Are two apparently Muslim practices really Roman practices?

The Video they do not want you to see! #Muslims throwing #gay #men off rooftops! WAKE UP #EUROPE pic.twitter.com/USDZkGhkMP #LGBT #BBC #SKY #UK

— SUPPORTING BREXIT (@EUVoteLeave23rd) December 5, 2016

@EUVoteLeave23rd This reminds me of the Tarpeian Rock of the Capitoline Hill in Rome. https://t.co/lhxDcJbqtV @holland_tom @wmarybeard pic.twitter.com/RHD8Tq4iMA

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 5, 2016

Peter Jones in Veni Vidi Vici on page 13:

Romans always did a lot of fighting. In the early years this probably consisted of brief raids or revenge attacks carried out by clans under leaders. After a campaign of a day or so, they returned to work their farms. They were, in other words, an irregular farmer-citizen army. Further, since one cannot live by fighting, only by eating, they fought between March and October ie when food was more likely to be easily available. The result was that most fit Roman males had military experience - a tradition that did not change for hundreds of years.

The Koran forbids fighting in the four sacred months.

Roman sacred months - November, December, January and February are the coldest months.

https://quran.com/9/36

Indeed, the number of months with Allah is twelve [lunar] months in the register of Allah [from] the day He created the heavens and the earth; of these, four are sacred. That is the correct religion, so do not wrong yourselves during them. And fight against the disbelievers collectively as they fight against you collectively. And know that Allah is with the righteous [who fear Him].

www.islamweb.net/en/article/155752/the-sacred-months

Moreover, the month of Muharram (which means forbidden in Arabic) was called that because the Arabs used to forbid fighting during it. Safar (which means zero in Arabic) was given this name because the Arabs used to loot all the property of the enemy after defeating them in battle (i.e. they left nothing behind). Rabee’ Al-Awwal (which means graze in Arabic) because they used to graze their cattle during this month. Jumaadaa (which means solid in Arabic) was given this name because water used to freeze during this month. Rajab (which means remove in Arabic) was given this name because the Arabs used to remove the heads of their spears and refrain from fighting. Sha’baan (which is anything positioned between two things in Arabic) was given this name because it comes between Ramadan and Rajab.

https://t.co/5qstfUnlnh Was this where the idea of the jizya came from?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 3, 2017

https://www.thejc.com/comment/comment/the-pursuit-of-rabbi-dweck-1.440146

When the Torah says “an eye for an eye”, the Talmud explains this is not taken literally but means monetary compensation must be paid for an injury.  When the Torah specifies the death penalty of stoning, the Talmud explains it meant the offender was hurled down from a high place – rather than pelted with stones.

Why I have no problem with the verses in the Koran Taj Hargey and Tom Holland wanted redacted

From the 59th minute, I ask those who want a reformation of Islam which verse they want redacted.

Tom Holland said the jizya verse. http://quran.com/9/29

Jizya is a conditional tribute and should never be imposed on your own people, or non-Muslims living in your land.

What should be imposed on your own people in your own Islamic State?

Khums, of course. That would be a 20% flat rate income tax. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums

The jizya can only be imposed on a country you have conquered. If Britain became Muslim and conquered Ireland or France, then we would impose the jizya on them. If they refused to convert to Islam, they would have to pay us the jizya. If they become an Islamic state, they avoid the tax.

How much should the jizya be?

I suggest jizya should be 20% of the GDP of the conquered country.

Then its citizens could work out that paying a flat rate income tax of 20% to their own government would work out to be lighter than paying 20% of their GDP as a tribute. This would be decided by referendum, of course.  

Taj Hargey said the wife-beating verse. http://quran.com/4/34

My literal interpretation of that wife-beating verse that will *not* result in a beating

http://www.lapidomedia.com/islamic-reformation-already-started

If the instructions are *not* incorrect, but are being incorrectly followed, those following them should change their ways. #donthatedebate

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2016

How do we know that Muslims r not following the Koran properly? Cos it says those who don't follow it properly will suffer. #donthatedebate

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2016

The difference between Judaism and Islam

Why do I go on and on ad nauseam about the Slut Single Mum ("SSM")? Because I am trying to see how how long it will take for people who do disapprove of them to actually find the courage to say so in public.

A few things that have happened to me as a result of my Anti-Slut Campaign:

1.  I was expelled from the BNP because I offended an SSM.

2.  I am often accused by Rabbi Zvi Solomons of being sexually frustrated.

3.  I have been accused of being a man.

4.  I have been accused of being extremist.

5.  I have been accused of being mad.

6.  I have been accused of being cruel.

7.  I have been accused by the Rabbi of wanting to "burn babies" though I never said any such thing.

It seems to me to be very worrying indeed that uncompromisingly promoting family values supported by marriage should produce such foul abuse and unfounded accusations, but it seems the British are far astray, with over 50% of babies born in Britain born out of wedlock nowadays.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1572446/Most-British-babies-now-born-outside-marriage.html

I believe that the Rabbi - and an Orthodox Rabbi to boot - regularly denounces me for being rude about SSMs because the morals of this country are so corrupted that even his religion cannot protect an Orthodox Rabbi from becoming a liberal.

Either that, or the Rabbi wishes to urge the toxic social and economic policies of free-loving liberal-femininist-statism in order to make his people look good when the gentiles turn into the pitiable and pathetic degenerates who are cursed by God in Deuteronomy 28, whom no one wants to buy when they are sold as slaves.

43 The alien who lives among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. 

44 He will lend to you, but you will not lend to him. He will be the head, but you will be the tail

28 The LORD will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind. 

68  The LORD will send you back in ships to Egypt on a journey I said you should never make again. There you will offer yourselves for sale to your enemies as male and female slaves, but no one will buy you.

Who are the accursed?

Cursed are the unmerciful, fornicators, and adulterers, covetous persons, idolaters, slanderers, drunkards, and extortioners.

http://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-worship/worship/book-of-common-prayer/a-commination.aspx

I have a nasty feeling that refers to us - the British - whose culture has been infamously described once in a letter to the Editor of Times as "Dipso, Bingo, Fatso, Tesco, ASBO" as well as Paedo and Slut Single Mummy O.

The Jew is like the wife who hates her husband and wants him dead, but knows she should not murder him.  Instead, she gives him as much cream as he will take, in the hope that he will die of a heart attack.  Perhaps that is why Jews are Conservative themselves but encourage the gentile to be liberal.   It makes them stronger and look good, which reinforces their racial and religious superiority.

The Muslim however is under a religious duty to forbid what is evil and to enjoin what is good, and therefore has the duty to civilise the world to make it a better more Islamic place where most people in the world agree to common standards of behaviour, thus avoiding more terrible wars in the long term.

To achieve this you do have to conquer other peoples and lands.  The rules of war for doing so is set out in the Koran which also mentions the conditional tribute called the Jizya.  (The conquered has the choice of paying the tribute if they do not wish to convert to Islam or avoiding it altogether if they do.  Can't say fairer than that, can you?)

If Judaism is an exclusive club, then Islam is a political party.   The Rabbi wants to keep his club exclusive while the Muslim wants to make the world a better place with lower crime caused by fewer sluts and bastards.

Which is better?