSpencer) December 3, 2014

@JonjonSpencer @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Talking about people's racial characteristics ended in the Holocaust? Really?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@JonjonSpencer @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Germans angry about hyperinflation during which middle class lost their savings.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@JonjonSpencer @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Germans voted 4 Hitler cos they were sick to back teeth of bad govt of Weimar Republic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@JonjonSpencer @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Jews were of course a convenient scapegoat but were never popular in Christian Europe.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink What is racism anyway? Is it just referring to the racial characteristic of anyone whatever their race?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink What if you thought the racial characteristic you are referring to is a POSITIVE and ENVIABLE one?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink its still bloody racist you gigantic doofus!
— tim erswell (@erswell_tim) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink If u say Jews r good with money in a nice way u cd still be done 4 racism if Jew doesn't like u? @cpsuk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

Hello 999? Yes, twat police please. RT @ntfem: @Dannythefink Jew @Baddiel delights in laws v free speech. Will he call the cops on me now?
— David Baddiel (@Baddiel) December 3, 2014

@Baddiel @ntfem @Dannythefink we'll be right over sir
— dean verlander (@1walkingfish1) December 3, 2014

@Baddiel @ntfem @Dannythefink "I believe you want the Incoherent Troll Department. Just putting you through now, sir."
— David Llewellyn (@TheDaiLlew) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink You mad!
— Ali Lane (@alister_lane) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink you do know "jew" isn't one person, rite? How the fuck can they all think the same.? Ridiculous.
— EVS (@lee_evans999) December 3, 2014

@lee_evans999 It is clear Jews other than @Baddiel @Dannythefink gloating about trouble Mario Balotelli, Malky Mackay n Dave Whelan got in2.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @Baddiel @Dannythefink YOU. ARE. *ADORABLE*.
— David Llewellyn (@TheDaiLlew) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @Baddiel @Dannythefink PS. I'm consigning you to the Phantom Zone of "mute" now, 'Claire', so tatty-bye.
— David Llewellyn (@TheDaiLlew) December 3, 2014

@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink What a shame no Jew is clever enough to answer my philosophical questions. Thot u was supposed 2b clever.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink no jew is clever enough. And you asked what racism is? Are you a parody?
— Martin Lacey (@martindlacey) December 3, 2014

@martindlacey @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink If you can define racism, then please do so.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink judging an entire race of people on certain characteristics for one thing
— tim erswell (@erswell_tim) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink you asked question what if characteristic was an enviable one to define a race like that is RACIST
— tim erswell (@erswell_tim) December 3, 2014

@erswell_tim @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Is referring to someone's racial characteristic racist?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink yes to assume there are characteristics is lazy stereotyping
— tim erswell (@erswell_tim) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink I have no need to. You're doing that all by yourself.
— Martin Lacey (@martindlacey) December 3, 2014

@martindlacey @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Not rising to the challenge, I see.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink there's no challenge there. Just your banality
— Martin Lacey (@martindlacey) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @Baddiel @Dannythefink all Jews? U know All Jews? Wow that's impressive. How come?
— EVS (@lee_evans999) December 3, 2014

@lee_evans999 @Baddiel @Dannythefink How do you infer from my previous tweet that I said I knew *all* Jews? I *never* said that.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Not sure you've ever had a "thot" that wasn't instantly detestable. Shut up.
— Andrew D (@El_Andrew_Uno) December 3, 2014

@danbarker @Baddiel @Dannythefink You are going down the ad hominem route to avoid answering my questions, it seems. Sad. :-(
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@ntfem @Baddiel @Dannythefink 'genetic fallacy' falls fairly firmly under 'ad hominem'.
— dan barker (@danbarker) December 3, 2014

@lee_evans999 Jews like @Dannythefink @Baddiel etc may gloat but I am sure there are Jews who are pained at yet more loss of free speech.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

@lee_evans999 @Dannythefink @Baddiel I like to think @rabbisacks whom I admire would not be gloating at yet more loss of free speech.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

Danny Finkelstein complains of Guardian readers making antisemitic comments about David Baddiel's piece on antisemitism

The comments in the Guardian on @Baddiel 's piece are remarkable, even distressing. Look how many had to be removed http://t.co/Dmi6RNN8aZ
— Daniel Finkelstein (@Dannythefink) December 3, 2014

@lee_evans999 @Dannythefink @Baddiel Wow. @Guardian readers making antisemitic comments now! Tee hee!
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014

Do Jews consciously or unconsciously provoke antisemitism and then complain about it?  Am I allowed to ask this question or will the cops be called on me in the land of "free speech" that is the West?

Sadly, the more Jews complain about antisemitism, the more people will hate them for even complaining.

The cleverer they are at getting governments to pass ever more restrictive laws against free speech such as Holocaust Denial, the more people will think there is a sinister Jewish conspiracy.

What I think is the problem is explained at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/a-swift-and-effective-way-of-addressing.html

Also, Jews get blamed for what goes on in publishing, but it is my contention that the problem in publishing - increasing censoriousness, mediocrity and risk-averse behaviour - is not Jews being a problem but due to the fact that women have taken over publishing and the BBC. Women are obviously and objectively more libtard than men -  83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did - and men these days have been so emasculated by feminism that they are afraid of saying boo to a feminist out of fear of being accused of misogyny, rape or a historical sexual offence. Not only would they lose their job, they might even lose their wife who, under the rules of no fault divorce, can easily deprive them of their home and their children for no good reason eg objecting to their husband's political views and wishing to punish them for that.

Feminists seize publishing

Should the TFA sue the BBC for libel?

http://www.tfa.net/the_freedom_association/2010/12/bbc-must-make-full-apology-for-bnp-smear-on-the-freedom-association.html

This is such a bad idea I just don't know where to begin.

Do they not see the irony of a libertarian organisation  such as The Freedom Association suing to suppress free speech and fair comment??


The Eurosceptic movement seems to be afflicted by the most alarming kind of hysteria and irrationality and there seems no helping them at all.

I post this merely to put on record that I have tried to warn them against this insane course of action, which has apparently goaded into a frenzy - there is no other word for it - of anti-BNP histrionics.

"Calm down, calm down," I want to say, in my best Michael Winner e-Sure voice ....

 PS    They have deleted my comment and have now disabled me from commenting!  There is one sensible comment:

Tanino said...

For what it's worth, I don't believe that any comparison could be drawn between The Freedom Association and the BNP but I think that it would be coherent with Libertarian principles to let the BBC do as it wishes.

I don't believe that one can arbitrarily call comparison to the BNP a smear. If I say that the Labour Party is a moderate version of Salvador Allende's Socialist Party, is that a smear? Most people would say it isn't, Allende is widely regarded a great man. But to say that the Labour party is a moderate version of the Soviet Union's Communist Party would be regarded as a smear by most people. In summary, I believe that whether the comparison to the BNP is a good or bad thing is fundamentally subjective and one should not be made to apologise for it. If the BBC apologised and accepted that the comparison to the BNP is a smear, that would surely be a breach of impartiality and would be considered anti-BNP bias.

"When a leftist sees something he doesn't like on television, he phones up to complain, when a man of the right sees something he doesn't like on television, he changes the channel".

Saturday, 18 December 2010 at 06:14 PM