Democracy will die if professional journalists go to the wall http://t.co/cw8gufSzNj
— Roy Greenslade (@GreensladeR) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR The facts are not in dispute, but the interpretation of the facts are.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR A report is easy to tweet, retweet and share, not so a reasonable interpretation of the facts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR If there is already a wide range of media outlets, then surely the purveying of a wide range of opinions is the way ahead?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR My solutions are elementary but will not be implemented simply because the media wishes to suppress views like mine.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR What is democracy but knaves soliciting the votes of fools and bribing voters with their own money?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR It is strange and sad that many apparently educated people persist in confusing democracy with good government.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR If democracy served any purpose at all, it would be for the purpose of facilitating good government.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR If it can be demonstrated representative democracy in an indiscriminate universal suffrage caused bad government, what then?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR If bad government is caused by allowing indiscriminate universal suffrage in a representative democracy then reform is required
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
@GreensladeR How willing are u and the media to even discuss let alone consider my proposals? If there are none, is democracy dead or alive?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2015
