How China and Russia could end Western hegemony once and for all on Monday 13 August

Dump the Dollar and the Euro ALL AT ONCE.  It is cheaper than war.   

I have really had enough of the disgraceful and disgusting foreign policy of the British government and their NATO partners in crime, who are the poodles of Israel.

What they are doing in Syria is beyond belief and beyond contempt.   Only insanity can be an excuse.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/10/britain-aid-syrian-opposition-groups

Britain to give £5m aid to Syrian opposition groups

002.190
YUSUFALI: Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors.
PICKTHAL: Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors.
SHAKIR: And fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits.

022.039
YUSUFALI: To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;- and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid;-
PICKTHAL: Sanction is given unto those who fight because they have been wronged; and Allah is indeed Able to give them victory;
SHAKIR: Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them;

It can be seen that NATO is transgressing these verses.  In fact, they regularly transgress these verses, and recent examples are Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and now Syria.  Iran will be next.

How can it be moral to ruin people's lives, have them kill each other and then invade them ... for WHAT?  Just so they can isolate Iran so they can rob them of their oil?

Do our political classes even know why they are doing what they are doing and why they are doing it?  It certainly ain't for the Syrians.  It is that hypocritical claim which is so SICKENING.

Russia and China could easily put a stop to this when the markets open on Monday.   

Frenchwoman ticks off the Greeks

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9291516/Christine-Lagarde-Greeks-can-help-themselves-out-of-the-crisis-by-paying-their-tax.html

No Frenchman would speak to a Greek man in such patronising terms without expecting a bloody nose and a good kicking.

That is what makes the matriarchy so infuriating.  

Christine Lagarde ticking off the Greeks

How an Ancient Greek might react to being ticked off by a  Frenchwoman comparing Greeks to starving children in Niger

What British Nationalists should expect from President Hollande

A Socialist French President means France will leave euro with Greece, Spain and Portugal.  No more euro means no more EU.  When that happens Eurosceptics can say "We told you so."

LibLabCon will then say:

"So you did, but you are racist, so we will just have a referendum, get us out and give you no credit.  We can do this because everyone hates you because you are nasty, stupid and lower class.   If you had got that Claire Khaw to lead your party and became civic nationalist we wouldn't be able to call your racist, but with Nick Griffin as your leader you are still the same bunch of despised racist failures.  Now fuck off."

Woolfson Prize and disorderly withdrawals

Date | Monday, 12th December 2011
Time | 6:00pm for 6:30pm start. 8:00pm finish.
Location | Clifford Chance, 30th Floor, 10 Upper Bank Street, London E14 5JJ
RSVP | kate.hooper@westbournecoms.com
Chair | Neil O’Brien, Director, Policy Exchange
Speakers | Derek Scott, Chair of the Wolfson Economics Prize and Professor Charles Goodhart CBE FBA, Emeritus Professor of Banking and Finance at the London School of Economics and a judge of the Wolfson Economics Prize

On behalf of the judges of the Wolfson Economics Prize, I would like to invite you to an event for those considering applying for the Wolfson Economics Prize and other interested individuals. There will be a discussion of the euro-zone crisis and an opportunity to ask questions of the judges. 

The objective of the prize is to find the best answer to the question:
“If member states leave the Economic and Monetary Union, what is the best way for the economic process to be managed to provide the soundest foundation for the future growth and prosperity of the current membership?”

Please R.S.V.P. to Kate Hooper at Westbourne on 020 3397 0100 or kate.hooper@westbournecoms.com. I very much hope you can join us.

Yours sincerely
Derek Scott

MY ANSWER:

1. start printing own currency    http://thelewespound.org/59.html
2. withdraw from the euro
3. default, but guaranteeing savings only, and let the losses fall where they may. 

Then start picking up pieces.

There will be a period of enforced SOCIALISM and rationing, I imagine, with massive tax cuts and deregulation.

The men will have fun organising their citizens' militias to dispose of the criminal elements in their community, in more ways than one.

The Slut Single Mums can all be herded into brothels for gainful employment with flexible hours.

Respectable married women will be congratulating themselves for not divorcing their husbands and taking half their stuff and then depriving them of their children while making them pay for their maintenance, because in these troubled times they will be grateful for the protection of men.

I have a nasty feeling that the euro may not last till 12 December and the Woolfson prize may well be cancelled after its collapse. The deadline for submitting your entry is 31 January, but by that time disorderly withdrawal will have happened in any case.

I wonder if the Germans are now secretly printing deutschmarks...

EU con trick of making its members give up what it would only have given up after being defeated in war (in a former age)

Clearly, the wily white European nations, who were formerly masters of the universe, abandoned much of their cunning and their realpolitik ruthlessness when they embraced liberalism.  That is what led to feminism, welfarism, emasculation, immigration and the giving up of national sovereignty with only a few squeaks of protest.

"You cannot have economic union without political union." 

The difference between "should" and "is likely to"

Stephan Schneider, chief international economist at Deutsche Bank, comments on the German government's ability to fund a rescue.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8509000/8509850.stm

He was asked by the interviewer: "What should happen?"

His answer: "The correct question is to ask what is likely to happen." [c 3.27]

"Should" and "ought" contain moral assumptions - these are invariably subjective.

"Likely to" is uncompromisingly objective.

A skilled politician knows the difference and thinks, speaks and acts accordingly.