The Reds and I may be on the same side

FACTS

1. The Reds and the Liberal Left want to discourage people from joining the BNP and similar "Far Right"  parties.
2. It is quite clearly the case that the BNP membership consists mostly of illegitimate and aggrieved men who were badly-parented by their SSMs (explained at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Slut-Single-Mothers-a-burden-on-the-state/220271251432495) who deprived them of their fathers.  They might have fucked some loser or a maniac who subsequently abandoned them.  Bastard by birth, bastard by nature.   
3. A bastard already represents three generations of bad genes.  A bastard has a mother who is a slut, for one thing.   This means the bastard is already half full of stupid slut genes, with the other half full of loser/maniac/cad/rogue/rake/bounder/scoundrel genes.  Also, the grandparents of the bastard did not tell their daughter not to be slut not to be a slut either because they didn't think of it (stupid) or because they thought it was OK for their daughter to be an SSM (low moral standards).  Therefore:  Bastard = Three Generations of Bad Genes      

Decrease the supply of SSM-parented dysfunctional losers and you will decrease the the supply of fresh recruits to the BNP.  

It seems obvious to me.   

The Liberal Left are invited to join https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Slut-Single-Mothers-a-burden-on-the-state/220271251432495 and keep the Far Right starved of fresh recruits consisting of dysfunctional fatherless young men who have not been brought up properly by their SSMs.

It is time, surely, that British women were told in no uncertain terms not to fuck losers, maniacs and SSM-parented degenerates?

The more they fuck, the higher the probability of getting knocked up by a man who will not be your husband and is unable to provide for you.  The state therefore becomes their provider.  This means that the taxpayer is having forced marriage imposed on him, and we already know that forced marriage is now ILLEGAL in this country.  

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/20/contents is where you can find the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007

The taxpayer in effect becomes the husband of these SSMs and their illegitimate children with not even the benefit of conjugal rights.  

Perhaps it should be made compulsory for any SSM in receipt of welfare payments to do at least one nice thing for her long-standing quasi-husband?   

If she does not comply with a request for sex by taxpaying man, could she perhaps be punished in some way starting with the withdrawal of welfare payments and her lifestyle to which she has become accustomed for at least four generations?

Once she is on the streets she could perhaps be made to work for a living in a brothel in a trade that would suit her talents.   

I am reminded of the Victorian principle of lesser eligibility in the workhouses they had.  This was the principle that conditions in the workhouse would always be made less pleasant than what the inmate enjoyed before he or she entered the workhouse.    

These immoral women must know that they are being punished for being sluts.   They must know that they are a cancer of society and that they must know that it is not a nice thing to be a slut.   

  

What is the definition of a slut?  

A woman who has sex with a man not her husband.   

This would mean that any fornicatress, even if she only did have sex once and then got knocked up, is in fact a slut.   

If she wants to have children, she must find a man to marry her, instead of just getting a man to fuck her.

It really is the only language stupid, immoral and irresponsible women understand.

Will the Reds henceforth start respecting the institution of marriage (this of course means condemning or at least criticising sluts) in order to starve the "Far Right" of its SSM-parented recruits?

This remains to be seen.

Those who liked this post may also like

Why the White Race is Declining in Numbers and Quality
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/why-white-race-is-declining-in-numbers.html

HELP ME ANNOY THE FEMALE-DOMINATED PC BBC

Would you like to nominate Claire Khaw for the iPM New Year Honour for being the most entertainingly philosophical, political and theological Woman of the Year?  Go on, go on, go on!

They won't let me win, but you will succeed in annoying them if the nominations keep coming in.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0089nbb/features/new-year-honour