Translate

Showing posts with label imperialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label imperialism. Show all posts

Sunday, 21 June 2020

On being accused of being an American imperialist when I am not even American

Some idiot liberal accused me of being so stupid that I would have been in favour of the Vietnam War had I been old enough to form an opinion as a White American Imperialist.

While I am happy to admit that I am not against the idea of imperialism per se because it cannot be denied that great civilisations are always great empires, I bridled at the presumption of the unthinking jingoism that I was being accused of.

All empires decline through breaking the rules they followed that made them great eg the Republican virtue of early Republican Rome. All civilisations rise in patriarchy - when only married sex was allowed - and decline in matriarchy - when all varieties of extramarital sex become part of the culture.

Empires are morally instructive to humanity. Troy fell because of its female trouble caused by the fornication of Paris and the adultery of Helen. King Priam and Queen Hecuba disobeyed the signs which told them to get rid of Paris as a baby because he was born under an unlucky star but subsequently accepted him when it appeared that he had grown into a fine young man.

His judgement is known to be unwise when he chose to award the Golden Apple to Aphrodite when asked to choose a winner out of Hera the Goddess of Empire, Athena the Goddess of Wisdom and Aphrodite the Goddess of Love who promised him the love of the most beautiful woman in the world.

If he had not stolen the wife of another man, Troy would not have fallen. If King Priam had disowned Paris for his sexual immorality and returned both Helen and Paris for punishment by Menelaus her husband, there would not have been a Trojan War and Troy would not have fallen as a result of its sexual immorality.

Apart from being good at picking your fights carefully enough to win the overwhelming majority of them, what else must you do as a successful imperialist?

The British cultivated their imperial propaganda about the aristocratic virtue of their leaders eg an innate sense of fair play, of a free nation of independent thinkers, of virtuous and chaste women as well as the stiff upper lip of restraining behaviour and speech that should not be displayed "in front of the servants" who were often their subject peoples.

If you want to be a successful imperial nation, you would have to cultivate a culture of aristocratic virtue amongst your populace. Indeed, the psychological weapon you would wield most often is that you are so obviously superior that potential subject nations would secretly long to be ravished by you.

The Americans are about to discover how washing one's dirty laundry in public and cursing each other like fishwives will now have devastating consequences on their status and reputation. Jews being the aristocracy of humanity would know all about the devastating consequences of Lashon Hara - the sin of evil speech that is said to have caused their 2000 year exile from Israel.

Since most Americans are both ignorant and indifferent to American foreign policy and are reluctant to assume the White Man's Burden, the model of American imperialism propagated by a perception of American virtue is in fact unsustainable. If there are non-Americans who long to be American, it is only because they aspire to a level of consumption that is American as well as a degenerate lifestyle of sex and drugs and rock and roll under the globohomo imperium that is turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah and doubtless provoking the same punishment.

Since US policy makers worship their Idol of Democracy, they feel they have to lie to their people while rigging the rules to see that US foreign policy always stays the same whoever is elected President.

Because democracy has now failed the Americans and the West, liberal democracy will not be around for much longer, since a one party state modelled on China's  would logically and necessarily be seen as the way forward for any nation that wants its government to govern in the national interest. Once it is generally accepted that democracy is dementia, feminism, no fault divorce, gay marriage, the civil partnership, transgenderism, equal pay, maternity leave, affirmative action, anti-discrimination legislation will also fall like dominoes.

Not long now before Secular Koranism will be more widely discussed as the antithesis of the matriarchal disorder that now pervades the West through which good moral order will finally be restored. 

Wednesday, 23 November 2016

How nationalism should be defined

Nationalism should be defined as a political and philosophical ideology of promoting the long term national interest.

It has only been demonised because WW1 and WW2 was blamed on nationalism and is now associated with racism and xenophobia in the late 20th and early 21st century.

Actually, nationalism was a reaction against imperialism.

WW1 occurred because the Austrian Empire was weakening and breaking up. Understandably, when this was happening, peoples that used to be under the Austrian Empire aspired to become independent, and that was why the Serbian terrorist assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

Woodrow Wilson's 14 Points after WW1 articulated and affirmed the principles of national self-determination, which described the principles of nationhood.

WW2 occurred because Britain and France - both empires - wanted to contain Germany's imperial ambitions.

America is an empire, the EU is an empire, Islamic State wants to become a nation state and then an empire with global domination in mind, but Western nations just want their country back again from whoever is pulling the strings of their leaders who keep foisting more and more immigration on a weary and increasingly anxious populace.

Nationalism does not have to mean war, any more than looking after your own interests must mean you will always be fighting and killing other people, if you are not a gangster.

In reality, well-led nations use a mixture of war and diplomacy as an instrument of policy. We just want wise leaders leading our respective nations, and for this to be done, we have to reform our political process.

Nationhood is indispensable because there seems no other way of organising human society. A nation is a piece of territory with borders with its own government. It is the only group we can join that is small enough to care, but big enough to matter.

The real controversy is not that nation states should exist, but how they should be run, who should participate in their decision-making processes and what rules they should follow. The real controversy is therefore between patriarchy and matriarchy ie whether we return to social conservatism and the practice of marriage as a means of reviving the patriarchy run on the clear rules of healthy competition and low taxes, or carry on as we are, being a degenerate matriarchy in which the preferences of immoral women are always prioritised in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage, where men are lower in status to women.

It is precisely because the West is a matriarchy that makes us a post-truth society operating post-truth politics. Because we are no longer moved by facts and logic, we will be moved by something worse: threats, intimidation and violence.

It is a shame no one will discuss this.


Friday, 15 July 2016

Imperialism (and its benefits to subject races), racism and feminism



4th minute

Liberian says to Taylor:

We did not have the benefit of being colonised by the French.

I often wondered why the English became imperialists and dominated the Irish, Welsh and Scots. The answer came to me in a revelation: the Romans didn't bother with the Welsh, Irish or Scots, only the English.

 55th minute:

Taylor:

You're again making the odd assumption that the facts somehow matter.  I think we're in effect dealing with what is the equivalent of a religion. Dan Root says that compared to Islam, which is probably the most powerful religion in the world today, egalitarian liberalism is the second most powerful religion. When people are absorbed by this idea, they cease to think in terms of facts. The facts don't matter. They can ignore the facts. If they discover the facts they're perfectly happy to suppress them.

The logic of masochism:
White people love to feel good about themselves by feeling bad about being white. 

Women are mainly masochists and measure their womanliness with their suffering and victimhood. Because they rule the roost, white men are now forced to adopt this position.The conquered - men - inevitably adopt the mindset of their conquerors - women.

1:05

Pathological self-destructive altruism of the feminine mind and the view that nations do not need borders or that people do not need nations with borders to protect their interests linked to the emasculation of men over several generations. Women are mostly children living in La La Land who want to believe Feminism is both moral and sustainable, refuse to be challenged on their beliefs and are able to suppress the free exchange of ideas between men by displaying their victimhood and shedding a few tears. 

At 1:16 Taylor asks:

If it is perfectly normal for Hispanics to prefer the company of other Hispanics and to take pride in their heritage and accomplishments, or if it is perfectly natural for Blacks or Asians or any other group to take pride in their accomplishments and to prefer to be around people like themselves, why is it wrong only for whites? We take it for granted that the Japanese have the right to preserve a Japanese society or that Israel has the right to maintain a Jewish state, why is it wrong for the French to wish to maintain a French state?

It is because white women are now in charge and they hate white men. 

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...