Translate

Showing posts with label Will Self. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Will Self. Show all posts

Thursday, 4 September 2014

Will Self thinks he is better than George Orwell

http://www.salon.com/2014/09/03/george_orwell_was_not_a_language_fascist_why_we_keep_misinterpreting_his_words/

The virtue of having a clear and grammatical style is that whatever you wrote will continue to be read,  understood and enjoyed by posterity.  Ask Homer, Pliny The Younger and Virgil, if you don't believe me.

Self already knows that he will be forgotten or only held up as a good-bad example of the dishonesty and intellectual vacuity as well as the moral bankruptcy that so characterises the Liberal Left of the early 21st century demonstrated at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28971276 .

An English genius of The Old School and a BBC-approved hack of the Liberal Left

Wednesday, 3 September 2014

Why do so many men insist on calling Feminism "Cultural Marxism"?

Because they are afraid of offending women, who are overwhelmingly feminists.

Feminism was the thin end of the wedge, and the thin end of the wedge began with the Equal Pay Act 1970.

Which group do you think would object most vociferously and is the largest and most electorally powerful group? Feminists, of course, ie the female vote. Most women these days are feminists, and feminists refuse to contemplate the repeal of the Equality Act 2010.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_Act_2010

The primary purpose of the Act is to codify the complicated and numerous array of Acts and Regulations, which formed the basis of anti-discrimination law in Great Britain. This was, primarily, the Equal Pay Act 1970, the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, the Race Relations Act 1976, the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and three major statutory instruments protecting discrimination in employment on grounds of religion or belief, sexual orientation and age. It requires equal treatment in access to employment as well as private and public services, regardless of the protected characteristics of age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation.

Women use their victimhood to make men feel guilty, and intersectionality is the measurement and acquisition of VICTIMHOOD.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality#Intersectionality_theory_and_feminist_thought

The disabled black lesbian is the best demonstration of the use of this concept, whose purpose is to PRIVILEGE members of these minorities at the expense of the heterosexual white male of mature years, traditionally identified as sexist, homophobic, antisemitic, builders of an empire, incorrigibly racist and therefore evil and fully deserving of their punishment that will be inflicted on them during the paedo witch-hunts that even now rages against men who used to have some status in society, eg paedophile priests and entertainers.

But it all started with feminism. Feminism served as the foot in the door of the salesmen that sold you all these unwanted and pernicious ideas that everyone has now absorbed, like mother's milk, since the 1970s.

What are the consequences of offending women, who are overwhelmingly feminists, who are overwhelmingly sluts? (Sluts are women who will have sex with men not their husbands.)

These men will get no sex from sluts and feminists. The only other option is to take a wife (who has the right to divorce her husband for no particular reason under no-fault divorce and then take half his stuff and deprive him of his children) or hire a prostitute.

Is it any surprise that most men in Britain are gutless wimps who only live for the next cheap to free sexual encounter with a slut before the police come knocking on their door to examine their computer for kiddyporn?

I trust I have demonstrated the helplessness of the politically incorrect and hopelessly marginalised white male of mature years. Once you are old enough to look ugly, you will look like the very model of a modern British paedophile.

Why do you think Will Self was questioned by the police who had him down as a potential paedophile when he was with his son hiking? Because he is as ugly as sin.

Will Self 

The matriarchy has no respect for the old, certainly not for old ugly men.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396222/Branded-paedophile-hiking-son-WILL-SELF-reveals-nightmare.html

The revolution devour its children. 

Friday, 25 May 2012

An Act of God humbles Guardian journalists



God (if He exists) may not look kindly upon Guardian journalists who deny His existence and scorn His Word



An insurance broker says:

"Unless Will Self had a bespoke warranty free high net worth contract for his buildings it’s unlikely this will be an Insured event. Most household policies are written on a “perils” basis whereby there is a specified list of perils that are Insured against – fire, lightening, explosion, impact, malicious damage etc. The damage at Mr Self’s home has been caused more due to “sudden and unforeseen” circumstances which, even if his Insurance does extend to cover, will most likely have an exclusion for extreme temperature or climatic causes. 

DO ALL THE HOUSES WITH COLLAPSED PARAPETS HAVE GUARDIAN-WRITING AND GUARDIAN READING OWNER-OCCUPIERS?  I think we should be told.

The roof did not fall IN, as was claimed by careless journalists with apparently no eyes to see.  However, the parapet did indeed fall OFF.   Perhaps imbecilic leftist journalists these days mix up "roof" with "parapet", carelessly thinking they are indistinguishable anyway, in the same idiotic way they think the meaning of marriage can be extended to pander to gay people who have no need for that sort of thing anyway.  It is not surprising then that parapets fall off the homes of morally confused leftist journalists, for apparently no reason at all.  Such an event could be likened to God tapping you on your shoulder and waiting for you to give an explanation of yourself, after you have gotten over the shock and surprise.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parapet
One thing I did consider however is the fact that his seems to be the only house in a very large residential area filled with very similar houses that has been affected. It does beg the question as to whether the roof was correctly maintained or indeed if in the past he had had a chimney breast or a supporting wall removed???

I hope for his sake his Insurers will be footing the bill as it looks like it’s going to cost a lot to repair."

Will Self, humbled by an uninsured peril that was an Act of God




God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...