Translate

Showing posts with label sex predators. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sex predators. Show all posts

Wednesday, 14 September 2016

Why some female teachers have sex with schoolboys

http://theothermccain.com/2016/09/13/teacher-had-sex-with-12-year-old-boy/

http://news3lv.com/news/local/former-teachernicole-willfinger-charged-with-sex-with-student-to-face-stricter-penalties

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/female-teacher-admits-having-sex-8383454

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3549878/Female-teacher-27-sex-16-year-old-boy-faces-jail-admitting-six-month-relationship-child.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10578951/Female-history-teacher-who-shared-bed-with-two-schoolboys-banned-from-classroom-for-sexual-misconduct.html

Not only are men lower than sluts, sluts are now corrupting the morals of boys.

The best way of corrupting boys is to give them sex before they even ask for it, so they will always yearn to be taken by a woman the way a woman is taken by a man.

Men now yearn to be dominated by women, to be disciplined and punished. It turns them on.

The more power men give to women, the more they will take, and to be weak is to invite exploitation.

It is clearly the intention of these immoral female teachers to corrupt the morals of adolescent schoolboys in their charge in order to destroy their masculinity as adult men. You won't have much masculinity to display if all the while you are seeking a woman who is older than you who will dominate you and boss you around. Give such a man who has been got at by an older woman a submissive woman, and he won't know what to do with her.

Men who are submissive to women and addicted to sex with sluts are easy to control. Such men would never be able to recognise a principle, much less stand up and fight for it. Such men would be spiritually incapable of standing up for the patriarchy and incapable of even desiring a patriarchy because patriarchy supports marriage and this by definition means it would forbid and punish extramarital sex, which is the very thing they are constantly craving for.

Sex addicted men are not interested in marrying and having progeny, but in merely continuing to enjoy sex with women they are not married to. Most men in the West are MCSFs - Morally Compromised Slut Fuckers incapable of supporting marriage.

Such men would be spiritually incapable of protecting their women from invaders. Men with no wives and offspring are not going to risk anything to protect sluts or random women from invaders. They can't even get it together to challenge the status quo - feminism- after all.

Talking to Western men about this is like talking to drug-addicted and intoxicated men who are incapable of focusing on the matter at hand, much less being persuaded by the case I have put to them for supporting marriage.

All they will be capable of doing is denying that things are as bad as they say they are and then changing the subject to something they would much rather talk and think about, probably the next fix of extramarital sex they hope to get.

I guess we women in the West will be taken as slaves and sex slaves by invaders because our men are too weak, gay and old to defend us.

The invaders will be predictably Muslim, and Western women will have no choice.

Perhaps surrender will be sweet, precisely because it is inevitable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_on_a_Scandal_(film)

at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 28 August 2014

On Muslim sex predators and their apparently superior skills of sexual preying

I think the real reason IC1 males are so angry with IC4 males is because they are not as good as IC4 males at being sex predators. I don't expect any Islamophobic BNP supporter to admit this though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IC_codes

If IC1 males want to be better sex predators than IC4 sex predators, what must they do?

Getting a car helps so you can drive from place to place preying on schoolgirls.

Getting a car that is a pussy magnet would also improve your chances.

If you are a sex predator, should you be a lone sex predator or work with men of similar interests so you can share information, resources and victims?

If you are a sex predator, then you would probably enjoy voyeurism, exhibitionism and gang-bangs, so it would be advisable to work in gangs to maximise your opportunities for sexual preying.

Why are Muslim sex predators more effective than non-Muslim sex predators though?

Is it because there are just more of them, or because they are more organised?

Do Muslim sex predators tend to have more access to cars than non-Muslim sex predators?

Are Muslim sex predators better at co-operating amongst themselves than non-Muslim sex predators, who tend to be lone wolves?

Why do Muslim sex predators have more access to cars than non-Muslim sex predators?

Is there anything about their religion that makes Muslim sex predators more effective sex predators than sex predators of other races and religion?

Or is it because IC1 schoolgirls just find IC4 males more attractive?

Does a high concentration of young unemployed Muslim men living near to high concentrations of inadequately supervised vulnerable white schoolgirls from "problem families" living in an environment where under-aged sex is virtually normalised and statements likely to arouse racial antagonism forbidden by law explain away the apparently superior operational effectiveness of the Muslim sex predator?

I think we should be told.


at 4 comments:
Labels: , ,

Wednesday, 9 July 2014

Are liberal journalists part of the paedo conspiracy if they refuse to ask the right question?

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Gordon Ramsay admits to spying on teenage daughter

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/10387503/Gordon-Ramsay-admits-to-spying-on-teenage-daughter.html

But Gordon Ramsay allows his daughter to have a boyfriend at 15.  How many changes of boyfriend has his daughter had?

"Oh, dad, I have used up my last boyfriend, can I have another one?"

"Yeah, sure, babe. Just make sure you don't get pregnant, yeah?"

That is why Muslim sex predators groom the daughters of British men for sex.

"Dad, if I can have a boyfriend,  why can't I have a boyfriend of another race?  Is it because you are racist, dad?  If you stop me I could call ChildLine and tell them what a racist Islamophobic shit you are, and we all know that being racist is the worst thing in the world to be, and I shouldn't have to listen to anything a racist Islamophobic shit like you says, should I?"   

Male Facebook friend 1:

15 is too young to have a boyfriend really. When I was in sixth form and started getting to know girls I was surprised at how care-free some of girls' fathers were. These people were middle class as well. Very little control over their daughters' behaviour. Not like my dad was with my sister.

Me:

What do you when you have a boyfriend? Why, you fuck him of course. If you have a boyfriend at 15 does it mean you shouldn't fuck him? How many of these girls care about the age of consent? How many adolescent schoolboys under 16 care about the age of consent?

Male Facebook friend 1:

None of them I knew cared about age of consent. Most of them had lost their virginity at about 15. By 17 they had already has 3 or 4 changes of boyfriend. It's strange because when people talk about "promiscuity" they tend to mean having casual sex with many partners. Yet female serial monogamy is also another "hidden" form of promiscuity.

Male Facebook friend 2:

I enforce a nearly cloistered life upon my 15 year old daughter. There is plenty of time in life for her when she's mature enough to make decisions that could and will greatly effect her future. Her job at this point in life is to focus on her studies and then move on to University. She is smart enough to have noticed (disapprovingly) the 'slide' that many of her classmates have already made toward slutdom.


Maybe most British mothers don't care about their daughters having under-aged sex because they think it is all about growing up and learning how to bargain with men using sex.

It seems most British fathers who are still living with their wives and children now have the same view too.

It is no wonder that sex predators of other races target white indigenous adolescent females when they are all expected to be sexually active by the time they are 15.

Male or female, the more sex you have had with different partners, the more likely you are to treat relationships as so many used condoms.  
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, 6 June 2013

Who deserves more hatred? Sex predators or Nick Griffin and the BNP?

"The [Pakistani] pimps seemed convinced that since their victims’ families haven’t organized lethal vendettas against them like any honorable Pakistani family would, they must not have cared.

Moreover, since the English people hadn’t carried out mass communal violence, such as burning down Pakistani neighborhoods in the time-honored South Asian manner, clearly they didn’t mind.

And if the English government didn’t want Pakistanis to act Pakistani, they wouldn’t let them into England, now would they?

You have to admit the defendants have a point."

http://takimag.com/article/the_real_threat_to_british_elites_steve_sailer#axzz2VLqneWCm

Well, of course. SSMs* are not about to organise anything against anyone, are they?  They will just keep getting themselves knocked up and having more variously-fathered illegitimate children at the expense of the taxpayer and send their daughters to a care home when they are old enough to get under their feet and make themselves interesting to their mothers' male sex partners (AKA "SPOSSMs" - Sex Partners of SSMs).

*  https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Spinster-Single-Mums-a-burden-on-the-state/417696111659379

Pakistanis demonstrate perfectly that even people from poorer and backward countries can prosper in Britain if they not mostly slut and bastard like the British.

If men are afraid of their women, they are basically fucked in the eyes of the men of other races, whose women are not mostly sluts.

The trouble is that white men no longer even have the self-respect to say this or the honesty to discuss this amongst themselves.

Sex predators OF ANY RACE would prey on adolescent schoolgirls OF WHATEVER RACE in care homes, because they are easy pickings.

This is bad, of course, but only racists would think that it is worse if the sex predator is a darker shade than the victim.

And only racists and COWARDS like Nick Griffin would refuse to question the morals of the sluts who keep having illegitimate children that end up in neglectful care homes, who produce the next generation of parasitical sluts and bastards.

Asian sex predators will know that white men will do NOTHING to stop their immoral women from having children out of wedlock and then abandoning them into care. Therefore their supply of victims will not be affected because they already know that the white man does not intend to do anything constructive about white girls being preyed on by sex predators of other races.

Nick Griffin only intends to say how much he hates Muslims, and, er, that's it.  He certainly won't be talking about SSMs because he already knows that the overwhelming number of his core supporters are SSM-parented or have impregnated SSMs or are SPOSSMs (Sex Partners Of SSMs).

How can you not feel hatred and contempt for such a man and his supporters and help yourself from regarding them and their women as degenerate and inferior?

Even now they fear to question and challenge the morals of their women.  They will certainly not be discussing the quality of British mothering, known to be the worst in the world because most British mothers are single mothers.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/13/david-starkey-claims-whites-black
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, 6 July 2012

TAKE A FRESH STAND ON THE MUSLIM GROOMING ISSUE IN TODMORDEN by David Jones



(By David Jones, Independent Nationalist,
Todmorden, East Lancashire)

On July 5th, I gave up my birthday to attend a local regular PACT (Police & Community Together) meeting in Todmorden Town Hall. As a "Town Hall Nationalist" that is not unusual, I am a regular there attending Town Council, Police and Ward meetings to hear and speak on behalf of local residents, a basic activity that anybody contending for local elected office ought to be doing.

Such meetings usually consist of Upper Calder Valley NPT Sgt. Mick Bowden hearing a litany of complaints about dog fouling and speeding preceded by an account of the arrests made by the local "Neighourhood Policing Team".

I went there however to raise a serious issue, that of the Muslim grooming gangs in Rochdale. We all know what has been taking place here, paedophiles and perverts of Pakistani extraction groom, drug, rape and eventually turn young, mainly white girls into prostitutes.

Whilst Greater Manchester Police have been investigating and bringing before the courts these lowlife scumbags who even the majority of our local Liberal Democrat Town Councillors agree should, at the very least, be castrated (albeit too little too late) the record of West Yorkshire Police is a little less gallant.

My fear, and many other locals fears, are that these sex gangs and child rapists will simply move up into West Yorkshire through Todmorden and into the Calder Valley.

They did launch an "Operation Parsonage" to investigate this crisis in Keighley years ago, but failed to put any of these people on trial, let alone behind bars. Meanwhile West Yorkshires Chief Constable, Sir Norman Bettison (who has a reputation for being a bit of a time sitter) goes on Regional TV and denies that the problem has any racial aspect to it at all - even the local Muslim community leaders admit otherwise!

FACT: THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A TRIAL OF AN ASIAN GROOMING RING IN THE HISTORY OF THE WEST YORKSHIRE POLICE

In fact when a friend of mine, DN Party boss Dr Jim Lewthwaite (while sitting as a Bradford BNP Borough Councillor) began investigating the matter and campaigning for justice, he was told to "get out of town" by first plain clothes CID and then by a senior-ranking Policeman Officer when he visited the went to the local police station to complain. Even Keighley Town Council barred him, an elected Borough Councillor, from setting foot in Keighley Town Hall.

All this I said to Sgt. Bowden and also to local residents at the local PACT meeting, in the presence of the sweating and squirming leader of the Liberal Democrat group on Calderdale Council, the odious Cllr Janet Battye, who was there to talk about another issue.

Doesn't all this construct a case to say that Todmorden and the Calder Valley will be the next areas where grooming will spread to?

Todmorden is, after all, on the border with Lancashire and Greater Manchester, and only nine miles away from Rochdale itself. Rochdale is acknowledged to be the cesspit of the universe, infested the with worst kind of white-cider drinking chavs and heroin addicts, criminals and crackheads alike -believe me I'm not joking, Rochdale is a truly evil place!

I raised the following:

1. Why does Sir Norman Bettison say  there is no race factor in the grooming issue when there clearly is?

2. What kind of parents allow their children to go anywhere near these perverts?

3. With so many (107 by the last records I saw) sex offenders already living in the Calder Valley already, isn't it time for a crackdown?

4. Why was "Operation Parsonage" wound up, surely we need to be on red alert?

5. What kind of moron could not see the danger of these gangs coming across the border?

By this time Cllr Janet Battye was shrieking, and a timely intervention by Sgt Bowden probably saved the poor old woman from a heart attack.

The rest of the public in attendance wasn't shrieking though, that public including an ex-NF retired copper, a B&B owner, an ex biker and a Licensee were clearly behind me on this vital issue, and a few approached me afterwards to say so. This kind of activity is why I managed to buck the trend and improve my vote from 5.5% to 8.5% where so many BNP candidates failed to do so.

To give Sgt Bowden his due, there was not a lot he could say but I made my point on the matter, he is I believe, an honest local copper whose hands are tied, it would be more than his job is worth to be seen, by Cllr Janet Battye, agreeing with me.

Other leading local nationalists across the Pennines appear to be preparing to tackle the grooming issue in constructive ways also.

The Infidels of Britain and the National Front may mean well but this issue needs to be dealt with in a intelligent, voter friendly and constructive way.
at 5 comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, 4 July 2012

British taxpayer paying more to get a worse result

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2142697/Scandal-care-firms-failed-protect-girls-grooming-Teenager-childrens-home-died-overdose-targeted-sex.html

It costs £200k per annum to keep each child in a Rochdale care home.

Nobody running the care home made a fuss when the children were absent between midnight and 6am.

It costs £28-30k to send your son to Eton or Harrow.

This is not the whole year of course, so let us say £42-43k for the whole year.   It is still cheaper than £200k per annum.

Clearly, our taxes are being wasted by the government.

Clearly, tax avoidance would be the moral thing to do.

at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Friday, 18 May 2012

Questions about sex predators and their victims of all races


http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/politics/baroness-warsi-some-pakistani-men-think-young-white-girls-are-fair-game-for-sex-abuse-7766319.html


  1. Are white girls easy meat?
  2. Are they easier meat than Muslim girls?
  3. Is it a good thing for a woman to be "easy"?
  4. Does being "easy meat" mean you are a slut?
  5. If most white women are sluts, does it mean that white men have lost control of their women?
  6. What does it say about you as a race if you have lost control of your women?
  7. Do you get think you are likely to get respect from other races when other races think your women are stupid sluts and you as a man are afraid of stupid sluts?
  8. Are white mothers bad mothers compared to Asian Muslim mothers?
  9. Why are white mothers so shit?
  10. Is the reason why white girls are such easy meat because their mothers are Slut Single Mums AKA Never Married Mothers?
  11. Why are white men so afraid of criticising their women?
  12. Is it because white men fear not getting sex from their women if they criticise them?
  13. Are white women who are sluts beyond criticism?
  14. If so, is this a Good Thing?
  15. There are more and more women claiming that women should never be called sluts.  Is this matriarchal censorship a Good Thing?
  16. Are white men despicable cowards for cowering so fearfully in silence before the worst of their women, the Slut Single Mother?
  17. Do Muslim sex predators "respect" less their victims less than non-Muslim sex predators?
  18. Do non-Muslim sex predators "respect" their victims more than Muslim sex predators?
  19. Surely all sex predators of all races do not respect their victims at all?
  20. Are there more Muslim sex predators in Britain than there are non-Muslim sex predators?

It is really very simple, boys and girls.  If a man has sex with an easy meat girl, he will  not respect her afterwards and want to move on.  Just imagine a man as a child with lots of presents under a Xmas tree.  The more of them he has, the less he will value them.   Certainly, a woman he has possessed cheaply and easily will be called a slag or a slut.   It is therefore quite easy to understand why a Muslim man would respect Muslim women because they tend to be wrapped up and not easily available, unlike white girls.   

If white men want to do something about the cheapness of their women then it is of course up to them to do something about this.  It may be that they want their women cheap and easy, especially if they know they cannot afford a wife or a girlfriend or even the occasional services of an honest prostitute.   

Therein lies the crux of the problem.   White men know what they must do but they will not do what is necessary because the cure for feminism is now worse than the disease , and in any case they no longer believe in God, Honour, Nation or Posterity, concepts which might help them fight the foul emasculating disease of feminism.  

What is the cure for feminism?  What would be strong enough to fight feminism and the emasculating cowardice, the stinking hypocrisy and the debilitating dementia of the white man?

Only religion (and only one religion - the one they most hate and fear) can save the white man now, for he cannot return to Christianity, for the cancer of feminism has spread to his government and his religious institutions who are now full of women, feminists, socialists, homosexuals, communists and third rate minds.  Indeed, the cancer of feminism shares his home with him and his bed with him.   He fears the disapproval and rejection of his women, and we all know that men are only after the One Thing.  If he has a wife, he will fear being divorced by her and being deprived of his children and half his property, which she can easily do, because the divorce laws of this benighted land allows her to do so.   

In the Family Courts, held in camera, no journalist can hear you scream ...

Most of these white men will have been brought up as drug-taking, drinking hedonistic liberal atheists.   The white man therefore knows that there is no afterlife.  This being the case, he will see it as expedient to take the crumbs of pleasure from the feminist table like a beggar or a dog.  Such a man is unlikely to assert his right to free speech, and even less likely to fight for his principles, assuming he even knew what such things are. Honour is an alien concept, and behaving honourably an unknown practice.   

There is no helping a race of men such as this.   

When men have no reason and no sense of honour, they can only be driven like animals, by means of a cattle prod from behind.
at 2 comments:
Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, 2 June 2009

"Racist grooming" videos by the BNP

http://tv.bnp.org.uk/2009/06/racial-grooming-the-truth/
http://tv.bnp.org.uk/2009/06/racial-grooming-part-one/
http://tv.bnp.org.uk/2009/06/racial-grooming-part-two/
http://tv.bnp.org.uk/2009/06/racial-grooming-part-three/

The BNP are complaining about other races preying on white women, who are internationally infamous for their promiscuity. This is supported by sitcoms such as Accidentally On Purpose starring Jenna Elfman to glamorise the life of a woman who gets pregnant after a one-night stand with a younger man who doesn't have a job, based on the book by Mary Pols, who herself did the same thing.

http://www.more.com/2039/4840-my-so-called-sitcom-life

If you were a sex predator wouldn't you prey on the easier pickings of white schoolgirls whose single mums don't care where their daughters to go, what they wear, who they go with and what time they come back?

The only way to stop this sort of thing is to:

1) enforce the law that makes it a criminal offence to have under aged sex

2) legally compel doctors to tell parents of daughters who come to them for the pill if they are under 16

3) legally compel family planning clinics to report under aged girls asking for contraceptives to the police on the grounds that giving them contraceptives is aiding and abetting under aged sex

4) tax us all less so most wives are not compelled to work and so be able to keep an eye on their daughters' comings and goings to see that they don't take up with unsuitable men, have under aged sex and unwanted pregnancies

5) abolish child benefit for all or withhold child benefit from unmarried parents

6) legalise brothels

Does this sound simple and commonsensical to you?

In that case, the LibLabCon are bound to ignore it, aren't they?

Perhaps, if the BNP were really trying to be constructive, they would propose these measures in their next manifesto.

If they did they might even get the Muslim vote.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...