THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
The Western world is convulsed by toxic gender relations that its religious leaders are too afraid to discuss because they fear being accused of something or other.
Don't let feminists divide your society by destroying your civilisation through destroying marriages and families. The matriarchy is a danger to itself. After it has destroyed the patriarchy (which it has equated with domestic violence), it will proceed to destroy itself through the chaos and criminality of degeneracy.
As the hero Arjuna tells the God Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita:
‘In overwhelming chaos, Krishna
Women of the family are corrupted,
And when women are corrupted,
Disorder is born in society’
Men of other races, religions and nations will know that men who submit to the censorship of feminism will be unable to defend a principle, let alone their country. Men who submit to feminists are men who submit to immoral and irresponsible women who bribe men with extramarital sex to keep them quiescent in their matriarchy, desperate for sexual access to women if they are unattached, or afraid of losing sexual access if they are attached.
Men and women who want to become and remain married parents to properly rear the next generation must say no to feminism now.
The political and moral system of the West - liberalism - produces matriarchy. Putin pronounced it "obsolete" in June 2019. Trump identified himself as nationalist in October 2019. The 2020 US Presidential elections is really about whether men and women think they should be married parents and nationalists or remain the sexually liberated bachelors and bitter spinsters of liberalism.
Nationalism cannot exist without patriarchy and matriarchy is the product of feminism which rode into town on the coat-tails of liberal egalitarianism.
Liberalism is one of the dangerous ideas of the French Revolution which is about to finally hit the buffers after 300 years.
In case this gets maliciously reported and then deleted for breaching YouTube Community Rules, the transcript of what Joseph Cotto said is below:
M Joseph Sheppard:
We have a problem supposedly with Karen. What women are saying to the pollsters does not necessarily reflect what they're going to do in the voting booth. I think we saw that at to a degree in 2016. How much of it is real and what can be done? The time is getting short to address it uh for the Republican Party, if it's real.
Joseph Cotto:
I think that there is obviously a female problem. A lot of women are radicalised against tradition, against anything they believe is male dominated. They despise men, period. They are told throughout their years in education that men are to blame for your problems. They're told through various theories that are taught in various so-called disciplines and also the media pumps these ideas into their heads so that reinforces what they're learning at school. This would not hold on if these women had a generally positive view of men from the outset. You have so many broken families nowadays. You have so many girls who grew up in divorced households where they're almost always raised by the mother and the mother tells them just how awful men are because of the divorce. Most households today are broken. You have to take this into consideration. I think that sets these girls up to become women that are SJW woke fanatics. I don't think you find very many of these people who come from uh traditional two-parent households unless there are some hardcore leftists who just raised them to think this way. Given the statistics on divorce, I think that really does set girls up to become women that are politically out there to say the absolute least. A lot of these women the GOP will never be able to reach because they have an identity now: hating tradition and hating the so-called patriarchy, hating men. It's in their interests to support the Republicans against the Democrats, from freedom of speech to not letting large-scale immigration that would hurt them economically.
M Joseph Sheppard:
Safety and security is another aspect. Women in New York are fleeing the Upper West Side because of violence and downtown Chicago. It's never less than 96% of black women who vote for the Democrats whereas black men will waver a bit maybe because of economics. Governor DeSantis won his election on school choice basically because of black women swinging to him. Women are my concern at the moment. It's not unheard of that sometimes what women say and what they do in the privacy of the polling booth may be different to what they say amongst their peers.
There is a lot of gender discrimination against men in India due to rising feminism. Therefore I have created a page on Facebook called Gender Bias Against Men in which I have been recording instances of such discrimination in India since many years. I have compiled a document on this with links to reliable sources of information as evidence. All this effort is to create awareness of the problem and to help bring about a united front against feminists responsible for discrimination against men in India. I am committed to the cause of men and wish to do a lot more work for the same and while doing so, I will need to support myself and my family financially. I am therefore seeking generous contributions for all this. Since we are all now living in difficult Corona times, I shall be especially very pleased and happy to receive contributions. Those wishing to contribute may send me a message on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/ivan.mathias.98. Here's requesting folks to like my page.
10:00 People who think they are too cool for rules are most likely to die without issue or with illegitimate children who are a disgrace to them, but they won't care because they are shameless nihilists.
21:00 Heresy and taboo to challenge the matriarchy if we live in one or live with an Arch-Feminist eg Ann Furedi.
22:00 Culture War
24:00 The warlike Europeans and their European wars
26:00 How about a number instead of your name?
28:00 Our beliefs and experiences are sacred to us.
29:00 Individuality and identity
30:00 Our associates are our identity.
31:00 Being modern
34:00 The Aztecs
35:00 Modernism
36:00 Intersectionality and inversion
37:00 Openness trumps democracy?
38:00 The rule of law v the law of the jungle
39:00 Whynottery
40:00 The censorship of the so-called open society
41:00 Companies submit to the matriarchy when they know they won't be protected by the state.
42:00 The moral compass of a religion
43:00 Religious principles are the strongest principles.
44:00 The culture war in Israel
45:00 Sociopaths and psychopaths
46:00 Multinationals will do what profit-seeking organisations were created to do: maximise their profit in however the law allows.
47:00 Democracy is asking stupid people stupid questions.
48:00 "Cancel culture" is censorship.
49:00 Changing national identity through changing the historical narrative of the nation.
52:00 Conservatism is a purely defensive ideology and cannot fight the degeneracy.
53:00 Cascades/Coin Pusher
1:01:00 Jews and Muslims must call out Christianity since Christians remain in denial.
1:02:00 If Christianity is a coach, the driver is dead at the wheel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bystander_effect
Claire Khaw
Any chance of summing it up in a sentence?
Anca Gheaus
Yes, although only in a very long one:
"Even if care-supporting policies mean that the association between women and care will be strengthened, and that as a result some women will enjoy fewer opportunities for great jobs, we should still support care; that's because, first, in unjustly unequal societies like ours some of these great jobs are rewarded in excess of what is just and should disappear; and, second, because only a small minority of people have access to great jobs - there is no real meritocracy to start with; care-supporting policies, on the other hand, benefit the vast majority of women."
Claire Khaw
What are "care-supporting policies"?
When you say "care supporting policies", do you mean patriarchy?
When you say "the association between men and women will be strengthened", do you mean "more men and women will marry before having children and stay together for the sake of their children"?
Claire Khaw
I see that you identify as feminist. What would you say are the fundamental principles of feminism?
Is feminism compatible with morality?
How would you define morality?
How would you define patriarchy?
How would you define matriarchy?
Is the West a matriarchy?
Islam means logos if logos means the peace you get from submitting to the inevitable ie Truth, Logic and Morality. You can ignore truth until it becomes unignorable. You can refuse to use logic until you fall into error and disaster. You can refuse to follow your moral principles until your body politic is lying on the ground decapitated by the Elephant in the Room: Feminism.
You can only comfort yourselves by pretending that you never cared about the statues anyway and hope your shops are not looted if you kneel to the God of Anti-racism, since the government will no longer uphold the law or protect your rights even if you are Big Business. How can the headless corpse of democracy and Christianity protect anything?
Perhaps the Jews will save us since they are the people who are supposed to martyr themselves if they are forced to kneel before idols, and idolatry is worshiping anything that isn't the Abrahamic God.
The Abrahamic God never forbade slavery in either the Torah or the Koran. It is enough that He forbade usury which leads to irresponsible borrowing and lending by individuals and governments. It is indebtedness that leads us into behaviour such as gambling and reckless imperial wars which ultimately leads to our own enslavement when we lose at gambling and at war.
"All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way." Do all civilisations rise in the same way and fall in a different way? But it seems to me that they rise in virtue ie patriarchy and fall in effeminacy ie matriarchy.
Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who casually conceived and parented their illegitimate offspring.
Are we not obliged to choose the lesser evil if we are rational and moral human beings?
Is there no one prepared to discuss these matters even though they call themselves philosophers, rabbis or religious leaders?
The West is now suffering from a crisis in masculinity - a state of mind prepared to defend patriarchal moral values. In general, it can be said that women are content with lockdown while men are going crazy with cabin fever. Is now the time for feminism to be debunked when men and women react so differently to the same thing?
The cause of effeminacy is sexual liberation. Men will do anything for sex, including become women. They will also yield like women if submitting to immoral women gives them access to sex when previously they were warriors. It is now time to ask ourselves how civilisations fall.
I am very disappointed that none of my questions I hoped Andy Nowicki would be asked in the chat were either asked or answered.
1) Pogroms can be avoided by good laws under good government. Perhaps you and Andy can discuss what good laws might be. The law under a patriarchy is fairer than under a matriarchy, I would suggest. Would you ask Andy what laws he would change if he could and whether he is in favour of a one party state?
2) Could you ask Andy what is the most radical change of law he would contemplate publicly advocating?
3) Would Andy agree that the West is now a matriarchy?
4) How would Andy feel about restoring the patriarchy and if he were to go about restoring the patriarchy, which laws would be the most necessary to effect this restoration?
5) How does Andy feel about slut-shaming?
6) Does Andy think there are too many female undergraduates?
7) Does Andy think SJWs are male undergraduates thirsty for sexual access to entitled middle class female undergraduates?
8) Is masculinity negatively affected by female promiscuity?
9) Has Andy warned his children about presenting him with any surprise illegitimate grandchildren?
10) Would Andy disown or disinherit his offspring if either of them presented him with surprise illegitimate grandchildren?
11) Would Andy support the abolition of no fault divorce?
12) Has Andy noticed any notable developments in the alt-right recently?
13) Would Andy agree that masculinity is a state of mind prepared to and capable of defending patriarchal moral values?
14) What does Andy consider to be masculine values?
15) Has anyone told Andy that ambiguity is a feminine trait and a feminine stratagem that I have noticed he is using?
From 1:28:00
I confront these Christian men about their failure to discuss restoring the patriarchy and am told that Andy Nowicki actually refuses to acknowledge the existence of the patriarchy.
White men are leaderless because the West is a matriarchy. In a matriarchy, all men are lower than the unmarried mother and any male leader would only be appointed by the matriarchy. Such appointed leaders would never dare to criticise unmarried mothers and we know who is in power by those we dare not criticise.
Worse than that, white men are not even talking about restoring the patriarchy. In a patriarchy, beta males would choose their alpha male leader who would look after their interests in exchange for their loyalty and support.
White men dare not talk about restoring the patriarchy because they are afraid of their immoral women and their running dogs. They are terrified of losing status through losing sexual access to their immoral women, and dare not admit it.
Being atheists, white men have no principles they dare defend against the matriarchy because atheism and childlessness makes them short-termist cowards who cannot think beyond their next sexual encounter. The alt-right, being a marginalised movement of marginalised and unmarriageable men, will not have the moral or intellectual authority to persuade anyone other than others who feel the same sense of hatred, anger and outrage that their government does not care about them. In the meantime, they refuse to discuss practical solutions.
Racism, Antisemitism, Islamophobia and Pogromism are now the quasi-religions of the alt-right. A religion would contain rules and solutions, but the alt-right have no solutions other than Pogrom, Paganism and Propertarianism. The alt-right who congregate to discuss their racism, antisemitism, Islamophobia and their anticipation of conducting their yearned for pogrom - which are but expressions of their feeling weelings - only do so to bond with each other while sharing horror stories of immigrant crime.
Why won't anyone already in the political establishment help these marginalised men? Apart from cowardice, they don't see these marginalised men as useful allies or in any way socially useful. Let us imagine that all the non-white immigrant workers have been expelled, as Greg Johnson predicts, after white men agree and then co-operate to remove them. Can you imagine these elderly embittered men or the young NEETs doing the jobs the immigrants used to do? Of course not. They have nothing to offer anyone in the political establishment to fight for you. Even if these men offered their loyalty and support - which so far they have not thought of doing - they cannot be trusted to deliver.
Preston Wigginton, the White Nationalist Texan who runs a business, actually admits that it is hard to get anyone white and indigenous to do the work his business requires them to do. There is no work ethic amongst whites now.
In fact, it has been pointed out by the historian David Starkey that whites have become black.
Only a revolution would overthrow the matriarchy and restore the patriarchy. Is the alt-right even admitting that Christianity and democracy have failed? Are they discussing what Christianity and democracy should be replaced with? Have they acknowledged that however perfect a political system is in theory, it cannot come into being if politicians are incompetent and corrupt? If establishment politicians are incompetent and corrupt, all the more so anti-establishment figures like Curt Doolittle, Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer.
What are the big ideas of the alt-right? Pogrom, Paganism and Propertarianism!
They don't even have the honesty to discuss the failure of Christianity, much less face the truth that the only legal system capable of protecting them from Liberal Jews and the indifference and contempt of the liberal elite for a working class that is no longer fit for purpose is Secular Koranism.
In fact, the liberal elite no longer want to even have the bother of making the working classes work, because they want them to be replaced by robots. Yuval Harari, the Israeli academic, gay and gaily married, has said as much in his books, in particular Homo Deus. It is a work of surpassing arrogance if you know what Homo Deus means.
The Abrahamic God is the most powerful God conceivable, Judaism is for Jews only, Christianity is kaput, and Islam is the only possible religion for you if you are a gentile wishing to remain a gentile who wishes to worship the Abrahamic God without being guilty of the idolatry of Christianity.
If you believe in the Abrahamic God and wish to obey His laws, you would know that He has forbidden idolatry in the Ten Commandments and through His Chosen People who are religiously obliged by the Noahide laws to forbid idolatry.
If you accept that God has forbidden idolatry, then you must expect Him to punish it, especially if you have been guilty of it for 2000 years. If you deny that Christianity is idolatry, you would have to prove that worshiping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the Abrahamic God is not in fact idolatry.
How is the US going to change its laws even if every member of the alt-right converted to Christianity? It is only Islam that accepts the logic that your laws should be in harmony with the principles of your chosen moral system, whatever they are. Any lawyer and social scientist should understand that laws are the algorithms of human behaviour.
Please bear in mind that a Torah theocracy would be much harsher and more restrictive than Secular Koranism. If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". https://t.co/NmH7a3u0iKhttps://t.co/KEgMMKzbM8
The Jewish Torah (the first five books of the Hebrew Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) serves as a common religious reference for Judaism. Stoning is the method of execution mentioned most frequently in the Torah. (Murder is not mentioned as an offense punishable by stoning, but it seems that a member of the victim's family was allowed to kill the murderer; see avenger of blood.) The crimes punishable by stoning were the following:
Touching Mount Sinai while God was giving Moses the Ten Commandments, Exodus 19:13
An ox that gores someone to death should be stoned, Exodus 21:28
Having a "familiar spirit" (or being a necromancer) or being a "wizard", Leviticus 20:27
Enticing others to polytheism, Deuteronomy 13:7–11
Cursing God, Leviticus 24:10–16
Engaging in idolatry, Deuteronomy 17:2–7; or seducing others to do so, Deuteronomy 13:7–12
"Rebellion" against parents, after repeated warnings, Deuteronomy 21:18–21
Getting married as though a virgin, when not a virgin, Deuteronomy 22:13–21
Sexual intercourse between a man and a woman engaged to another man in a town, since she did not cry out, Deuteronomy 22:23–24; both parties should be stoned to death
Forced sexual intercourse between a man and a woman engaged to another man in a field, where no one could hear her cries and save her, Deuteronomy 22:25–27; the man should be stoned
Describing the stoning of those who entice others to apostates from Judaism, the Torah states:
If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which [is] as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; [Namely], of the gods of the people which [are] round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the [one] end of the earth even unto the [other] end of the earth; Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
— Deuteronomy 13:6–10
Quran
"And those who accuse chaste women then do not bring four witnesses, flog them, (giving) eighty stripes, and do not admit any evidence from them ever; and these it is that are the transgressors. Except those who repent after this and act aright, for surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." — Qur'an, Sura 24 (An-Nur), ayat 4-5
The Qur'an does not mention the act of stoning (Rajm) for any crime.
Contrary to popular belief, the punishment for Adultery (Zina) in the Quran is not stoning to death but flogging with a 100 lashes (if the accuser can provide 4 witnesses to the act). If the accuser cannot produce 4 witnesses, he himself will be punished by flogging with 80 lashes.
"The woman and the man guilty of fornication/adultery,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment."
They complain about Cultural Marxism AKA Feminism AKA Intersectionality. Protect yourself from Cultural Marxism with Secular Koranism!
34:00 The antisemitic assumption of this Islamophobic Australian Hindu is that malign Jews would deliberately destroy a civilisation's national identity because that would lower the gentile and elevate the Jew, turning our global village into a globo homo gayplex and Sodom and Gomorrah, and then fleeing to Israel when the balloon goes up. If this is so, these Jews have forgotten about the stumbling block they are not supposed to be putting in the way of anyone at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stumbling_block
45:00 Secular Koranism is discussed. Jennifer, do you know any Hindus who have read the Koran? Do you know how much reading of Hindu scripture is required by Brahmin priests and do they have to pass written examinations in this? I suspect most of them are hardly scholars, perhaps barely literate, just masters of theatricality and ceremony. An Islamic scholar would be expected to know the Koran inside out.
46:00 After two or three generations after Secular Koranism has been introduced, the overwhelming majority will believe in the Abrahamic God. I can confidently predict this because parents who don't literally believe in Santa now willingly become the High Priests and High Priestesses of the Cult of Santa at Christmas. Doubtless they will do the same thing when, after Secular Koranism becomes the law of the land, couples marry and go on to bring up the legitimate children that they have living together as a couple. Introducing God to them from a young age will be the equivalent of introducing them to the policeman who will be in their heads for the rest of their lives.
1:01:00 Elliott was asking why I was publicising Halsey's stream on https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/01/halsey-english-discusses-secular.html. Obviously, I was doing that in the hope of getting invited on his show and to get the alt-right YouTubers he mentioned to notice the Creator of Secular Koranism. If they have already heard of me, then obviously, I wanted to remind them of Secular Koranism and to emphasise that it is being discussed widely in alt-right circles. They may not like it, but they cannot think of a better solution to all their problems or deny that my diagnosis of the cause of Western malaise is correct. If my diagnoses is accepted as correct, then my prescription for its cure should logically and necessarily be also accepted. I do realise however that society can stay irrational for longer than I can stay alive. Since my ideas are so easy to remember, it would not be the end of the world if I will be no longer be around to be consulted to advise and warn Western governments of the finer points of Secular Koranism to avoid the pitfalls of common or garden sharia as the Muslims interpret it and apply what they erroneously believe to be Islamic principles.
My Grand Plan is to get Jews to promote Secular Koranism out of self interest. Most diasporas Jews in the West like Halsey want to stay where they are. To prevent Western nations from becoming failed states in the turbulent years to come, they must use Secular Koranism to displace the malign matriarchy run by the preferences of immoral and irresponsible women and their ill-bred bastards. Only under a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest thereby preventing societal collapse. Jews have a particular role in this because they have yet to accept that Israel should be a theocracy.
Once Israel becomes a theocracy, there will be peace with its Arab neighbours, particular when Israel adopts Secular Koranism. Israeli Jews should point to https://quran.com/17/104 as evidence that the Koran is also Zionist. God obviously intends for Jews to live in Israel but Israel must be an independent nation of priests, not the mere colonial outpost of a morally rotten empire promoting global gay marriage and global Sodom and Gomorrah.
No rational Israeli Jew - religious or not- would choose a Torah theocracy because its implementation would mean being stoned to death for every little thing, including breaking the Sabbath. As Prophetess of Secular Koranism, I contend that God if He exists would want Israel to be a theocracy, and will not insist on it being a Torah theocracy, because that would be too hard even on Jews.
Once Israel adopts Secular Koranism, Western nations would follow suit, encouraging China and Russia to do so by example.
In this way will the world be a better place under Global Sharia. (Secular Koranism is basically sharia interpreted by me, a non-Muslim, ex-liberal and ex-feminist agnostic.)
1:07:00 Jennifer: "That's exactly what Claire Khaw does!" Why are you comparing me with Hank Yoo, the Oriental who thinks he is a White Supremacist, whom you say has adopted American culture? Taking an interest in US politics and observing the alt-right as an ethnographer is hardly adopting American culture. What exactly has Yoo done that I have done? Is promoting Secular Koranism adopting Western culture? Perhaps it is, in the best intellectual traditions of Western thought! http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
1:10:00 Feminism rode into town on the coat-tails of egalitarianism. Egalitarianism comes from the French Revolution promoting the principles of Equality, Fraternity and Liberty. Feminism had established a matriarchy (ie a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who did not respect their children enough to prevent them from being born the bastards of people who would have been treated as sex offenders by https://quran.com/24/2) which displaced the patriarchy (ie a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers who want to properly parent their legitimate offspring).
1:13:00 Fascism is one party-ism. The fasces symbol originated from Rome meant to represent national unity and the authority of the state. It can be found in Congress. https://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/House-Chamber/Rostrum/ A Fascist is a Conservative who knows what it takes to promote Conservatism. But what is Conservatism? It is meaningless if it does not include social conservatism, and social conservatism means respecting the practice of marriage and upholding family values which the degenerates of the West are no longer capable of doing because the West is now a matriarchy.
Conservatism was really Theocracy Lite since it Conservatism was a defensive ideology created as a reaction to the ideas of the French Revolution which an anti-clerical revolt when they could no longer stomach the greed and corruption of the Catholic Church and their monarch associated with it. Because of the inferior scripture of the New Testament, no clear principles can be established. Because the Koran is clearly superior in concept and expression, anyone who has read it would be in no doubt as to its principles which easily translates into legislation.
All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy.
All advanced civilisations are patriarchies; all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.
The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents
The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents
Why are Canadian men more cucked than American men? Because the illegitimacy rate is higher in Canada.
Patriarchy has a pyramid and military command structure that allows orders from above given by the alpha male to be carried out by those below by the beta males. Patriarchy brings about male solidarity and enables male co-operation, allowing a society to deal firmly and effectively with its internal and external enemies.
Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and civilisation.
Matriarchy is the sea, patriarchy is coastal defences.
In short, it creates a hierarchical society where there is a place for everyone and everyone knows his or her place. There is less conflict in these societies than those who believe in the polite fiction of equality.
Left untreated, the disease of feminism could turn your society back to the barbarism of human civilisation before marriage was invented and could even result in the most extreme matriarchy known to us: the bee colony. We already know that male chicks are destroyed after being hatched in chicken farms. We certainly know that the only thing about feminism that men like is how it lowers the price of sex. Feminism uses sexual liberation to bribe and distract men from the damage it is doing to the civilisation their male ancestors created.
If religion used to be the opium of the people when the West took its religion seriously, then extramarital sex is now the opium of atheist degenerates of the West and those who ape the worst of the West.
This is a good livestream because it is actually about something important ie Jews, Secular Koranism and me, of course. I am basically telling Jews that Secular Koranism could save them from having to all flee to Israel and they won't all fit in there nor will they be able to take their wealth with them since buildings in Manhattan take years to sell anyway. Jews like Halsey want to stay in America and he has expressed a fierce and honourable willingness to fight for it. I only hope that Halsey will be brave enough to one day invite me on his channel.
I take the view that Jews are not being malign by being liberal, just as stupid and clueless as the liberal gentile.
There are more liberals than nationalists everywhere in the West - both Jew and gentile - because there are more stupid people who believe what they are told and people who prefer to go with the flow, everywhere.
For some reason, many people hear about deconstruction and they acquire only a few particular targets: traditional marriage, dead white male books, or whatever. And all that is fine... but there is so much more fun to be had now. Yes, marriage was just a social construct. But 1/
...so are the days of the week and the weekend and months. Let’s shake things up! Why are we dating things from the time of Jesus? Start over at year zero. We’re deconstructionists. Let’s enjoy this. Deconstruction &traditionalism thread — 2/ ...
There are silly ways we could play around — switching which side of the road we drive on. But let’s be honest, there are very controversial ways! If marriage is a social construct, the age of consent is absolutely a social construct. In most of Mexico it’s 12. Is that bad? 3/...
...who is to say, right? We’re deconstructionists. We can change the rules of the NFL so that it’s inclusive of women. Keep reading. Let’s have a random computer algorithm redraw the national boundaries around the world. Those are constructs! 4/...
Democracy certainly is a social construct. We should play around and try lots of different forms like anarchy capitalism and strict patriarchal Catholic imperium and everything in between. And it’s a social construct that men ask women out & not vice versa. Let’s reverse that! 5/
Obviously “education” is a social construct. Even the disciplines are constructs. Property ownership is a construct. Voting age is a construct. Anti-cousin marriage taboos, the movie rating system—all constructs. I know you all know all of this — 6/
Legalize prostitution and drugs. Make pornography and coffee illegal. We are masters of the universe and everything is arbitrarily arranged! Why are we so conservative in our deconstruction? The Constitution, the Bible, The Odyssey — all constructs. Let’s revise. 7/
Is hitting children acceptable? Who is to say? The DSM-V is a construct, and we should play around and revise all of its arbitrary distinctions. Again, why are we so conservative? Is usury acceptable or not? Construct. Why should pop songs be 3 minutes? Why not 30 seconds? 8/
Dismantle all standardized testing, right? And it’s not fair that some universities are prestigious and others aren’t. Admissions should be by lottery cuz no person is better than any other. Political correctness and “hate speech” rules are constructs! Point is... 9/
...once you start dismantling traditions, it’s a race to absolute zero. There’s no solid metaphysical basis for retaining any of our cherished taboos now. Back to age of consent: we say 18. Mexico says 12. There is no way of settling this. some secular pope makes judgment call. +
Until we arrive at total anarchy. Which seems to be the direction we’re headed. Against all of this—against this acid that eats away at all value, we have traditional values, which are said to be permanent and stable. And which “worked”—not perfectly, but reliably, for millennia.
What honestly surprises me is the way that so many people genuinely cannot play this narrative out in their heads. They go, “yeah, we normalized usury and revised the Latin mass and legalized gay marriage and so on and so on, but don’t think we’ll ever lower age of consent...”
And they go, “...and legalizing gay marriage isn’t even comparable to making the week 10 days long.” But of course it is. And when they go, “Yeah but legalizing SSM is *good*,” — it’s not that I think it’s bad. It’s that there is no basis for saying whether it’s good or bad.
It’s just an arbitrary whim. Like everything is now. And they counter, “well, ‘twas ever so—traditional marriage was also just arbitrary.” And this is the part I’m not sure about. Maybe they’re right. Or maybe certain traditional “conventions” actually reflected some realities?
Think of it like a golf swing: should we teach children that the golf swing is an arbitrary motion? Merely a construct? I mean, look at gym Furyk. Try it one-handed, kid. Who are we to say? We’re deconstructionists. We don’t want to oppress you with traditionalism.
But the golf swing achieves a particular end—and many of its standard forms are thought to beat achieve that end. Should it be illegal to do it wrong? Probably not. But should we clearly instruct children in what grip and motions generally work best? So is a golf swing...
“a social convention” or not? Possibly not. Possibly it is a reflection of our physiology and of physical reality. How much more, then, might marriage or taboos on sex or age of consent laws be not arbitrary, but aligned to certain really-existing unavoidable realities?
Does deconstruction have limits? Well, the classic/traditional golf swing might not work best for a severely mutilated person... or on the moon? —and so if the body itself can be deconstructed, or laws of nature, then maybe deconstruction has no limits.
But it’s also possible that the combo of our bodies, our brains, natural reality itself, hormones, etc. — that this adds up to a set of constraints. And that something like traditional marriage might even be the “best form” for managing these realities.
—and marriage is, again, merely an early indicator of how deconstruction will operate. Why should the week have seven days? Is that arbitrary? Or maybe our physiology and our minds need a weekend every 7 days or so? Maybe there would be consequences for screwing up the calendar?
1) Is marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy?
2) Is the West now a matriarchy?
3) Do all civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy?
4) Is matriarchy a society that tolerates a culture of fornication?
5) Is a patriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers?
6) Is a matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who are invariably the bad parents of their often variously fathered illegitimate offspring?
7) Are the problems of the West really problems of character, parenting and its egregiously low standards of sexual morality (which is in fact dysgenic) as well as the failure of its religion and political system which no one will acknowledge?
8) Is it true that Western men are afraid of Western women withholding sex from them or divorcing them under the rules of no fault divorce, so much so that they are in fact too afraid to criticise feminism even as they see it destroying the civilisation their ancestors created?
No, I don't think I can. I'm afraid to ask some of them cuz they might report me to the ADL just for proposing it. Others wouldn't dare, because they know (deep down) that they have no idea what basis they have for their own claims. Others aren't smart enough. Etc. But I'll look-
Academics are 100% certain that patriarchy is the enemy. So you'd have to first show them that their classification of good & evil, justice & injustice, have been either wrong or totally arbitrary... all that, just to get them to consider it. Right now, they're not considering.
They seem to equate patriarchy with domestic violence and wife-beating. Let us assume that if most women are married then they would be more likely to be beaten by their husbands than anyone else. However, would they prefer to be raped by marauding soldiers/invaders instead?
Here's a common style of argument: "What, you reject basic LGBT civil rights legislation? And now feminism? Then do you also reject anti-slavery? Should there be inquisitions again?"
I am getting more serious about the Bible. The breastplate of Christ. Eventually progressives will of course categorize it as hate speech, but... I think it provides cover for a generation or two.
i think we're in far enough that the only way out is through... meaning acceleration, basically. Get to the end, then we can start again. Or at least, that's the only contribution I can make in academia. To try to show people how hollow their assumptions are, as Socrates did.
If we have offspring, surely it is our duty to make the period of transition as smooth and bloodless as possible? This we can do by pointing to the problem and proposing the solution. https://t.co/hqBLWTbJJ0 is an example of a solution.
Even if the most we can do is say "I told you so" when the balloon goes up, we can at least truthfully say that we did tell them so thereby retaining some moral authority. If we only stood idly by and said nothing, we will have no moral authority at all and be rightly ignored.
The matriarchy knows it cannot win arguments on the basis of truth, logic and morality alone. I do hope you will be discussing the effects of men denying that they live in a matriarchy.
You live in a matriarchy if the number of illegitimate births are approaching or are over half the number of legitimate births. You know this is the case in the West.
Western men fear to challenge feminism because they already know that their womenfolk are overwhelmingly feminist.
You are a feminist if even if you are a man complaining about feminism and feminists unless you also condemn fornication.
No man will publicly condemn fornication because there are too many vested interests eg men who wish to have sex with women they are not married to, men who are already having sex with women they are not married to, men who have fornicating daughters, men who used to fornicate, men who have gay sons, men whose associates have already been condoning extramarital sex and underage sex for decades.
Last, but not least, is big pharma who manufacture the contraceptive pill and of course those with shares invested in big pharma.
This is pretty much everyone really in the West and also in Russia.
Feminism is a disease of the mind and I would only be too happy to explain why it is destroying Western civilisation if given the opportunity.
We know that it is overwhelmingly women who vote for the left. Ann Coulter herself said so.
The average Western voter is a 40 year old single mother whom all political parties pander to. This explains why no one cares about foreign policy. You must understand that the national character in democracies can be easily determined by working out the average age of the nation and deciding which sex wields more power.
A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, a matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of the unmarried mother, usually with variously fathered illegitimate offspring whom she badly parents.
Why the West is sucking in foreign workers from around the world because the class supposed to constitute its own labour force is degenerate, incompetent, uncompetitive and unwilling to work because it can claim welfare.
The Welfare State is another Sacred Cow that must be slain.
We live in an Idiocracy because we live in a matriarchy. The matriarchy is not only dangerous to the patriarchy, it will also destroy itself after it has destroyed the patriarchy.
The only political ideology that can now shame these shameless women that their men are now too afraid to criticise of is the one with a holy book that has the verse at https://quran.com/24/2
If you are in a burning building but are too afraid of your sacred cows that you know are blocking the exits and the windows, you will die in it, unless you remove those obstructions.
You know you must remove those obstructions or at least talk about removing those obstructions, man to man.Once you agree that this must be done, simply convey the message to the US President by promising him your support in the slaying of these sacred cows.
That would be the quickest non-violent way of restoring the patriarchy.
There are too many entitled middle class female undergraduates in universities. Male undergraduates who seek sexual access to these females will commit violence to gain access to these women by flattering them and committing violence to impress these women.
Since Christianity and Islam are derived from Judaism, it must be because gentiles found something admirable or enviable in Jews and/or Judaism.
After all, getting their homeland back after 2000 years of exile is no mean feat. The least you can do in the name of racial superiority is to be in existence to enter the competition.
If you wish to remain a gentile, then you can only choose between Christianity and Islam.
Why not Hinduism or Buddhism? Because they are even more alien to the traditions of the West than Islam and the delinquent Westerner now desperately needs boundaries and structure in his national life as well as hope for the future. The Koran is the best available guide for him on the question of changing the rules so that they are fair to his women and minorities after the patriarchy is restored.
Let us hope it will not be too long before Western Man submits to the Truth, Logic and Morality of another Abrahamic faith after recognising that the one of his ancestors has absolutely failed along with his political system of indiscriminate universal suffrage that has now created a rapacious parasitic class.
Obviously, only 24:2 of the Koran quran.com/24/2 is capable of shaming the shameless slut with public corporal punishment to discourage her from producing badly parented bastards who become the underachievers, criminals, knife crime perpetrators and knife crime victims of the next generation. Such women are the agents of degeneracy, and it is time they are acknowledged to be the agents of decline, dementia and the death of your civilisation.
If Jews are indeed a superior race, then the gentile should defer to them and seek their advice because there now is an urgent question:
Is Christianity or Islam more in conformity with the Noahide laws and why?
It cannot be Christianity, because worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God, as the Doctrine of the Trinity requires, is undeniably idolatry and absolutely forbidden by the Noahide laws.
If the West is currently being punished by the disease of the mind that is feminism, it must be because God has finally decided to punish the Post-Christian for 2000 years of idolatry.
