Translate

Showing posts with label Nigel Farage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nigel Farage. Show all posts

Monday, 27 May 2019

How Nigel Farage could become our Brexit Prime Minister


  1. Expel Theresa May. The Conservative Party Constitution allows any member to be expelled at its absolute discretion. She should be informed as soon as possible that her membership of the Conservative Party has been cancelled under Part IV 17.7 of the Constitution of the Party, which states: "The Board of the Party shall have power to do anything which in its opinion relates to the management and administration of the Party.  It shall be ... responsible for ... the cancellation or refusal of membership, in its absolute discretion of any Party member ...." The Chairman of the Conservative Party, Brandon Lewis MP, would be the one to administer the coup de grâce.  https://www.conservatives.com/Members/Party-Structure-and-Organisation
  2. This would trigger a by-election in Maidenhead.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maidenhead_(UK_Parliament_constituency)  https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/by-elections/
  3. When Farage wins it, invite him to join the Conservative Party just in time to participate in the leadership elections, which he should be able to win.
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, 22 November 2016

The wise man does at once what the fool does finally. Theresa May is indulging in the feminine vice of denial













































‘Western laws now clash with moral nature of man’ – Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill


The Bhagavad Gita:

Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil.

The West is a degenerate matriarchy where the preferences of fornicating parasitic sluts are prioritised over and above those of the working men. Unskilled manual labour is completely unrepresented in Britain, except by the BNP and UKIP while all the political parties continue to chase the female vote, all afraid to alienate it and ignoring the concerns, welfare and preferences of men.

Indeed, it is feminazis like Helen Goodman at the top of the Labour Party who calls the shots. People who think there is a Jewish conspiracy should reflect on the political careers of good principled Jewish men destroyed by feminazis when they tried to stand up for gentile men: Keith Joseph's in the Conservative Party and Lord Glasman's in Labour.

In a matriarchy, no one can hear you scream the truth.

Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened' 
 
Asked by the Daily Telegraph's Mary Riddell whether he would support a total ban on immigration, even if just for a temporary period, Lord Glasman replied, "Yes. I would add that we should be more generous and friendly in receiving those [few] who are needed. To be more generous, we have to draw the line."

How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Friday, 12 August 2016

Whose moustache is best?

at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

Which Tory leadership candidate should UKIP support?















at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, 2 February 2016

Female vote will decide the outcome of the EU Referendum and more of them will vote to stay

0810

The president of the European Council Donald Tusk will today put forward a draft text to renegotiate the UK’s membership of the EU. Katya Adler is the BBC’s Europe Editor, Laura Kuenssberg is the BBC’s Political Editor and Dr Gyorgy Schopflin is MEP from the Hungarian governing party Fidesz.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b070drln

From 2:15

Laura Kuennsberg:

... The crucial people will be those in the middle. By Number Ten's calculation there is a chunk of people on one side maybe as many as 40% who are always going to vote to leave the EU and maybe between 30 or 40% on the other side of people who will always vote to stay. What will make the difference when it comes to the referendum is the 20 or 30% of the people - said to be the mushy middle - who will have to be convinced, and those will be the votes who will actually make the difference.

Apparently, 1/3 has already decided YES, 1/3 has already decided NO, and 1/3 are undecided. I bet it is the women who are undecided ending up voting for the UK to stay in because women are risk-averse, can't be bothered to understand how the EU operates or the principle of national sovereignty. Even if they did they are basically as unprincipled as unprincipled men who are easily frightened. People who stand firm against scare stories are people who believe in the principle of national sovereignty. The only way to frighten the undecided into voting to leave is to use migrant swarms to scare them, but it seems many European women want migrant swarms to come so they can work in refugee centres to be with them and can get their mangina running dogs to support them doing so.


Mangina running dogs of feminazis who will perform any act of masculine self-abnegation if called upon to do so. Europe's invaders will know what to do to them when they arrive. 




Nigel Farage and the effeminate and emasculated leave campaigners will be too afraid of alienating the female vote to call feminism out, so we will probably end up having to stay in. Sad, innit?



Europe’s Tragedy: Most Of Its Men Are Feminized Wimps

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/feminism-causes-immigration.html

Female judge grants asylum to Sudanenese migrant Abdul Rahman Haroun, 3 women greet him at prison gates

Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power and migrant swarms

Female BBC journalists' pro-migrant coverage

Ten Reasons Why Females Prefer Alien Males
Why women mind immigration much much less than men

http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/6876/how-should-i-understand-the-word-corruption-in-this-passage-of-the-bhagavad-gita

It may be argued, of course, that all the major religions are fundamentally patriarchal since they came into being at historical periods distant from our own when human survival was predicated on a strict division of male and female realms. As the hero Arjuna tells the God Krishna in the Baghavad Gita,

‘In overwhelming chaos, Krishna

Women of the family are corrupted,

And when women are corrupted,

Disorder is born in society’

What is more despicable and contemptible than men who are corrupted by and weaker than their corrupted and weak women?

White feminists REPULSED by anti-immigration white proletariat and DON'T CARE what happens to them
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, 18 January 2016

Why gay men will always be the most effortlessly successful MGTOWs

https://www.mgtow.com/

The reason why MGTOWs keep talking about women is because they still want to fuck them.


The principle idea about being a MGTOW is heterosexual men having sex with sluts and never marrying them.

A slut is a woman who will fornicate with any man not her husband, and that is now most women in the West.

Even if no fault divorce were abolished, MGTOWs still wouldn't be interested in marriage or in having legitimate children.

They would change their behaviour and consider marriage again if

- no-fault divorce were abolished

- fornicating sluts were shamed and lashed 100 times as 24:2 of the Koran prescribes, noticeably and drastically reducing the supply of sluts for MGTOWs. Then these heterosexual men would find themselves faced with the stark choice of having to take a wife or hiring prostitutes for sex, or going gay, which is the cheapest form of sex.

MGTOWs are mainly unmarriageable men and a social phenomenon with a high rate of beta male participation. This social phenomenon is a reaction to feminism and no fault divorce; in essence, it is beta males waking up to the fact that marriage does not give them a good deal if they can still have sex outside marriage. "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?" sums up their attitude towards women.

The most successful MGTOWs remain gay men, because they don't need to have any sexual dealings with women at all since they don't want to have sex with them, but with each other. Straight women still respect gay men for their lifestyle choice because gay men tend to look better than heterosexual beta males.

What women despise is low status sub-alpha males they find repellent with no dress sense who want to have sex with them.

The Koran also punishes gay men in 4:16, and I believe it is for this reason: because gay men make no biological contribution towards the gene pool for the next generation. Fornicating MGTOWs are punishable under 24:2 because they lower its quality by siring bastards.

Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.

004.016YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

024.002YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.

MGTOW Sandman wants to have sex with sex dolls instead of having sex with women. Surrogacy is his preferred route if he wants to have offspring. How dysgenic are his proposals on a scale of 1 to 10?


MARRIAGE, ITS ABSENCE IN THE WEST AND THE PROBLEM THIS CAUSES


1.  Marriage is for the purpose of having legitimate children.



2.  Marriage is the rearing of the next generation in optimum conditions.



3.  The institution of marriage is what distinguishes humans from lower animals. 


4.  Marriage is a delicate mechanism that man tampers with at his peril.

5.  Marriage was never intended for couples who are not contemplating sexual reproduction or do not have the theoretical possibility of sexual reproduction. (It is a sign of alarming degeneracy that leaders of so many democracies cannot and refuse to see this.)

6.  Monogamy is the pivot upon which true gender justice rests. 

7.  Monogamy was created to protect the beta male, who do the work and fight the wars.

8.  Monogamy was created to keep up the morale of the beta male because, if demoralised, he will cease to work, cease to marry and cease to sire more workers and soldiers for society and your civilisation will decline, become a degenerate matriarchy and eventually be overwhelmed by immigrants or threatened with invasion by Islamic State, as is now the case in the West.

9.  Wives were required to promise to be obedient to husbands not because it was considered that they were inferior, but because the arduous undertaking that is marriage had to be somehow sweetened for the man by such promises.  

10.  It is a true sign of degeneracy that no Western man with sufficient status or seniority, not even the men who say they are Conservatives who say they care about defending their civilisation such as Roger Scruton and Peter Hitchens can bear to discuss any of the above. This is because they fear persecution by feminazis from the state, from their place of employment and of course within their own family, especially their wives. 

Radical multicultural types will in the end destroy the things they claim to like, because they don't understand that liberty and reasonable equality are features of stable, free, conservative societies based on Christian ideas, which guard their borders and are proud of their civilisation.

The people who really want to defend our enlightened society, in the end, are dinosaurs like me.

This was two days after Peter Hitchens outed himself as a feminist.


11.  Only an alpha male will protect the interests of beta males, but Britain does not have even a single alpha male. David Cameron, who legalised gay marriage, is not an alpha male because he fears what alienating the female vote would do to him and his party. He would never criticise SSMs, because if he did they would go over to Labour at once, because the Left is stuffed with less affluent men who want the price of sex to be reassuringly low. The SSM explained

12.  An alpha male is a man who is not afraid to discuss any of the above because he would know that sluts are lower than him and wouldn't be afraid of them or would know not to show fear by discussing the above in public without fear or favour. The last man who had alpha male aspirations - Keith Joseph - gave a speech in Edgbaston that offended sluts in 1974; his career was destroyed, paving the way for Britain's First Female Prime Minister. 1974 was the year in which the alpha male became extinct in Britain. 

13.  Britain has been without an alpha male for at least 42 years. Can he be brought into existence by an act of will and the will to power, by a man of sufficient seniority and status prepared to discuss the above? Do note that Nigel Farage is planning his TV career after the EU Referendum. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3382294/Nigel-Farage-s-car-wheels-sabotaged-assassination-attempt-Ukip-leader-lost-control-Volvo-wheel-fell-motorway-police-confirm-foul-play.html I rather doubt it because he would have too much to lose. Atheist libtards have no principles and no intention of making sacrifices for any principle they ever claimed to have. 

14.  The only men of sufficient seniority and status are without exception libtards or men like Nigel Farage, Roger Scruton and Peter Hitchens professing to identify with Conservatism, but who have come to an accommodation with the matriarchy. That is why the West is doomed. Islamic State jihadis who have threatened to invade the West and imposing sharia on us are not afraid of offending sluts or of making sacrifices, are they? 

at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 12 October 2015

Degrees of radicalisation


One then has to consider whether state-sponsored terrorism is always evil, if it is indeed the case that one man's terrorist is another man' freedom-fighter.


All rapists are men, but not all men are rapists.
All sluts are women, not not all women are sluts.

It is possible to be a man without being a rapist.
It is possible to be a woman without being a slut.
It is possible to be radicalised without going on to become a terrorist.
It is possible to be a terrorist without being Muslim.

Questions for MPs:


  1. Does radicalisation only apply to Muslims?
  2. Would you say that Anders Breivik was radicalised?
  3. If your answer is NO, is it because he is not Muslim?
  4. Have you considered changing UK foreign policy to deal with the problem of terrorism? 
  5. Have you considered why Muslims might get upset, angry and violent if you bomb, invade and impose regime-change on Muslim countries for no good reason that they can see?
  6. Have you considered having an honest debate about UK foreign policy?
  7. Is the reason why you refuse to have a full and frank debate about UK foreign policy is because the UK does not have an independent foreign policy and/or that it is in fact indefensible?
  8. Is the reason why the UK does not have an independent foreign policy because it is a vassal state of the US?
  9. Have you considered whether now might be the time to leave NATO so as to break it up and make the Americans withdraw into isolationism, leaving the world a more peaceful place?
  10. Have you considered that the possibility that US foreign policy is actually insane?
  11. Have you made the link between destroying Muslim countries at the behest of Washington for no good reason and the migrant swarms heading your way?
  12. Have you heard of the Wolfowitz Doctrine?
  13. Have you considered that the victims of the Wolfowitz Doctrine ie Muslim countries toppled by the West might wish to object to it in the strongest possible terms and use terrorism to do so?
  14. If you are an MP and have not heard of the Wolfowitz Doctrine, should you be whipped by your party into voting to bomb Syria?
  15. If you are a Labour MP, are you grateful that Jeremy Corbyn is allowing you a free vote on whether to bomb Syria?
  16. If you are a Tory MP, dare you demand a free vote for Tory MPs over voting on whether to bomb Syria if Labour MPs are getting a free vote?
  17. If not, why not?
  18. Is it cos you are too scared or stupid to challenge UK foreign policy of "bomb first and wring our hands later"?
  19. Does UK foreign policy promote the British national interest?
  20. How would you define the national interest?
  21. What is the point of supporting a foreign policy that provokes terrorism that you cannot explain to your constituents?
  22. Does it make sense to support a foreign policy that provokes terrorism and responding to the terrorism you provoke with increasing restrictions on the liberties of your citizens?
  23. Do you know why so many citizens in NATO member states like, admire and support Putin, as Iain Dale said on the Sky Press Review?
  24. Do you know why non-establishment politicians like Nigel Farage and Donald Trump admire and like Putin?






Because sane people can understand what Putin is doing, why he is doing it and seeing that what he is doing works while explaining current government policy both domestic and foreign is like trying to explain the motivations of an imbecile or a lunatic, that's why we like Putin so much.


Paul Craig Roberts explains the evil of US foreign policy.



at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, 27 September 2015

Ex-BNP National Organiser Eddy Butler at UKIP meeting in Thurrock


at 2 comments:
Labels: , , ,

Monday, 7 September 2015

Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power and migrant swarms


 Coming to Britain soon.


I was talking to my parents over the weekend and they were both genuinely concerned about Europe, and they don't even live here. They were concerned about Europe being the Europe they knew and enjoyed on holiday and Europeans staying European.

Even the foreigner is more concerned about European identity than Europeans themselves.

Europe is in the grip of mass hysteria piling up its own funeral pyre while its inhabitants cheer, egged on by the female-dominated media.

The hysteria is induced by white middle class women in control of the European media.

In time these migrants will defenestrate these women in places of influence they have no business being in. Western men are cowed by these harridans but these Muslim migrants will know what to do with them, in time.

Remember the story of The Fisherman and His Wife. Western man is of course the fisherman and the Whore of Babylon is his wife.


http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sex-Power-Manual-Male-Female-Relations/dp/190124024X

Second printing of Sex and Power

Photo of 'Sex and Power' front cover


Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power - the book every man should read, and every father gift to his son after he loses access to his children and control over his son's upbringing when his wife divorces him under the rules of no fault divorce.


Simon Sheppard:

The Feminine Mind
"While females prefer feelings, intuition and ambiguity, males prefer logic, rationality and precision."

The Fisherman and His Wife
"Females know no limit. They do not check their own behaviour but rely on others to do it for them [like children]. Females make unreasonable demands to test and extend their power. They do not limit the excesses of other females but will exploit whatever gains their excessive behaviour achieves. The answer to the question 'What will women do?' is 'Whatever they can get away with.' Females are never satisfied."

Feminine Influence on the Affairs of Men Dysgenic
"The reality is that modern woman's contribution to progress is minor and what advances there have been relied entirely on systems and technology developed by males. Their net influence is profoundly dysgenic. Western societies are not evolving, but regressing.

White middle class Guardianista females in control of British media
Instincts are the source of emotion and emotion is the ultimate engine of behaviour. What is happiness but the contented satisfaction of our basic desires? But emotions can be manipulated, and human groups vary greatly in their susceptibility to manipulation. Given the existence, if not the prevalence, of false emotions we would be wise to confront our many societal dysfunctions, and particularly to identify their origin, with rational minds and cool heads."

Feminine Hypocrisy
"Females always reduce everything to the personal. Further, females are superficial [and sentimental], because this is consistent with hypocrisy."

Women Have No Sense of Humour
"Females have no sense of humour. Women often define OCC (Our Cosy Circle) by deriding someone they wish to exclude from it. They can discourage true humour because males use it to distribute information and dissipate neurosis, and it is in the female interest to maintain the male in as high a state of neurosis as possible. By disallowing humour on particular themes taboos can be instituted. Then the perception of a topic can be altered to suit unstated goals.

Women Hate Wisdom, Experience and Bald Men
"The modern phenomenon of relatively youthful, physically attractive political leaders, and having a large proportion of the electorate still undecided a few weeks before an election, are both evidence of a feminised society. Other indications are bloated bureaucracies and undue emphasis on avoiding risk. It has been claimed that due to the female vote balding politicians of any stripe are virtually unelectable. The last bald British Prime Minister was Churchill (1951) and no bald American president has been elected sine Eisenhower (1953). An interesting comparison can be made with the practice of some American Indian tribes, who would elect a chief solely on the length of his hair."

Female Neurosis Source of Male Neurosis or Cherchez la Femme
"Elevated female influence results in great emphasis being placed on emotion. Females have not historically inhibited their own or each others' instincts; the male performed this role, and without his influence irrational fears will flourish. A reinforcing cycle of fear will be established. The more latitude the female is allowed, the more her capricious instincts will be expressed, the more she will project her nature onto the male and the more insecure of his intentions she will become.
When males see females unreservedly following their instincts they will want to do the same, indeed the absence of inhibition by females has a pervasive effect which makes male suppression of their impulses an increasingly arduous burden. Males will also find it increasingly difficult not to show their emotions, putting them at a disadvantage in their interactions with females. Of course a man who follows his instincts without self-restraint would very rapidly find himself imprisoned."

Women More Interested in Displaying Indiscriminate Compassion Than Understanding National Affairs
"The ability to logically compartmentalize give the male greater capacity to understand societal dynamics, and the conflicting and complementary forces within it. The female emphasis on personality and her inclination towards familial concerns severely limit her appreciation of national affairs."

Feminazis Have Curtailed Free Speech
"The free and uninhibited interchange of ideas, including discussion of racial and sexual differences, is a prerequisite for a healthy, mature and truly democratic society."

Feminazis Despise Beta Males and Probably Want to Euthanase and Exterminate Them Because They Are Poor, Lower Class, Ugly and Not Sexy
"In a highly feminine environment females can fall into a belief, then an insistence, that their feelings are precious, invariably valid and paramount, while male sensibilities can be dismissed as inconsequential. This has been dubbed emotional fascism."

SSMs [Slut Single Mothers] are Social Parasites
"Male policy is to create wealth, female policy to consume it. In Holland, females accounted for 70% of the welfare budget."

Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males

 Prognosis for the Future

"Female avoidance of risk means that radical solutions to society's problems will be abhorred, even when such radicalism is necessary. Feminised societies are intrinsically unstable, with the result that large shifts can take place relatively quickly.
1. The super-masculine state [eg ISIS] dominates;
2. The super-feminine state [eg the EU] becomes extinct.

Will the female-dominated media be inviting me for an interview any time soon? I am surely saying something important, urgent and relevant, but of course not. They would want to suppress my ideas and all the men in the media are terrified of a false and malicious accusation of sexual harassment, misogyny, rape or a historic sexual offence that will lose them their jobs, promotions or wives and family. You won't find charming, clever, articulate me in the media any time soon because these women don't want you to see how charming, witty, articulate and clever I can be, because they have no answer to anything I have said and only want to make their men invite migrants into their bedrooms and then leave them to it.

Make no mistake, every time these feminised male politicians accede to their demands they are even more despised by their women than previously.  Look at what this bitch Michelle Carter did to this man, and he did it too, just to please her. Time to make sure your male politicians don't become this man, don't you think? Even Nigel Farage cried his crocodile tears over the migrants, so all is lost.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/05/exclusive-video-ukip-leader-nigel-farages-emotional-interview-about-deceased-kurdish-child/


Why do male politicians cry for TV? Because they think female viewers are their mummy while male viewers are quietly being sick. Of course, male politicians count the preferences of their male voters at nothing because they are  not part of the capricious and crucial female vote they need to be elected or stay in office, but what woman would respect retard male politicians who think female viewers are their mummy? So now you know why they invite migrants into their country: so they have the chance of having better and more fun "playmates". Democracy is dementia under indiscriminate universal suffrage, and Western civilisation is doomed.


BBC sends only pro-migrant female journalists to report on migrant swarms
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, 3 September 2015

Male politicians even more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than their voters




Women who are single and looking tend to make indiscriminate displays of compassion because they think men prefer women who are stupid and kind.

They don't really mean it, but they feel they have to do this because they know men would be put off by rational and ruthless women with a will of iron, like me, perhaps.

Imagine if you were trying to manipulate a powerful lunatic, imbecile or a capricious woman of low intelligence and morals. You would have to find out their preferences and pander to them. Indeed, you would have to change your behaviour and mirror their behaviour and thinking in order to appease and manipulate them.

However, the danger of this is that you end up becoming like the capricious irrational and immoral slut, lunatic or imbecile you are trying to manipulate.

What will happen to your society if the rest of the world knows that no one is in charge and that the nation's perceived alpha male is even more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than his voters?

Even Nigel Farage has softened his message against migrants as a result of the publication of that photo of that drowned boy.

What do you think happens to dementia sufferers, stupid sluts and imbeciles?

They would be exploited, cheated, used and abused.

This is what is happening to the West now, because no Western nation has an alpha male leading them because you cannot be an alpha male if you are afraid to criticise the worst of your women - SSMs, who are lower than prostitutes.

If there is no official alpha male who dares to criticise SSMs (Slut Single Mothers with illegitimate offspring) who are lower than prostitutes, then we live in a matriarchy, and all matriarchies without exception are primitive or declining societies. (SSMs are lower than prostitutes because prostitutes at least have the virtue of making men pay for sex and giving them a price up front, unlike sluts who pretend it is free but load it with all kinds of hidden charges for the man they are transacting with and society in general. Men must always be made to pay for sex because free slut sex corrupts their characters and turns them into men afraid of sluts in just the way a drug addict would be afraid of his drug dealer no longer selling him the drug to which he is addicted. Marriage for men is always the riskiest and most expensive form of sex, even in the days of the patriarchy.)

British politicians stopped criticising SSMs in 1974 when Keith Joseph's career was destroyed in 1974 after his Edgbaston speech for talking about them destroying "our human stock". http://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron Male MPs have not criticised SSMs for 41 years and they are not suddenly going to start now since they are even more castrated now than they were in 1974.

Even Peter Hitchens, Britain's foremost Conservative thinker, won't criticise sluts because his late mother was an adulterous suicide.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/peter-hitchens-wont-condemn-low-sexual.html If the sins of the fathers are visited on their sons, then so does the weight of a mother's adultery cripple her son's ability to denounce her sin and those of others like her.

Tom Harris the former MP for Labour, didn't get away with it either. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/mar/05/welfare-children

This is why male politicians are stupider and more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than their voters whom they presume to lead. These so called leaders are still pandering to the lowest, stupidest and most hypocritical of women still looking to trick a man into a relationship with them by pretending to be stupid and kind.

The trouble with democracy in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage is that the preferences of the beta male have been entirely marginalised. All political parties chase the female vote precisely because it is capricious but crucial to being elected and staying in office.

(Why are beta males important? They are important because they do most of the work and are the ones whose lives are sacrificed if there is a war. Beta males are still important even if sluts don't fancy them and will cheat on them at the first opportunity because those of them who think "A few minutes of alpha is better than a lifetime of beta" would still be maintained by the welfare state paid for out of the taxes of the beta male for making this "lifestyle choice". If beta males are demoralised and marginalised then very little work will be done and even defensive wars cannot be won. It is of course the beta male who objects to immigration.)  

So this is the basis on which our much-vaunted democracy rests - the preferences and unstated agenda of stupid, immoral and irresponsible sluts with the vote whom male politicians dare not criticise because they know they cannot be reasoned with. We live in a declining and morally degenerate matriarchy all right.


My review of Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sex-Power-Manual-Male-Female-Relations/dp/190124024X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377715983&sr=8-1&keywords=simon+sheppard+sex+and+power


BBC sends only pro-migrant female journalists to report on migrant swarms
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, 20 June 2015

Was Nigel Farage thinking of Claire Khaw when he said this?

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/ukips-deputy-chair-suzanne-evans-sacked-over-comments-about-nigel-farage-10330278.html

Mr Farage has said he is "prepared" to lead the No campaign in the EU referendum - but suspects the role will go to a figure from "outside normal politics".

Claire Khaw in the Reading Room at the Wellcome Trust

Claire Khaw - definitely "outside normal politics" ...
at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...