Translate

Showing posts with label Gina Miller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gina Miller. Show all posts

Wednesday, 3 May 2017

A message of support to Rhodri Philipps Lord St Davids from a first generation immigrant Brexiteer








http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4465666/Viscount-offered-5-000-reward-run-Gina-Miller.html

On 3 May 2017, at 08:43 I emailed his brief Andrew Rinker in the following terms:

Dear Mr Rinker

As you can see [from the above tweets], I, a leave voting first generation immigrant, have expressed support for Lord St Davids. 

If you wish me to give evidence as a witness on any legally relevant matter to do with your client's defence , I would be delighted to assist. 

I too have expressed a hope that Gina Miller drops dead. 

https://twitter.com/search?l=&q=Gina%20Miller%20from%3Antfem&src=typd

Even if you find no use for me in the July hearing, I'd be grateful if you would pass my message of support to your client.

Yours sincerely

Claire Khaw 

Sunday, 6 November 2016

My solution to Theresa May's problem of the libtard judiciary being the enemies of the people





The best way of dealing with High Court decision to thwart the result of the plebiscite is require that any judge hearing this application for judicial review on the triggering of Article 50 declare how he voted in the EU Referendum and swear to tell the truth. If it is subsequently discovered that he lied, he should be hanged from the nearest lamp post.

If he voted remain, then that judge should be disqualified from hearing this application on the grounds that no one should be a judge in his own cause, or, nemo judex in causa sua, if you prefer Latin.

This should sort out how the appeal to the Supreme Court should be handled to get the result we want.

If no Supreme Court judge can be found who voted leave - which is perfectly possible knowing how libtard the judiciary is - then the whole application should be struck out.

In fact, the application should have been struck out ab initio for being totally without merit.

The First Claimant Gina Miller has no locus standi for one thing because she does not represent the majority of the voters who voted to leave. It would be outrageous that this woman - who was not even British-born - should have the right to thwart the will of 17M voters by merely application by requiring that MPs vote to trigger Article 50 when she did not even vote leave.

The Second Claimant is the First Claimant's Portuguese hairdresser and is not even a British National.

No one who is not a British national has the locus standi to make this application. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3903436/Enemies-people-Fury-touch-judges-defied-17-4m-Brexit-voters-trigger-constitutional-crisis.html
























































































































































A self-deception of words

People using words to deceive themselves 2:00  Plenty more fish in the sea 4:00  Ignoring facts and logic 5:00  Turning your online communit...