Free Love and how it is bad for your society

View https://t.co/0RrshaLRsm to understand gender relations and how sex is traded and exchanged between men and women. #freelove
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2015

In some ways MGTOW is an offshoot of the free love movements of the past. Free love is typically a social movement that rejects marriage because it sees it as a form of social and financial bondage. And free love as about getting the state out of the bedrooms of its citizens. The idea is that the state has no business in the bedrooms of the people and that it needed to be pushed out. Today we have a hybrid form of free love. There's free love for women but the same types of social contracts for men or worse ones. The few men that are still the main breadwinners of the family being punished for loving more then ever. But women are getting free love. They are free to migrate from one partner to another and have the full enjoyment of sexual mobility. Not only is free love given to them but women over the last few forty to fifty years have been rewarded for exercising their option to express free love. All of this started coming about after the introduction of the birth control pill. And it was around that same time the hippy subculture rose in the 1960s. And then the free love movement culminated in the late sixties and early seventies as no fault divorce and abortion were introduced. And then ended around the end of the Vietnam war. At that point women didn't have to dress like hippies to tell everyone that they were about free love. That they didn't need to get married to dole out intimacy like dog treats to men. The Hippy uniform was one that was no longer required because people in society started taking part in free love into their own way without dressing up as hippies. Haight-Ashbury in San Francisco and Woodstock in 1969 all pushed the idea of free love into the consciousness of American society. And from there it spread out into the rest of the world. The idea I believe was to trick the people into thinking the state was not really interested in controlling the bedrooms of America. People felt free but at the same time men's rights were taken away shortly after there was a big push towards freedom. The same thing is now happening with the gay community. Gays are now being pushed to marry and form state sponsored couples. But it was only a few decades ago where being gay was not accepted. First it needed to become culturally accepted for people to become gay before the state could create laws like gay marriage and common-law to enrich the lawyers and take away the rights of gays. First you give them rights and then you take those rights away. Men in the 1960s and 1970s were given free love alongside women but then men had their free love taken away. And as men we are worse off then before we got free love. If you think about MGTOW today as a culture, men going their own way are not being recognized. Instead we are being shamed and ridiculed much like gays were two or three decades ago. But at some point if the state so desires it will give men rights but only to then take them away.

The economics of Feminism AKA Why it is uneconomic and a BAD IDEA for most women in your society to be sluts

Rafal Pruszyn-ski

When you don’t get the basic principles of economics, you get hurt. It happens when you elect a president who thinks money can be printed off without a shred of harm. And it also happens when you don’t understand the basic premise of supply-and-demand. What women never got was that the most valuable bargaining card they were holding – their sexuality – does indeed conform to the laws of supply-and-demand (as well as to monetary principles); and that by making supply (of their sexuality) in essence never-ending, they were destroying the value of their sexuality on the market.

We can also put this proposition in monetary terms with female sexuality being like the dollar. When both the supply and the velocity of sexuality increase, the value of each woman’s sexuality takes a nose-dive. Now, if you think of each woman’s sexuality as a currency with which she acquires a unit of Stability (under this we can include things like the value of the male, his faithfulness, his ability to take care of the woman and her children, etc) then we can better show what is happening using Fisher’s equation for the quantity of money:

MV = PT, where:
M = Money Supply
V = Velocity of Circulation (the number of times money changes hands)
P = Average Price Level
T = Volume of Transactions of Goods and Services

Which we can alter a bit
SV = PT (where S = Supply of female sexuality)
What do we find? If we reorder to solve for P:

P= SV/T
Not only has M (number of women ready to have premarital sex) incrased radically, but so has V (the number of times or the number of males with whom those women are ready to have premarital sex). The equation shows that the P for Stability has increased which means what? It means that the inherent value of a woman’s sexuality has been inflated into worthlessness. She can no longer afford to buy Stability, or, to put it differently, her bargaining position is now much weaker and can only obtain a much lower quality of Stability.

I am all for freedom and liberation, but freedom that goes against your long-term self-interest needs to be seen as foolhardy. Women have given away their most valued commodity and that will never be regained. The ship has sailed and the genie is himself fornicating and has no desire to get back in the bottle.

The sexual revolution that started off in the 1960s was an unmitigated disaster to every woman, except maybe lesbians.

http://therightstuff.biz/2013/12/16/free-milk-is-always-greener-on-the-other-side/

A piece of ass, a dime a dozen.

With thanks and acknowledgement to my Facebook friend Rafal Pruszyn-ski

If you enjoyed this, you will probably enjoy http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/what-is-feminism-libertarian-facebook.html also by Rafal.  

All healthy societies have a healthy loathing of the promiscuous female. Western society is sick and dying.

Any healthy society has this VISCERAL loathing of sluts. Stored in the memory of every race and society is the memory of how things turned to SHIT when they let sluts take power like they have now.

All societies made the same mistake at some time in their history.

Socialism, feminism, communism and atheism are just ideologies that says it is OK to be an SSM  and are just Man's periodic attempts to rid himself of this memory that Free Love kills your civilisation.

Those who forget the lessons of history are condemned to re-learn them again - the hard way.

The only good matriarchy is a dead matriarchy.