Translate

Showing posts with label Katie Hopkins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Katie Hopkins. Show all posts

Friday, 26 May 2017

Claire Khaw to replace Katie Hopkins at LBC?


Would you like Claire Khaw to take Katie Hopkins' place? 



  1. Why?
  2. Why not?
  3. I am not racist.
  4. I am not xenophobic.
  5. I am not an Islamoophobe
  6. I have the greatest respect for the Chosen People, especially Orthodox Jews. I am afraid I don't think much of Liberal and Reform Jews. The Jews I most admire are the Neturei Karta. 
  7. I am a civic nationalist with a wide range of ideas to solve the longstanding problems of the British people that are admittedly radical and controversial.
  8. I am job-hunting. 
  9. It is only right that I should be paid for my invaluable service to the British people.  
  10. I am enormously (perhaps dangerously) entertaining and the only reason why LBC might not wish to hire me is because they fear that their listeners might be in danger of being overstimulated.
I cannot find the LBC email, but those of  you wish to enjoy The Claire Khaw Show on LBC should consider printing this post and sending it to LBC with your name and address at


LBC Radio Ltd
30 Leicester Square
London
WC2H 7LA 


Saturday, 11 March 2017

Katie Hopkins *must* appeal against this clearly wrong decision by Justice Warby

http://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/national/15148557.Writer_Jack_Monroe_wins___24k_damages_from_columnist_Katie_Hopkins/

A question is not a statement. An offensive question can be answered in the negative, neutralising any libelous content of the question.

A "When did you stop beating your wife?" question is of course libelous if you are denying that you ever beat your wife.

I am also annoyed that the Sally Bercow case was decided wrongly.

Someone asking a question with an "innocent face" does not amount to libel.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/22/lord-mcalpine-libel-row-sally-bercow

This is because any question can be answered in the affirmative or the negative to neutralise any libelous content within it, unless the question assumes the existence of some contested fact, eg "When did you stop beating your wife?" when it is being disputed by the person asked that he ever beat his wife.  

No jury of right-thinking tweeting men and women would ever have decided that Katie Hopkins had caused Mx Jack Monroe "serious harm" or awarded damages in these terms at paragraph 80.

Taking  account  of  all  these  matters,  my  award  is  £24,000.  That  is  divided  into £16,000  for  the  First  Tweet  and  £8,000  for  the  Second  Tweet. 

https://inforrm.wordpress.com/2015/03/26/lee-kuan-yew-and-freedom-of-expression-the-libel-action-as-a-means-of-silencing-political-opposition-tessa-evans/


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/opinion/04pubed.html

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/monroe-v-hopkins-2017-ewhc-433-qb-20170310.pdf

Monday, 17 September 2012

Why I am supporting the Bill Etheridge and not Simon Darby in the Police & Crime Commissioner Elections by David Jones




By David Jones, Independent Pennine Nationalist
Todmorden, East Lancashire.



Whilst I am sympathetic in general to UK Independence Party, I have always rooted for the British National Party in elections but the decline of the BNP and their failure to capitalise on the law and order issues and field a list of candidates anywhere bar the West Midlands was indeed a great let down. Had I lived in the West Midlands Simon Darby would have probably got my vote but they have a better candidate—the UKIP Candidate Mr Etheridge.

You heard me right, the UKIP candidate is better than the BNP Candidate.

Both candidates are “civic nationalists” but Bill is a man after my own heart, and while I’m sure he wouldn’t endorse everything I believe in, he is a hard working, skilled political operator who genuinely cares about his community and is, generally, a nice guy. The BNP Campaign, however, seems to be a shameless promotion of the BNP by a typical Nick Griffin attack-dog.

The difference between UKIP and the BNP is as follows.

UKIP: - Civic Nationalists, neo-conservatives & Whigs.
BNP: - Civic Nationalists, Socialists & Ethno-Nationalists.

The voting public is not interested in the ideological differences between these two parties in the slightest, only in who will fight for:

A referendum over Britain’s EU membership.
Lower Taxes & Fewer Laws
An end to Party Whips.
An end to mass Immigration.
The abolition of equality, human rights & race laws.
The return of Capital Punishment.
An end to Gay Privilege and the undermining of marriage.

It has come to something when a nationalist like me can no longer support the BNP, but voters want candidates who will represent them competently, not slick, self-promoting party bosses followed by deluded, stubborn buffoons who believe their party is always right.

TV’s Apprentice contestant Katie Hopkins who proposes to fight all 73 EU seats UK “We Demand A Referendum Party” is on the right track, but single-issue doesn’t go far enough. We need an all-nationalist manifesto, not a single issue party.

I myself am running for a Town Council by-election on an independent ticket on pretty much all of these issues, and I think the results will be an education if I win, it will make it much harder for anybody, whether they are in UKIP, the BNP, Ms. Hopkins Campaign to ignore the power of such a message.

First, David Jones (Independent) to Todmorden Town Council.
Secondly Bill Etheridge (UKIP) for West Midlands Police Commissioner.

And Then Ms Hopkins, let's see where we can go from there.

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...