UKIP not adopting my proposal to enslave illegal immigrants

UKIP's @SuzanneEvans1 calls for a "limit of 50,000" for skilled workers http://t.co/5yMIAAX47j #GE2015
— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) April 15, 2015

Clear skies in Misurata today, hundreds are expected to attempt the crossing to Italy. pic.twitter.com/xcLCmDfoUx
— Quentin Sommerville (@sommervillebbc) April 15, 2015

Ali, right, is from Gambia. It's his 2nd attempt to cross to Italy. "I've had enough. I want to go home to my mum". pic.twitter.com/ZnwYcC8AoL
— Quentin Sommerville (@sommervillebbc) April 15, 2015

We should just reintroduce slavery and enslave illegal immigrants. http://t.co/HguZVMQ4Yg
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@ntfem @fleetstreetfox we sort of do that with zero hour contracts & draconian benefit testing. we leave out chains, expensive, obvs.
— Ross P (@rbp77) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox Let's do it properly. @DWPgovuk can become the Department of Work, Pensions *and Manumissions*.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox After abolishing Social Services Slave Visiting would be established to inspect the conditions and work of slaves.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox It would be slavery under humane conditions open to all races, religions and classes including bankers and bankrupts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox Slavery would be an alternative to welfare since owners and hirers would be expected to accommodate and feed them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox What a shame @UKIP will not be adopting my recommendations. It would cause a SENSATION. @SuzanneEvans1
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox The downside of this would be that we would all have to identity cards but we can easily get used to that.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox Slaves not accommodated by hirers wd hv 2b housed in slave quarters which cd be converted ex-council accommodation.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox What Britain needs is cheap labour and reintroducing slavery would give us this.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox Criminals would have their crime converted into money and then enslaved to pay that debt off, saving on prisons.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

@rbp77 @fleetstreetfox Doubtless @anjemchoudary will confirm the Koran is cool with slavery - an institution like marriage and prostitution.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2015

Thoughts on slavery, Islam and Lincoln - the movie

http://livinginamadhouse.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/politically-incorrect-film-reviews-a-lincoln-convertible/

It struck me that if the Americans were going by the Koran the American Civil War would have been prevented.  

This is because the Koran tolerates slavery though it encourages owners to free slaves and acknowledges that all slaves have the option of manumission.  

That would have been the middle way, I would have thought.  Then the slaves would have been gradually freed.  

It is quite a thought how so many quarrels that resulted in wars would have been peacefully resolved if people had just followed the Koran.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_views_on_slavery#Slavery_in_the_Qur.27an

Islamic justice begins in Scotland?

Killers to pay for victims' funerals

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article5776333.ece

That is an excellent idea and, if I may say so, rather Islamic. The idea of restorative justice through "blood money" - of victim compensation by the perpetrator - would be fairer than small awards from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diyya

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qisas

Choosing to pursue someone through the civil courts for compensation - where the burden of proof is lower - has been done before. The O J Simpson case comes to mind.

I do not myself see why other taxpayers should compensate the victim for a crime when they were not at fault.

Can someone explain to me why the current system is supposed to be better than making the wrongdoer himself personally compensate the victim?

If someone cannot adequately compensate a victim, then that might be a good reason for bringing back slavery. This would also solve the problem of obtaining cheap indigenous labour.

As Britain bobs uncertainly in a sea of bankruptcy, there is actually a huge potential of slave labour which could be humanely harnessed - with the possibility of manumission

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manumission

once they have paid off their debt - for the good of the nation ...