 |
| Andrew Gamble, Cambridge Professor of Politics. Does he state in his latest book the origins and the continuing causes of Western economic decline? |
http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/derbyshire/crisis-without-end-a-conversation-with-andrew-gamble/#.U7o-qPldVqV
http://www.polis.cam.ac.uk/crisis-without-end-a-conversation-with-prof-andrew-gamble
http://www.polis.cam.ac.uk/Staff_and_Students/professor-andrew-gamble
My theory is not in a book but is expressed rather more succinctly in the series of tweets below:
@prospect_uk The expert on #OscarPistorius trial is a fine example of experts who don't know what they are on about. http://t.co/q5Fiy62DuG
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk It is pretty obvious that those who trust in experts simply choose "experts" who support their own prejudices and interests.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk It seems the author of this book does not even mention female promiscuity as a factor in Western decline.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk It seems the author of this book does not even mention female suffrage as a factor in Western decline.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk It seems the author of this book does not even mention Free Love as a factor in Western decline.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk Does the author of this book really not know why individuals and governments in the West borrow and lend irresponsibly?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk Does the author of this book not know that governments in the West borrow and lend irresponsibly to chase the female vote?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html
@prospect_uk Does the author of this book really not know that most women in the West are feminists and therefore sluts?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk Does the author of this book not know that sluts are stupid and if most female voters are sluts most female voters are stupid?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk Does the author of this book not know that male politicians are afraid of criticising slut single mothers who have the vote?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk Does the author of this book not know that if men are afraid to criticise single mothers then they are lower than sluts?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@prospect_uk Does the author of this book not know that if men are afraid of criticising stupid sluts their civilisation will turn to shit?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
@Jderbyshire https://t.co/qimsRjkuWD has a number of questions you could have asked Professor of Politics, Andrew Gamble.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 7, 2014
Oh, and did I say that general elections are merely politicians pandering to the vices of their voters every 5 years?Did he not mention feminism because he did not identify as it as a major cause of Western profligacy and fear of offending female voters the operating cause of preventing Western politicians from making economically sound decisions? Or did he not mention feminism because it would not have been politic to do so and he feared the feminazis of Cambridge would crucify him?
Very predictably, Jonathan Derbyshire and Prospect Magazine have blocked me on Twitter. This is how these "liberals" "debate". I am very very happy to change my views if proven wrong, but no liberal has been able to do so. Every time they block me without further ado, I conclude that they cannot win the argument using fair and rational means.
The New Statesman loved this book as you can see at
http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2009/06/crisis-gamble-capitalism
David Marquand, who reviewed the book, warns:
The left has no hope of winning the battle of ideas if it has nothing better to offer than a spruced-up Keynesianism. To win, it will have to jump out of the Keynesian box in which it has been trapped for too long, admit that there was substance to the neoliberal critique of the postwar Keynesian order, and think new thoughts in new ways.
Actually, all it has to do is propose the abolition of usury - which the Koran prescribes. This would please everyone because it would allow us to default on our debts https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-we-abolish-usury/351776538265174?fref=ts and implement other Islamic measures such as the Slut-shaming recommended at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts and other measures for moral regeneration recommended at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Secular-Koranism/657868884251333?fref=ts including the reintroduction of slavery to kick-start the economy mentioned at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Controversial-Humour-Is-it-in-the-long-term-British-national-interest-to-reintroduce-slavery/230825987052657?fref=ts, legalising brothels at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-we-legalise-brothels-in-Britain/292618650867502?fref=ts, requiring those who want to marry to agree a marriage contract to allow the courts to better apportion fault in the event of a divorce, and finally enjoining charity after dismantling the welfare state at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-the-welfare-state-be-dismantled/437625616314380?fref=ts under a one-party state
All we need is conduct a referendum under the principles of Shura to vote for a Caliph and a Caliphate, and a Caliph is simply a leader who agrees to govern under the rules prescribed by the Koran.
As we all know, boys and girls, Islam is the middle way between the patriarchy and the matriarchy, and between Capitalism and Communism.
I would be very happy to advise the Labour Party on how all of the above is to be done with the minimum of fuss and inconvenience. Everything will be fine as long as they do exactly what I say.
