What you must logically and necessarily do if you believe in the Abrahamic God

If you believe in the Abrahamic God then you would logically and necessarily have to obey His laws after knowing He has taken the trouble to reveal them.

When the Catholic Church was the European hegemon, European laws and monarchs were controlled by the Catholic Church until it lost the Wars of the Reformation. But even under Protestantism, Europeans framed their laws according to what they believed the Bible permitted and commanded.

The purpose of God is also to see that the ruler does not exceed the laws set by God and be a check on his power. "Be you ever so mighty, the law is above you" is a universal idea. Emperors of Ancient China were presumed to be given the Mandate of Heaven until it was withdrawn.

But if you believe in the eternal, omnipotent and supreme Abrahamic God who created the Universe and even now controls it, you would have to believe that everything happens for a reason, even bad things. We are being pushed along with a narrative towards a conclusion and this means our suffering has meaning, but it will only have meaning if we make a point of learning from our mistakes.

If you are an atheist, you don't have to believe in God to accept that the Koran containing the rule of law is considered to be most in harmony with the Seven Noahide laws by the rabbis of God's Chosen People.  The Koran is believed by Muslims to be from God and is clearly more efficacious in promoting the rule of law than the New Testament written by mortal and fallible men such as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. There are no Christian theocracies now accept the Vatican, but Iran under sharia has allowed it to defy the might of America and its allies.

There is no requirement to believe in God to restore the patriarchy, but it helps.

How Jews can solve the problem of the New Testament justifying antisemitism

E Michael Jones:

The Jews killed Jesus Christ and they are enemies of the entire human race." This was what St Paul said in 1 Thessalonians 2.

New International Version:

For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those churches suffered from the Jews 15 who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to everyone 16 in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last.

King James Version:

For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:

15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

Surely if Jews want to be less persecuted by gentiles they should recommend to the gentile a better religion more in conformity with the Noahide laws and not idolatrous?

Jewish Virtual Library:

In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate. Since the later Middle Ages, however, Christianity too has come to be regarded as Noachide, on the ground that Trinitarianism is not forbidden to non-Jews.

The Koran is actually Zionist.

Sahih International: And We said after Pharaoh to the Children of Israel, "Dwell in the land, and when there comes the promise of the Hereafter, We will bring you forth in [one] gathering."

Pickthall: And We said unto the Children of Israel after him: Dwell in the land; but when the promise of the Hereafter cometh to pass We shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.

Yusuf Ali: And We said thereafter to the Children of Israel, "Dwell securely in the land (of promise)": but when the second of the warnings came to pass, We gathered you together in a mingled crowd.

Shakir: And We said to the Israelites after him: Dwell in the land: and when the promise of the next life shall come to pass, we will bring you both together in judgment.

Muhammad Sarwar: We told the Israelites after this to settle in the land until Our second promise will come true. We would then gather them all together (on the Day of Judgment).

Mohsin Khan: And We said to the Children of Israel after him: "Dwell in the land, then, when the final and the last promise comes near [i.e. the Day of Resurrection or the descent of Christ ['Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) on the earth]. We shall bring you altogether as mixed crowd (gathered out of various nations).[Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, Vol. 10, Page 338]

Arberry: And We said to the Children of Israel after him, 'Dwell in the land; and when the promise of the world to come comes to pass, We shall bring you a rabble.'

The Arab-Israeli dialogue that would lead to peace in the Middle East

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_and_the_New_Testament

I hint that Jews as part of their tikkun olam should declare Secular Koranism to be more in conformity with the Noahide laws than idolatrous Christianity

Why Christianity is kaput

Applying Heidegger to Judaism

How Jews can stop themselves from being hated by calling for Israel to become a theocracy

Does @michaelgove mention that Arabs who are Muslims are also Semitic people? Anti-Semitism is Trinitarian hatred of Unitarians. https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

Does @michaelgove  mention that Arabs who are Muslims are also Semitic people? Anti-Semitism is Trinitarian hatred of Unitarians. https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

The world's most powerful tribe, who controls the selection of the US Presidential candidate, must expect to be envied, hated and feared. https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

Antisemitism is thoughtcrime giving Jews the right not to be hated or offended, privileging them. Privilege is resented by those denied it. https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

If God exists, He would expect Israel to be a theocracy. @michaelgove does not mention this. https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

The most powerful tribe in the world should expected to be hated and resented if it does not denounce the West, who break the Noahide laws. https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

For peace in the Middle East and world peace, Israel *must* become a theocracy. It is what God would wish, if He exists. https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

6 million Jews being murdered by the Nazis is not enough for Israelis to have peaceful enjoyment of Israel, it must also be a theocracy. https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

If any country should be a theocracy, it is Israel. @michaelgove does not address this point at all. https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

Would those hostile to the existence of Israel be appeased if it became a theocracy?  @michaelgove https://t.co/64PTJsWue8

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

If Israel became a theocracy, from which holy book should it base its theocratic laws? a) Old Testament  b) New Testament  c) Koran https://t.co/YlrPVIBQsK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

If you were agnostic and had no choice but to live in a theocracy, which one would you choose? https://t.co/2kuFW3kWZ1

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 21, 2016

Biblical Inconsistencies

Again the Church, this time represented by the Rt Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester - is selective over what is taught by the Bible and what is not, because of personal preferences and phobias. I agree that homosexuality is banned but so is eating pork (Leviticus 11:8) and the fat of animals (Leviticus 7:22). Priests are not allowed to cut their hair (Leviticus 21:5). The Bible forbids working on the Sabbath (Leviticus 23:3) but approves the purchase of slaves (providing they are not Israelite); their children may be made slaves for life (Leviticus 25.:44).

So why pick one rule and not follow the rest?

Steve Cattell, Lincolnshire
Published in The Sunday Telegraph

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=3&chapter=11&version=31

It can be seen that Christ attempted to reform some of the harsher testaments of the Old Testament and was executed for his trouble.

It was the Prophet Muhammad who successfully created a religion that was more humane than the Old Testament and more precise than the New Testament.

Man, however, prone to straying and excess, has ignored parts of the Koran it does not like and added his own inventions.

We have been warned, though.

"O you who believe! Make not unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you, and commit no excess; for Allah loves not those given to excess." (Qur'an 5:87)

"Make not unlawful the pleasant things which Allah has made legitimate for you and commit no excesses in violating the limits imposed on you - exuberance as well as diminution, both are equally harmful."

http://www.salaam.co.uk/knowledge/halal.php

The basic principles are:

1. The rule is that everything is Halal unless explicitly forbidden.
2. Only Allah has the right to legislate for man.
3. Prohibiting Halai and permitting Haram is synonymous with Shirk.
4. Haram is always associated with what is bad and harmful.
5. There is always a better substitute in Halai for that which is made Haram.
6. Anything that leads to Haram is considered Haram.
7. It is Haram to declare something Halal when it is manifestly Haram.
8. Good intentions do not justify committing Haram.
9. One should guard himself against matters that are on the borderline between Halal and Haram (Mushtabahat).
10. In extreme circumstances, Haram is permissible within certain limits.

It can be seen that Islam has very clear, sensible and simple guidelines that suggest that one must always attempt to find the right balance.

If only our legislators would heed them.