The Bible is obviously more extreme than the Koran. Why won't Christian chauvinists admit this?

Matthew 10:34: "Do not suppose I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. JESUS PREACHES JIHAD.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 18, 2015

http://t.co/lD2kS7r76q is much more *extreme* than anything in the Koran. Why won't Christian chauvinists ever admit this? #Islamophobia

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 18, 2015

http://t.co/5f5ms17k6H gives examples of Biblical extremism which prescribes honour killing, which the Koran does not. #Islamophobia

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 18, 2015

@ProfJCharmley What have you to say to this?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 18, 2015

Professor Charmley is a Catholic academic.

@ntfem I suggest you get yourself an orthodox commentary and learn how to read Scripture.

— John Charmley (@ProfJCharmley) October 18, 2015

@ProfJCharmley You are not prepared to engage on this?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 18, 2015

@ntfem no point engaging with ignorance

— John Charmley (@ProfJCharmley) October 18, 2015

@ProfJCharmley Of what am I ignorant?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 18, 2015

@ntfem for yur enlightenment http://t.co/bODi70FjVJ @DarkLor51551926

— John Charmley (@ProfJCharmley) October 18, 2015

@ProfJCharmley @DarkLor51551926 Silly metaphors can be interpreted literally by the foolish. It is safe to interpret the Koran literally.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 18, 2015

The rationale of honour killing explained

Pregnant 10-year-old girl 'denied life-saving abortion after being raped by her stepfather'

Any mother who takes up with a man who rapes her 10 year old daughter must ipso facto be a SHIT mother and a slut.

A slut is a woman who suffers because her promiscuity. Promiscuity is choosing one's sex partners badly and suffering for one's bad choices.

Any daughter of any SHIT mother must ipso facto inherit her SHIT genes.

Would you marry a woman who was knocked up by her step father when she was 10? NOPE.

Would you marry a woman who married a man who raped and impregnated her daughter? NOPE.

If you were a mother, would you want your son to take up with such a woman? NOPE.

DAMAGED GOODS.

I would have the mother's husband executed to draw a line under this.

I mean, even if you were the mother you would secretly be relieved if your daughter "disappears", wouldn't you?

Imagine all the guilt you would have to deal with and all the arguments you would have with her.

"Mum, you have to say yes to whatever I ask cos you were the one who married the man who raped and impregnated me when I was ten. " 

Intolerable and insufferable.

Just imagine yourself to be the father of the woman whose daughter was raped by her husband. You would want your grand-daughter dead too, wouldn't you, so your daughter could start again instead of being dragged down by her raped daughter and the bastard spawn of her raped daughter?

What if your daughter with the raped daughter wants to keep the offspring of her raped daughter who is also the offspring of your late son-in-law?

You could disown her, but you may just prefer it if she and her daughter and her grandchild disappeared off the face of the earth too, or at least moved far far away, wouldn't you?

If she won't go, she and your raped and impregnated granddaughter and her grand-daughter's bastard spawn would be like three albatrosses round your neck, wouldn't they?

The disgrace would be total if you allowed this: the mockery and disdain of all your community and the contempt of your peers. If you had any position in this community at all it would all be lost, because of your slut of a daughter who chose to get knocked-up by the wrong man and then married even more of a wrong 'un who raped and impregnated her daughter who is also your "damaged goods"granddaughter.

What would you be mocked for?

For having lost control of your women, of course.

Western men wouldn't get any of this, of course.

When honour killing is the only option

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2441756/Autumn-Pasquale-Murdered-girls-family-sues-juvenile-killers-parents.html

The parents of the murderous boy should honour kill their son.  If they do not they would face death.  That would be the most satisfying solution.  

Killing women in the name of family honour

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2069459/Alarming-rise-Muslim-honour-killings-thousands-cases-reported-police-year.html


I think being in this country tempts these women into behaviour that will alarm their community and for them to think the woman in question will turn into an SSM.

For some reason, I am reminded of EVERYBODY HATES CHRIS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everybody_Hates_Chris

Anyone who has watched it will remember how the mother always thinks her daughter is going to turn into an SSM the moment she shows even displayed the mildest form of disobedience.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/6808907/Honour-killing-the-legacy-of-village-life-which-killed-Tulay-Goren.html

I imagine they don't want their women becoming like the 15 year old girl who was knocked up by the 11 year old boy next door.

Sean Stewart, father at 12

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/father-11-hides-as-pregnant-girl-faces-the-media-1246186.html?fb_action_ids=10150998851555052%252C10151002982125577%252C10150395178997286%252C10151020992440441%252C2370357653824&fb_action_types=news.reads&fb_ref=U-xIY68Fk9EyH94mldIgMQxb-CFCONX01FRS-33nh8XXX%252CU-iDyXgdXcRbaP4aNlIVRoGR-CFCONX01FRS-33nh8XXX&fb_source=other_multiline

or have their grandchildren suffer the fate of Scarlett Keeling while supposedly in the care of an unfit mother who allowed her sexually-active but under-aged daughter to stay with an Indian man they had met on holiday while she went to visit another part of India, and returned to find her daughter gang-raped and dead.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/jan/21/interview-fiona-mckeown-scarlett

Fiona McKeown: Should she have been prosecuted for arranging and facilitating a child sex offence?
http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=102

Perhaps they just want to make a point that they do not want to be a people who have lost control of their women, their men mostly sad, stupid, skint and scared bastards afraid of criticising Slut Single Mums.  

Perhaps they have not really thought that through, but are dimly aware that they must kill their women who dishonour their family before they lose all sense of shame and their women become like the women of the host community and their men become like the men of the host community, who have no honour and feel no shame at submitting to a matriarchy, and who are afraid to criticise the worst of their promiscuous women who lower the quality of the national gene pool and merely breed more parasites like themselves, rather than employable and productive citizens the way they used to in the time when married parents were the norm, schools taught properly and punishments fitted the crime.

Otherwise, their daughters would end up like Farah Damji
http://squaremilenews.blogspot.com/2010/01/danger-woman-damji-jailed-for-housing.html who has produced two illegitimate children for her parents to look after, who clearly should have been locked up in an institution
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Women's+imprisonment+in+the+United+States%3a+a+historical+analysis+of...-a053520078, which was what fathers in the West in the olden days did to their wayward daughters to avoid them dishonouring the family name.

Farah Damji, author of TRY ME

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Try-Me-Farah-Damji/dp/1907188045