Translate

Showing posts with label Theresa May. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theresa May. Show all posts

Monday, 27 May 2019

How Nigel Farage could become our Brexit Prime Minister


  1. Expel Theresa May. The Conservative Party Constitution allows any member to be expelled at its absolute discretion. She should be informed as soon as possible that her membership of the Conservative Party has been cancelled under Part IV 17.7 of the Constitution of the Party, which states: "The Board of the Party shall have power to do anything which in its opinion relates to the management and administration of the Party.  It shall be ... responsible for ... the cancellation or refusal of membership, in its absolute discretion of any Party member ...." The Chairman of the Conservative Party, Brandon Lewis MP, would be the one to administer the coup de grâce.  https://www.conservatives.com/Members/Party-Structure-and-Organisation
  2. This would trigger a by-election in Maidenhead.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maidenhead_(UK_Parliament_constituency)  https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/by-elections/
  3. When Farage wins it, invite him to join the Conservative Party just in time to participate in the leadership elections, which he should be able to win.
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Saturday, 26 November 2016

What have George Osborne, Theresa May and Tom Holland got in common?

George Osborne

Theresa May

Tom Holland, cricket bore and classical historian

My, hasn't Donald Trump - not standing with his legs apart - got large hands!


Future social historians will ask themselves why the political classes of a degenerate liberal democracy are standing with their legs apart.

Can you imagine a real man like Donald Trump resorting to such a pathetic attempt to convey masculinity and command?

We now talk of fake news. There is now fake masculinity, fake femininity and fake displays of leadership and authority.

The less you have of something you want, the more you want to pretend you have it by adopting ridiculous positions of display.

I'm warning Michael Gove not to adopt that stance if he is still hoping to salvage his political career. It is pathetic that he's trying to get people to like him by appearing to angle for a gig on Strictly Come Dancing. It's only for retired and fallen politicians who need something to top up their income, rather like footballers whose careers have come to an end wanting compo from the Football Association for being sexually abused as a child when they never complained at the time, not even to their parents. If he wants to angle for a position, he should be up to challenging and discussing my ideas, or even more daringly, agreeing with them.
































at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 22 November 2016

The wise man does at once what the fool does finally. Theresa May is indulging in the feminine vice of denial













































‘Western laws now clash with moral nature of man’ – Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill


The Bhagavad Gita:

Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil.

The West is a degenerate matriarchy where the preferences of fornicating parasitic sluts are prioritised over and above those of the working men. Unskilled manual labour is completely unrepresented in Britain, except by the BNP and UKIP while all the political parties continue to chase the female vote, all afraid to alienate it and ignoring the concerns, welfare and preferences of men.

Indeed, it is feminazis like Helen Goodman at the top of the Labour Party who calls the shots. People who think there is a Jewish conspiracy should reflect on the political careers of good principled Jewish men destroyed by feminazis when they tried to stand up for gentile men: Keith Joseph's in the Conservative Party and Lord Glasman's in Labour.

In a matriarchy, no one can hear you scream the truth.

Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened' 
 
Asked by the Daily Telegraph's Mary Riddell whether he would support a total ban on immigration, even if just for a temporary period, Lord Glasman replied, "Yes. I would add that we should be more generous and friendly in receiving those [few] who are needed. To be more generous, we have to draw the line."

How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Sunday, 6 November 2016

My solution to Theresa May's problem of the libtard judiciary being the enemies of the people





The best way of dealing with High Court decision to thwart the result of the plebiscite is require that any judge hearing this application for judicial review on the triggering of Article 50 declare how he voted in the EU Referendum and swear to tell the truth. If it is subsequently discovered that he lied, he should be hanged from the nearest lamp post.

If he voted remain, then that judge should be disqualified from hearing this application on the grounds that no one should be a judge in his own cause, or, nemo judex in causa sua, if you prefer Latin.

This should sort out how the appeal to the Supreme Court should be handled to get the result we want.

If no Supreme Court judge can be found who voted leave - which is perfectly possible knowing how libtard the judiciary is - then the whole application should be struck out.

In fact, the application should have been struck out ab initio for being totally without merit.

The First Claimant Gina Miller has no locus standi for one thing because she does not represent the majority of the voters who voted to leave. It would be outrageous that this woman - who was not even British-born - should have the right to thwart the will of 17M voters by merely application by requiring that MPs vote to trigger Article 50 when she did not even vote leave.

The Second Claimant is the First Claimant's Portuguese hairdresser and is not even a British National.

No one who is not a British national has the locus standi to make this application. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3903436/Enemies-people-Fury-touch-judges-defied-17-4m-Brexit-voters-trigger-constitutional-crisis.html
























































































































































at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, 6 September 2016

In defending Keith Vaz, we are defending the rule of law and British values

REMINDER TO FEMINAZIS

 Relevant and rational considerations
  1. There is no law against hiring prostitutes.
  2. Keith Vaz at no time took a position as Chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee that is inconsistent with the exercise of his human right to hire prostitutes.

 Irrelevant and irrational considerations
  1. You hate Keith Vaz.
  2. Everyone you know hates Keith Vaz.
  3. You'd be furious if you found your husband had hired prostitutes. 
  4. You would never dream of hiring prostitutes.
  5. You don't want anyone at all to hire prostitutes. 
  6. You want to punish Keith Vaz on behalf of his wife who has decided to stand by him.


We will always need politicians prepared to defend the rule of law. Keith Vaz by refusing to resign as Chairman of the Home Affairs Select Commitee is in fact using his position to defend the principle of decriminalising prostitution, which its members are already agreed upon.

What is not forbidden is allowed. It is not forbidden to hire prostitutes, even if you are an MP who is Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee. If there is some unwritten rule that says MPs are forbidden from hiring prostitutes, why would MPs support this infringement of their own human right? They are the legislature after all. If they do not even support their own right to hire prostitutes when it is not illegal to do so, does this mean they are stupid or scared, or both?

Why are British voters being governed by MPs who are more stupid and scared than they are, and who won't even stand up for their own legal rights when those are not in question?

If Keith Vaz is ousted as Chairman, the more thoughtful voter - not very many admittedly - who is also for the decriminalisation of prostitution would be asking himself precisely this question.

If Home Affairs Committee Tory MPs try to oust him, it would be only because they are following the orders of Theresa May. Being an unprincipled woman, she will probably be unable to think beyond how angry she would be if discovered her husband had hired prostitutes, but that is not the point.

The point is that if everyone has the right to hire prostitutes then wives enraged by the thought of their husband doing so is completely irrelevant.

Mrs Keith Vaz has clearly decided to stand by her husband and it is not anyone's business to punish him on her behalf, not even our female Prime Minister, who is also a wife.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, 13 July 2016

The 39 male Brexiteer Tory MPs who snatched defeat from the jaws of victory



Dumb fuck Brexiteer male Tory MPs applauding Andrea Leadsom, the woman who betrayed their cause and gave them the triple whammy of what men don't need or want: May - a female remain Prime Minister who will stuff her cabinet full of female mediocrities and further marginalise men. Look at dumb fuck Tim Loughton looking at her legs and applauding her. The country is going down the toilet and male Tory MPs can only look at a woman's legs and applaud her for betraying their cause. The best way for Andrea Leadsom to show her remorse for fucking it up royally for Brexiteers is to apply for the Children Hundreds, but she won't be doing that, will she? Another over-promoted female mediocrity screws it up for men, and all they can do is applaud her and look at her legs ...


  1. Steve Baker
  2. John Baron
  3. Julian Brazier
  4. Andrew Bridgen
  5. David Burrowes
  6. Bill Cash
  7. Philip Davies
  8. Steve Double
  9. James Duddridge
  10. Iain Duncan Smith
  11. James Gray
  12. Chris Green
  13. Chris Heaton-Harris
  14. Gordon Henderson
  15. Stewart Jackson
  16. Bernard Jenkin
  17. Boris Johnson
  18. Edward Leigh
  19. Julian Lewis
  20. Peter Lilley
  21. Tim Loughton
  22. Karl McCartney
  23. Stephen McPartland
  24. James Morris
  25. David Mowat
  26. Andrew Murrison
  27. David Nuttall
  28. Neil Parish
  29. Owen Paterson
  30. Daniel Poulter
  31. Tom Pursglove
  32. John Redwood
  33. Laurence Robertson
  34. Andrew Rosindell
  35. Bob Stewart
  36. Michael Tomlinson
  37. Craig Tracey
  38. Martin Vickers
  39. William Wragg
https://twitter.com/ntfem/lists/dimwit-leadsom-supporters

Andrew Murrison, who supported Leadsom, belatedly grovels about being "bowled over by the strength and power" of May. This is the kind of man who represents South West Wiltshire.



Unlike me, these male politicians in charge of the ship of state couldn't see that this woman who probably reminded them of their granny or mummy was unreliable, inexperienced as well as selfish and self-indulgent with no idea of her place in the world and politics, whose husband is so henpecked he didn't dare stop her from standing by threatening to divorce her. That would have stopped her dead in her over-ambitious tracks. Typical woman: quitting the moment the going got tough.

Why couldn't they have supported Gove? Was he not pretty enough for them then? If he had dressed up as a woman would they have been more likely to support him? These pathetic men who still want their mummy couldn't bring themselves to support Gove because they wanted their leader and PM to be like their mummy, so they pretended Gove was guilty of some great betrayal and that he owed Boris some kind of duty of honour not to stand. 

Gove was guilty of no more than being a man and changing his mind: a woman's prerogative but clearly not a man's. Whither gender equality?

See how these infantilised and emasculated middle-aged men, clueless about male solidarity, let the remainer May in to stuff her cabinet full of women.  

These Brexiteers have somehow maneuvered themselves into getting a double whammy of what we don't want: a woman and a remainer as PM.  ALL BECAUSE THEY WANTED THEIR MUMMY. 

When politicians are turkeys voting for Xmas, you know your country is just a turd in the toilet that hasn't been quite flushed away yet.

And all because grown men still want their mummy. Disgusting and contemptible. 






While Tory MPs could have ignored Paul Dacre of the Mail supporting May, they did not. Paul Dacre must also take part of the blame. https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2016/jul/01/paul-dacre-daily-mail-plays-tory-kingmaker-theresa-may

Why did Dacre support May? Because he thought he was betting on a horse, probably, just like the all the dumbshit Tory MPs who thought Gove wouldn't be quite popular enough with the Tory membership because his legs weren't shapely or his skirt short enough or because he didn't remind them of their mummy or granny enough. Unprincipled, infantilised and emasculated British men are strangers to principle and beyond contempt. Even the men who want the right things for the right reasons are pathetically venal.  No wonder this country is fucked. 

And so, I assume, are my chances of getting a column in The Mail. 

BREXIT BETRAYED: When did you first realise Brexit had been cancelled?
at 16 comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, 2 July 2016

Which Tory leadership candidate and future Prime Minister possesses most of these Roman virtues?

Auctoritas — "Spiritual Authority" — The sense of one's social standing, built up through experience, Pietas, and Industria.

Comitas — "Humour" — Ease of manner, courtesy, openness, and friendliness.

Constantia — "Perseverance" — Military stamina, mental and physical endurance.

Clementia — "Mercy" — Mildness and gentleness.

Dignitas — "Dignity" — A sense of self-worth, personal pride.

Disciplina — "Discipline" — Military oath under Roman protective law & citizenship.

Firmitas — "Tenacity" — Strength of mind, the ability to stick to one's purpose.

Frugalitas — "Frugality" — Economy and simplicity of style, without being miserly.

Gravitas — "Gravity" — A sense of the importance of the matter at hand, responsibility and earnestness.

Honestas — "Respectability" — The image that one presents as a respectable member of society.

Humanitas — "Humanity" — Refinement, civilization, learning, and being cultured.

Industria — "Industriousness" — Hard work.

Iustitia — "Justice" — Sense of moral worth to an action.

Pietas — "Dutifulness" — More than religious piety; a respect for the natural order socially,
politically, and religiously. Includes the ideas of patriotism and devotion to others.

Prudentia — "Prudence" — Foresight, wisdom, and personal discretion.

Salubritas — "Wholesomeness" — Health and cleanliness.

Severitas — "Sternness" — Gravity, self-control.

Veritas — "Truthfulness" — Honesty in dealing with others.

Virtus - "Manliness" - Valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth. Vir meaning "man".



It's unlikely to be Leadsom.

It can't be Crabb.

It f [ill in the blank] be Fox.

It mustn't be May.

It's got to be Gove.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, 29 May 2016

British government to feminise sharia law

http://www.lawandreligionuk.com/2012/10/24/sharia-law-the-arbitration-act-1996-and-the-arbitration-and-mediation-services-equality-bill/



 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/23/section/1

General principles.

The provisions of this Part are founded on the following principles, and shall be construed accordingly—

(a)the object of arbitration is to obtain the fair resolution of disputes by an impartial tribunal without unnecessary delay or expense;

(b)the parties should be free to agree how their disputes are resolved, subject only to such safeguards as are necessary in the public interest;

(c)in matters governed by this Part the court should not intervene except as provided by this Part.

If the public interest is the national interest, then feminism is the antithesis of the national interest, because it results in degeneracy and the decline and fall of your civilisation.

Those who who wish to impose feminism on society are the agents of the matriarchy. Theresa May has been undermining the patriarchy by undermining marriage since 2002. 

The Conservative Party's surrender to slut single mothers in 2002

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/may/26/theresa-may-launches-sharia-law-review
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 13 May 2015

How will the government define "extremism" and what are British values?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05tllvh

0715

David Cameron is outlining new measures today to tackle extremism in the UK - plans for a counter-extremism bill will be set out at the first meeting since the election of the National Security Council. Jonathan Russell is the political liaison officer for Quilliam, the counter extremist think tank.

0810

David Cameron is outlining new measures today to tackle extremism in the UK - plans for a counter-extremism bill will be set out at the first meeting since the election of the National Security Council. Theresa May is the Home Secretary.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380595/SMSC_Guidance_Maintained_Schools.pdf

Through their provision of SMSC  (spiritual, moral, social and cultural [development]), schools should:
• enable students to develop their self-knowledge, self-esteem and self-confidence;
• enable students to distinguish right from wrong and to respect the civil and
criminal law of England;
• encourage students to accept responsibility for their behaviour, show initiative, and
to understand how they can contribute positively to the lives of those living and
working in the locality of the school and to society more widely;
• enable students to acquire a broad general knowledge of and respect for public
institutions and services in England;
• further tolerance and harmony between different cultural traditions by enabling
students to acquire an appreciation of and respect for their own and other cultures;
• encourage respect for other people; and
• encourage respect for democracy and support for participation in the democratic
processes, including respect for the basis on which the law is made and applied in
England.
The list below describes the understanding and knowledge expected of pupils as a result of schools promoting fundamental British values.
• an understanding of how citizens can influence decision-making through the democratic process;
• an appreciation that living under the rule of law protects individual citizens and is
essential for their well-being and safety;
• an understanding that there is a separation of power between the executive and
the judiciary, and that while some public bodies such as the police and the army
can be held to account through Parliament, others such as the courts maintain
independence;
• an understanding that the freedom to choose and hold other faiths and beliefs is
protected in law;
• an acceptance that other people having different faiths or beliefs to oneself (or
having none) should be accepted and tolerated, and should not be the cause of
prejudicial or discriminatory behaviour; and
• an understanding of the importance of identifying and combating discrimination.

As a qualified solicitor, I am sure Anjem Choudary already understands all of the above.

If Britain is a matriarchal society - and believe me it is - does proposing and promoting a return to the patriarchy mean you are guilty of extremism?

What is the evidence that Britain is a matriarchal society? The desecration by the establishment of the institution of marriage. All it takes for a matriarchy to establish itself is the absence of the practice of marriage and society's lack of respect for this institution. To respect marriage, we must logically and necessarily forbid extramarital sex. Instead, however, a Conservative government actually went out of its way to legalise gay marriage, which is like decriminalising what was once a criminal offence to solve the crime problem. Sadly, the British are now so degenerate that they cannot see through this ruse, or worse, they are so depraved they pretend not to understand this point no matter how many times or how clearly I explain this.


To this list I would add "paedo".

Margaret Thatcher:

Watch your thoughts, for they become words. Watch your words, for they become actions. Watch your actions, for they become habits. Watch your habits, for they become your character. And watch your character, for it becomes your destiny. 

Q1.   What are the thoughts of the British?

A1.   [Extramarital] sex and shopping.

Q2.   What are the actions of the British?

A2.   Sexual intercourse, especially of the extramarital variety.

Q3.   What are the habits of the British?

A3.   Drunkenness, over-eating, gambling, anti-social behaviour and borrowing to buy things they don't need with money they don't have. When they are not having extramarital sex, drinking, over-eating and shopping, they like pretending that indiscriminate universal suffrage - the so-called democratic process - is superior to all forms of government when it is clear that they out of all nations have lost the most through the operation of democracy.

Poppy Mania Day prevents any rational and impartial analysis of the insanity of UK foreign policy for the past 100 years

In short, their habits are indulging in all the seven deadly sins without any longer being able to understand the concept of sin let alone list them.

Q4.  What are the characteristics of the British?

A4.   Dipso, fatso, bingo, ASBO, Tesco, paedo, and denial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Q5.   What is the destiny of the British?

A5.   Deuteronomy 28: Curses for disobedience



SSMs = Slut Single Mothers

It has been a British "value" not to criticise irresponsible, stupid and promiscuous women since 1974.

Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened'

The 4 Categories of Unmarried Motherhood

Most children of British mothers born out of wedlock - most British children *bastards*, most British mothers *sluts*, no male British politician will criticise sluts, therefore all British men lower than stupid, irresponsible, promiscuous sluts who are bad mothers of bastards.

Tories have been soliciting the vote of stupid irresponsible promiscuous sluts who are bad mothers of bastards since 2002, *at the suggestion of Theresa May*.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/11554595/Pornography-has-changed-the-landscape-of-adolescence-beyond-all-recognition.html

Allison Pearson:

In recent years, Sue had treated growing numbers of teenage girls with internal injuries caused by frequent anal sex; not, as Sue found out, because she wanted to, or because she enjoyed it – on the contrary – but because a boy expected her to. “I’ll spare you the gruesome details,” said Sue, “but these girls are very young and slight and their bodies are simply not designed for that.”

Her patients were deeply ashamed at presenting with such injuries. They had lied to their mums about it and felt they couldn’t confide in anyone else, which only added to their distress. When Sue questioned them further, they said they were humiliated by the experience, but they had simply not felt they could say no. Anal sex was standard among teenagers now, even though the girls knew that it hurt.

For Sue’s surgery isn’t in some inner-city borough where kids may have been brutalised or come from cultures where such practices are commonly used as contraception. Sue works in the leafy heart of Hampshire. The girls presenting with incontinence were often under the age of consent and from loving, stable homes. Just the sort of kids who, only two generations ago, would have been enjoying riding and ballet lessons, and still looking forward to their first kiss, not being coerced into violent sex by some kid who picked up his ideas about physical intimacy from a dogging video on his mobile.

Yet when Muslim parents take organised action to prevent the same thing from happening to their daughters, they are denounced as "Trojan horses". http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10983109/Trojan-horse-plot-report-disturbing-evidence-of-intolerant-Islamic-ethos.html As you would expect, their Muslim values warns them against integrating into a society that asserts extramarital sex as a right or even a sacrament. While Muslims worship and fear an omnipotent and morally perfect God, Islamophobes, feminists and liberals worship and fear sluts. They fear and hate Islam because they see it as an ideology that threatens their right to have extramarital sex as well as what they regard as their "liberty" and their "way of life". 

How long has under-aged sex been condoned in Britain all the way up to the House of Lords? Since 1985. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Gillick+competence

DEMOCRATS' IDEAL VOTER: ILLEGAL ALIEN, SINGLE MOTHER, CONVICTED FELON

Coulter: "If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president"

Ian Cowie and Benedict Brogan agree with Claire Khaw's proposal of no representation without taxation (to disenfranchise non-taxpaying Slut Single Mothers)

Would David Cameron's proposal to "tackle extremism" criminalise people like Keith Joseph, Howard Flight, Ann Coulter, Ian Cowie and Benedict Brogan as well as my good self and Anjem Choudary?


004.015
YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.

004.016
YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

024.002
YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.
PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.
SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.

Claire Khaw's Class and Gender Theory of Western Decline

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=terrorism
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

​@WoodStoneAndSteel asks about the lolcows of the world

2:00   Incorrect diagnosis Chaste women 3:00  Political economy Abolishing no fault force 5:00  Socialising 6:00  Disposable relationships 7...