Insane Western Foreign Policy of Liberal Jingoism

Good Muslims and Good Rational Non-Muslims 
for Gaddafi 

- v - 

Hypocrites and Bad Muslims 
for Demented Liberal Jingoism  

Foreign Secretary Hague distancing Britain from Israel and the US?

0850
Britain's foreign secretary William Hague has warned that the Middle East peace process is in danger of becoming a casualty of the wave of protests sweeping the Arab world. Sir Sherard Cowper Coles considers the future for Israel.  

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9391000/9391740.stm

It delights me to think that he could be a regular reader of Voice of Reason. 

China has a benevolent dictatorship, we have a malign oligarchy.

“A benevolent dictatorship has one advantage; it can get things done. When China decided to build monopoly in rare earths, it goes about it without opposition or debate. In the US democracy, it's almost impossible to choose a course for the nation. Every idea, every strategy is debated and opposed by one or both political parties. As a result, in national emergencies the US responds only slowly. China has the advantage of being able to hire the best minds in the West and then apply their experience and know-how to China's growing store of knowledge. The Chinese population has a fierce work ethic. The people of the West (particularly in Europe) have a ‘vacation ethic’ and a ‘government will take care of me’ psychology that is rendering them less competitive. China is patient, and thinks in terms of the future. As a result, China is running around the world buying up reserves in raw materials and staking out claims for agricultural land and mining sites where ever they can find them. In contrast, the US is building up ’impossible’ debts and in doing so mortgaging its future.” - Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, 11-22-10

A sea change in political thinking?

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2010/11/islam-should-become-our-state-religion.html shows a certain willingness from someone in the Conservative Party to think the unthinkable, ie making Islam the British state religion.

It is now generally agreed, even in military circles that being the poodle of America (who is the poodle of Israel who will become the Sarajevo of the 21st century century) is not demonstrably in the British national interest.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11751888

If I were PM I would break off diplomatic relations with the US just to show how very sorry we are for being the poodle of a warmongering rogue nation and want nothing further to do with it.

The relationship is only "special" if the US is the world's strongest nation. Since it is clearly showing signs of poverty and dementia, the only specialness of this relationship would be in the "special needs" sense.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_needs

If the UK is to be a canine country of some sort, becoming a Pekingese would serve its interests better.

Al Megrahi: How the government should deal with yet another bumpy moment

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1210000/Jack-Straw-dropped-plan-include-Lockerbie-bomber-prisoner-transfer-agreement-oil-deal-Libya.html

My advice would be to ignore all the opportunistic Tory cries for a Select Committee Enquiry.

Say nothing more. No further comment. It will blow over.

"What will the Americans say and do?" some ask in souped-up despair.

If the Americans make any more trouble over this, the UK government will take this golden opportunity of withdrawing its troops from Afghanistan and Iraq in one of those hissy fits that David Milliband is now so good at doing.

We will take our troops and flounce off, that's what we'll do.

"Why America is doomed" or "When we break our own rules"

Quote from R E McMaster, a commodities and currency trader - http://www.remcmaster.com/:

... with the US financial system “broke”, to quote former Fed Head Paul
Volcker, we should expect more chaos, with the very high risk of either more
severe recessions and/or higher inflations (maybe both simultaneously) in more
violent whipsaws. …What I also ponder is unfavorable climate resulting in poor
global food production (Russia coming back online agriculturally to the
contrary, a huge boost). Lack of food is a great historical reason for war. And
what concerns me most is the real and present danger of war by 2012-2017, with
Iran and Pakistan boiling, plus terrorists increasing their technological
capabilities. All it would take is one low yield back pack nuclear device being
exploded once in one city somewhere in the world, and the world as we know it
would change, black swan style, over night. And Machiavellian style, governments
have historically used war as distractions from the economic distress they have
often created. …Americans might have a reality check. The USA has become a
secular humanistic socialist empire, far removed from the mindset and philosophy of their freedom-loving, tax hating Founding Fathers.

In fact, if you read the writings of the US Constitutional Founding Fathers, that kind of thinking today would land them on the Homeland Security terrorist watch list. (The US Founding Fathers saw themselves as freedom fighters, but the British saw them as terrorists. Point of view matters. Wonder how the Taliban views things? …It is next to impossible to defeat militarily a masculine-based culture on their own home ground where people are willing to fight and die for what they believe in, unless genocide is the chosen military option. The Russians knew and exercised this military option in Afghanistan. And Russia today is looking for payback for the humiliation it suffered when the USSR fell.) …

I find it useful to look at organizations impersonally. As author M. Scott Peck wrote, bureaucrats, wherever you find them, of whatever stripe, are “people of the lie.” They are like the nameless, faceless, plastic, white storm troopers commanded by Darth Vader in the movie, Star Wars. Bureaucracies have ever been the greatest collective manifestation of human evil. And the older the bureaucracy, the more vertical layers it has, the richer it is, the more people it employs, the more widely dispersed its tentacles are internationally and geographically, the more corrupt, inhumane, immoral, self-interested, perpetuating and evil it becomes – any bureaucracy. Bureaucracies are the antithesis of freedom. They tell people what to do, when to do it, how to do it, for how much and keeps them dependent, childlike, slave-like in the bureaucratic collective. So the more bureaucratic the organizational structure, the more layers, the more slave-like (as opposed to free individual, horizontal, covenantal and contractual arrangements).

Singapore and Switzerland enjoy the most civil of civil governments.
Singapore’s government, on a tiny island, is like the local government of most
US cities. And as long as you do what used to be considered the normal, decent
and right thing in Singapore, you have freedom there. Jimmy Rogers has relocated
to Singapore. And Switzerland, although increasingly corrupted by US pressure,
well, the Germans, Italians and French who comprise the bulk of Switzerland have
such different languages, cultures and outlooks on things, and a modest
underlying distrust for each other along with a modicum of dislike, that a loose
knit Swiss federation government, where power lies in local cantons, serves
their purposes just fine. Oh yes, the Swiss so favored the US Constitution at
the time that they basically adopted it and still pretty much apply it the way the US Founding Fathers intended, not the way it has been effectively discarded by the US empire today.

London Muslims "suicide voting" for the BNP?

My recommendation on how to make the best use of your second vote, ie to vote for Ken and BNP, is based on the fact that they are both anti-establishment and AGAINST INVADING IRAQ FROM THE START, which is good enough for me, and perhaps for any Muslims reading this.

Personally, I do not see why Islam could not become the happy medium between capitalism red in tooth and claw and an overweening nanny state, the happy compromise between a male-dominated society and the over-feminised society we have become, mutatis mutandis.

DO EUROSCEPTIC MUSLIMS EXIST?


If so, they may wish to read this with particular attention.


If the BNP do well, they will be keen on doing even better.


If they become keen on maximising their support, they would have to consider lifting their colour bar, if to do so would significantly increase membership and win over those who are currently in UKIP and voting for UKIP.

The local elections last year (or was it the year before?) revealed that the BNP commanded 14% of the vote. UKIP had 12% and the LibDems 28%. If UKIP and the BNP merged and became a party that no longer operated a colour bar or wished for the repatriation of non-white citizens, they would very probably receive around 26% of the vote, if not much more, AND BE IN A POSITION TO INFLUENCE EVENTS.



If support for UKIP collapses after the BNP modernises itself, then the voter would at last have ONLY ONE Eurosceptic party with which to demand a referendum, rather than the current vote-splitting choice of two. (Unless there is a revolution, the BNP will have to play by the rules of the current system, and there is no imminent danger of a BNP government in any case.)

If the UK leaves the EU as a result of a referendum, then there is a chance Britain will once again become a sovereign nation state operating commonsense government, rather than remaining part of the EU, led by a discredited and ineffectual out-of-touch liberal elite, who are too dishonest and disorganised to tackle the urgent problems facing us now.

REASONS TO VOTE BNP EVEN IF YOU ARE MUSLIM

Because they were against invading Iraq from the beginning. Anyone who was at the anti-war demo in Hyde Park 2003, as I was, will know that the BNP marched with the Muslims, Jesse Jackson, Ken Livingstone and assorted groups, including the Socialist Workers' Party against the Iraq invasion.

Had there been a BNP government it would not have invaded Iraq - not in the national interest and "none of our business", you see!



Neither would a BNP government have supported the Israeli government unconditionally at the expense of the Palestinians. Many in the BNP cannot decide between whom they dislike more - Jews or Muslims. Therefore a BNP government would have been isolationist and non-interventionist.

What is important is that Boris (who voted for the war and has made Islamophobic comments) does not become mayor.

Muslims can safely vote for Ken and BNP because

(1) both were against the Iraq invasion

(2) both are anti-establishment (Ken is supposedly Labour but that is only because they know any rival Labour candidate would be a dead duck, as Frank Dobson was in 2000 -Ken had 40% of the vote, Dobson around 12%)

(3) it will upset and frighten all those of our ruling classes who pursue insane foreign policies that do no one any good


Any Muslims who can bring themselves to do what might be described as "suicide voting" should have the courage to declare his intentions and let it be known that this is what they have done, by posting a comment here and joining http://www.1party4all.co.uk/ where there is a poll on precisely this issue.

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=105
Vote: Should Londoners vote BNP on 1 May 2008 to upset and alarm our ruling classes?



Remember, it was Tory and Labour who voted to invade Iraq and are even now planning to curtail our liberties further by using this "war" on terrorism as an excuse.


Think about it. Is the enemy of your enemy your friend? Is the government and its opposition your "friend" when it operates an insane foreign policy that is bad for all Britons and even now won't admit it?


Is the BNP really your enemy when it has committed no atrocity or messed up anyone's country? OK, they don't like you, but are you that surprised when they have seen their part of the country changed out of all recognition within such a short space of time?


Are you so sure you wouldn't join BNP if you happened to be working class and indigenous?


No? Then consider the evil already done by Labour and Tory (who voted for the war) whom you are supposed to trust. Compare and contrast that to the probability of the evil that might befall you if you used your protest vote in the way that would most upset the Tory and Labour warmongers (and those who would acquiesce with their war-mongering).


There is only one way to stay safe, be brave and make a point - vote Ken and BNP!