Muslim countries under sharia have no need for the age of consent

The approach to marriage in Muslim countries like Afghanistan, Iran, Kuwait, Maldives, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine Gaza Strip, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, UAE and Yemen is that you must be married to each other in order to have legal sex.

This means they entirely reject and have no use for the concept of an age of consent. You only need an age of consent when you in practice condone premarital sex.

https://www.ageofconsent.net/world

LGBTs have a hissy fit at me because of a misunderstanding

https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/587747044124712960

@chabcorner @ATessio @Perangini @allison00812810 @ntfem I'm pro inclusion of LGBT in schools as that's the way to stamp out homophobia
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner @chabcorner @ATessio @Perangini @allison00812810 You want to turn schoolboys gay so you can fuck them later.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2015

@derrickbrasher @Hotdesigner @chabcorner @ATessio @Perangini @allison00812810 When you are 50 you will be looking for young meat, surely?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2015

@PowerWayne @Hotdesigner @chabcorner @ATessio @Perangini @allison00812810 It could be true. When a gay many is 50 he would want young meat.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2015

I think you should retract such statements @ntfem #ClaireKhaw. #LGBT #homophobia @metpoliceuk https://t.co/IdA9sCmUWm
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk LGBTs cannot reproduce so they will always want to recruit more young flesh to fuck as they get older.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc If you say it is OK to be gay and then show children gay porn they r more likely 2b gay.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc http://t.co/xpkbRJRyGX suggests parents should worry about the content of sex education.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2015

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/protesting-parents-ask-wynne-to-scrap-new-sex-ed-curriculum/article23961650

Under the changes, Grade 3 students [children from 8 to 9]  will learn about same-sex relationships, kids in Grades 4 [children from 9 to 10] and up will learn more about the dangers of online bullying, while the dangers of sexting will come in Grade 7 [children from 12 to 13].

Lessons about puberty will move from Grade 5 [children from 10 to 11] to Grade 4, while masturbation and “gender expression” are mentioned in the Grade 6 curriculum.

Come on. isn't the Caliphate better than our pornocracy of  a government literally fucking with our children's minds? Who do you think will be teaching our children Sex Ed? Slut female or sex predator male teachers who will think nothing of seducing your adolescent son or daughter, probably.

In the UK anyone who wants to teach at a state school has to undergo a full year of teacher training indoctrination about how it is OK to be gay if you're a man and super to be a slut if you are female.

Haven't you had enough?


Muslims don't put up with this shittification of standards of sexual morality, so why should we?


http://www.afa.net/action-alerts/if-your-childs-school-allows-day-of-silence-keep-your-child-at-home-april-17/ has  more gay shit at schools. 

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews I think you should worry more about the libellous homophobic content you tweet
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 13, 2015

@MontyUncle I think we should all report her. See what happens. I can't find the appropriate thing to report her for
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner i chose harassment of another and hate postings.
— Uncle Monty (@MontyUncle) April 13, 2015

@MontyUncle I did harassment but whether or not they actually sort it is another matter. Fingers crossed they do. X
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner they ought to be pretty good. the pædophillia lies i think, especially. Will be interesting to see what constabulary do, too.
— Uncle Monty (@MontyUncle) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner might be worth filling out a hate crime report via the met's website, too.
— Uncle Monty (@MontyUncle) April 13, 2015

@MontyUncle I'd hope they'd do something. I know you're not meant to report via Twitter but highlighting should suffice?
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner i think they can process more easily through their website, but not sure. BTP say to call in/use the website, i think.
— Uncle Monty (@MontyUncle) April 13, 2015

@MontyUncle I'll have a look tomorrow 😊
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews I wd argue that an accusation is not libellous because it can always be denied.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews Once you deny the accusation then the alleged libel is neutralised.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews labelling gay people paedophiles is rather libellous. Also a hate crime
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews maybe the police should know about how you wish for women to be lashed 100 times
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews Is wanting http://t.co/TtXp14fd4t implemented a criminal offence? @anjemchoudary
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews no, once it's highlighted to police, they'll keep an eye on you for hate crimes
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews You cannot libel a group of people, only individuals.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews It is clear from the context that I was talking about LGBTs as a whole.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews no you used the word YOU, which implied you meant ME. Regardless it's hate crime
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews Hate crime is not what you think it is.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews calling all LGBT people paedophiles is a hate crime. It's also a lie & ignorant
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews I think it's wise you stop digging as I will be reporting you via True Vision
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc Hate crime is NOT saying something that makes a member of a protected group hate you.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews I know what hate crime is. What you e spouted constitutes hate crime.
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews I think I am still allowed to say that.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc calling all LGBT people paedophiles is a hate crime. You also called me one. Hate crime
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews Hate crime = criminal offence motivated by hatred of a protected group
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc as I said. I'll be reporting you via true vision. I suggest you stop tweeting
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews would you like to be lashed? Do you think barbaric violence is acceptable?
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews which you've clearly shown with your tweets. Thanks for confirmation
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews It can be seen from the context that I meant "you people".
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews Obviously you would want schoolchildren to be old that it is OK to be gay.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

TYPO: "old" = "told"

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews Pro-gay sex ed is an excellent way of growing the next generation of LGBTs.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews I am sure I did not say *all* LGBTs are paedos.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews Just cos you hate me does not mean I am guilty of hate crime.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc I did not call you or all LGBTs paedos.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews Not all violence is barbaric.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc Is it illegal now to imply anything a protected group dislikes?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @metpoliceuk @Support @true_vision_hc @BBCNews Is it now "homophobic" to say "you people"?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @chabcorner @ATessio @Perangini @allison00812810 Schoolchildren should be discouraged from exhibiting gay behaviour.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@ntfem @chabcorner @ATessio @Perangini @allison00812810 sex ed in secondary school usually includes video to some degree of straight people
— Lee W D (@Hotdesigner) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @chabcorner @ATessio @Perangini @allison00812810 So you want pupils in secondary schools to view videos of LGBTs having sex?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @pinknews @stonewalluk If you read https://t.co/15hK840qKF again you will see that I said "later".
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @pinknews @stonewalluk "Later" in https://t.co/15hK840qKF could mean after they are 16 and/or when they leave school.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @chabcorner @ATessio @Perangini @allison00812810 LGBTs used to be despised, now it is racists. Fashion changes, eh?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @pinknews @stonewalluk @chabcorner @ATessio @Perangini @allison00812810 Most people are capable of swinging both ways in theory
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @pinknews @stonewalluk It would be legal to fuck schoolboys after they are 16, wouldn't it? You wouldn't be breaking the law.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @pinknews @stonewalluk It wouldn't be paedophilia after the schoolboy turns 16 so you would be OK to do it, wouldn't you?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @pinknews @stonewalluk You may not always have your partner. LGBT relationships have a high turnover.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @pinknews @stonewalluk You wouldn't personally have to "groom" schoolboys cos their schools would have done it for you.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@Hotdesigner @pinknews @stonewalluk So calm down, I wasn't saying *all* LGBTs are paedos, and fucking a 16 year old schoolboy is not illegal
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2015

@ntfem I especially liked the bit where you remind them that they can not reproduce, so they need to recruit.
— Geoff Dunbar (@GSDunbar) April 14, 2015

http://www.churchmilitant.tv/scripts/vort-2015-04-13.pdf

HOMO HEGEMONY IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND EVERYWHERE ELSE, AIDED AND ABETTED BY FEMINAZIS IN KEY OR PIVOTAL POSITIONS

Michael Voris:

" ... much of the Catholic clergy is homosexual.

And the reason so much of the clergy is gay is because the seminaries and vocation directors and chanceries are busting at the seams with homosexuals.

They are the ones who surround bishops, for example, and “counsel” them—the bishops who aren’t gay themselves, that is. They run various key departments in the chancery,
and they see to it that their own get appointed in key or pivotal positions."

Who is Chief Feminazi in the UK?

The Directrix of Public Prosecutions in the UK Alison Saunders. Men haven't got a chance.

John Humphrys points out the campaigning statement of feminazi Alison Saunders who wants to raise the numbers of convictions of men accused of rape

THINGS TO BEAR IN MIND ABOUT LIVING IN A MATRIARCHY

1. In a matriarchy, all men are lower than Slut Single Mothers. Keith Joseph's career was destroyed in 1974 when he criticised Slut Single Mothers. That was the beginning of the end. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron 
2. In a matriarchy homosexual men are above heterosexual men because only they dare to say things heterosexual men are too afraid to say about women eg David Starkey, Stephen Fry. They dare to criticise women because they are not bothered if women withhold sex from them. 
3. In a matriarchy even the Prime Minister is afraid of sluts because they all have the vote and have used it to devastating effect when they voted New Labour in. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8555358.stm Women considered Tony Blair sexier than John Major, obviously. Guess who will be the new leader of the Labour Party after Ed Miliband loses the 2015 General Election? Guess who middle class female Labour members find sexiest and whose **** they most want to suck? As Janusz Korwin-Mikke said at “Women usually vote for the more handsome man" Pity the beta male who cannot even choose his own leader without omega females - who are very libtard - influencing the vote. We know who voted New Labour and the Democrats in, don't we? Stupid irresponsible parasitical women with no jobs or public sector non-jobs. http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html
4. Alpha males (eg US President, UK Prime Minister) are more preoccupied with appeasing the omega female SSM voter and keeping her voting than looking after the interests of the beta male who do all the work. That is the democratic process for you in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage.
5. Will any politician be proposing to disenfranchise non-taxpayers? What do you think, dear reader, knowing of the pussy-whipped cowardice, corruption and competence of the average Western politician? 
6. Beta males will not accept the authority of another beta male and that was why John Major's Cabinet were always rebelling against him.  
7. Beta males would rather choose a female they find attractive to be their leader than another beta male. 
8. Attractive people are more often than not vain, shallow, lazy and unprincipled.
9. Women will always conspire to lower standards of sexual morality if ever given the opportunity. This is probably because they are incapable of abstract thought because they are just not interested in the longevity and strength of their civilisation or the long term national interest, or just selfish, stupid and evil. Lowering standards of sexual morality would let them off the hook while raising standards would result in most women being shamed as sluts. 
10. 83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did. What does this say about feminism?
11. You have to be pretty stupid ugly smelly and nasty as a woman for a man to say no if you are offering them no-strings sex. Men are of course the weaker sex when it comes to saying no to no-strings sex.
12. Saying it is OK for women to be sluts - as a matriarchy would - invariably lowers standards of everything else, eg education, morality. 
13. A matriarchy or pornocracy is a society in which most women are sluts whose power base is built on the desire men have for sex with sluts. Women use sex to control men and sluts are the main suppliers of sex to men in a matriarchy. In a patriarchy most of the sex that would take place is married sex and sex with prostitutes. This explains why evil feminazi sluts want to undermine marriage and criminalise men for buying sex from prostitutes (so as to keep them continuing to get sex from sluts) while encouraging primary schoolchildren with their Sex Ed to fuck whoever whenever wherever as long as it feels good to keep that whole shitty shebang of their stinking pornocracy banging and chuntering on. 
14. Shaming sluts would discourage women who don't want to be shamed as sluts into withholding sex forcing men to up their game thereby raising standards. 
15. The shittier women are to men the more of them will go gay or paedo.
16. Deep down men are afraid of women because they know they are not supposed to hit or rape women but understandably don't want to be bullied and mocked by women.
17. Are you beginning to get why Muslims don't want to integrate into this kind of shit and have their daughters become SSMs, their sons gaily married or if married to a woman divorced for no good reason and lose access to their grandchildren because their vengeful ex-daughter-in-law wants to punish them? Do you now understand why so many of them would rather die fighting for ISIS than live in a society where all men are lower than Slut Single Mothers because they are afraid to criticise them? Did you know that the US President himself - supposedly the most powerful man on earth - is afraid of SSMs because they all have the vote?
18. When  most men in the West become gay, or unemployed losers because their jobs have been taken by women or contemptible pussy-whipped MCSFs or paedophiles, ISIS will come and take us over. 

You would have thought that all right-thinking people would agree that what I am saying is quite important and ought to be more widely discussed.

Why isn't it?

MPs would be too afraid of antagonising their slut, SSM, MCSF and SPOSSM voters. This is of course the corrupt and craven nature of our much-vaunted democratic process.

What is an SSM?

What is an MCSF and a SPOSSM?

Why isn't the media discussing it?

Have you noticed that almost every other BBC producer is female and possibly a feminazi protected by pro-feminist legislation?  

Self-censorship is much  more insidious than overt censorship. If there is overt censorship people would just try to get round the rules. If it is self-censorship people won't even touch the subject for fear of someone (eg a female they fancy) taking a dislike to them. 

Why isn't UKIP discussing it?

Because UKIP are just as terrified as the LibLabCon of antagonising voters who regard extramarital sex as a God-given right.

What do you think is going to happen if the slut problem continues to be ignored?

What do you think will happen to you if you suspect you have cancer but refuse to go to the doctor?

Underage sex *is* a cultural norm in the UK as illegal immigrant claimed

Migrant who had sex with 13-year-old girl claims he thought it was a 'cultural norm' in UK

If this illegal immigrant's lawyers were more on the ball, they would have argued that the existence of the concept of Gillick competence means that under-aged sex has been condoned by the House of Lords since 1985.

Why is no journalist asking what Shaun Wright meant when he asked "Why are you picking on Rotheram?"

But then so is hypocrisy, cowardice and mendacity. 

Gordon Ramsay admits to spying on teenage daughter

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/10387503/Gordon-Ramsay-admits-to-spying-on-teenage-daughter.html

But Gordon Ramsay allows his daughter to have a boyfriend at 15.  How many changes of boyfriend has his daughter had?

"Oh, dad, I have used up my last boyfriend, can I have another one?"

"Yeah, sure, babe. Just make sure you don't get pregnant, yeah?"

That is why Muslim sex predators groom the daughters of British men for sex.

"Dad, if I can have a boyfriend,  why can't I have a boyfriend of another race?  Is it because you are racist, dad?  If you stop me I could call ChildLine and tell them what a racist Islamophobic shit you are, and we all know that being racist is the worst thing in the world to be, and I shouldn't have to listen to anything a racist Islamophobic shit like you says, should I?"   

Male Facebook friend 1:

15 is too young to have a boyfriend really. When I was in sixth form and started getting to know girls I was surprised at how care-free some of girls' fathers were. These people were middle class as well. Very little control over their daughters' behaviour. Not like my dad was with my sister.

Me:

What do you when you have a boyfriend? Why, you fuck him of course. If you have a boyfriend at 15 does it mean you shouldn't fuck him? How many of these girls care about the age of consent? How many adolescent schoolboys under 16 care about the age of consent?

Male Facebook friend 1:

None of them I knew cared about age of consent. Most of them had lost their virginity at about 15. By 17 they had already has 3 or 4 changes of boyfriend. It's strange because when people talk about "promiscuity" they tend to mean having casual sex with many partners. Yet female serial monogamy is also another "hidden" form of promiscuity.

Male Facebook friend 2:

I enforce a nearly cloistered life upon my 15 year old daughter. There is plenty of time in life for her when she's mature enough to make decisions that could and will greatly effect her future. Her job at this point in life is to focus on her studies and then move on to University. She is smart enough to have noticed (disapprovingly) the 'slide' that many of her classmates have already made toward slutdom.

Maybe most British mothers don't care about their daughters having under-aged sex because they think it is all about growing up and learning how to bargain with men using sex.

It seems most British fathers who are still living with their wives and children now have the same view too.

It is no wonder that sex predators of other races target white indigenous adolescent females when they are all expected to be sexually active by the time they are 15.

Male or female, the more sex you have had with different partners, the more likely you are to treat relationships as so many used condoms.