The mental and physical health of Quarantine Britain

3:00  UK's Plan B if 'Team Johnson' Is Incapacitated? Answer Is Unclear
https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/04/05/world/europe/05reuters-health-coronavirus-britain-johnson-illness.html

4:00  Elected dictators
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dictator

5:00  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominic_Raab

6:00  Dominic Raab should have told the ITV journalist to stick his stupid question up his arse. Then he might have become leader, but he doesn't have the balls really. 

8:00  Idiot journalists goes on to ask Raab how many times he works out in a week. That was when Raab should have smashed punched that fucker in the face and told him to leave his property.  

10:00  Raab is a snorefest about feminism when he could have been inspirational and appealing. If you are a feminist suffering from insomnia, listen to Raab complaining about feminism. 

11:00  Raab prevaricates about the abolition of the Equalities Office when previously said he would abolish it.  

14:00  In principle, that bore Raab is in favour of grammar schoolszzzzzzzzzzzzzz

15:00  Raab is "a little bit worried" about transgenderism.

23:00  Favourite song: Break On Through To The Other Side by The Doors

23:30  Favourite meal: Wuhanese Bat Stew

24:00  Biggest regret: not punching journalists with stupid questions in the face sooner

Raab is clearly a danger to society because he will make us all fall asleep at the wheel after stirring up tsunamis of apathy up and down the country. 

It's got to be Gove, don't you see?

I know he has done and said stuff but he really does come across as milquetoast the way he talks.

7:00  Michael Gove

7:30  Succession

8:00  The British constitution is the official handbook for the Rules of Britain, but it neither has an index nor chapter headings because it is unwritten with the whole purpose of being obscure, hard to find and subject to the rule of parliamentary sovereignty, which is really the principle of being unprincipled.

11:00  Keir Starmer
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/search?q=Keir+Starmer

12:00  A state of emergency should have been declared once the EU referendum delivered Brexit

13:00  Matriarchy

13:30  Email to me soliciting my services for the mental well-being of the world
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/04/claire-khaws-voice-of-reason-identified.html

18:00  The health of the British Prime Minister discussed
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000h0f0

19:00  Dr Abdul Wahid on Prime Ministerial health



24:00  Michael Gove

28:00  Dominic Raab

30:00  "Well-developed protocols on national security" my arse

33:00  A one-party state

34:00  Dominic Raab

35:00  It's got to be Gove if Boris goes, IMHO.
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/search?q=Michael+Gove

An Islamic view of Britain's role in WW1

Dr Wahid points out that Germany posed no existential threat to Britain by violating Belgian neutrality. It was an imperial war about colonial interests. The Eastern Question was finally resolved when Britain bounced the Ottoman Empire to choose a side.

Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall fought on the British side on the basis of false promises made to them by the British.

The legacy of WW1 is that of treachery. The British promised the same piece of land - Palestine - to three different parties ie the American Zionists, the French and the Ottoman Empire.

The wording of the Treaties of Sevres and Lausanne can be found in the British Foreign Office website.

The British booby-trapped the Middle East and left a poison pill when they left.

Arab Nationalism making the Turk hate the Arab is denounced.

WW1 was bloodier than the Crusades.

Compared to the peace and stability in the Middle East before WW1, the collapse was swift and sudden.

Islamic Values in Britain Today

Dr Abdul Wahid of Hizb ut-Tahrir answers my question on British values from the 49th minute.

Questions I asked and suggestions made in the chat and under the video not addressed or answered:

1. Should UKIP allow Tommy Robinson to become a member?
2. What do you think of Imram Hosein?
3. Do HT Britain support leave or remain?
4. What do you think of Imran Khan so far?
5. What is the difference between British values and Islamic values?
6. Is Christianity idolatrous?
7. Is Christianity now indistinguishable from Liberalism?
8. What is the best way of combating Islamophobia?
9. Counter Extremism is about suppressing Islam and any other sensible views such as nationalism and patriarchy. Marriage and family values are being suppressed by the matriarchy.
10. A lot of British people are not convinced about so-called fundamental British values either.
11. Is Reform Islam like Reform Judaism?
12. When asked what values you believe in, you could say marriage and family values, couldn't you? To make Islam "motherhood and apple pie", all you have to do is say that Islam is about marriage and family values. Just a suggestion.

Hizb ut Tahrir, Western imperialism, Clive of India, youth offending and Merchant Taylors' College

Dr Abdul Wahid: Why I joined Hizb ut-Tahrir https://t.co/Rth8H6dudw via @YouTube

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

Abdul Wahid went to Merchant Taylors - the same school as Clive of India, who was expelled from Market Drayton Grammar School after the shopkeepers of Market Drayton complained to his school that he was running a protection racket. https://t.co/ltr1lhS48u

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

For the avoidance of doubt, let me say it was Clive of India who ran a protection racket in Market Drayton, not Dr Abdul Wahid, who is a lovely man, though he assumes - incorrectly in my view - that nationalism is synonymous with evil and confuses it with Western imperialism. https://t.co/R13GjXn4ID

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

It is interesting, is it not, that Clive of India began as a juvenile delinquent and a youth offender, who subsequently became a hero of the British empire? Nations do behave like gangsters, do they not? What makes them respectable later is the success of their empire, I suppose. https://t.co/R13GjX5tR5

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

Are we therefore to think that all empires are evil? While I readily concede that all empires have as tendency to become evil, empire itself is an objective measure of human achievement. Even the invaded eventually acquire the benefits of a higher civilisation and gain knowledge. https://t.co/KPHUYHSlsC

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

If empire is an objective measure of human achievement, and empire is inevitably fuelled by war and conquest, the best we can do is to agree and stick to humane rules of warfare. The best source of humane rules of warfare is the Koran. https://t.co/pBGMvczSxX

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

https://t.co/1lqbqTOwD8 is authority for the proposition that Koranic rules of warfare are rather more humane than in the Old Testament as you can see at https://t.co/h0UjC6yXwT https://t.co/FDZnW3GFLD

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

I think I should be congratulated for working out from reason alone as an agnostic - and without ever relying on the actual existence of God - that Islam must necessarily and logically be the way forward for all of humanity. A Nobel Peace Prize is all I ask. https://t.co/VepGJXsi2y

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

I wonder if it is at all possible for my genius to be acknowledged within my own lifetime or even better, within the lifetime of my own dear honourable parents. I know poor old Confucius was a failure in his own lifetime. https://t.co/1o3Z1xuPtU

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

Modesty forbids me from claiming more than to have merely arranged the great ideas of civilisation in a rational, moral and practical way to indicate the way forward in the faltering twilight that is our uncertain future. If I my warnings are heeded, the chaos will be briefer. https://t.co/F25VNZ1yTh

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

I would say empire is an objective measure of human achievement and it is a game of do it to them before they do it to us and may the best man win. If nothing else, it keeps people on their toes. I am proud to consider myself a product of the British empire. https://t.co/CTJKNFZtYt

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 8, 2018

After viewing the HT video on the Caliphate, I have the following questions for them. I do hope they will not be deliberately ignoring me because I am neither male nor Muslim. If so, that does not bode well because it smacks of male and Muslim chauvinism. Neither would it be consistent with their policy of dawah.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawah

1.  Does Hizb ut Tahrir believe it can just abolish the nation state and live in a global Muslim village without engaging in debate with non-Muslims?

2.  Is HT confusing nationalism with Western imperialism?

3.  Is it impossible in your minds to separate nationalism from Western imperialism?

4.  First, tribes must be able to form a city-state before it can form a nation. Do you disagree?

5.  Secondly, a city-state must control its surrounding territory before it can become a nation. Do you disagree?

6.  Thirdly, a nation must be able to successfully conquer territories outside its own borders to become an empire. Do you disagree?

7.  Jews were a tribe of wandering former slaves who through following Judaism conquered enough territory to become a kingdom. Do you disagree?

8.  Islam was what first united the Arab tribes which then enabled Islamic imperialism. Do you disagree?
   
9.  Ummah also means nation in Arabic. Would you agree? http://www1.cbn.com/onlinediscipleship/what-is-the-muslim-understanding-of-%22ummah%22%3F
   
10.  Nationhood is a natural aspiration for all those who live in a defined piece of territory.  Would you agree?

11.  Apparently, HT are Muslims who want to abolish nation states and borders who cannot understand that uncontrolled immigration upsets the locals. Such denial and naivete is not a secure basis upon which to embark on a global Caliphate. Would you agree?

12.  HT seem to think nationalism is some wicked modern Western imperialist invention, apparently ignorant of the fact that the Jewish revolts against the Romans of the second century was also a form of nationalism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism#History Would you confirm that this is indeed the position of HT on nationalism?

13.  We all have to start somewhere. Individuals exist in bodies, and countries as nation states. To call nationalism evil is to call the nation state evil, which makes about as much sense as denouncing individuals for necessarily existing as a physical being inhabiting a human body. Would you agree? https://www.facebook.com/claire.khaw.92/posts/1845229085551716?comment_id=1846060515468573&reply_comment_id=1846861275388497&notif_id=1520365865757713&notif_t=feed_comment&ref=notif
   
14.  The Ottoman Empire ended because it could not reform itself before it was dominated then divided by the European powers. Was this because the Gate of Interpretation was closed?  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3114/muslims-ijtihad

15.  God if He exists is a nationalist. http://Quran.com/3/104  is conclusive evidence that God approves of nations who promote their national interest by following His laws. Would you agree?
16.  It is surely possible to defend the national interest without descending to xenophobia. Why do Muslims, like liberals and the left, assume nationalism is synonymous with evil? We all live in nation states, so why should we as loyal citizens not defend the national interest or expect our political leaders to do so?
   
17.  en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectification_of_names is a philosophy of calling things by their proper names or things will go awry. If you mean the policies of divide and rule used by Western imperialism, call it that and don't confuse it with nationalism. Is this a subject you are prepared to discuss?
   
19.  Do you really think a transnational Caliphate can spontaneously come into being without first establishing an imperialistic Islamic State? If so, please explain your reasoning.

20.  Have you considered putting it to nationalists and imperialists that running their governments under a one party theocracy would be in the national interest as well as good for Western imperialism and world peace?